Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3019
|
Posted - 2014.04.09 23:46:00 -
[151] - Quote
SeneschaI wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:]CREST has the potential to be very useful when it comes to management of the corporations. Like automation of SRP payouts, management of contacts, renting programs, and so on. More for control, rather than things which directly create value. Sounds exciting. currently the only way i can make all BPOs available to early corp members is to have 'view only' hangars ('other' access setting) of the blueprints, with one 'take+view' hangar (division 7 hangar) for input/output. obviously, i have to deal with the annoying 'lockdown' mechanic to boot. It's a pretty cool system that can get fledgling industrialists access to upgraded blueprints to copy to their hearts content. It would be nice if this CREST idea of yours means i can have an alternative...or are we talking about two different things here?
CREST won't touch that unfortunately. It's basically there to do the same things you can do in client, from out side of the client. So, with someone that knows what they're doing, they can put together an application to do things for you.
Now, it was said at Eve Vegas that they'd be working on corp roles at some point, as a prereq for the 3 year plan (iirc). Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4236322 http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Sabriz Adoudel
Mission BLITZ
2517
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 01:00:00 -
[152] - Quote
Steve, you're the only candidate that's not a pirate type to get on my ballots. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=326497 --áPsychotic Monk for CSM! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. If you want to mine in highsec, read www.minerbumping.com. |
Crasniya
Strange Energy Gentlemen's Agreement
499
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 01:06:00 -
[153] - Quote
My Twitter question wasn't worthwhile enough to get answered. :'( |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3019
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 01:25:00 -
[154] - Quote
Crasniya wrote:My Twitter question wasn't worthwhile enough to get answered. :'(
Uh.. twitter question?
Must have been lost in the sea on (fun) inainity that is tweetfleet.
Ask it here? Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4236322 http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Quazal Atreides
StarTrucks
13
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 16:29:00 -
[155] - Quote
you good sir are getting the vote of the 'atreides' house, Good too see some good ole fashioned carebear CSM and not a wanna be indi guy pretending for votes
Still the only person to offer corp creation free of charge. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=35634#post35634 Created over 200 was 3rd on the all time corporation job history on eve-board. This service is in stasis due to personal game time... |
Crasniya
Strange Energy Gentlemen's Agreement
501
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 16:44:00 -
[156] - Quote
I tweeted to ask you, if elected, how much interaction would you expect or like to have with the CPM?
https://twitter.com/ocdtrekkie/status/453654796528918528 |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3024
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 16:47:00 -
[157] - Quote
Huh. Don't know how I missed that.
Anyway: I'd say, in general, not that much interaction? But that's mostly because flying in space, and running on the ground are very different topics.
Where the two worlds come together (FW. possibly Sov. The market. possibly manufacturing. Molden Heath) then collaboration is very important so that both games get something useful and meaningful out of it. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4236322 http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Crasniya
Strange Energy Gentlemen's Agreement
501
|
Posted - 2014.04.10 17:07:00 -
[158] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Anyway: I'd say, in general, not that much interaction? But that's mostly because flying in space, and running on the ground are very different topics.
Where the two worlds come together (FW. possibly Sov. The market. possibly manufacturing. Molden Heath) then collaboration is very important so that both games get something useful and meaningful out of it.
Of course, CSM is EVE stuff, and CPM is DUST stuff, but any hope of a further link will require both working together. My concern is that last year, several candidates noted support for DUST integration. However, a CPM member did tell me that nobody from CSM8 ever personally reached out to them. So apart from a single summit session on DUST, which CCP has still not seen fit to release the minutes for, there has been no or almost no interaction. |
Mynxee
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 00:27:00 -
[159] - Quote
Good luck in the election. I included you on my slate because those oh-so-vital third party apps need an informed voice on the council! ====== My Blog: Outlaw Insouciant-áhttp://outlawinsouciant.blogspot.com/ |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
15043
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 07:24:00 -
[160] - Quote
Crasniya wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Anyway: I'd say, in general, not that much interaction? But that's mostly because flying in space, and running on the ground are very different topics.
Where the two worlds come together (FW. possibly Sov. The market. possibly manufacturing. Molden Heath) then collaboration is very important so that both games get something useful and meaningful out of it. Of course, CSM is EVE stuff, and CPM is DUST stuff, but any hope of a further link will require both working together. My concern is that last year, several candidates noted support for DUST integration. However, a CPM member did tell me that nobody from CSM8 ever personally reached out to them. So apart from a single summit session on DUST, which CCP has still not seen fit to release the minutes for, there has been no or almost no interaction.
Your information is inaccurate. There is a dedicated CSM:CPM channel on skype; we're all in it and we regularly talk to each other in there. Here is my CSM9 endorsement list - vote for diversity of expertise : Ali Aras-á Mangala Solaris-á Mike Azariah-á Steve Ronuken James Arget-á Xander Phoena-á Sugar Kyle-á corbexx-á mynnna-á progodlegend-á Psychotic Monk-á Jayne Fillion
|
|
Crasniya
Strange Energy Gentlemen's Agreement
503
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 14:23:00 -
[161] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Your information is inaccurate. There is a dedicated CSM:CPM channel on skype; we're all in it and we regularly talk to each other in there.
Good to know, thank you. :) |
Wendy Holl
Jita Investing Compagny
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 23:19:00 -
[162] - Quote
As a highsec trader and producer i am fully aware of the risks. Highsec isnt as save as it used to be. Mostly due to the now virtually risk free ganking of freighters and miningships, sure CONCORD jumps in and shoots the gankers which then gets a slap on the hand, standing wise. But when you the next moment can dock up at a station and turn in some tag to restore a negative standing i think it has gone to far.
What good is a standing system if you can just buy your way into good standing?
What is your stance on this? |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3029
|
Posted - 2014.04.12 01:18:00 -
[163] - Quote
Wendy Holl wrote:As a highsec trader and producer i am fully aware of the risks. Highsec isnt as save as it used to be. Mostly due to the now virtually risk free ganking of freighters and miningships, sure CONCORD jumps in and shoots the gankers which then gets a slap on the hand, standing wise. But when you the next moment can dock up at a station and turn in some tag to restore a negative standing i think it has gone to far.
What good is a standing system if you can just buy your way into good standing?
What is your stance on this?
Afraid I have to disagree with you.
Sure, you can buy sec status. Effectively you're outsourcing the grinding.
tbh, it's not having a major effect on people who gank mining barges. They're still able to do it with their -10 characters in catalysts, because most miners they gank fit next to no tank.
As for freighter ganks, yes, it might help the gankers recover a little sec status. But it takes a fair amount to drop below -5, and didn't take a lot of effort to chain back up to above -5. Avoiding a freighter gank, if it's being done for profit, is easy. Don't fly a freighter with more than a billion, to a billion and a half.
Aside from that, the tags aren't a cheap option. https://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/sectags/ Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4236322 http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3118
|
Posted - 2014.04.17 18:37:00 -
[164] - Quote
I am keeping an eye on the industry changes.
Just mostly withholding comment until we have them all, as we can't really comment coherently, until we see all of what CCP want to do.
I have some concerns, but these may be mitigated by later blogs. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4236322 http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Tesco Ergo Sum
91
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 06:30:00 -
[165] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:I am keeping an eye on the industry changes.
Just mostly withholding comment until we have them all, as we can't really comment coherently, until we see all of what CCP want to do.
I have some concerns, but these may be mitigated by later blogs.
Keep a close eye on them Steve, I don't trust them...
Also (getting in early) congratulations
|
Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
7048
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 14:42:00 -
[166] - Quote
you seem like you have a good head on your shoulders and understand a lot about this game, hope you won
would have posted this during the election but an endorsement from anyone in goonswarm would probably not have helped you win votes :v: Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division. |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
15220
|
Posted - 2014.04.25 16:43:00 -
[167] - Quote
Good luck Steve, I hope you make it Here is my CSM9 endorsement list - vote for diversity of expertise : Ali Aras-á Mangala Solaris-á Mike Azariah-á Steve Ronuken James Arget-á Xander Phoena-á Sugar Kyle-á corbexx-á mynnna-á progodlegend-á Psychotic Monk-á Jayne Fillion
|
VonDon
Forward Innovations
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:29:00 -
[168] - Quote
Just saw on Twitch! GRATS!!! |
Eto Demerhzel
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:31:00 -
[169] - Quote
Congratz :D
(I voted for you with all my account) |
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
374
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 17:40:00 -
[170] - Quote
Rip, didn't want that.
Nerf afk cloaking? Remove local and I will be fine with it.
EvE-Mail me if you need anything.
|
|
Salpun
Global Telstar Federation Offices Masters of Flying Objects
724
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 18:45:00 -
[171] - Quote
Congrats If i dont know something about EVE. I check https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/ISK_The_Guide
See you around the universe. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
3157
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 19:23:00 -
[172] - Quote
Woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
(This post was deleted for no content ) Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4236322 http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Zappity
Stay Frosty. A Band Apart.
1040
|
Posted - 2014.05.03 22:53:00 -
[173] - Quote
Well done. Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec. |
Suzariel Kel-Paten
Nevermind Enterprises BadWrongFun
6
|
Posted - 2014.05.04 02:06:00 -
[174] - Quote
Congratulations! I was pleased to see all three of my top picks make it. :-) BadWrongFun Blog |
Audrey Koshka
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
14
|
Posted - 2014.05.05 21:35:00 -
[175] - Quote
Yay, my #1 pick got in. Best of luck! |
Celeste Taylor
Ruby Dynasty
262
|
Posted - 2014.05.06 09:40:00 -
[176] - Quote
I'm still shocked that you didn't get CSM 8 but congratulations on getting in this year. I hope to see some work on both HS and industry for Eve year 11! CSM will be different without Trebor, but I am happy to see that you and Mike are on board. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |