I just multiplied all the null->c6 wormhole counts by 100, I hope this meets your expectations!

I just multiplied all the null->c6 wormhole counts by 100, I hope this meets your expectations!

I just multiplied all the null->c6 wormhole counts by 100, I hope this meets your expectations!

I just multiplied all the null->c6 wormhole counts by 100, I hope this meets your expectations!

They were at 0 weren't they...

hah greyscale. maybe you deserve that named Dust vehicle.

I thought trolling on the forums was prohibited.

( 0 x 100 = 0 for all those not getting it )

I'm terrible with the LAV, I always end up upside down :/

(If you will ask for silly things, I reserve the right to give a silly response. Sorry if I got anyone excited!)

I just multiplied all the null->c6 wormhole counts by 100, I hope this meets your expectations!

I wasn't having a serious dig at you i just found it funny that people on the wormhole sub-form have been asking for something like this for a while now but you guys come along and add it for k-space only, like it's nothing.

If it's silly to want wormhole content to be improved and expanded on for the first time since apocrypha, i apologize.

[Edit] Also, to be clear, the thing that I was (very much tongue-in-cheek) suggesting was "silly" was *more* C6-Null wormholes, when there aren't any in the first place :) The request for more w-space connectivity in general is something we'd very much like to respond to with changes, as we think it's a good idea.

Am I mistaken? I'm pretty sure we get direct-to-nullsec wormholes from the c6 now and again. Or was that when we were in a c5?

I double-checked before making the earlier post :) C5s, yes, C6s should only connect to w-space.

I thought trolling on the forums was prohibited.

( 0 x 100 = 0 for all those not getting it )

I just multiplied all the null->c6 wormhole counts by 100, I hope this meets your expectations!

Regarding the "small fleet" angle of these holes, is it possible to mass-limit these types of holes so that they are primarily used for pvp, instead of as logistics shortcuts for freighters?

OK that would explain why the c5 was more fun.

In that case, I'll revise my request. Could we have some 0-sec direct wormholes from c6 space please? It's lonely out here!

I just multiplied all the null->c6 wormhole counts by 100, I hope this meets your expectations!

Any chance of these wormholes having a means of identifying just how far away they go? E.g. a dark red wormhole's exit would be within ~X lightyear radius, whereas a bright blue/white wormhole would exit, far, far, far away.

I ask because jumping into random wormholes gets a bit tedious.

Or maybe a skill/module that provides some analysis of the wormhole's exit, on the grounds we've had enough experience with wormholes to tease out some of the science behind them?

I double-checked before making the earlier post :) C5s, yes, C6s should only connect to w-space.

1. Use the "look at" function on the hole
2. Compare to http://i.imgur.com/NdLDTVL.jpg
3. Profit

1. Use the "look at" function on the hole
2. Compare to http://i.imgur.com/NdLDTVL.jpg
3. Profit

Regarding the "small fleet" angle of these holes, is it possible to mass-limit these types of holes so that they are primarily used for pvp, instead of as logistics shortcuts for freighters?

who the hell flies freighters in low sec, get a jump freighter, Also I think we see enough frig and destroyer fleets in low, these new WHs could be used for battleship and battle-cruiser fleets to move around and attack others without being swarmed by frigates. Not to mention money making opportunities day tripping to null without hitting gate-camps that are at the choke points of almost every null entrance minus the ones 15-30 jumps in low sec.

Quoting this so he is held accountable!