| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Sibyyl
Gallente Federation
2645
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 03:17:00 -
[181] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:I think you can spin this with semantics any way you want. The intent here is meant to insult the person not playing your way by calling them cowards. The rage against carebears isn't that they are "role-playing cowards", it is the attitude that these players have that drive you to say such hateful drivel against them. And Kaarous is no new face at this.
Not everyone finds douchbaggery acceptable behavior. And the kicker is this doesn't make them cowards for thinking this way. Look, EVE is a game and people get invested into games. Games give us an emotional connection and we all have at times felt very strongly about what's happening in a game. Some of us express things very aggressively, perhaps even in an abrasive manner, to say something about the characters in the game, and the choices people make in the game. Some of us do it in softer tones.
You can argue that these in game characters are connected to the real life people behind them. This is true.. but to some extent, it's fair to say "get over it". For those instances that it goes too far, CCP has EULA rules specifically defined as "griefing" (a much misused word).
Some of us get frustrated enough to make jovial or very threatening comments about real life. I think that no matter how comedic such comments are, they are a totally inappropriate reaction to anything that may happen in a game.
I hope you are able to see the difference between the two. People make heated in-game comments about EVE, its players, and their playstyles because EVE is a niche game, and niche games that are sustainable for 11+ years are incredibly hard to find. As long as these people aren't attacking anything about you in RL, I'm not sure why you can't just "get over it" and argue the points they are making? .. when everything else is gone .. |

rswfire
Firesworn Nation
180
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 03:20:00 -
[182] - Quote
Nathaniel Raynaud wrote:... pressuring people to change their playstyle is changing gameplay, though. an enormous amount of eve's content is created by the players, and trying to manipulate the way people play space jerk simulator 2k14 for the greater good is just silly
Isn't that exactly what many of the "griefers" do to miners and others in this game? Isn't that pretty much a stated goal for many of them?
At any rate, in response to the op, I don't think Eve has as wide of a reputation as many think. I knew nothing at all about Eve when I started, and whenever I mentioned Eve to the people I know, they have never even heard of it. And it's not for lack of gaming. I have hundreds of games on Steam and plenty of friends on there. Eve is fortunate that it still remains on the fringes because it still has an opportunity to redeem itself.
That said, we all play this game because we're getting something out of it. I think it's fair to say Eve is a unique community and even though I dislike a lot of the things that some people do in it, I think it is a better game for allowing it. I think in some ways it does have a very realistic parallel to real life, but it's not well-balanced. Many people argue Eve advertises itself with slogans like "Be the villain" but they always neglect to point out those exact same ads also say "Be the hero."
We just need more of the latter; then, I feel, Eve would have more interesting things going for it. About Us .|. Facebook .|. Google+ .|. Steam .|. Twitter .|. Youtube |

Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
1122
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 03:28:00 -
[183] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Goldiiee wrote:And Kaarous Aldurald get rid of the persecution complex, this dynamic does lend itself to balance, if the game gets to many predators and not enough prey, just like in all habitats, the predators die off with no food to eat and the prey repopulates in relative saftey. The person who has posted all about the "society of takers" ruining the game for all the "victims" doesn't get to tell anyone else that they have a persecution complex. You're quite literally acting one out right now for us. I mean, if things were in any way what you were describing, where we're over hunting our prey, you'd think we would end up with less ALODs, less afk miners, and less autopiloting freighers. Instead of more. There are so many people out there worth killing that I couldn't even clean out Molden Heath if I had a CONCORD battleship. You guys literally choke the spacelanes in some systems *cough Jita* and you think there are "too many predators"? I was simply describing an Eco System and how that can become unbalanced, I also stated how it would rebalance itself. I never said there were too many gankers or that there were too many carebears, just that if a Risk/Reward activity is unbalanced it would attract more players to that activity.
You make a lot of assumptions off a simple mathematical theory.
Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
7891
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 03:31:00 -
[184] - Quote
Goldiiee wrote: You make a lot of assumptions off a simple mathematical theory.
More like I've heard more than enough snide suggestions hidden behind "concern" in my lifetime.
Especially when you predicate it with the assumption that the first guy who scams or steals is only because he sucks at everything else. Your opinion isn't even well hidden. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Clean Up Local 2014.-á |

Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
1122
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 03:34:00 -
[185] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Goldiiee wrote: You make a lot of assumptions off a simple mathematical theory.
More like I've heard more than enough snide suggestions hidden behind "concern" in my lifetime. Especially when you predicate it with the assumption that the first guy who scams or steals is only because he sucks at everything else. Your opinion isn't even well hidden. Read; ''one of them fails at this miserably (Or is miserable doing it) ''
It's the only thing your being asked to do right now, so focus and read all the words.
Things that keep me up at night;-á Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state,-áOnce you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another. |

KIller Wabbit
The Scope Gallente Federation
642
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 03:36:00 -
[186] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:KIller Wabbit wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:You see that as a problem OP, I see it as EVE working as intended, weeding out the weak minded "I am a hero!!!" type gamers who wouldn't like EVE anyway, even beofre they try (and fail at) the game. That's most of the gaming world, hell, it's most of humanity. Yep. CCP doesn't need their money. Anyone seen a legit subscriber count in a while? No? Didn't CCP brag, errr, publish that number every year? Well, the wiki entry for EVE says that the subscriber numbers were officially released in December of 2013. So it hasn't been released yet. Last year was an exception that we heard about early since they hit a nice milestone. But if you think you can interpret silence as being support for your agenda, you are a long way off, Scope.
Thanks! Here's looking forward to December 2014, if the doors are still open.
I guess the number usually released with the CSM election was just overlooked.
But who cares? Subscriber numbers mean nothing to content, right? It's those pesky login's creating content.
CCP .. always first with the wrong stuff CSM .. CCP Shills with a vacation plan
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
7891
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 03:39:00 -
[187] - Quote
KIller Wabbit wrote: Thanks! Here's looking forward to December 2014, if the doors are still open.
You heard it here first, folks. EVE dead by 2015 or earlier. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Clean Up Local 2014.-á |

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
15303
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 03:40:00 -
[188] - Quote
KIller Wabbit wrote:Thanks! Here's looking forward to December 2014, if the doors are still open. I guess the number usually released with the CSM election was just overlooked. But who cares? Subscriber numbers mean nothing to content, right? It's those pesky login's creating content.
I don't know about you guys, but im convinced. Lets all hold hands and jump feet first into the biomass grinder together. Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |

Guttripper
State War Academy Caldari State
487
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 03:45:00 -
[189] - Quote
If Eve dies, then life will go on...
...at least for most of us. |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
7250
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 04:06:00 -
[190] - Quote
KIller Wabbit wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:You see that as a problem OP, I see it as EVE working as intended, weeding out the weak minded "I am a hero!!!" type gamers who wouldn't like EVE anyway, even beofre they try (and fail at) the game. That's most of the gaming world, hell, it's most of humanity. Yep. CCP doesn't need their money. Anyone seen a legit subscriber count in a while? No? Didn't CCP brag, errr, publish that number every year?
CCP never needed 'their' money, they need money from people who would actually like EVE. CCP could do a better job at reaching out to such people, probably at prisons and biker bars. |

Guttripper
State War Academy Caldari State
488
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 04:15:00 -
[191] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:CCP never needed 'their' money, they need money from people who would actually like EVE. CCP could do a better job at reaching out to such people, probably at prisons and biker bars. In hindsight, I wonder what kind of game Eve would be today if the original ambiance and intended lore stayed with the game instead of being phased out. That is, the transportation and usage of drugs in high sec space, finding "prostitutes", and other aspects found in the old Chronicles brought forth into the game. But instead, we now have a warning label on the opening screen, the dark and seedy side of the game is basically removed, and CCP keeps attempting to dumb the game down to attract a lower and lower denominator since things like industry and new player experiences are just too rough for newbies now-a-days. |

Lady Areola Fappington
2064
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 04:49:00 -
[192] - Quote
Guttripper wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:CCP never needed 'their' money, they need money from people who would actually like EVE. CCP could do a better job at reaching out to such people, probably at prisons and biker bars. In hindsight, I wonder what kind of game Eve would be today if the original ambiance and intended lore stayed with the game instead of being phased out. That is, the transportation and usage of drugs in high sec space, finding "prostitutes", and other aspects found in the old Chronicles brought forth into the game. But instead, we now have a warning label on the opening screen, the dark and seedy side of the game is basically removed, and CCP keeps attempting to dumb the game down to attract a lower and lower denominator since things like industry and new player experiences are just too rough for newbies now-a-days.
I want my transparent Gallente dresses back plz. This thread officially has 25% more pssssssshhh than leading competitors. Rick Moranis was never put on death row for shrinking his children. New York exists outside the mind of Billy Joel. A French press is not lifting weights with your tongue out. Lena Dunham is not a girl ventriloquist. |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5551
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 04:59:00 -
[193] - Quote
Goldiiee wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Goldiiee wrote:And Kaarous Aldurald get rid of the persecution complex, this dynamic does lend itself to balance, if the game gets to many predators and not enough prey, just like in all habitats, the predators die off with no food to eat and the prey repopulates in relative saftey. The person who has posted all about the "society of takers" ruining the game for all the "victims" doesn't get to tell anyone else that they have a persecution complex. You're quite literally acting one out right now for us. I mean, if things were in any way what you were describing, where we're over hunting our prey, you'd think we would end up with less ALODs, less afk miners, and less autopiloting freighers. Instead of more. There are so many people out there worth killing that I couldn't even clean out Molden Heath if I had a CONCORD battleship. You guys literally choke the spacelanes in some systems *cough Jita* and you think there are "too many predators"? I was simply describing an Eco System and how that can become unbalanced, I also stated how it would rebalance itself. I never said there were too many gankers or that there were too many carebears, just that if a Risk/Reward activity is unbalanced it would attract more players to that activity. You make a lot of assumptions off a simple mathematical theory.
Thing is, the ecosystem doesn't actually rebalance itself. What happens is we get dozens of threads like this one & CCP goes off & makes a really stupid change to the game. After that the casual bad guys leave or go AFK ratting or whatever, & the career bad guys adapt so efficiently that more threads are posted. If you think this sounds familiar, it is. This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal & proud member of the popular gay hookup site, somethingawful.com |

Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari End of Life
2086
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 05:00:00 -
[194] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:I want my transparent Gallente dresses back plz. Yeah. I'd wear one of those.
Um, well not on this character. Ok, I'll get my coat on the way out. Hope it isn't see through too.
Come Win At Eve - Join The Vendunari
. -á<- Argue this, not this ->-á( -í-¦ -£-û -í-¦) |

Tauranon
Weeesearch Greater Western Co-Prosperity Sphere
1103
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 05:19:00 -
[195] - Quote
Goldiiee wrote:
It's not that CCP has given the Asylum keys to the patients, well maybe it is exactly like that, but that was probably not the original intent. But it is what we have now, and new players are more and more likely to be victims since the demographic is prone to unbalance in the side of predators and not to the builders/explorers.
EVE was designed to be a cold dark place and since then the sheer layering on of compromises to suit people who don't or won't accept that has bent the vision pretty badly if you can no longer see it at all.
In any case EVE has proven one thing, the only good solution to pve item flooding is not treadmilling new content, it's rampant object destruction.
Everything you value in this game is valued because of the risk of acquisition or loss. Incursion fittings and ships particularly. |

Naburi NasNaburi
A Little Peculiar borealis
219
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 05:40:00 -
[196] - Quote
EVE is perfect the way it is .. we dont need a *all nice superhero fluffy puff reputation* here.
|

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
12362
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 06:28:00 -
[197] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:KIller Wabbit wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:You see that as a problem OP, I see it as EVE working as intended, weeding out the weak minded "I am a hero!!!" type gamers who wouldn't like EVE anyway, even beofre they try (and fail at) the game. That's most of the gaming world, hell, it's most of humanity. Yep. CCP doesn't need their money. Anyone seen a legit subscriber count in a while? No? Didn't CCP brag, errr, publish that number every year? CCP never needed 'their' money, they need money from people who would actually like EVE. CCP could do a better job at reaching out to such people, probably at prisons and biker bars.
That money doesn't exist.
I have seen all these arguments before with SWG. That game shows that the fabled bigger playerbase does not exist and ripping out the core of a game only results in that game losing its current player base and going belly up. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

Remiel Pollard
The Vigilance Institute
3915
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 06:35:00 -
[198] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:KIller Wabbit wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:You see that as a problem OP, I see it as EVE working as intended, weeding out the weak minded "I am a hero!!!" type gamers who wouldn't like EVE anyway, even beofre they try (and fail at) the game. That's most of the gaming world, hell, it's most of humanity. Yep. CCP doesn't need their money. Anyone seen a legit subscriber count in a while? No? Didn't CCP brag, errr, publish that number every year? CCP never needed 'their' money, they need money from people who would actually like EVE. CCP could do a better job at reaching out to such people, probably at prisons and biker bars. That money doesn't exist. I have seen all these arguments before with SWG. That game shows that the fabled bigger playerbase does not exist and ripping out the core of a game only results in that game losing its current player base and going belly up.
Exactly this. I went over how intended audiences work on another thread. For every intended audience, there's an unintended audience that will try it out anyway. Some will become the intended audience by virtue of enjoying what they're trying and adapting to it, but many of the unintended audience will quit. EVE's reputation is attractive to its intended audience, and its intended audience are the ones who develop passion for the game, ergo, the unintended audience who might find this reputation to be a put-off was never gonna stick around anyway, in which case, the reputation is doing us all a huge favour by driving away the players who won't develop said passion and contribute nothing to the EVE community dynamic anyway, except their butthurt tears. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita.
People complain about how 'empty' space is. Personally, I would be complaining if it were more 'full'.
|

Myxx
751
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 06:38:00 -
[199] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:KIller Wabbit wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:You see that as a problem OP, I see it as EVE working as intended, weeding out the weak minded "I am a hero!!!" type gamers who wouldn't like EVE anyway, even beofre they try (and fail at) the game. That's most of the gaming world, hell, it's most of humanity. Yep. CCP doesn't need their money. Anyone seen a legit subscriber count in a while? No? Didn't CCP brag, errr, publish that number every year? CCP never needed 'their' money, they need money from people who would actually like EVE. CCP could do a better job at reaching out to such people, probably at prisons and biker bars. That money doesn't exist. I have seen all these arguments before with SWG. That game shows that the fabled bigger playerbase does not exist and ripping out the core of a game only results in that game losing its current player base and going belly up. You're right. EVE is on the path that it is. Can't turn back at this point. Hence why I'm not suggesting a 180 turn like with Galaxies.
What I am saying is: people that play EVE should probably work on being a nicer kind of ******* to one another. |

Hasikan Miallok
Republic University Minmatar Republic
964
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 06:40:00 -
[200] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Guttripper wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:CCP never needed 'their' money, they need money from people who would actually like EVE. CCP could do a better job at reaching out to such people, probably at prisons and biker bars. In hindsight, I wonder what kind of game Eve would be today if the original ambiance and intended lore stayed with the game instead of being phased out. That is, the transportation and usage of drugs in high sec space, finding "prostitutes", and other aspects found in the old Chronicles brought forth into the game. But instead, we now have a warning label on the opening screen, the dark and seedy side of the game is basically removed, and CCP keeps attempting to dumb the game down to attract a lower and lower denominator since things like industry and new player experiences are just too rough for newbies now-a-days. I want my transparent Gallente dresses back plz.
translucent
translucent > transparent
watch Star Trek |

Remiel Pollard
The Vigilance Institute
3916
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 06:41:00 -
[201] - Quote
Myxx wrote:baltec1 wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:KIller Wabbit wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:You see that as a problem OP, I see it as EVE working as intended, weeding out the weak minded "I am a hero!!!" type gamers who wouldn't like EVE anyway, even beofre they try (and fail at) the game. That's most of the gaming world, hell, it's most of humanity. Yep. CCP doesn't need their money. Anyone seen a legit subscriber count in a while? No? Didn't CCP brag, errr, publish that number every year? CCP never needed 'their' money, they need money from people who would actually like EVE. CCP could do a better job at reaching out to such people, probably at prisons and biker bars. That money doesn't exist. I have seen all these arguments before with SWG. That game shows that the fabled bigger playerbase does not exist and ripping out the core of a game only results in that game losing its current player base and going belly up. You're right. EVE is on the path that it is. Can't turn back at this point. Hence why I'm not suggesting a 180 turn like with Galaxies. What I am saying is: people that play EVE should probably work on being a nicer kind of ******* to one another.
We're very nice to one another. Until someone starts getting overly rambunctious and starts taking gameplay personally. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita.
People complain about how 'empty' space is. Personally, I would be complaining if it were more 'full'.
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
7906
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 06:43:00 -
[202] - Quote
Myxx wrote: You're right. EVE is on the path that it is. Can't turn back at this point. Hence why I'm not suggesting a 180 turn like with Galaxies.
What I am saying is: people that play EVE should probably work on being a nicer kind of ******* to one another.
Sure, the second they stop spewing death threats and sexual insults in local when someone uses the "P word". "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Clean Up Local 2014.-á |

Mithandra
Serene Vendetta Brawls Deep
74
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 06:53:00 -
[203] - Quote
Eve has a problem with its reputation....
Seriously?
EVE is the dark haired, totally hot emo gothchild of the gaming community.
Shunned by the Ignorati, the emotionally stunted, and vapid pink clad bimbettes, she doesn't give a ****, because as she sashays down the corridors of the gaming community singing to a tune only she understands, she knows that with a look and a crooked smile, she could own them all heart and eternal soul.
|

Harrison Tato
Yamato Holdings
87
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 06:54:00 -
[204] - Quote
Posting in a stealth "I'm an Alpha Nerd because I play EVE" thread. |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5555
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 06:56:00 -
[205] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Myxx wrote: You're right. EVE is on the path that it is. Can't turn back at this point. Hence why I'm not suggesting a 180 turn like with Galaxies.
What I am saying is: people that play EVE should probably work on being a nicer kind of ******* to one another.
Sure, the second they stop spewing death threats and sexual insults in local when someone uses the "P word".
Nah, that adds flavour. I awoxed a bunch of Orca's one night & the husband/wife combo that ran the corp accussed me of raping their daughter irl. You just don't get that level of crazy anywhere else. This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal & proud member of the popular gay hookup site, somethingawful.com |

Remiel Pollard
The Vigilance Institute
3918
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 07:04:00 -
[206] - Quote
Mithandra wrote:Eve has a problem with its reputation....
Seriously?
EVE is the dark haired, totally hot emo gothchild of the gaming community.
Shunned by the Ignorati, the emotionally stunted, and vapid pink clad bimbettes, she doesn't give a ****, because as she sashays down the corridors of the gaming community singing to a tune only she understands, she knows that with a look and a crooked smile, she could own them all heart and eternal soul.
This guy gets it. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita.
People complain about how 'empty' space is. Personally, I would be complaining if it were more 'full'.
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Deep Space The ROC
7906
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 07:07:00 -
[207] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Myxx wrote: You're right. EVE is on the path that it is. Can't turn back at this point. Hence why I'm not suggesting a 180 turn like with Galaxies.
What I am saying is: people that play EVE should probably work on being a nicer kind of ******* to one another.
Sure, the second they stop spewing death threats and sexual insults in local when someone uses the "P word". Nah, that adds flavour. I awoxed a bunch of Orca's one night & the husband/wife combo that ran the corp accussed me of raping their daughter irl. You just don't get that level of crazy anywhere else.
Oh, I don't exactly mind their ranting, but of late it's taken on an irl level that bothers me. I've been doxxed in the past, and pretty badly, so the irl stuff rubs me the wrong way.
Of course, that just motivates me to ramp it up once they start. Pretty sure the last guy won't be forgetting me for a while. I stole a plex from their corp hangar(seriously, who puts those in there?), a bunch of skillbooks and about 200 million units of trit, which I destroyed. Although I bet the next time he makes a corp he won't set corp shares to public. "Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
Clean Up Local 2014.-á |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
5450
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 07:12:00 -
[208] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:EvE's reputation is one of its biggest, if not the biggest, selling point
This.
There are millions of players who love to play "politically correct", traditional style, sword and board games.
Then there's the only MMO that caters to "the others", that takes its pride at being different.
Not by random chance, the MMOs catering to the former are all flattened around FEW titles, one of which still holding strong and killing the imitations. The MMO catering to the latter has no relevant competition and actually survives despite its age and flaws also because of that.
So, make EvE switch sides and become "like all the others" and it will fail like most of the others, it'll lose many years loyal players who don't identify themselves with the major numbers while not attracting enough of the traditional players (who don't even care about space sci fi).
EvE can either die a quick death by flipping sides, or slowly age and fade by staying true. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Emination of Haxti
Imperial Collective Unsettled.
12
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 08:18:00 -
[209] - Quote
All the reputation issues stem from hi sec, the home of the douchebags and ****** mechanics.
Solution: remove hisec.
|

Kiryen O'Bannon
Thrall Nation Brave Collective
113
|
Posted - 2014.07.15 08:22:00 -
[210] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Goldiiee wrote:And Kaarous Aldurald get rid of the persecution complex, this dynamic does lend itself to balance, if the game gets to many predators and not enough prey, just like in all habitats, the predators die off with no food to eat and the prey repopulates in relative saftey. The person who has posted all about the "society of takers" ruining the game for all the "victims" doesn't get to tell anyone else that they have a persecution complex. You're quite literally acting one out right now for us. I mean, if things were in any way what you were describing, where we're over hunting our prey, you'd think we would end up with less ALODs, less afk miners, and less autopiloting freighers. Instead of more. There are so many people out there worth killing that I couldn't even clean out Molden Heath if I had a CONCORD battleship. You guys literally choke the spacelanes in some systems *cough Jita* and you think there are "too many predators"?
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 15 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |