| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
9917
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 00:32:00 -
[91] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote: Moving along.
Meanwhile the carriers are taking out one of these every 4 seconds. If they are smart they can take out one a second as you only need 40 carriers to alpha that ship.
How long do you think it will take before that nado force loses the ability to alpha carriers?
It will take 1600 megathrons before we start to alpha carriers, any fewer and you cannot take them out. So you tell me, who can field subcap armadas of the size needed to kill the capital blobs?
And this is before we get to the issue of the nodes being unable to support any fleet that is able to counter todays capital blobs. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
9917
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 00:34:00 -
[92] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote: Says the team who jumped 700 dreads into a 2700 man grid
We jumped a dread fleet into bigger numbers before and did just fine. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 00:35:00 -
[93] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Grath Telkin wrote: Says the team who jumped 700 dreads into a 2700 man grid
We jumped a dread fleet into bigger numbers before and did just fine.
No you didn't, now you're outright lying.
Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
9918
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 00:36:00 -
[94] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:baltec1 wrote:Grath Telkin wrote: Says the team who jumped 700 dreads into a 2700 man grid
We jumped a dread fleet into bigger numbers before and did just fine. No you didn't, now you're outright lying.
6VDT. We dumped a dread fleet into the fight towards the end. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Mario Putzo
Welping and Dunking.
73
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 00:37:00 -
[95] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Mario Putzo wrote: Moving along.
Meanwhile the carriers are taking out one of these every 4 seconds. If they are smart they can take out one a second as you only need 40 carriers to alpha that ship. How long do you think it will take before that nado force loses the ability to alpha carriers? It will take 1600 megathrons before we start to alpha carriers, any fewer and you cannot take them out. So you tell me, who can field subcap armadas of the size needed to kill the capital blobs? And this is before we get to the issue of the nodes being unable to support any fleet that is able to counter todays capital blobs.
LOL Ok. Keep swinging wildly at air then. (with perfect skills only 70 nados needed to Alpha a well tanked Archon)
baltec1 wrote: 6VDT. We dumped a dread fleet into the fight towards the end.
You mean when the fight was all but won and N3ST was starting to withdraw LOL. Ya we used caps too loot wrecks guys. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 00:40:00 -
[96] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:baltec1 wrote:Grath Telkin wrote: Says the team who jumped 700 dreads into a 2700 man grid
We jumped a dread fleet into bigger numbers before and did just fine. No you didn't, now you're outright lying. 6VDT. We dumped a dread fleet into the fight towards the end. So you're comparing jumping a dread fleet in at the end of a fight when most of the fighting was done and numbers were on the decline (near the end) and the field you jumped into was mostly friendly to jumping a dread fleet that massively dwarfs the 6VDT dread fleet in size into a hostile grid at the peak of fighting in the system.
And you don't see how one is not like the other and how your original statement is a lie?
Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
9918
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 00:48:00 -
[97] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote: So you're comparing jumping a dread fleet in at the end of a fight when most of the fighting was done and numbers were on the decline (near the end) and the field you jumped into was mostly friendly to jumping a dread fleet that massively dwarfs the 6VDT dread fleet in size into a hostile grid at the peak of fighting in the system.
And you don't see how one is not like the other and how your original statement is a lie?
Most of the fighting was not done. The dreads landed at the hight of the battle and broke tests back.
Speaking of lies, are you still pushing that 100 maelstroms can beat our carriers line? Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 00:50:00 -
[98] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Grath Telkin wrote: So you're comparing jumping a dread fleet in at the end of a fight when most of the fighting was done and numbers were on the decline (near the end) and the field you jumped into was mostly friendly to jumping a dread fleet that massively dwarfs the 6VDT dread fleet in size into a hostile grid at the peak of fighting in the system.
And you don't see how one is not like the other and how your original statement is a lie?
Most of the fighting was not done. The dreads landed at the hight of the battle and broke tests back.
This is not true in the slightest bit, like not even close to anything like what actually happened.
Rewriting history while talking to people that were there seems dumb, but coming from you its a non shocker.
Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.
|

Vald Tegor
Empyrean Guard Tactical Narcotics Team
125
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 00:51:00 -
[99] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote: The point is it was jumping massive amounts of players in at the last second that ruined the experience for CFC, not drones. You should plan better next time friend.
Actually,
CCP Veritas wrote:Allright, post-nap replyathon! Frostys Virpio wrote:How much does a drone "lost" in space cost in performance? To someone already on grid, nothin'. They hurt a bit to someone coming on grid, which is why massed container spew on Jita 4-4 is unhappy and we hurt people who do that.
the drones on field had a negative impact on the dreads ability to load grid.
I wonder if scooping blue drones and bombing enemy drones before jumping in reinforcements may have allowed the dreads to load. You will never bomb all the drones because you will lose bubbles, but could at least significantly reduce the amount.
Though that makes people deploy more drones as there are players loading grid, which may end up counter productive. |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 00:58:00 -
[100] - Quote
Vald Tegor wrote:You will never bomb all the drones because you will lose bubbles
We bubble ourselves, why would you care about losing bubbles? Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
9918
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:02:00 -
[101] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:
This is not true in the slightest bit, like not even close to anything like what actually happened.
Rewriting history while talking to people that were there seems dumb, but coming from you its a non shocker.
I was there. And unlike you, I haven't posted blatant lies in an attempt to defend a horribly overpowered capital blob.
CCP are going to be nerfing your capital hive fleet. Anyone with half a mind could see this coming. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10066
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:03:00 -
[102] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:baltec1 wrote:Mario Putzo wrote: I don't think you know what N+1 is...secondly there are a pile of subcapital doctrines that work against capitals. Ask your Allies in BL to maybe teach you how to use Maelstroms.
Given that there is not a single possible setup for a subcap fleet to kill a carrier due to a lack of firepower vs the capitals massive EHP and capital reps I'd say you have no idea what you are talking about. A Maelstrom fleet cannot alpha carriers. Sorry sorry my mistake. You can do it with T3 BCs. [Tornado, alpha] 8x 1400mm Howitzer Artillery II (Republic Fleet EMP L) 3x Tracking Computer II (Optimal Range Script) 2x Sensor Booster II (Scan Resolution Script) 4x Gyrostabilizer II 2x Medium Ancillary Current Router I Medium Projectile Locus Coordinator I [Statistics - Mario Putzo] Capacitor (Stable at 88.68%) Volley Damage: 9,213.08 DPS: 511.29 42K Optimal 93K Falloff and thats will like skills @ 3 and 4. (its over 11000K Alpha with all level 5s) But hey 1000 of these can't possibly alpha a Carrier. After all you only need a post resist Volley of what 600 per ship with 1K dudes. Moving along.
We'd have to load Tremor and shoot from >180km, otherwise we'd still get gunned down by sentries. We'd also need 800+ Tornadoes.
This is ridiculously unrealistic. Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:10:00 -
[103] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:
This is not true in the slightest bit, like not even close to anything like what actually happened.
Rewriting history while talking to people that were there seems dumb, but coming from you its a non shocker.
I was there. And unlike you, I haven't posted blatant lies in an attempt to defend a horribly overpowered capital blob. CCP are going to be nerfing your capital hive fleet. Anyone with half a mind could see this coming.
So what you're saying is that you're not going to post any of the 30 odd videos that came out of 6VDT to back up your claim then, and just instead go nanny nanny boo boo.
Fits you, I'd stick with it.
Andski wrote:
We'd have to load Tremor and shoot from >180km, otherwise we'd still get gunned down by sentries. We'd also need 800+ Tornadoes.
This is ridiculously unrealistic.
800 tornado's is unrealistic for an coalition thats fielded 1000 domis and 1000 mega's on different occasions and at one point and time relied exclusively on Maelstroms.
Got it.
Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.
|

PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
958
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:14:00 -
[104] - Quote
Andski wrote:[quote=Mario Putzo] We'd also need 800+ Tornadoes.
This is ridiculously unrealistic. But 700 dreads is cool.  |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
9919
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:18:00 -
[105] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Andski wrote:[We'd also need 800+ Tornadoes.
This is ridiculously unrealistic. But 700 dreads is cool. 
They wont die to a flight of bombs or explode every volley from any fleet let alone the carrier blob. Nados for alphaing capitals in massive fights like these just cannot work. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:19:00 -
[106] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:Andski wrote:[We'd also need 800+ Tornadoes.
This is ridiculously unrealistic. But 700 dreads is cool.  They wont die to a flight of bombs or explode every volley from any fleet let alone the carrier blob. Nados for alphaing capitals in massive fights like these just cannot work.
Guys guys it can't possibly work, even though we've never tried it, because its easier to just a bloo bloo bloo on the forums about it.
EDIT: Domi's don't take many more vollies of bombs to kill, so this logic starts at failure, brought to you of course by baltec, knower of literally nothing.
EDIT EDIT: Obviously this means nerf bombers. Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.
|

Mario Putzo
Welping and Dunking.
73
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:21:00 -
[107] - Quote
Andski wrote:
We'd have to load Tremor and shoot from >180km, otherwise we'd still get gunned down by sentries. We'd also need 800+ Tornadoes.
This is ridiculously unrealistic.
What are you even talking about? Its basic math.
The EM Damage alone is doing over 5K So against a max tanked archon running their hardners ahead of time you need 300 or so to break the tank...Just with the EM Damage. You need around 250 Total With all Damage types of REMP accounted for. Against an average fit archon (no Trimarks, not running hardeners but fitted) you need like 100. About 70 if you all have perfect skills.
Also why would you need to be at 180KM? Do Carriers have some kind of extra armor when you are sitting at 40K? |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:23:00 -
[108] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Andski wrote:
We'd have to load Tremor and shoot from >180km, otherwise we'd still get gunned down by sentries. We'd also need 800+ Tornadoes.
This is ridiculously unrealistic.
What are you even talking about? Its basic math. The EM Damage alone is doing over 5K So against a max tanked archon running their hardners ahead of time you need 300 or so to break the tank...Just with the EM Damage. You need around 250 Total With all Damage types of EM accounted for. Against an average fit archon (no Trimarks, not running hardeners but fitted) you need like 100. About 70 if you all have perfect skills. Also why would you need to be at 180KM? Do Carriers have some kind of extra armor when you are sitting at 40K?
The idea of being at 180k is so that they don't take losses at all, its cute, they want to kill capitals with zero risk or effort simply by virtue of outnumbering their opponent and they seem to think nobody will notice.
Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
9919
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:24:00 -
[109] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:
So what you're saying is that you're not going to post any of the 30 odd videos that came out of 6VDT to back up your claim then, and just instead go nanny nanny boo boo.
Fits you, I'd stick with it.
Feel free to post some. Meanwhile I will continue to point out that you made an article on the mittani and many posts here stating that a fleet a maelstroms can kill your capital blob despite the fact that the number of ships you gave are mathematically impossible to alpha carriers. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Leigh Akiga
My Highsec Backbone
520
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:24:00 -
[110] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Also why would you need to be at 180KM? Do Carriers have some kind of extra armor when you are sitting at 40K?
No they just instantly nuke everything within 200k thanks to imba drone assist. You didnt name it wrecking ball for nothin did you?
|

Mario Putzo
Welping and Dunking.
73
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:26:00 -
[111] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:Andski wrote:
We'd have to load Tremor and shoot from >180km, otherwise we'd still get gunned down by sentries. We'd also need 800+ Tornadoes.
This is ridiculously unrealistic.
What are you even talking about? Its basic math. The EM Damage alone is doing over 5K So against a max tanked archon running their hardners ahead of time you need 300 or so to break the tank...Just with the EM Damage. You need around 250 Total With all Damage types of EM accounted for. Against an average fit archon (no Trimarks, not running hardeners but fitted) you need like 100. About 70 if you all have perfect skills. Also why would you need to be at 180KM? Do Carriers have some kind of extra armor when you are sitting at 40K? The idea of being at 180k is so that they don't take losses at all, its cute, they want to kill capitals with zero risk or effort simply by virtue of outnumbering their opponent and they seem to think nobody will notice.
Ahhhh I see coward math. |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1390
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:26:00 -
[112] - Quote
Eram Fidard wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:Drops 1000 domis on grid and tries to crash node with sentries.
Complains when node doesn't crash after additionally cynoing in hundreds of dreads on grid.
~~The CFC~~ Pre-Loads system with ~500 ships that each have 10 drones (hrrrm, 1000x5 vs. 500x10), launches and recalls fighterbombers and sentries repeatedly. Gets free turkey shoot while overwhelming force sits in warp tunnel. ~N3PL~ p.s. I didn't mention the thousands of drones in each carrier Oh the wonders of tinfoil.
Goons still mad they couldn't crash the node? ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
9920
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:29:00 -
[113] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Andski wrote:
We'd have to load Tremor and shoot from >180km, otherwise we'd still get gunned down by sentries. We'd also need 800+ Tornadoes.
This is ridiculously unrealistic.
What are you even talking about? Its basic math. The EM Damage alone is doing over 5K So against a max tanked archon running their hardners ahead of time you need 300 or so to break the tank...Just with the EM Damage. You need around 250 Total With all Damage types of REMP accounted for. Against an average fit archon (no Trimarks, not running hardeners but fitted) you need like 100. About 70 if you all have perfect skills. Also why would you need to be at 180KM? Do Carriers have some kind of extra armor when you are sitting at 40K?
Not only are you wildly wrong in how many ships you would need to alpha a carrier, you are failing to see that putting your subcaps in range of the carriers means they will be taking out at least one of your nados every volley with their sentries. You very quickly lose the ability to alpha carriers and it just turns into a slaughter. The number you would need are obscene. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Mario Putzo
Welping and Dunking.
73
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:32:00 -
[114] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:Andski wrote:
We'd have to load Tremor and shoot from >180km, otherwise we'd still get gunned down by sentries. We'd also need 800+ Tornadoes.
This is ridiculously unrealistic.
What are you even talking about? Its basic math. The EM Damage alone is doing over 5K So against a max tanked archon running their hardners ahead of time you need 300 or so to break the tank...Just with the EM Damage. You need around 250 Total With all Damage types of REMP accounted for. Against an average fit archon (no Trimarks, not running hardeners but fitted) you need like 100. About 70 if you all have perfect skills. Also why would you need to be at 180KM? Do Carriers have some kind of extra armor when you are sitting at 40K? Not only are you wildly wrong in how many ships you would need to alpha a carrier, you are failing to see that putting your subcaps in range of the carriers means they will be taking out at least one of your nados every volley with their sentries. You very quickly lose the ability to alpha carriers and it just turns into a slaughter. The number you would need are obscene.
You should learn math mate. Also to answer your question you would need about 8 less Maels to Alpha a Carrier than Tornados.
How much HP do you think an Archon has? |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
8786
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:32:00 -
[115] - Quote
"See how many ships you need to alpha a carrier? That's all you'll ever need and you'll have that many ships the entire fight." My EVE Videos |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:33:00 -
[116] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:
So what you're saying is that you're not going to post any of the 30 odd videos that came out of 6VDT to back up your claim then, and just instead go nanny nanny boo boo.
Fits you, I'd stick with it.
Feel free to post some. Meanwhile I will continue to point out that you made an article on the mittani and many posts here stating that a fleet a maelstroms can kill your capital blob despite the fact that the number of ships you gave are mathematically impossible to alpha carriers.
So you're stating publicly that 250 Maelstroms can't alpha an Archon?
Please say thats what you're saying.
Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.
|

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
8786
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:36:00 -
[117] - Quote
You just need to alpha one Archon and then you can go home because you've won. My EVE Videos |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10068
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:37:00 -
[118] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:The idea of being at 180k is so that they don't take losses at all, its cute, they want to kill capitals with zero risk or effort simply by virtue of outnumbering their opponent and they seem to think nobody will notice.
No, because being any closer means that the nados will be volleyed as fast as the drone trigger can cycle his TP. If we were to compensate for that and sit closer, we'd have to bring in more nados than the node could handle. Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10068
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:38:00 -
[119] - Quote
> Blue to half of the supercapitals in the game > Tells everyone else they want to kill capitals without risk > Is Grath Telkin Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 01:38:00 -
[120] - Quote
Andski wrote:Grath Telkin wrote:The idea of being at 180k is so that they don't take losses at all, its cute, they want to kill capitals with zero risk or effort simply by virtue of outnumbering their opponent and they seem to think nobody will notice.
No, because being any closer means that the nados will be volleyed as fast as the drone trigger can cycle his TP. If we were to compensate for that and sit closer, we'd have to bring in more nados than the node could handle.
Actually your damage would be higher closer so you'd need fewer to alpha, thanks for playing at home.
Andski wrote:> Blue to half of the supercapitals in the game > Tells everyone else they want to kill capitals without risk > Is Grath Telkin
You forgot to add "drops them on every fight in the game daring the other half to come in" Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |