EVE Search - Tux/Tomb/Hammerhead/Anonymous Dev, RE: Upcoming Changes

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Tux/Tomb/Hammerhead/Anonymous Dev, RE: Upcoming Changes

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 4 post(s)
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.03.25 12:23:00 - [1] Is there any possability that one of you could answer the following questions? 1) Will all tachs get an identical damage mod increase of 5.88%? 2) When will we know about the specific changes to blasters? 3) Is the list in the sticky final, or are there other changes coming you haven't told us about yet (and has anything in the sticky changed already)? 4) How long are we looking to wait for the patch to come out with these changes in? Ta Originally by: Tassi Projectile very overpowdered
Kunming	Posted - 2006.03.25 12:26:00 - [2] 5) Is deimos gonna get some ♥? Website Kaos Empire Killboard
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.03.25 12:30:00 - [3] Originally by: Kunming 5) Is deimos gonna get some ♥? see: 4) :) Originally by: Tassi Projectile very overpowdered
Malken	Posted - 2006.03.25 12:34:00 - [4] i so miss the times when they actually slapped in a mini patch weekly with small updates that were done instead of waiting 3months before they put it into a huge bundle patch wich of course screws up the whole server for 3-7 days.
Dreez	Posted - 2006.03.25 13:15:00 - [5] Small patches ftw, less things to screw up. Current Location: After chasing TomB for 2 years, at the pub, getting a cold beer.
Kaylana Syi	Posted - 2006.03.25 20:29:00 - [6] I would too like small mini patches. If SoE can do it then so can CCP Originally by: "Oveur" I don't react to threats any better than you do
Calisto Cody	Posted - 2006.03.25 22:34:00 - [7] Originally by: Kaylana Syi I would too like small mini patches. If SoE can do it then so can CCP do not mention the them here, they are infidels The Black Swan Society Berneh is not appropriate for the forums -
Bob Niac	Posted - 2006.03.25 23:27:00 - [8] aye Sony On E = teh devil Yarr! Pirate Learning Skills!
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.03.27 12:21:00 - [9] bump now the devs are actually at work :) Originally by: Tassi Projectile very overpowdered
Soyemia	Posted - 2006.03.27 12:33:00 - [10] Sarmaul! We demand arty whine thread!
MissileRus	Posted - 2006.03.27 12:40:00 - [11] yes plz --------------------------- 4. i like pizza
Sarmaul	Posted - 2006.03.27 12:45:00 - [12] Originally by: Soyemia Sarmaul! We demand arty whine thread! and I demand I find out what's happening to all tachs beforehand :) Originally by: Tassi Projectile very overpowdered
Rodj Blake	Posted - 2006.03.27 12:53:00 - [13] Originally by: Sarmaul 1) Will all tachs get an identical damage mod increase of 5.88%? It wouldn't make any sense if they didn't. Dolce et decorum est pro imperator mori
MissileRus	Posted - 2006.03.27 12:56:00 - [14] Edited by: MissileRus on 27/03/2006 12:59:35 give minmatar justice! stop the abuse! suicides tempest in random station clone: autopilot triggered by amarr.. >.< sry --------------------------- 4. i like pizza
rig0r	Posted - 2006.03.27 14:01:00 - [15] Originally by: Kunming 5) Is deimos gonna get some ♥? What she said.

Tuxford	Posted - 2006.03.27 14:09:00 - [16] Originally by: Sarmaul Is there any possability that one of you could answer the following questions? 1) Will all tachs get an identical damage mod increase of 5.88%? 2) When will we know about the specific changes to blasters? 3) Is the list in the sticky final, or are there other changes coming you haven't told us about yet (and has anything in the sticky changed already)? 4) How long are we looking to wait for the patch to come out with these changes in? Ta 1) It's not exactly 5.88% afaik. Probably they were all increased by 5% and then rounded to some sane number, but they are all getting an increase. 2) When we get around to actually making some changes on the blasters. 3) Hell no, in fact we might still decide to take those changes on the assault ships in a whole other direction, although you can be reasonably safe to assume that Hawk will be a missile ship. 4) I though it was abundantly clear now that noone at ccp knows how to work a calander. 5) Didn't know Deimos needed love but it should be easier to fix after blaster love. 6) Autocannons and artilleries will get a look at as well. This isn't a promise that they get a boost we'll just look at them and see if they need some balancing. _______________

Testy Mctest	Posted - 2006.03.27 14:15:00 - [17] Originally by: Tuxford 6) Autocannons and artilleries will get a look at as well. This isn't a promise that they get a boost we'll just look at them and see if they need some balancing. Please don't take this as a flame, but has the mass abundance of numbers shown in the forums not proven already that they do? Testy's Eve Blog!
Denrace	Posted - 2006.03.27 14:19:00 - [18] Wow! Tuxford is on! /me quickly grabs him and whisks him off the Nighthawk fix thread! Tux, fix the NH P.S - Woot for the Vengeance boost! ________________________________________ Sig Gallery
Alpdruck	Posted - 2006.03.27 14:20:00 - [19] Edited by: Alpdruck on 27/03/2006 14:20:48 Originally by: Testy Mctest Originally by: Tuxford 6) Autocannons and artilleries will get a look at as well. This isn't a promise that they get a boost we'll just look at them and see if they need some balancing. Please don't take this as a flame, but has the mass abundance of numbers shown in the forums not proven already that they do? I do not believe that the Devs take anything said on these forums as proof. If one is lucky, they take it as an incentive to look into things. Edit: and Tux should run fast, because some people will want to have his baby now.
wierchas noobhunter	Posted - 2006.03.27 14:27:00 - [20] Originally by: Tuxford 5) Didn't know Deimos needed love but it should be easier to fix after blaster love.

Tuxford	Posted - 2006.03.27 14:28:00 - [21] Originally by: wierchas noobhunter Originally by: Tuxford 5) Didn't know Deimos needed love but it should be easier to fix after blaster love. omg easier to fit _______________

Mikal Drey	Posted - 2006.03.27 14:33:00 - [22] hey hey, 6) autos only getting a look. :( if anything needs some love its minmatar* * and various parts of my body
wierchas noobhunter	Posted - 2006.03.27 14:33:00 - [23] Originally by: Tuxford Originally by: wierchas noobhunter Originally by: Tuxford 5) Didn't know Deimos needed love but it should be easier to fix after blaster love. omg easier to fit oh now oki :)

Tuxford	Posted - 2006.03.27 14:34:00 - [24] Originally by: Mikal Drey hey hey, 6) autos only getting a look. :( if anything needs some love its minmatar* * and various parts of my body The look meaning that if there is anything wrong with them we boost them. It's not like we look at them say "wow autocannons sure do suck,... oh well lets go boost amarr". _______________

Testy Mctest	Posted - 2006.03.27 14:42:00 - [25] Originally by: Tuxford It's not like we look at them say "wow autocannons sure do suck,... oh well lets go boost amarr". Oh come on, thats just controversial :S Testy's Eve Blog!
LWMaverick	Posted - 2006.03.27 14:47:00 - [26] Originally by: Tuxford Originally by: wierchas noobhunter Originally by: Tuxford 5) Didn't know Deimos needed love but it should be easier to fix after blaster love. omg easier to fit Sure as hell aint an easy job u've got there mate
Spartan239	Posted - 2006.03.27 14:50:00 - [27] Edited by: Spartan239 on 27/03/2006 14:49:58 Originally by: Tuxford 5) Didn't know Deimos needed love but it should be easier to fit after blaster love. um erm...
Nafri	Posted - 2006.03.27 14:58:00 - [28] Originally by: Testy Mctest Originally by: Tuxford It's not like we look at them say "wow autocannons sure do suck,... oh well lets go boost amarr". Oh come on, thats just controversial :S but thats what most of the ex-matari users think
Emsigma	Posted - 2006.03.27 15:31:00 - [29] Originally by: Tuxford 5) Didn't know Deimos needed love but it should be easier to fit after blaster love. Deimos biggest problem is surely that it is insanely hard to fit, but another great concern is that is is 10m/s slower than it's T1 base ship and is extremly hard to use since it has the agility and speed that is closer to a pregant barn than it is to a ships designed to get in blaster range quickly.
j0sephine	Posted - 2006.03.27 15:50:00 - [30] "It's not like we look at them say "wow autocannons sure do suck,... oh well lets go boost amarr"." You mean, this isn't how it's usually done? ^~^

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.