| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 138 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 20 post(s) |

scorchlikeshiswhiskey
Black Slag Authenticated Corrosive.
32
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 17:03:00 -
[2581] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:RIP Caldari. Phoenix is deadGǪ Drake is deadGǪ Caracal is deadGǪ Tengu will soon be joining them. They're not dead. They're just very situational, niche support weapons. Thanks CCP40sec and the rest of the missile support team.  Unless you're the missile expert Bouh and then they're the boogeyman under your bed that makes everyone else think you're an idiot. Mainly because you are an idiot.... |

Daniel Doormant
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 17:04:00 -
[2582] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:I'll try to hit a few points raised in the last page or two, sorry if it's not everything.
Few comments about ignoring feedback still.... I'm still trying to gather as much info as possible and if you guys are using it and are able to say it's not fun (separate from it not being good, which is a different issue and could be corrected with numbers tweaks like 30s reload or more ammo per launcher) please post and let me know.
In celebration of something different for RLML and RHML. It doesn't have to go back to the way it was but here are some minor suggestions. 1. At a minimum increase the payload size one missile per Meta level so the meta 4 meta 5 and faction modules are more "Fun" and making the faction modules sought after. Keeping meta 0 Base line the same. 2. Reduce the Reload time by at least 5 to 10 seconds. If you need to justify a graduation then 1 or 2 seconds reload reduction per Meta level keeping meta 0 baseline the same and giving a 35 or 30 second reload time for Tech 2 and so on. 3. If you must offset this in good conscience then shave the rate of fire a bit but not so much that the Paper DPS goes down even further. Having DPS that can hit lower sig targets was offset by travel time to target now it is totally useless solo and for missions I guess I'll just go back to doing My attempt with Rapid Heavies on a Geddon was disappointing to be sure and will be going back to long range fit rather than a close in brawler with crap DPS and damage projection till you "balance" this. When I tried my rapid light Caracal, Arbitrator and Celistis I was heartbroken. I'm just glad I didn't train up for a sacrilege. |

Spugg Galdon
APOCALYPSE LEGION The Obsidian Front
320
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 17:15:00 -
[2583] - Quote
I've been thinking about missiles for a few days now and I was wondering if people would agree with this:
What if short range missiles were very good at applying damage to small targets but weak vs fast targets and if long range missiles were very good at hitting fast targets but poor at hitting small targets.
From what I understand of the missile formula, it considers both the ratio of target velocity to missile explosion velocity and target signature to explosion radius. It then picks the worse of the two figures for "Applied Damage".
If short range missiles were good at hitting small targets but their weakness was fast targets (so, excellent explosion radius with poor explosion velocity) then these munitions would work best with Webs and warhead flare catalysts.
If long range missiles were good at hitting fast targets but struggled with small signatures (the opposite of short range missiles) then these munitions would work best with TP's and Rigor rigs.
This way both munitions would have strengths and weaknesses that worked well with their intended range usage.
Obviously: Long range missiles would have better application vs short range when using these weapons without any supporting mods/rigs because speed is more important than size when looking at how the application formula works but it could easily be balanced out where short range deal more damage and are excellent vs webbed targets and long range deal less damage and require the use of TP's and rigs (and future modules: Read Missle TE/TC).
This is literally just a thought I wanted to share and is off topic so flame on if you wish. |

Fourteen Maken
State Protectorate Caldari State
87
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 17:17:00 -
[2584] - Quote
Bouh Revetoile wrote:Again, RLML are NOT a solo weapon anymore. They are frigate interdiction weapons, and they will be very good at that.
Example : you are in a cruiser fleet and one get tackled by a fast tackler, but the RLML cruiser in the fleet will fastly get rid of him and the fleet will safely go away. In the same kind of fleet, the RLML ship will also be able to shoot at any frigate (tackle, EWAR...) an ennemy fleet could have, removing them from the field.
And if required, the RLML ship can shoot at the primary and add a good burst dps to take down a target before reloading.
A drone ship can do the same, but a lot less effectively : light drones will never ever have 300dps.
RLML ship are now escorting vessels for the fleet, a job destroyers are bad at because they are too vulnerable to ennemy cruisers the fleet might encounter.
And RHML should work the same for BS against cruisers, yet I think a BS can wait 40 seconds and continue the fight then, si I think it's less damaging for them, unless you plan to shoot at BS.
Logistic ships are the worst ship in game for soloing, yet no one would say they are useless. They are supporting ships. RLML are now supporting weapons.
RLML and RHML are not supposed to obsolete other missiles systems and a lot of complaints here aimed the fact that they can't replace other weapons effectively, but they should not do that. There should be use cases for all of them, but for most situations involving low numbers in point range, HAM should be the weapon of choice, exactly like short range turrets are the weapons of choice for turret point range engagements.
HAM's and HML's are not solo weapons either, and that's the problem we have; no utility missile system that's capable of engaging a wide range of targets. With turrets as long as you are at the proper range and make an effort to keep your angular velocity low you will be doing effective and instant dps against all targets. Drones have an even wider envelope of engagement, bring more to fleets with drone assist and spider tanking tactics, are flexible enough that they can increase their dps against larger ships, or carry ewar drones to break lock when things are not going your way. I'm not saying drones or turrets are perfect weapons either but they are far more versatile and effective than medium missiles in their current state. |

Niena Nuamzzar
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
147
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 17:18:00 -
[2585] - Quote
Daniel Doormant wrote: My attempt with Rapid Heavies on a Geddon was disappointing..
 Poor ship, to be molested in such a way... terrible! |

Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
701
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 17:21:00 -
[2586] - Quote
scorchlikeshiswhiskey wrote:They're not dead. They're just very situational, niche support weapons. "My mommy always said there were no monsters - no real ones - but there are." "What kind of spaceship? Something with reclining leather seats, that goes really fast, and gets really sh*tty gas mileage!" "So immoral, working on the thing can drive you mad. That's what happened to this friend of mine. So he had a lobotomy. Now he's well again." I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Niena Nuamzzar
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
147
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 17:25:00 -
[2587] - Quote
Spugg Galdon wrote: ... This is literally just a thought I wanted to share and is off topic so flame on if you wish.
Without numbers it's hard to tell. |

Dr Sraggles
The Covenant of Blood
41
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 17:32:00 -
[2588] - Quote
Is there some Null Blob Doctrine for their mega fleet battles that makes missiles OP?
Is that the problem? When you get 300 Ravens/Carcals together then that is more powerful than 300 Megathrons/Vexors?
|

Niena Nuamzzar
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
147
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 17:34:00 -
[2589] - Quote
Dr Sraggles wrote:Is there some Null Blob Doctrine for their mega fleet battles that makes missiles OP? Ohh but there is something that makes drones OP. Solution: nerf drone bonuses on Gal ships. Lolol.. |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Fatal Ascension
613
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 17:36:00 -
[2590] - Quote
Dr Sraggles wrote:Is there some Null Blob Doctrine for their mega fleet battles that makes missiles OP?
Is that the problem? When you get 300 Ravens/Carcals together then that is more powerful than 300 Megathrons/Vexors?
Yeah, lets see how that works out, they would lose some half of their fleet every ammo cycle. |

Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
701
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 17:37:00 -
[2591] - Quote
Spugg Galdon wrote:What if short range missiles were very good at applying damage to small targets but weak vs fast targets and if long range missiles were very good at hitting fast targets but poor at hitting small targets. Honestly, the whole conversation surrounding missiles is just depressing. Every update they get worse, and there's not really any light at the end of the tunnel. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
129
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 17:39:00 -
[2592] - Quote
Dr Sraggles wrote:Is there some Null Blob Doctrine for their mega fleet battles that makes missiles OP?
Is that the problem? When you get 300 Ravens/Carcals together then that is more powerful than 300 Megathrons/Vexors?
Well, you can smartbomb them and reduce the dps of an entire missile fleet to 0 with a single ship. |

Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
702
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 17:58:00 -
[2593] - Quote
Sal Landry wrote:Well, you can smartbomb them and reduce the dps of an entire missile fleet to 0 with a single ship. I feel soooo much better now.  I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Moonaura
The Dead Rabbit Society
462
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 18:22:00 -
[2594] - Quote
GUYS GUYS GUYS GUYS
I found an exploit to get around the 40 second reload timer!
Here is what you do:
1. Buy a Caracal.
2. Load it full of RLML launchers.
3. Place ammo in the launchers - all 18 of them.
4. Undock.
5. Find somebody to PVP with.
6. Before pressing F1, overload all your RLML
7. Now open fire.
8. You should find, if you are lucky, that your RLML have been completely burnt out before the last missile fires.
9. This avoids you having to wait 40 seconds for the reload.
10. I hope this helps.
11. Please can we have both this and the old RLML back please. "The game is mostly played by men - 97%. But 40% of them play as women... so thats fine." -á- CCP t0rfifrans-á |

Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
702
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 18:24:00 -
[2595] - Quote
Moonaura wrote:GUYS GUYS GUYS GUYS I found an exploit to get around the 40 second reload timer! ... You should find, if you are lucky, that your RLML have been completely burnt out before the last missile fires. Good one.  I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Bouh Revetoile
TIPIAKS
434
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 18:43:00 -
[2596] - Quote
Fourteen Maken wrote:HAM's and HML's are not solo weapons either, and that's the problem we have; no utility missile system that's capable of engaging a wide range of targets. With turrets as long as you are at the proper range and make an effort to keep your angular velocity low you will be doing effective and instant dps against all targets. Drones have an even wider envelope of engagement, bring more to fleets with drone assist and spider tanking tactics, are flexible enough that they can increase their dps against larger ships, or carry ewar drones to break lock when things are not going your way. I'm not saying drones or turrets are perfect weapons either but they are far more versatile and effective than medium missiles in their current state. I was almost waiting for this one, and I actually already answer it.
First, HAM are better than pulse for example : I know from experience a frigate can orbit a solo kiting Omen fast enough to only care for the drones, drones you can kill when Omen is tackled. HAM wouldn't have this problem : an AB frigate would not catch you, and a MWD one will die to your HAM before she kills you.
HAM Caracal with 3 BCS do 80dps to a non AB Incursus, 150 if webed. That's a lot for a frigate.
Second, Caldari Navy cruisers have high damage application or lots of mid slots for whatever you need, and they are stupidly fast so they make very effective solo kiters.
And finaly, caldari have a whole line of turret ships ; I know hybrid turrets are kind of dirty when you use missiles, but war is a dirty thing anyway. |

Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
702
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 18:54:00 -
[2597] - Quote
Bouh Revetoile wrote:And finaly... And finally, can you please shut the h*ll up? You have less than zero to offer in this thread, and your arguments are completely transparent to those of us who actually fly these things. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
704
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 19:40:00 -
[2598] - Quote
In the interest of science, I'm trying another experiment with RLMLs. Pray for me... I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

faggorz
Revenge Served Cold 9th Company
2
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 19:44:00 -
[2599] - Quote
That is terrible I would rather have a slower fire rate then have a 40sec reload time this is not efficient for running missions or ratting. |

Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
704
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 19:47:00 -
[2600] - Quote
faggorz wrote:That is terrible I would rather have a slower fire rate then have a 40sec reload time this is not efficient for running missions or ratting. For missions and ratting, you do have other choices (since NPCs don't pose the same threat as in PvP). HML would probably be my recommendation, just for the range. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Onictus
Silver Snake Enterprise Fatal Ascension
614
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 20:27:00 -
[2601] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:faggorz wrote:That is terrible I would rather have a slower fire rate then have a 40sec reload time this is not efficient for running missions or ratting. For missions and ratting, you do have other choices (since NPCs don't pose the same threat as in PvP). HML would probably be my recommendation, just for the range.
See that is the thing.
I was recently grinding up a high sec alt, the difference in range between a rapid caracal and HML drake was less than 7km. That being said the caracal didn't really have the damage to do level 3s and the drake sails through them. Any level 3 with elite cruisers took forever because of the caracals lack of raw damage.
....however the caracal was faster on a lot of the missions that weren't cruiser heavy, due to hull speed and significantly better damage application.
Otherwise they were very close.
.....now that carcal fit is impssible and even if it was it would be trash. |

Vincintius Agrippa
F L O O D
8
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 20:28:00 -
[2602] - Quote
Harvey James wrote:also what's happened too the TE/TC/TD change to add missiles too them that would also help with making missiles more useful and add options and balance up the e-war situation..
along with a missile rebalance ofc...
-nerf rockets expl radius 20 is OP 30 odd on rage is OP too and nerf their range - nerf light missiles damage a little and nerf its expl radius a bit along with a range nerf - nerf HAM range it shouldn't be the same as torps its usually 50% scaling of sizes from small - large
NO,no,no. Ham range is fine. id say it needs a little bit more range and a adjustment so that anything moving faster than 400m/s will recieve more than 20% of the missiles damage.
1. They are rockets. They are smaller than light missiles have considerably less range. The explosive radius is fine, its smaller than lights.
2. Light missile and rocket dps is already ****** compared to other frig sized weapons. Also lights have the range of small beams and rails with lr ammo.
3. ? small-large? these are medium cruiser missiles.
The real problem is all missiles above lights. My suggestion:
1. For rapid launcher: Make a skill called....maybe idk [Ordnance specialist (ization)], or [Ordnance handling]. Skill Trait
-15% bonus to Rapid Light and Rapid Heavy Missile Launcher reload time per level. That means at level IV Rapid launchers would have a reload time of 16 seconds and Level V would be 10 seconds. Give the skill a decent multiplier so that lvl IV takes 4-5 days to train and lvl V takes 20 days. The vast majority will only train lvl IV so in general most rapid launcher will have longer reloads than regular launchers.
2. A. Give Heavy Missiles a 90% Un-nerf. Reduce that -20% damage nerf you did a few years ago to -10%( meaning increase damage by 10%) . Give it a higher velocity and a lower flight time so that range stays the same.
B. Reduce Heavy Missile Explosion radius to that of medium turrets sig radius, after all heavies are medium cruiser weapons, and they should be able to do damage to anything other than bc's and bs's, primarily cruisers at full damage. Increase explosive velocity so that anything moving faster than 300-400 m/s can actually be damaged. Another cruiser or battleship for that matter should not simply be able to activate an afterburner and from then on only receive 20 percent of incoming damage.
IMO, the whole explosive velocity thing is flawed and unrealistic in its current form, this coming from an aerospace engineering student.
If your going to include explosion velocity as a part of damage application you also should include the missiles velocity as a factor. Basically, it should be missile velocity+explosion velocity. Some guy doing 3km/sec away from you or at an angle should be as difficult should be as difficult to kill with missiles as it would be with turrets so you cant say its op. This buff should allow heavies to once again be effective in combat whilst preventing them from being an I win button.
As it stands now, t1 launchers and missiles are utterly useless and do not output comparable dps as other medium turrets of the same class( using faction ammo or otherwise). Even with the 3 BCU's that missile ships usually have. You only get real dps from using t2 hams and heavy missile launchers. T2 high damage missiles can only effectively hit battle cruisers (because of the massive explosion penalty, which is bullshit considering no other t2 ammo increases turret sig radius) and above. Given that fact i think ccp should actually give both hams and heavies a 15% damage increase.
Also missiles should be able to turn a bit more, so either increase agility or make a new skill that does so. Maybe 5% per level.
|

Vincintius Agrippa
F L O O D
8
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 20:32:00 -
[2603] - Quote
Harvey James wrote:i would suggest - nerf light missile damage 10% maybe buff light missile launchers ROF if needed for frigs -increase ammo capacity by about double on RLML's (HAMS have 60 maybe reduce HAMS to 45) - reduce reload time to 25 seconds and increase reload time on all missile launchers to 17.5 seconds - add reduced reload time skill for all launchers 1 second a level.
i always think its strange that missiles can reload as fast as projectiles do seems strange too me.. bulkiness and all i would think a crew would need to practice reloading missiles more than reloading bullets
No one is hand loading these missiles or projectiles.
I find it more strange that projectiles take 2x longer to reload than hybrids.
|

Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
704
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 20:36:00 -
[2604] - Quote
Fun times. This is an interesting RLML update... I equipped a "suicide Tengu" and went looking for a fight. Took me 20 jumps through low-sec to finally find one (go figure). I ran 5x Arbalest RLMLs with no missile rigs, modules or other enhancements. I got into an engagement with a Incursus, Keres, Navy Comet, Thrasher and Malediction. Wasted the Incursus in no-time flat, put the Keres into hull twice (driving it off twice) and mauled the Thrasher and Malediction. Long story short: the frigates and destroyers all tucked tail and ran as soon as they realized they were screwed. Even the cruisers were wary.
They tried scrambling me - nope. Tried web'ing - nope. Tried neuts - nope. Then they called in the big guns. I finally went down to the combined firepower from a Thorax, Rupture, Navy Brutix and Typhoon. Before perishing in a glorious fireball, I peeled the shields completely off the Brutix and Rupture - and knocked about 10% armor off each (best I could do; RMLs just don't have staying power). I died to a combination of Neutron Blasters, Hammerheads and Mjolnir Rage Torpedos (Tengus do have a pretty big EM hole).
If I'd been in a Caracal I'd have been dead long before the heavies showed up, though. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd CAStabouts
1292
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 20:37:00 -
[2605] - Quote
Why only five?
You were using the capacitor regen matrix, weren't you. |

Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
704
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 20:39:00 -
[2606] - Quote
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:Why only five? You were using the capacitor regen matrix, weren't you. Yeah, for the extra slot so I could run another shield power relay. Not that the 6th would've made any difference in the grand scheme of things. Off to test RHMLs next... I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Michael Harari
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
989
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 20:41:00 -
[2607] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:Fun times. This is an interesting RLML update... I equipped a "suicide Tengu" and went looking for a fight. Took me 20 jumps through low-sec to finally find one (go figure). I ran 5x Arbalest RLMLs with no missile rigs, modules or other enhancements. I got into an engagement with a Incursus, Keres, Navy Comet, Thrasher and Malediction. Wasted the Incursus in no-time flat, put the Keres into hull twice (driving it off twice) and mauled the Thrasher and Malediction. Long story short: the frigates and destroyers all tucked tail and ran as soon as they realized they were screwed. Even the cruisers were wary.
They tried scrambling me - nope. Tried web'ing - nope. Tried neuts - nope. Then they called in the big guns. I finally went down to the combined firepower from a Thorax, Rupture, Navy Brutix and Typhoon. Before perishing in a glorious fireball, I peeled the shields completely off the Brutix and Rupture - and knocked about 10% armor off each (best I could do; RMLs just don't have staying power). I died to a combination of Neutron Blasters, Hammerheads and Mjolnir Rage Torpedos (Tengus do have a pretty big EM hole).
If I'd been in a Caracal I'd have been dead long before the heavies showed up, though.
Could you perhaps post these kills to evekill or battleclinic? |

Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
704
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 20:59:00 -
[2608] - Quote
Michael Harari wrote:Could you perhaps post these kills to evekill or battleclinic? I only got the single kill, as I didn't have a disruptor or scrambler to pin anything. http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=20741668 I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |

Moonaura
The Dead Rabbit Society
464
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 21:07:00 -
[2609] - Quote
Bouh Revetoile wrote: First, HAM are better than pulse for example : I know from experience a frigate can orbit a solo kiting Omen fast enough to only care for the drones, drones you can kill when Omen is tackled. HAM wouldn't have this problem : an AB frigate would not catch you, and a MWD one will die to your HAM before she kills you.
HAM Caracal with 3 BCS do 80dps to a non AB Incursus, 150 if webed. That's a lot for a frigate.
Second, Caldari Navy cruisers have high damage application or lots of mid slots for whatever you need, and they are stupidly fast so they make very effective solo kiters.
And finaly, caldari have a whole line of turret ships ; I know hybrid turrets are kind of dirty when you use missiles, but war is a dirty thing anyway.
Bouh, you are right about the lasers, but this is more of the mechanic of how they are flown I reckon. They are very different than hybrids, and something I will be looking into more, as I personally love flying a kiting Omen, but I want to research more the best way to fit and fly it, as it does seem to have some quirks regarding tracking DPS and ranges. I think its more about flying it a certain way, and relying less on an orbit. That is my initial hunch.
But given what I've shown you previously with a Thorax, if you compare it to the HAM's, then once a frigate is webbed, AB, MWD or not, its still going to hit very well as long as I've loaded the right ammo for the range. It can also reach much further than the HAM's if you're going for Rails (which is the best bet honestly).
150 dps might not seem to bad, but that is still far less than either the blasters or rails, by a large margin.
One thing that I have to make clear, is that Hybrids were buffed a while back - I think it was Crucible - in fact I'm certain it was, and rails got a fair bit of love at all sizes, which is one of the reasons why the Naga became the de-facto Attack Battlecruiser in bigger fleets.
A target painter typically has a better effect on HAM use, than webs though, as the issue with HAM is one of hitting smaller signature targets. If I used HAM Caracals, and I have several times, then the Bellicose was standard to have along in the gang for its TP bonus - as well as the fact its a very good missile boat in its own right.
But clearly, HAM's are still nowhere near as effective as rails in the game right now. They are far better than Heavy Missiles, but against frigates, in a mixed gang where a frigate wouldn't be able to stay 500m range off of everything, so there is always a gang mate hitting it perfect a few KM away from me - so its just going to melt.
As for the Caldari being able to use the Hybrids as well, there are indeed some options there for sure, and stuff like a Merlin is actually a nice frigate. I have tried the Moa a lot in my gangs when the T1 cruiser changes came out, and in many ways it looks like a great boat. It can reach a very high EHP, fit a MWD, and with Blasters, reach similar DPS numbers to a Thorax, with the added advantage that they reach further.
In practice, I found that due to their large signature, especially when getting in range, that everything shooting it, applied perfect DPS. So even though the EHP looks great, the reality is it melts pretty fast. I had some very close fights with them, but overall we lost more than we won. A particular nasty ship for sure was the Ruptures, because they could keep at range from the Moa's long enough, while the Moa was desperately trying to close range and still apply damage.
Fitting an active tank to a Moa is doable, but its not really its role and almost certainly you're going to have to give up the point slot to make the active tank decent. If I was to use them again, I'd probably go EHP but shove in an ASB to give it a bit more survivability.
Naturally, as a resistance boat, its very good when being repped by logistics, and frankly its far better than its big brother, the Ferox - easily one of the worst BC's out there - which is a pain to fit and still, in small gangs, doesn't have the mid slots and fitting to work as well as Minmitar. Before the T1 BC changes - you couldn't even fit a Ferox with all its guns and a shield buffer tank - at least it can do that now, as they bumped the powergrid up.
The problem for Caldari in the sort of PvP you are engaged in, is that they are not really designed for small gang, faction warfare. They are designed to be backed up by logistics ships. That is really their modus operandi and all their fittings and bonuses absolutely suggest that is their role. They are a great brawling race when backed like this, which is what stuff like the Moa is meant for - and they are a great race at applying damage from range, but at dramatically reduced DPS when it comes to the missiles.
This wouldn't be such an issue if the long range heavy missiles actually did the DPS that they are supposed to (It isn't a lot to start with) but it don't hit well at all, so are completely useless compared to gunnery.
Given that I've tried to run a Caldari only corporation - and I mean - EVERY freaking ship in a fleet Caldari - then I really sense Caldari pilots frustration and there are some issues to be ironed out. But I also against changing Caldari into something else. If EVE becomes too standardised and too general, it will become boring.
It wasn't long ago, that Drakes once ruled the vacuum, so its fair to say, it wouldn't take to much to make Caldari decent again.
* Fix Heavy Missiles ability to hit targets - and Precision Heavies SHOULD and used to hit frigates and need to do so again. * Give us both the Original RLML and a new burst/swarm whatever you want to call it - even with its 40 second awful reload - but as a choice - not an enforced nerf for something that was only acceptable before. * Increase (i.e. nerf) Light Precision missiles explosion radius by 5%, so they can't hit an AB Frigate almost perfectly by standard. "The game is mostly played by men - 97%. But 40% of them play as women... so thats fine." -á- CCP t0rfifrans-á |

Arthur Aihaken
The.VOID
705
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 21:17:00 -
[2610] - Quote
Moonaura wrote:It wasn't long ago, that Drakes once ruled the vacuum, so its fair to say, it wouldn't take to much to make Caldari decent again. It would take the desire. That seems insurmountable at the moment... I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 138 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |