| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 53 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
511
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:07:00 -
[1291] - Quote
Tor Norman wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:The fact that most of the people are actively ignoring that part (as you are) is rather interesting. I'm not actively ignoring it. The warning issue is more concerning to me than sohkar's punishment. This discussion and its various aspects has spanned thousands of posts already, hence I want to focus my discussion on what I feel is more important.
Ah, the racism and IRL threats arent important to you then.
I get it
PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
112
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:12:00 -
[1292] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Tor Norman wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:The fact that most of the people are actively ignoring that part (as you are) is rather interesting. I'm not actively ignoring it. The warning issue is more concerning to me than sohkar's punishment. This discussion and its various aspects has spanned thousands of posts already, hence I want to focus my discussion on what I feel is more important. Ah, the racism and IRL threats arent important to you then. I get it No, they're not relevant to me. I engage in content generation and emergent game play. On one hand, emergent game play is condoned by CCP, such as miner bumping. On another, it's a permabannable offence, such as the bonus room. I would have considered neither a breach of the game's rules, hence I am concerned I might take part that I thought were allowed well inside the game's rules but find myself getting banned for it.
Racism is obviously against the game's rules but is something I'll never take part in, hence it's not relevant to me. The fact that sohkar seems to have got away from it, seemingly scott free is a concern, but I'm more interested in my game than ensuring some random has been adequately punished. WTF did I just read? |

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
511
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:14:00 -
[1293] - Quote
Tor Norman wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Tor Norman wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:The fact that most of the people are actively ignoring that part (as you are) is rather interesting. I'm not actively ignoring it. The warning issue is more concerning to me than sohkar's punishment. This discussion and its various aspects has spanned thousands of posts already, hence I want to focus my discussion on what I feel is more important. Ah, the racism and IRL threats arent important to you then. I get it No, they're not relevant to me.
Ah, they dont AFFECT you so theyre not important.
You want a shovel? PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
113
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:20:00 -
[1294] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Ah, they dont AFFECT you so theyre not important.
You want a shovel? " I engage in content generation and emergent game play. On one hand, emergent game play is condoned by CCP, such as miner bumping. On another, it's a permabannable offence, such as the bonus room. I would have considered neither a breach of the game's rules, hence I am concerned I might take part in activities that I thought were allowed well inside the game's rules but find myself getting banned for it.
Racism is obviously against the game's rules but is something I'll never take part in, hence it's not relevant to me. The fact that sohkar seems to have got away from it, seemingly scott free is a concern, but I'm more interested in my game than ensuring some random has been adequately punished."
They're important. By all means pursue and discuss the matter, I have every faith you'll find a way to settle the issue. The part I want to discuss is the part that is of more concern to me.
I don't know why you're pursuing this line of conversation with such zealotry. The bonus room scandal has kicked up a lot of discussion and I don't want to dilute the parts I take part in by engaging in conversation that I don't deem to be the most important and relevant to my own interests.
I've given you the answers to your questions. Now please, let me pursue my line of discussion. I have no issue with you following yours. WTF did I just read? |

H aVo K
Tycheon Industries Northern Associates.
109
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:30:00 -
[1295] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:It's hardly true to say that ero was "immediately" banned, now is it?
It was immediate in that he didn't get warned for his actions.
Question: Would it have made a difference in the outcome if he'd been repentant upon seeing the forum fuckery that followed? |

H aVo K
Tycheon Industries Northern Associates.
109
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:31:00 -
[1296] - Quote
Deep Crust wrote:Lucky it wasn't a minor. I'm willing to bet that if there was a minor involved, then we would all be having a different conversation. Just a matter of time till that happens, as the present rate of "In game fun" that seems to be passed off as "doesn't break any EULA and we can police this all ourselves" mentality shows no sign of slowing down.
THERE IT IS!!!!
I was wondering when someone would break out the "won't someone please think of the children!!!" bullshit that so often precedes new and totally unrelated laws in the US.... |

Revman Zim
Grim Determination Nulli Secunda
237
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:32:00 -
[1297] - Quote
God the trolls are out on this one.
So I have divided this thread up to two kinds of people.
1) Those players that "get it" and understand the difference between SCAMMING and HARASSING.
2) Those players that continue to defend Erotica 1 and try to come up with a hundred different scenarios to defend his actions.
Luckily the former outnumber the latter. As in real life.
BOTTOM LINE: CCP has the right to refuse service to ANYONE that could damage the game or their reputation. Without the consent or the players. Any arguments after that statement is a waste of time.
And if you want to be an asshat, then do so. BUT DON'T RECORD IT AND POST IT FOR ALL TO SEE! We have an example of what happens when you draw attention to your psychosis. |

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
522
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:35:00 -
[1298] - Quote
Tor Norman wrote: On another, it's a permabannable offence, such as the bonus room.
Its not actually, as has been stated
NOW whose having issues following the subject? PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested |

H aVo K
Tycheon Industries Northern Associates.
109
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:35:00 -
[1299] - Quote
Malcanis wrote: I'm very confident that he knew full well that what he was doing was unacceptable to CCP. That was why he was so careful to keep everything that he knew full well was way over the limit out of CCP's direct control, wrongly assuming that this would save him.
Not that it mattered after he started getting careless.
I don't follow the miner bumping crowd (I run an indy corp and they're the reason why I have to pay rent instead of just running my operations in hisec), so my apologies if I've got this wrong.... but:
I thought they went out of their way to POST their hijinks/tomfoolery/fuckery/debasery/stuffery/andThingsery? |

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
525
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:37:00 -
[1300] - Quote
Revman Zim wrote:God the trolls are out on this one.
Yeah theyre the ones who dont need CCP to tell us what the rules are
H aVo K wrote:Malcanis wrote: I'm very confident that he knew full well that what he was doing was unacceptable to CCP. That was why he was so careful to keep everything that he knew full well was way over the limit out of CCP's direct control, wrongly assuming that this would save him.
Not that it mattered after he started getting careless.
I don't follow the miner bumping crowd (I run an indy corp and they're the reason why I have to pay rent instead of just running my operations in hisec), so my apologies if I've got this wrong.... but: I thought they went out of their way to POST their hijinks/tomfoolery/fuckery/debasery/stuffery/andThingsery?
Same with Hulkageddon lol PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested |

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
132
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:37:00 -
[1301] - Quote
Revman Zim wrote:
BOTTOM LINE: CCP has the right to refuse service to ANYONE that could damage the game or their reputation. Without the consent or the players. Any arguments after that statement is a waste of time.
And if you want to be an asshat, then do so. BUT DON'T RECORD IT AND POST IT FOR ALL TO SEE! We now have an example of what happens when you draw attention to your psychosis.
So you concede that E1 suffers from psychosis. A guy on the last page said that nobody has the right to ostracize anyone... yet CCP has ostracized E1 because of his mental illness. According to said guy on the previous page, affirming CCP's right to ostracize anyone for any reason is tantamount to being a certain infamous Austrian dictator.
STOP THE MADESS!
BEING AN ******* IS NOT A CRIME! I support un-banning Erotica1
|

Revman Zim
Grim Determination Nulli Secunda
237
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:38:00 -
[1302] - Quote
Revman Zim wrote:God the trolls are out on this one.
So I have divided this thread up to two kinds of people.
1) Those players that "get it" and understand the difference between SCAMMING and HARASSING.
2) Those players that continue to defend Erotica 1 and try to come up with a hundred different scenarios to defend his actions.
Luckily the former outnumber the latter. As in real life.
BOTTOM LINE: CCP has the right to refuse service to ANYONE that could damage the game or their reputation. Without the consent or the players. And no, the lines DO NOT have to be clearly defined. Any arguments to the contray is a waste of time.
And if you want to be an asshat, then do so. BUT DON'T RECORD IT AND POST IT FOR ALL TO SEE! We now have an example of what happens when you draw attention to your psychosis.
Edited for clarity |

Tor Norman
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
119
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:39:00 -
[1303] - Quote
H aVo K wrote:Malcanis wrote: I'm very confident that he knew full well that what he was doing was unacceptable to CCP. That was why he was so careful to keep everything that he knew full well was way over the limit out of CCP's direct control, wrongly assuming that this would save him.
Not that it mattered after he started getting careless.
I don't follow the miner bumping crowd (I run an indy corp and they're the reason why I have to pay rent instead of just running my operations in hisec), so my apologies if I've got this wrong.... but: I thought they went out of their way to POST their hijinks/tomfoolery/fuckery/debasery/stuffery/andThingsery? That's a part of my reasoning, too. If they thought that they were hiding evidence from CCP, why would they publicize it? Hardly the actions of someone thinking they're breaking the rules. WTF did I just read? |

H aVo K
Tycheon Industries Northern Associates.
115
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:42:00 -
[1304] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Yes because blowing up space pixels is really socially, morally and ethically unacceptable.
Apparently it is, provided someone gets upset enough over having their space pixels blown up that they start to "lose emotional control".
If someone comes into my space with a hulk and starts mining, and I blow them up. I'm okay.
If they do it repeatedly and start losing their mind and claiming that I'm harassing them, does that mean I have to stop?
If I don't, and they're "clearly losing emotional control" (but still too stupid to stop bringing hulks into my null sec system), am I now obligated to let them mine in peace in my system? Because this null bear would be more inclined to blow them up again and say something to the effect of "are you an idiot? Go mine somewhere else ffs" before podding them.
Should I then expect a ban? |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1045
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:44:00 -
[1305] - Quote
Tor Norman wrote:H aVo K wrote:Malcanis wrote: I'm very confident that he knew full well that what he was doing was unacceptable to CCP. That was why he was so careful to keep everything that he knew full well was way over the limit out of CCP's direct control, wrongly assuming that this would save him.
Not that it mattered after he started getting careless.
I don't follow the miner bumping crowd (I run an indy corp and they're the reason why I have to pay rent instead of just running my operations in hisec), so my apologies if I've got this wrong.... but: I thought they went out of their way to POST their hijinks/tomfoolery/fuckery/debasery/stuffery/andThingsery? That's a part of my reasoning, too. If they thought that they were hiding evidence from CCP, why would they publicize it? Hardly the actions of someone thinking they're breaking the rules. Do the other actions cross that line of directly bringing the victim into a forum just for the point of further mockery after the in game scam is already complete? That draws a distinct difference between posting about past escapades and the bonus room. |

Danalee
Oberon Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
841
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:49:00 -
[1306] - Quote
Revman Zim wrote:God the Bears and CSM fanclub members are out on this one.
So I have divided this thread up to two kinds of people.
1) Those players that "get it" and understand unwritten rules can't be considered broken untill the would be perpetrator is made aware of it.
2) Those players that continue to attack Erotica 1 and try to come up with a hundred different scenarios to say how someone who asks you to sing songs might aswel drop the charade and start the waterboarding.
Luckily the former outnumber the latter. As in real life.
BOTTOM LINE: CCP can not refuse service to paying custommers who abide by the written rules. If CCP feels someone is crossing an imaginary boundary in their sandbox they can open dialogue with who they percieve as perpetrator by means of talking, warning and if that fails banning.
And if you want to be an asshat, then do so. It's the one and only unique selling point we have left over all the other carebear PC crap that is available. We can't expect new players to read all forum posts and blogs by CSM members to know how much of a villain they can be. FIXED!
D.
 HTFU, in moderation ofcourse. If perchance the above statement has rustled a CSM's jimmies, I respectfully beg of him/her not to blog about it nor pressurize CCP to ban me. |

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
527
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:51:00 -
[1307] - Quote
H aVo K wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Yes because blowing up space pixels is really socially, morally and ethically unacceptable. Apparently it is, provided someone gets upset enough over having their space pixels blown up that they start to "lose emotional control". If someone comes into my space with a hulk and starts mining, and I blow them up. I'm okay. If they do it repeatedly and start losing their mind and claiming that I'm harassing them, does that mean I have to stop? If I don't, and they're "clearly losing emotional control" (but still too stupid to stop bringing hulks into my null sec system), am I now obligated to let them mine in peace in my system? Because this null bear would be more inclined to blow them up again and say something to the effect of "are you an idiot? Go mine somewhere else ffs" before podding them. Should I then expect a ban?
Better question, if they keep coming into your territory and you keep blowing them up, they get pissed and you have to stop, you lose your territory to them. New form of territory control! PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested |

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
134
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:53:00 -
[1308] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote: Do the other actions cross that line of directly bringing the victim into a forum just for the point of further mockery after the in game scam is already complete? That draws a distinct difference between posting about past escapades and the bonus room.
So if you fall for my isk-doubling scam, and I later invite you into a convo with some corpies and we tell you how stupid that was of you, I should be banned?
This "kinder, gentler Eve" is a reverse course from a model that has kept this game surviving for 10 years, something not many MMOs can claim. This game caters (or DID cater) to a certain demographic, people who like a certain harshness in their virtual world. CCP, IT WORKED FOR YOU, DIDNT IT? Havent you stayed in business for 10 years with things the way they have always been?
I dont think it's an overstatement to say that CCP's knee-jerk reaction to this fiasco is shaking the very foundations of Eve, and I dont think it's a wise business decision, given the long term success that CCP has had with Eve being a harsh and cold environment. Apparently lots of people liked it that way. For 10 years.
By all means, CCP, bite the hands that have fed you for 10 years. It'll be interesting to see where this all goes.
BEING AN ******* IS NOT A CRIME! I support un-banning Erotica1
|

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
527
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:54:00 -
[1309] - Quote
Danalee wrote:Revman Zim wrote:God the Bears and CSM fanclub members are out on this one.
So I have divided this thread up to two kinds of people.
1) Those players that "get it" and understand unwritten rules can't be considered broken untill the would be perpetrator is made aware of it.
2) Those players that continue to attack Erotica 1 and try to come up with a hundred different scenarios to say how someone who asks you to sing songs might aswel drop the charade and start the waterboarding.
Luckily the former outnumber the latter. As in real life.
BOTTOM LINE: CCP can not refuse service to paying custommers who abide by the written rules. If CCP feels someone is crossing an imaginary boundary in their sandbox they can open dialogue with who they percieve as perpetrator by means of talking, warning and if that fails banning.
And if you want to be an asshat, then do so. It's the one and only unique selling point we have left over all the other carebear PC crap that is available. We can't expect new players to read all forum posts and blogs by CSM members to know how much of a villain they can be. FIXED! D. 
Oh I wanna like this five times!
PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested |

Toshiro Ozuwara
Crimson Serpent Syndicate
627
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:57:00 -
[1310] - Quote
I see the tears are still flowing today. They thought they could get away.-áNot today, it's not the way that this kid plays.
GRRR Gallente |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1046
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:57:00 -
[1311] - Quote
H aVo K wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:Yes because blowing up space pixels is really socially, morally and ethically unacceptable. Apparently it is, provided someone gets upset enough over having their space pixels blown up that they start to "lose emotional control". If someone comes into my space with a hulk and starts mining, and I blow them up. I'm okay. If they do it repeatedly and start losing their mind and claiming that I'm harassing them, does that mean I have to stop? If I don't, and they're "clearly losing emotional control" (but still too stupid to stop bringing hulks into my null sec system), am I now obligated to let them mine in peace in my system? Because this null bear would be more inclined to blow them up again and say something to the effect of "are you an idiot? Go mine somewhere else ffs" before podding them. Should I then expect a ban? Do we have an example of this actually taking place? Right now it seems more like the hyperbolic response of people who like to take statements to their logical extremes despite the very clear intent of the words.
We all know people as a general rule don't like getting their stuff blown up, but doing so has not to my knowledge been an offense. Even the grey area that was bumping was, according to James315, legitimized by attaching the extortion of isk to the act. Emotional responses as a result of gameplay wasn't an issue here or there, but acts purely for the sake of harassment were and still are. |

Revman Zim
Grim Determination Nulli Secunda
237
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 20:57:00 -
[1312] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Danalee wrote:Revman Zim wrote:God the Bears and CSM fanclub members are out on this one.
So I have divided this thread up to two kinds of people.
1) Those players that "get it" and understand unwritten rules can't be considered broken untill the would be perpetrator is made aware of it.
2) Those players that continue to attack Erotica 1 and try to come up with a hundred different scenarios to say how someone who asks you to sing songs might aswel drop the charade and start the waterboarding.
Luckily the former outnumber the latter. As in real life.
BOTTOM LINE: CCP can not refuse service to paying custommers who abide by the written rules. If CCP feels someone is crossing an imaginary boundary in their sandbox they can open dialogue with who they percieve as perpetrator by means of talking, warning and if that fails banning.
And if you want to be an asshat, then do so. It's the one and only unique selling point we have left over all the other carebear PC crap that is available. We can't expect new players to read all forum posts and blogs by CSM members to know how much of a villain they can be. FIXED! D.  Oh I wanna like this five times!
You are incorrect. CCP can refuse service to anyone they want. Whether you think they broke a rule or not. You need to read the EULA and TOS. |

Danalee
Oberon Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
842
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 21:04:00 -
[1313] - Quote
Revman Zim wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Danalee wrote:Revman Zim wrote:God the Bears and CSM fanclub members are out on this one.
So I have divided this thread up to two kinds of people.
1) Those players that "get it" and understand unwritten rules can't be considered broken untill the would be perpetrator is made aware of it.
2) Those players that continue to attack Erotica 1 and try to come up with a hundred different scenarios to say how someone who asks you to sing songs might aswel drop the charade and start the waterboarding.
Luckily the former outnumber the latter. As in real life.
BOTTOM LINE: CCP can not refuse service to paying custommers who abide by the written rules. If CCP feels someone is crossing an imaginary boundary in their sandbox they can open dialogue with who they percieve as perpetrator by means of talking, warning and if that fails banning.
And if you want to be an asshat, then do so. It's the one and only unique selling point we have left over all the other carebear PC crap that is available. We can't expect new players to read all forum posts and blogs by CSM members to know how much of a villain they can be. FIXED! Oh I wanna like this five times! You are incorrect. CCP can refuse service to anyone they want. Whether you think they broke a rule or not. You need to read the EULA and TOS.
You mean wether THEY think a rule is broken or not but please quote me where it says CCP can legally steal money from whoever they choose, this will be fun!
D.

HTFU, in moderation ofcourse. If perchance the above statement has rustled a CSM's jimmies, I respectfully beg of him/her not to blog about it nor pressurize CCP to ban me. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1049
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 21:07:00 -
[1314] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote: Do the other actions cross that line of directly bringing the victim into a forum just for the point of further mockery after the in game scam is already complete? That draws a distinct difference between posting about past escapades and the bonus room.
So if you fall for my isk-doubling scam, and I later invite you into a convo with some corpies and we tell you how stupid that was of you, I should be banned? Yes, that seems to be the clear message here. Don't do things for the pure sake of emotional provocation.
Edit: Banning outright would depend on severity, but discipline in some fashion is entirely justified.
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:This "kinder, gentler Eve" is a reverse course from a model that has kept this game surviving for 10 years, something not many MMOs can claim. This game caters (or DID cater) to a certain demographic, people who like a certain harshness in their virtual world. CCP, IT WORKED FOR YOU, DIDNT IT? Havent you stayed in business for 10 years with things the way they have always been?
I dont think it's an overstatement to say that CCP's knee-jerk reaction to this fiasco is shaking the very foundations of Eve, and I dont think it's a wise business decision, given the long term success that CCP has had with Eve being a harsh and cold environment. Apparently lots of people liked it that way. For 10 years.
By all means, CCP, bite the hands that have fed you for 10 years. It'll be interesting to see where this all goes. And this is where you fail to grasp the issue. The hashness of the virtual world was accomplished in the scam itself. E1 wasn't banned for that, so clearly that was all in line. If the "kinder, gentler" eve still allows people to wreak unprovoked havoc in the client for reasons largely your own, outside of personal harassment, which has always been against the rules, I could care less if your capacity to seek further jollies by trying to escalate peoples rage fits is impeded.
The community that CCP has been so proud of is actually exactly the opposite of that, a community that can largely leave what goes on in the client in the client and have a sense of community as a whole out of client regardless of what roles we play. It was never about using it as a medium for escalating RL rage. |
|

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2930

|
Posted - 2014.03.31 21:11:00 -
[1315] - Quote
Removed an off topic post. ISD Dorrim Barstorlode Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
529
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 21:12:00 -
[1316] - Quote
Ssabat Thraxx wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote: Do the other actions cross that line of directly bringing the victim into a forum just for the point of further mockery after the in game scam is already complete? That draws a distinct difference between posting about past escapades and the bonus room.
So if you fall for my isk-doubling scam, and I later invite you into a convo with some corpies and we tell you how stupid that was of you, I should be banned? This "kinder, gentler Eve" is a reverse course from a model that has kept this game surviving for 10 years, something not many MMOs can claim. This game caters (or DID cater) to a certain demographic, people who like a certain harshness in their virtual world. CCP, IT WORKED FOR YOU, DIDNT IT? Havent you stayed in business for 10 years with things the way they have always been? I dont think it's an overstatement to say that CCP's knee-jerk reaction to this fiasco is shaking the very foundations of Eve, and I dont think it's a wise business decision, given the long term success that CCP has had with Eve being a harsh and cold environment. Apparently lots of people liked it that way. For 10 years. By all means, CCP, bite the hands that have fed you for 10 years. It'll be interesting to see where this all goes.
THIS. Ask Smedley how well that works out.
Or the guys running MWO
**** no dont ask them anything -.- PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested |

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
529
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 21:13:00 -
[1317] - Quote
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:I see the tears are still flowing today.
Damn it, stop it. My emotions!
PSYCHOTIC MONK (or Erotica1's next alt) for CSM. All gameplay modes should be represented! http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears you will be harvested |

Toshiro Ozuwara
Crimson Serpent Syndicate
627
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 21:15:00 -
[1318] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:I see the tears are still flowing today. Damn it, stop it. My emotions! Keep posting friend. I really believe deep down in my soul you're finally getting your message across. They thought they could get away.-áNot today, it's not the way that this kid plays.
GRRR Gallente |

Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
137
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 21:16:00 -
[1319] - Quote
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:I see the tears are still flowing today.
You see my tears... which means you know I have lost control over my emotions, for I have broken down and cried. I sure hope you're not mocking me, now. DONT CROSS THAT LINE!
I fear for your account, sir.
BEING AN ******* IS NOT A CRIME! I support un-banning Erotica1
|

Qalix
Long Jump.
253
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 21:19:00 -
[1320] - Quote
Danalee wrote:Haha, I see what you did there, play the asshat/douchebag to prove you were wrong in thinking that's not exactly what being a villain can entail  Well played. Now, was there a warning to Erotica 1 on the bonus room, yes or no? If yes: I can finally go work in my garden as I've promised to do for the last week. CCP can do whatever it wants, whenever it wants. It doesn't need your permission or mine. If you don't like their decision, by all means go play some other game that condones and allows such behavior. When you find that game, let us know.
BTW you are quite possibly one of the worst trolls I've ever seen. Srsly. Take notes on the posts of some of the other people in this thread. You have to at least feign a semblance of coherent thought.
What does this mean? "play the asshat/douchebag to prove you were wrong in thinking that's not exactly what being a villain can entail." It's almost like its written in English, but not quite. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 53 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |