"Only my play style is correct. Any suggestions you give me are incorrect and unacceptable. I want CCP to change this to my desires even though I posted in the wrong forum"

High sec wardecs are so easy to avoid, they are broken.

lol

War deccing is broken, almost to a surreal extent. In high sec, small industrial corps are war decced repeatedly for no other purpose than to cause grief. The ward deccers--if looking at their killboards are any indication--are cowards, never attacking a low sec corp, or even the more potent high sec corps.

War dec after war dec after war dec. It has all become rather tiresome, even disheartening. My corp alone has endured a war dec almost every other week since the early summer.

Some--most, perhaps-- war deccing corps will issue war decs against multiple corps at once: XXX XXXX just issued war decs against 23 corps and alliances simultaneously. Why? For the lulz, and to generate a superficially more attractive resume, I imagine. Of course, all the corps that they are 'fighting' (do they ever leave major hubs?) are small industrial corps.

Some suggestions:

--No corp/alliance should be permitted to issue more than three concurrent war declarations.

--The aggressor must deposit into a CONCORD trust account enough isk to cover a war for a month of renewals. As it is now, a corp issues a war dec, and after a week, the war is usually allowed to lapse. Wars should not just lapse because the aggressor loses interest; the aggressor must either surrender with consequences, or be forced to pay repeatedly for a month for the continuance of the war.

--The 'alts' of the war deccing corporations should all be identified to the defenders. As it stands now, any single war deccer is accompanied by two neutral logistics alts who suddenly appear 80 kms away, with repping so over-powered that an Atron can destroy a Dominix.

--War dec fees are too low by a factor of ten. Only 50 million isk to dec an entire alliance for a week is nonsensical.

Hiring mercenaries is not an answer. Joining larger alliances is not the answer. HTFU is not the answer. High sec war deccing is broken, and it is used primarily to abuse, grief, and harass others.

Summary: High sec war deccing is broken. It is an instrument for griefers to constantly harass industrialists, miners, and missioners. Unable to survive the travails of low and null, they repeatedly war dec those least inclined to fight. War decs should have strict limits and significant consequences for the aggressors.

additional suggestions:

- starbases cannot be taken down during a wardec
- alts of defenders are flagged as targets
- station services including hangars defenders have assets in are flagged as targets and can be destroyed
- corps can't be remade to shed decs, all defenders are flagged even if they drop corp
- targets are marked on the ingame map for the aggressors
- defenders have to pay for the dec when they lose

- when a dec is made, defenders are automatically unsubbed from eve and subbed into world of warcraft

What an unusually insightful post. How can it be that no one who has felt this way has ever used a forum alt to express their feelings of frustration with the wardec mechanic before?

I myself also believe it is broken. It is far too easy for my targets to just drop corp and avoid the war altogether. I paid 50mil isk for a war, I should get to have my war.

"Only my play style is correct. Any suggestions you give me are incorrect and unacceptable. I want CCP to change this to my desires even though I posted in the wrong forum"

There, OP, I fixed your summary.

Following this line of reasoning I propose that every corporation that declares a wardec should be denied access to all ships except mining vessels for a week, following the week of the war. In this way, do we ensure that all parties are equally forced into play styles that they do not wish to participate in.

Every corporation should have a security division to deal with enemies. If you don't, then you're just asking for it.

Wars in eve being what they are, getting a security division is kinda ill advised since fighting back has no incentive.

wrong

You have some reasoning behind that?

Try ewar vs rr alts.

--No corp/alliance should be permitted to issue more than three concurrent war declarations.

--War dec fees are too low by a factor of ten. Only 50 million isk to dec an entire alliance for a week is nonsensical.

Or when a character drops Corp due to wardec the ceo should be able to add a deserter tag to the gutless, offending character so that future ceos can easily determine their worth.

- starbases cannot be taken down during a wardec
- alts of defenders are flagged as targets
- station services including hangars defenders have assets in are flagged as targets and can be destroyed
- corps can't be remade to shed decs, all defenders are flagged even if they drop corp
- targets are marked on the ingame map for the aggressors
- defenders have to pay for the dec when they lose