| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 53 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
468
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:11:00 -
[931] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
As I said, there's either equal justice, or there's no justice.
The rules apply to everyone, or noone.
Only Sith deal in absolutes (and Schizophrenics actually)
PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
2813
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:13:00 -
[932] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
The rules apply to everyone, or noone.
Only Sith deal in absolutes (and Schizophrenics actually)
Isnt that an absolute? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Facebook would never tolerate that behaviour we are talking about" - Big Lynx |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
4183
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:22:00 -
[933] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Good grief people. The OP was a troll. There was no question or option implied.
Qalix wrote:Your choices are written in a way that makes it nearly impossible for a rational, reasonable person to choose anything other than #2. The wording on #3 is especially egregious. These are not real choices.
Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Thats because he's not looking for a real conversation. Its just CSM like whoring
Sokath, his eyes uncovered!!! The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
1140
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:22:00 -
[934] - Quote
CSM Feedback would be worthwhile, IF CCP didn''t consider you a bunch of sub-human mouth breathers....
CCP: "We know what's best for the game, so you can't have any options....." |

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
469
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:24:00 -
[935] - Quote
Serene Repose wrote:NOTE TO CCP: I certainly hope you don't rely on input such as that found on this thread in order to formulate policy. I somehow imagine you as being more PROFESSIONAL than that...this....(despite all I've said about you in the past.) Go figure.
COMPLETE agreement (especially since I have yet to be serious in this thread lol) PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested |

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
469
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:26:00 -
[936] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
The rules apply to everyone, or noone.
Only Sith deal in absolutes (and Schizophrenics actually)
Isnt that an absolute?
Absolutely XD
PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan
2816
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:27:00 -
[937] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
The rules apply to everyone, or noone.
Only Sith deal in absolutes (and Schizophrenics actually)
Isnt that an absolute? Absolutely XD
Sweet
*** Vote MTU For CSM *** ***Free The Jita 1*** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." - Pontianak Sythaeryn "Facebook would never tolerate that behaviour we are talking about" - Big Lynx |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
5308
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:33:00 -
[938] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote: That said, I honestly am NOT trying to waste your time. I rly don't see what the problem is. This is EVE, I play it BECAUSE it's full of pirates, thieves, backstabbers, scammers, and even obviously twisted frags like E1. It's a very refreshing change from games like WOW, etc. It's the harshness of the world that I love, absolutely love. You have to watch your back at all times, you have to be VERY careful with who you trust, because The Big Dirty is just around the corner, waiting for you to fall into the trap. By Gawd, I think it's FUN, exciting, and very interesting. As Ive said, I know Im not alone in this feeling, I know many (maybe even most?) players feel this way. It's why Eve has survived for 10 yrs, because it's DIFFERENT from all those other games.
So, as I've said, I think E1 is a slightly unbalanced, sadistic guy. I dont especially appreciate those traits in someone, but because of my love for the unregulated aspect of the game, and because I see a blatant double standard here, I vehemently oppose his being banned for the reason they banned him. People run right over that "line where someone has lost emotional control" hundreds of times a day in this game, you can see it anywhere, yet those guys dont get banned....Erotica get's banned. Again, CCP's OFFICIAL reasoning for the ban is that he "crossed the line when someone lost emotional control."
CCP have to maintain their fame, their intellectual property, their game "atmosphere".
They really tolerate a lot, BUT there's a line not to pass: the line beyond witch you risk causing CCP or their intellectual property one or more of: legal issues, defacement issues, impression of having "lost control" over their own product.
So, yes, many can easily "get" that scamming, bumping and ganking are perfectly in theme with an harsh cold universe blah blah but less can accept that evidently RL "problematic" people have a go to others, cause RL grief and collateral damage on CCP. The fact they abandoned in game communication tools is also proof that they KNEW they were going really beyond the "accepted path" and would have sure EULA issues.
It's the same reason they punished Mittani: he went far enough to grant a bad name to CCP, a damage beyond what's "strictly confined and acceptable in game" (which rightly, is a lot).
So, yes, there's a "line" to not trespass. Just be smart (or nice) enough not to pass it. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
470
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:39:00 -
[939] - Quote
Snupe Doggur wrote: Get caught, get dealt with.
Exactly why they just have to step up their game. Screw the victim up so badly that they wont tell on you. This isnt gonna make it better, itll just make it worse and more likely to get someone to self harm.
PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
110655
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:40:00 -
[940] - Quote
It's like when a bar owner catches folks smoking cannabis on the back patio or something.
Even though it may not personally bother the owner, the behavior jeopardizes their business (as that does), and they are within full rights to eject them from the premises.
Permanently. "He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."-á - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882 |

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
71
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:45:00 -
[941] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:It's like when a bar owner catches folks smoking cannabis on the back patio or something.
Even though it may not personally bother the owner, the behavior jeopardizes their business (as that does), and they are within full rights to eject them from the premises.
Permanently.
A more accurate analogy would be if the bartender knew ppl were smoking pot in the bathroom and did nothing about it, but busts the guys who walked off the property to do their smoking.
CCP Falcon wrote: However, there's a line as to how severe those circumstances should get, and I'll paraphrase Mynxee by saying that this line needs to be drawn at the point where the alleged victim starts to lose emotional control.
People are pushed past the point of losing emotional control probably hundreds of times a day. Their tormentors don't get banned for it.
BEING AN ******* IS NOT A CRIME! I support un-banning Erotica1
|

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
110655
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:47:00 -
[942] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
A more accurate analogy would be if the bartender knew ppl were smoking pot in the bathroom and did nothing about it, but busts the guys who walked off the property to do their smoking.
...which they absolutely cannot do, especially if off property, so your comment is negated and invalid as an example. "He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."-á - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882 |

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
71
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:49:00 -
[943] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
A more accurate analogy would be if the bartender knew ppl were smoking pot in the bathroom and did nothing about it, but busts the guys who walked off the property to do their smoking.
...which they absolutely cannot do, especially if off property, so your comment is negated and invalid as an example.
You're telling me that what happens on a privately-owned TS server is within CCP's juris diction of control? The analogy makes perfect sense. He got banned for his actions in TS, outside the game, "off CCP's property."
BEING AN ******* IS NOT A CRIME! I support un-banning Erotica1
|

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
471
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:50:00 -
[944] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:It's like when a bar owner catches folks smoking cannabis on the back patio or something.
Even though it may not personally bother the owner, the behavior jeopardizes their business (as that does), and they are within full rights to eject them from the premises.
Permanently.
I AM curious though, how many times HAVE you been banned? And gotten around the ban by making a new guy? Cause you always seem to use the same name. I ask this because youre SO on the side of right here. PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
110655
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:54:00 -
[945] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:It's like when a bar owner catches folks smoking cannabis on the back patio or something.
Even though it may not personally bother the owner, the behavior jeopardizes their business (as that does), and they are within full rights to eject them from the premises.
Permanently. I AM curious though, how many times HAVE you been banned? And gotten around the ban by making a new guy? Cause you always seem to use the same name. I ask this because youre SO on the side of right here.
Never banned. 4 years on the same toon as of 8 days ago.
I'm here for fun and the experience, not sadistic child's play by adults. "He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."-á - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882 |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
110655
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:56:00 -
[946] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
A more accurate analogy would be if the bartender knew ppl were smoking pot in the bathroom and did nothing about it, but busts the guys who walked off the property to do their smoking.
...which they absolutely cannot do, especially if off property, so your comment is negated and invalid as an example. You're telling me that what happens on a privately-owned TS server is within CCP's juris diction of control? The analogy makes perfect sense. He got banned for his actions in TS, outside the game, "off CCP's property."
If a bar brawl moves outside, it can still affect the reputation of the bar, and all can indeed be dismissed permanently from the premises, if it started inside.
"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."-á - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882 |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
4759
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:58:00 -
[947] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
A more accurate analogy would be if the bartender knew ppl were smoking pot in the bathroom and did nothing about it, but busts the guys who walked off the property to do their smoking.
...which they absolutely cannot do, especially if off property, so your comment is negated and invalid as an example. You're telling me that what happens on a privately-owned TS server is within CCP's juris diction of control? The analogy makes perfect sense. He got banned for his actions in TS, outside the game, "off CCP's property."
Seriously? People still trying that angle?
First off, you have no idea why he got banned.
But let me speculate. It had nothing to do with what happened off CCP's property. It had everything to do with him using CCP's property to hunt for victims.
Mr Epeen  There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
472
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:58:00 -
[948] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
A more accurate analogy would be if the bartender knew ppl were smoking pot in the bathroom and did nothing about it, but busts the guys who walked off the property to do their smoking.
...which they absolutely cannot do, especially if off property, so your comment is negated and invalid as an example. You're telling me that what happens on a privately-owned TS server is within CCP's juris diction of control? The analogy makes perfect sense. He got banned for his actions in TS, outside the game, "off CCP's property."
Especially when CCP have said in the past they cant use third party info for this purpose. But to quote a company called PGI, "that was our position at the time" PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
5310
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:59:00 -
[949] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
A more accurate analogy would be if the bartender knew ppl were smoking pot in the bathroom and did nothing about it, but busts the guys who walked off the property to do their smoking.
...which they absolutely cannot do, especially if off property, so your comment is negated and invalid as an example. You're telling me that what happens on a privately-owned TS server is within CCP's juris diction of control? The analogy makes perfect sense. He got banned for his actions in TS, outside the game, "off CCP's property."
CCP's EULA mentions they can accept or reject you at their sole discretion.
Here we go, someone managed to push CCP's "discretion" and they just applied the EULA which allows them to not accept anyone they don't feel "fit" for their product. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
472
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 18:00:00 -
[950] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:It's like when a bar owner catches folks smoking cannabis on the back patio or something.
Even though it may not personally bother the owner, the behavior jeopardizes their business (as that does), and they are within full rights to eject them from the premises.
Permanently. I AM curious though, how many times HAVE you been banned? And gotten around the ban by making a new guy? Cause you always seem to use the same name. I ask this because youre SO on the side of right here. Never banned. 4 years on the same toon as of 8 days ago. I'm here for fun and the experience, not sadistic child's play by adults.
Ah so Krystal Icefluxor (the first guy I knew that got banned from your name set) was a different person youre pretending.
lol more of the ppl who RP in real life here.
Man, if we're sociopaths, you guys are schizophrenics
Also; the main premise of this entire game is one fan's fun IS another's sadistic torture. Or are you deaf to the cries of the miners and missioners. Then why not the stupid as well?
Mr Epeen wrote:But let me speculate. It had nothing to do with what happened off CCP's property. It had everything to do with him using CCP's property to hunt for victims. Mr Epeen 
Bravo! by that logic you just made 90% of the PVP in EVE bannable!
Damn sure glad YOURE not a dev PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested |

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
75
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 18:04:00 -
[951] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
A more accurate analogy would be if the bartender knew ppl were smoking pot in the bathroom and did nothing about it, but busts the guys who walked off the property to do their smoking.
...which they absolutely cannot do, especially if off property, so your comment is negated and invalid as an example. You're telling me that what happens on a privately-owned TS server is within CCP's juris diction of control? The analogy makes perfect sense. He got banned for his actions in TS, outside the game, "off CCP's property." CCP's EULA mentions they can accept or reject you at their sole discretion. Here we go, someone managed to push CCP's "discretion" and they just applied the EULA which allows them to not accept anyone they don't feel "fit" for their product.
Oh yes, I don't dispute that CCP is within their rights to do whatever the hell they want. What I'm saying is what theyre doing is ambiguous, unfair, and hypocritical given that they allow others to commit actions in the same vein and don't ban those people. As I said, either the rules apply to everyone or they apply to noone, IF you want to be fair and respectable.
BEING AN ******* IS NOT A CRIME! I support un-banning Erotica1
|

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
472
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 18:06:00 -
[952] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Ssabat Thraxx wrote:
A more accurate analogy would be if the bartender knew ppl were smoking pot in the bathroom and did nothing about it, but busts the guys who walked off the property to do their smoking.
...which they absolutely cannot do, especially if off property, so your comment is negated and invalid as an example. You're telling me that what happens on a privately-owned TS server is within CCP's juris diction of control? The analogy makes perfect sense. He got banned for his actions in TS, outside the game, "off CCP's property." CCP's EULA mentions they can accept or reject you at their sole discretion. Here we go, someone managed to push CCP's "discretion" and they just applied the EULA which allows them to not accept anyone they don't feel "fit" for their product.
And ppl are just trying to get an idea of the outline we have to "fit" into now. Because this has been going on for the better part of a year but only when the public spotlight is shines on it do they care.
So Blog away, unhappy EVE players! You can get the game warped into you own vision in this way! PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested |

Winchester Steele
706
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 18:07:00 -
[953] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:Winchester Steele wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:[
Well, given you believe that it is perfectly acceptable to torment someone after blowing up your ship, I am not surprised that you believe that this behaviour is acceptable. If I was dumb enough to jump into his fleet and get trapped, yeah, my stupidity.
But the last 2 lines of his display the issue with this game. Personal attacks because I would not walk into a trap.
Oh, and BTW, the first thing I check when anyone opens a convo with me is their employment history and bounty. Took me all of 5 seconds to recognize this for what it was. And the part of the no tank, 4 faction damage mods, that was my own little trolling. And no, I don't fly no tank, pimped out ships.
Speaking the truth on the forums has had consequences, and I can no longer fly optimized PvE ships. You think personal attacks are a product of the Eve community alone? That's p funny bro. You should get out more. Eve is downright tame compared to some political forums I engage in. MOST people tend to keep it in character, and in game. Believe it or not Dinsdale, I actually have a modicum of respect for your playstyle. I don't doubt for one minute that you are very smart in game and would be a very hard target. Oh no, you get me wrong. Personal attacks have been around forever. But prior to the anonymity of the internet, you attacked someone, there was a strong bet that they would find out who you are. And when someone is outted, that person I find has a tendency to really moderate their behaviour, because they might just **** off the wrong person. There is a reason that most newspapers require a name when it comes to the letters to the editor. Did you know the Huffington Post now requires a real name to comment on a blog? That has dropped their commenting activity by about 90%, because people are terrified of others knowing their political views. The internet is forever, and if someone is ever planning on looking for a new job, they don't want their name out there. But it also has dramatically improved the civility of the discussions, because the trolls and sociopaths now see their name in bright lights, and that can be a dangerous thing. So what I am saying is yes, personal attacks do occur in Eve, just like everywhere else. And yes, every char should be anonymous in Eve. But because of the privilege of that anonymity, players should be held to a higher standard of civility. Oh, and BTW, though I am careful in game, I do get nailed occasionally. I got nicked a couple months ago by someone using the aggressive drones/ MTU exploit that I did not know about. But the GM gave me my ship back, and CCP closed that exploit. The interesting thing was that log as well. I won't bother posting it, but the ganker opened it up, and invited his friends to the chat, one who apparently knew me from my nullsec days. They tried to goad me into a rant, and when I stayed silent, they jumped out of the chat saying "this is boring." If they guys need me ranting to provide them entertainment in Eve, maybe they should be looking for another game.
I agree with you broadly. I think people should be more civil to one another, especially on the forums. (I am guilty here at times)
Two points where I disagree with you though:
1. You seem to believe that the "gankers/bad guys" are the rude ones, when often I find it's the "carebears". Point being, there are dicks on both sides of this debate.
2. Me shooting your spaceship (consensual or not) and smacking about it a little is not in and of itself an uncivil act, especially within the context of Eve. Maybe there is a line, but that isn't it.
As far as RL names etc. I stand by my positions whether we are face to face or over the internet. The importance of anonymity isn't so I can say things that I wouldn't normally say. It is to protect us from the psycho's who claim they will "gut our mothers" IRL over the loss of internet pixels.
... |

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
473
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 18:10:00 -
[954] - Quote
Winchester Steele wrote:
1. You seem to believe that the "gankers/bad guys" are the rude ones, when often I find it's the "carebears".
ya, like me.
Point being, the danger is part of the fun remove one and you remove the other.
Quote:It is to protect us from the psycho's who claim they will "gut our mothers" IRL over the loss of internet pixels.
Yeah like the guy that ran the scam
no wait... PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested |

Winchester Steele
706
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 18:12:00 -
[955] - Quote
Arsine Mayhem wrote:Winchester Steele wrote:Arsine Mayhem wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Man, you people who cant separate real life and the game baffle me. Dude, seriously, take some time off before someone pods you and you self harm
Tears from this one all through the thread. Keep 'em coming. Wait wait wait. Are you getting pleasure from his suffering? Isn't that the VERY THING you lot are moaning about. Hypocrit. I've always said, no other game attracts more stupid.
You shouldn't disparage yourself so. You aren't stupid, you just don't get what the issue is. ... |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
4759
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 18:18:00 -
[956] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:But let me speculate. It had nothing to do with what happened off CCP's property. It had everything to do with him using CCP's property to hunt for victims. Mr Epeen  Bravo! by that logic you just made 90% of the PVP in EVE bannable! Damn sure glad YOURE not a dev
You'd have to DOX me to know for sure. And that's bad, mkay.
Mr Epeen 
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |

H aVo K
Tycheon Industries Northern Associates.
100
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 18:18:00 -
[957] - Quote
Winchester Steele wrote:Arsine Mayhem wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Man, you people who cant separate real life and the game baffle me. Dude, seriously, take some time off before someone pods you and you self harm
Tears from this one all through the thread. Keep 'em coming. Wait wait wait. Are you getting pleasure from his suffering? Isn't that the VERY THING you lot are moaning about. Hypocrit.
It is, and it's not in-game, which, according to the wizards in here, makes it REAL LIFE. |

Ralph King-Griffin
Var Foundation inc.
516
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 18:21:00 -
[958] - Quote
i love how falcon and malik come on, settle everything and then dinsdale looses his **** If in doubt...do...excessively. |

Andreus Ixiris
Duty.
4470
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 18:23:00 -
[959] - Quote
I'm going to spare people the mendacity and be honest.
I approve of CCP's ban of Erotica 1 not so much because of what he did or how he did it (although that's certainly a contributing factor) as much as who it upset. Tears from the people who usually brag about collecting tears themselves are inarguably the most delicious. Mane 614
|

Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
2500
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 18:26:00 -
[960] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Malcanis wrote:Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:BTW, this conversation just happened. I think this encapsulates everything wrong with this game, and the sociopaths defending their right to be sociopaths:
Channel ID: -58667330 Channel Name: Private Chat (Dieter Rams) Listener: Dinsdale Pirannha Session started: 2014.03.30 14:42:16
n++[ 2014.03.30 14:42:20 ] Dieter Rams > hi there o/ n++[ 2014.03.30 14:42:22 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > hello n++[ 2014.03.30 14:42:40 ] Dieter Rams > I need some quick help with a combat site, my DPS is too low to kill the NPC n++[ 2014.03.30 14:43:06 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > sure. Let me get into a PvE ship n++[ 2014.03.30 14:43:26 ] Dieter Rams > alright, what dps can you bring? n++[ 2014.03.30 14:44:17 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > well, I have a pretty pimped out Marauder that can bring about 1200-1300. But that is without much tank n++[ 2014.03.30 14:44:39 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > To get that I have to fit 4 faction damage mods n++[ 2014.03.30 14:44:45 ] Dieter Rams > we only need to kill 3 elite battleships so I think that wil do n++[ 2014.03.30 14:45:32 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > what mission? n++[ 2014.03.30 14:45:48 ] Dieter Rams > it's a combat site, like lvl 4 in difficulty n++[ 2014.03.30 14:45:58 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > which one? n++[ 2014.03.30 14:46:44 ] Dieter Rams > blood den n++[ 2014.03.30 14:48:17 ] Dinsdale Pirannha > interesting. This one? https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Blood_Denn++[ 2014.03.30 14:48:32 ] Dieter Rams > hehe you're sucha carebear n++[ 2014.03.30 14:48:34 ] Dieter Rams > sad loser PvEers can be so rude  so posting chat logs isnt against the rules anymore? Good to know! CSM approved guys!
If posting chat logs is not allowed, I will take it down. Or I am certain that the ISD will shut it out fast if it has been copied too many times.
I was trying to make a point, and that one happened today, so thought it was appropriate.
Most people viewed Orwell's writings as a warning. The harper regime and the goons treat them as a guidebook. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 53 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |