Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 .. 81 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 18 post(s) |
JTK Fotheringham
Infinity Engine Sleeping Dragons
72
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 01:22:00 -
[1951] - Quote
Arya Regnar wrote:By that I mean please stop trolling as you obviously have an agenda that benefits from these changes staying. Good for you but I'd like wormholes not dead.
No I don't.
JTK Fotheringham wrote: -1 for the changes. Please implement a fix. I'd settle for a mini-jump-drive, for caps only, that moves you 10km forward, and eats a chunk of your cap.
But I do have a huge problem with idiotic comments that are only going to drive CCP Devs deeper into the bunker of denial.
|
Rroff
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
791
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 01:43:00 -
[1952] - Quote
JTK Fotheringham wrote: But I do have a huge problem with idiotic comments that are only going to drive CCP Devs deeper into the bunker of denial.
Edit: You're the second person to accuse me of trolling. I think the WH community is poorly served by mouth pieces - like yourself and epicurus ataraxia - who feel they need ad hom attacks to silence slightly dissonant voices. Disappointed.
While I agree with your viewpoint I can quite understand the disappointment that has resulted to some people resorting to it, I've had to go back and edit a few of my posts several times before hitting post. I like a lot of the work Fozzie does but I just can't understand this one, the reasoning behind it is completely lost to me and I don't understand why this thread has turned out the way it has even before anyone resorted to less than polite/less than constructive posting. |
JTK Fotheringham
Infinity Engine Sleeping Dragons
72
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 01:46:00 -
[1953] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote: We wish to discuss the mass spawn jump "luck mechanic" and it's effect on the game, your personal attacks and selective quoting are purely disruptive, an attempt to derail the forum into chaos, and not welcome.
Stealth edit is stealthy. You might win a coconut for trying to make yourself look smarter than you are.
I've made a suggestion about fixing the "luck" mechanic - something I've not seen you do... just more words about how upset you are that CCP have stolen your sweeties, and run roughshod over Chinese and Islamic culture in the dark ages (that's a reference to your silly comment about CCP looking like Atilla the Hun).
JTK Fotheringham wrote: -1 for the changes. Please implement a fix. I'd settle for a mini-jump-drive, for caps only, that moves you 10km forward, and eats a chunk of your cap.
And as for personal attacks, you're the one who resorted to the ad hom first... "Troll". Well done.
|
JTK Fotheringham
Infinity Engine Sleeping Dragons
72
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 01:54:00 -
[1954] - Quote
Rroff wrote:
While I agree with your viewpoint I can quite understand the disappointment that has resulted to some people resorting to it, I've had to go back and edit a few of my posts several times before hitting post. I like a lot of the work Fozzie does but I just can't understand this one, the reasoning behind it is completely lost to me and I don't understand why this thread has turned out the way it has even before anyone resorted to less than polite/less than constructive posting.
Thanks for taking the time to try to see where I'm coming from.
I do understand why so many WHers are disappointed... a lot of my own corp are too. I am myself.
But i'm long enough in the toof to understand how the Dev-Player dynamic works in EVE. Threadnaughts aren't effective ways of bringing change - especially not emotionally charged posts like so many in this thread. Subs count more - that's why the post-Incarna changes happened.
Disentangling the emotion, from the reality, we've seen that CCP haven't listened to player feedback to Sisi tests of major features - like the industry screen. I'm just not surprised with the way things have worked out on this expansion - and therefore i'm maybe less inclined to the nerdrage, let alone the badly articulated nerdrage we're seeing in this thread.
We need a constructive response, which some are arguing for. But when prominent WH advocates who normally do a great job jump on the emotional bandwagon, we all lose out.
Thanks again. |
Kirasten
No Vacancies
59
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 02:18:00 -
[1955] - Quote
JTK Fotheringham wrote:Rroff wrote:
While I agree with your viewpoint I can quite understand the disappointment that has resulted to some people resorting to it, I've had to go back and edit a few of my posts several times before hitting post. I like a lot of the work Fozzie does but I just can't understand this one, the reasoning behind it is completely lost to me and I don't understand why this thread has turned out the way it has even before anyone resorted to less than polite/less than constructive posting.
Thanks for taking the time to try to see where I'm coming from. I do understand why so many WHers are disappointed... a lot of my own corp are too. I am myself. But i'm long enough in the toof to understand how the Dev-Player dynamic works in EVE. Threadnaughts aren't effective ways of bringing change - especially not emotionally charged posts like so many in this thread. Subs count more - that's why the post-Incarna changes happened. Disentangling the emotion, from the reality, we've seen that CCP haven't listened to player feedback to Sisi tests of major features - like the industry screen. I'm just not surprised with the way things have worked out on this expansion - and therefore i'm maybe less inclined to the nerdrage, let alone the badly articulated nerdrage we're seeing in this thread. We need a constructive response, which some are arguing for. But when prominent WH advocates who normally do a great job jump on the emotional bandwagon, we all lose out. Thanks again.
I know this thread has de-evolved into something to be ashamed of, but does anyone really think CCP is monitoring this anymore? I certainly don't. When this threadnaught was still in it's infancy, many people gave well thought out and articulate responses. While there were a lot of emotional responses as well, CCP had the responses they we thought they were asking for. Then it appeared that they either ignored them or disagreed and moved forward anyway. This is why i think the responses have gotten much more emotional, and why people are using the word, "betrayed".
They feel betrayed because they had the wrong premise. They felt, myself included, that CCP was interested in whether we liked the change or if there were ways that we could see a version of the change that we would accept. Now I see much more clearly that what they really were asking for were the ways in which the change might break mechanics they were interested in, not us. An example of this would be how it was pointed out that if a K162 only spawned when someone jumped through it, then our connections would be far less as people chose not to jump through. We gave feedback, they saw the error of their implementation and adjusted. They were NEVER thinking about scrapping the mass jump distance. They just wanted to know if it would break anymore of their plans at creating more connectivity and risk. |
JTK Fotheringham
Infinity Engine Sleeping Dragons
81
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 02:25:00 -
[1956] - Quote
Kirasten wrote:
I know this thread has de-evolved into something to be ashamed of, but does anyone really think CCP is monitoring this anymore? I certainly don't. When this threadnaught was still in it's infancy, many people gave well thought out and articulate responses. While there were a lot of emotional responses as well, CCP had the responses they we thought they were asking for. Then it appeared that they either ignored them or disagreed and moved forward anyway. This is why i think the responses have gotten much more emotional, and why people are using the word, "betrayed".
They feel betrayed because they had the wrong premise. They felt, myself included, that CCP was interested in whether we liked the change or if there were ways that we could see a version of the change that we would accept. Now I see much more clearly that what they really were asking for were the ways in which the change might break mechanics they were interested in, not us. An example of this would be how it was pointed out that if a K162 only spawned when someone jumped through it, then our connections would be far less as people chose not to jump through. We gave feedback, they saw the error of their implementation and adjusted. They were NEVER thinking about scrapping the mass jump distance. They just wanted to know if it would break anymore of their plans at creating more connectivity and risk.
+1 Spot on. I'm glad I'm not the only one seeing things this way.
It's like Government consultations - when you're working on a draft bill, you don't run a consultation to see if people like it, you run a consultation to see if anyone in the public can find a flaw you've missed.
I think a lot of the player base misunderstands that aspect of putting things on Sisi, and dev blogs. But equally, CCP have lately seemed slow to react to players pointing out genuine game problems with their new features. |
Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
2176
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 04:00:00 -
[1957] - Quote
Anyone remember the ice miner tears? 95% were against the change to remove unlimited ice. Now ice mining is better and more profitable then ever.
Adapt and quit crying. The only mistake CCP made was letting safe-holes go on for this long. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |
Gunner GzR
Anomalous Existence Low-Class
42
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 04:32:00 -
[1958] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:Anyone remember the ice miner tears? 95% were against the change to remove unlimited ice. Now ice mining is better and more profitable then ever.
Adapt and quit crying. The only mistake CCP made was letting safe-holes go on for this long.
Safe holes lol you have no idea what you are talking about null bear..Lets remove local From Null ..heck lets remove local from low sec as well..Safe holes..Get a clue. Change For the Sake of Change is bad Listen to you community CCP We are what make you Money. Remove Local From 0.0 Space Please
|
Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
434
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 05:33:00 -
[1959] - Quote
Gunner GzR wrote:Sentamon wrote:Anyone remember the ice miner tears? 95% were against the change to remove unlimited ice. Now ice mining is better and more profitable then ever.
Adapt and quit crying. The only mistake CCP made was letting safe-holes go on for this long. Safe holes lol you have no idea what you are talking about null bear..Lets remove local From Null ..heck lets remove local from low sec as well..Safe holes..Get a clue. pretty sure that is an npc corp poster which is not known for its presence in nullsec |
Winthorp
2664
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 05:51:00 -
[1960] - Quote
Almost 100... |
|
Aquila Sagitta
Blue-Fire
443
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 05:52:00 -
[1961] - Quote
Just had an awesome fight with 1%
They're still possible! Blue-Fire Best Fire |
Asayanami Dei
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
688
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 06:12:00 -
[1962] - Quote
I vote we keep this change but remove local from the game too. I'm a leaf on the wind, watch how I-- THE CAPACITOR IS EMPTY Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/asayanami Twitter: https://twitter.com/Asayanami Twitch: http://www.twitch.tv/Asayanami
|
Jezza McWaffle
Pandora Sphere Disavowed.
146
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 07:44:00 -
[1963] - Quote
Had a pretty good example of why this change was **** last night.
We were rolling the hole and got jumped by NoHo and last a Moros, kinda sucked and I guess this is the point of the changes. But then it just lead to us having to POS spin and go play some other games, I know I played Metro for a good 2 hours following it since we didn't have a force that could compete with NoHo. In the end we got a small fleet online and used Battleships till Noho showed up again and crit the wormhole for us. I bet neither side was having much fun bar the Moros kill at their end. C6 Wormhole blog http://holelotofwaffle.wordpress.com/ |
Talaq
Anomalous Existence Low-Class
27
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 08:01:00 -
[1964] - Quote
Promiscuous Female wrote:Gunner GzR wrote:Sentamon wrote:Anyone remember the ice miner tears? 95% were against the change to remove unlimited ice. Now ice mining is better and more profitable then ever.
Adapt and quit crying. The only mistake CCP made was letting safe-holes go on for this long. Safe holes lol you have no idea what you are talking about null bear..Lets remove local From Null ..heck lets remove local from low sec as well..Safe holes..Get a clue. pretty sure that is an npc corp poster which is not known for its presence in nullsec
Before we do yet another round of who has the biggest pedigree in W-space, lets just not.
People are pissed for the changes, not cause there is change (w-space needed some), its more that there was no constructive reason or thought behind them.
the changes should improve space with a plan behind it to make it at least so people would like to go there, instead of abandoning it.
holes got only safer due to the stupid scanner patch showing holes, making it harder to surprise people. now they make it harder to roll finding targets, and it makes farmers less secure, so they take even risk.
smaller corps leave, taking out people, and there are less people to shoot, which will just go on and on till there are to few people to sustain the situation as it was before.
instead of unwanted changes, where are the pos changes, something that for one would at least for smaller corps and beginning corps would make it more appealing to move in a wormhole.
the mass-bases spawn distance change CCP should at least have put on hold seeing this thread pre the patch. then again putting their head in the sand by not having a discussion after the patch, shows that CSM and forums really are there just to for show.
Low-Class Diplomat
|
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
566
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 08:17:00 -
[1965] - Quote
Talaq wrote: Before we do yet another round of who has the biggest pedigree in W-space, lets just not.
People are pissed for the changes, not cause there is change (w-space needed some), its more that there was no constructive reason or thought behind them.
the changes should improve space with a plan behind it to make it at least so people would like to go there, instead of abandoning it.
holes got only safer due to the stupid scanner patch showing holes, making it harder to surprise people. now they make it harder to roll finding targets, and it makes farmers less secure, so they take even risk.
smaller corps leave, taking out people, and there are less people to shoot, which will just go on and on till there are to few people to sustain the situation as it was before.
instead of unwanted changes, where are the pos changes, something that for one would at least for smaller corps and beginning corps would make it more appealing to move in a wormhole.
the mass-bases spawn distance change CCP should at least have put on hold seeing this thread pre the patch. then again putting their head in the sand by not having a discussion after the patch, shows that CSM and forums really are there just to for show.
Let's get back to the part when they tell protesters in Jita to go protest on forums after they ignore over 100 pages of combined posts (if you include thread they made for criticism and then deleted). This goes beyond caring. Were talking intentional lies and deception.
EvE-Mail me if you need anything. |
Valenthe de Celine
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
182
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 08:47:00 -
[1966] - Quote
JTK Fotheringham wrote:epicurus ataraxia wrote: You fail to understand.
Customers do not have to explain themselves to their suppliers.
CCP should be grateful to be given the chance to correct their errors.
Very few businesses get that opportunity. None would complain about the quality of their customers.
I think you need to learn to read and understand what people are saying. I've no problem with customers making complaints. But I have a huge problem with customers taking to a public forum and denigrating the sacrifice of real world war veterans to explain their feelings of betrayal. I find that sickening. Plus it does nothing to help CCP hear their customers' complaint. Stop justifying this nonsense. First of all I was making an analogy of the effect of poor planning causing a great sense of betrayal. The use of what happened with Pearl Harbor was to illustrate that timing is everything, and to screw up that timing creates miserable failures from what could have been awe inspiring success. If you can't distinguish between the situations being similar and some misconstrued outrage on your part being entirely of your own choosing, then words alone will never achieve anything with you.
Second, I would never denigrate the armed forces of my country or that of any other without very specific cause, and that hasn't happened here. The tragedy for the US military that was the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor was one nation's military attacking another nation's military installation. This wasn't the slaughters we see in the news regularly of armed militia slaughtering civilians. Both sides believed they were in the right and were obeying instructions from their commanders. Both sides attempted to fight with honor in they ways they understood honor to exist. Both sides were soldiers in the profession of war. To believe that a soldier is not risking his life by putting on a uniform is naivete in the extreme.
Finally, stop arguing your opinion about my words at someone else. If you want to speak against what I said, say it to me, direct it at my posts, and I will remind you that this forum isn't about that one real life event, it's about discussion of the game we are playing using a similar historical reference in my case. Please take the history lesson in context. I could just as easily speak about an event in local corporate politics, but that carriers less understanding and, therefore, less weight. |
JTK Fotheringham
Infinity Engine Sleeping Dragons
85
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 09:00:00 -
[1967] - Quote
Valenthe de Celine wrote:[quote=JTK Fotheringham] First of all I was making an analogy of the effect of poor planning causing a great sense of betrayal. The use of what happened with Pearl Harbor was to illustrate that timing is everything, and to screw up that timing creates miserable failures from what could have been awe inspiring success. If you can't distinguish between the situations being similar and some misconstrued outrage on your part being entirely of your own choosing, then words alone will never achieve anything with you.
Second, I would never denigrate the armed forces of my country or that of any other without very specific cause, and that hasn't happened here. The tragedy for the US military that was the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor was one nation's military attacking another nation's military installation. This wasn't the slaughters we see in the news regularly of armed militia slaughtering civilians. Both sides believed they were in the right and were obeying instructions from their commanders. Both sides attempted to fight with honor in they ways they understood honor to exist. Both sides were soldiers in the profession of war. To believe that a soldier is not risking his life by putting on a uniform is naivete in the extreme.
Finally, stop arguing your opinion about my words at someone else. If you want to speak against what I said, say it to me, direct it at my posts, and I will remind you that this forum isn't about that one real life event, it's about discussion of the game we are playing using a similar historical reference in my case. Please take the history lesson in context. I could just as easily speak about an event in local corporate politics, but that carriers less understanding and, therefore, less weight.
1) You made a crass analogy.
2) Your crass analogy is denigrating to real world war vets.
3) I was making a general point, as you're not the only one behaving in this crass, and sadly immature manner.
4) Profit? |
Valenthe de Celine
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
182
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 09:07:00 -
[1968] - Quote
Arya Regnar wrote: Let's get back to the part when they tell protesters in Jita to go protest on forums after they ignore over 100 pages of combined posts (if you include thread they made for criticism and then deleted). This goes beyond caring. Were talking intentional lies and deception.
The correct action when confronted and asked to stop protesting in Jita is to demand they produce a reason why your in-game sandbox is being infringed upon by the game's support team. Your emergent gameplay was producing your desired effect, and you had several friends coming in to scout the camera locations for the AT next. Because generating emergent gameplay is fun, right? If EVE is really a sandbox, time to knock over some castles. |
JTK Fotheringham
Infinity Engine Sleeping Dragons
85
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 09:08:00 -
[1969] - Quote
Valenthe de Celine wrote: If you can't say something pertinent to wormholes, this new mechanic, or the rest of our discussion about what these changes mean for us or our peers in the game, then please leave. Now. Go.
Your constant bemoaning our examples as inappropriate to some group somewhere has likened your speech to the parade of placards of the ignoble dead held by protesters next to an abortion clinic. After the first time driving by, everyone just ignores it because it's scenery.
You need to learn to read, and listen instead of spew silly nerdrage.
JTK Fotheringham wrote: -1 for the changes. Please implement a fix. I'd settle for a mini-jump-drive, for caps only, that moves you 10km forward, and eats a chunk of your cap.
|
epicurus ataraxia
Lazerhawks
1175
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 09:52:00 -
[1970] - Quote
This is actually a genuine question?
Do CCP or someone else employ automatic computer programs to generate posts? As the behaviour mannerisms of a few, are genuinely making me question that?
As soon as anything is posted that mentions the management other than the DEVs or a protest activity other than on the forums, they come out, selectively quoting other posts,and other procedural tricks in order to cause as much derailment as possible.
When one actually reads the replies from these suspected postbots, they vary from attack mode, to seemingly rational in a moment, and frankly would not pass a turing test.
It is like a "chinese room" system of imitating comprehension has been implemented as it's AI.
I have just suffered a string of attacks, accusing me of all sorts of things, and even had the bot follow me onto mail in an attempt to cause outrage by accusing me of abusing animals.
Just weird phrases strung together.
My offence that triggered the program? Replying to a reasoned poster in a rational manner somehow made me a target for the trollbot. And I was then accused of all sorts as my "trigger" post quoted and contained the original post.
I cannot believe a human was at the keyboard. There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE |
|
OMEGA REDUX
Forever Winter Absolute Zero.
23
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 10:58:00 -
[1971] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:Anyone remember the ice miner tears? 95% were against the change to remove unlimited ice. Now ice mining is better and more profitable then ever.
Adapt and quit crying. The only mistake CCP made was letting safe-holes go on for this long. I mined ice before the changes and I'd rather have the old way rather than the current way as logging in and the ice belt either not being up (and you no idea how long until the next one spawns) or it so close to being empty that the only difference from the "not there" option is I at least know how long I have to wait on the next spawn. Ice prices are increasing because fewer people are mining it not because it's better. And don't even go suggesting I pick up the exhumer and go jumping to the other ice systems on the off chance they havent despawned as that takes way too much time in an exhumer.
@epicurus...why use an automated program when you can just not ban the trolls for trolling and do ban the customers actually affected by the changes (or at least threaten to ban them hoping they will shut up) |
epicurus ataraxia
Lazerhawks
1176
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 11:06:00 -
[1972] - Quote
OMEGA REDUX wrote:Sentamon wrote:Anyone remember the ice miner tears? 95% were against the change to remove unlimited ice. Now ice mining is better and more profitable then ever.
Adapt and quit crying. The only mistake CCP made was letting safe-holes go on for this long. I mined ice before the changes and I'd rather have the old way rather than the current way as logging in and the ice belt either not being up (and you no idea how long until the next one spawns) or it so close to being empty that the only difference from the "not there" option is I at least know how long I have to wait on the next spawn. Ice prices are increasing because fewer people are mining it not because it's better. And don't even go suggesting I pick up the exhumer and go jumping to the other ice systems on the off chance they havent despawned as that takes way too much time in an exhumer. @epicurus...why use an automated program when you can just not ban the trolls for trolling and do ban the customers actually affected by the changes (or at least threaten to ban them hoping they will shut up)
I still find it very hard to believe that a human could fail the turing test. There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE |
OMEGA REDUX
Forever Winter Absolute Zero.
24
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 11:12:00 -
[1973] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:OMEGA REDUX wrote:Sentamon wrote:Anyone remember the ice miner tears? 95% were against the change to remove unlimited ice. Now ice mining is better and more profitable then ever.
Adapt and quit crying. The only mistake CCP made was letting safe-holes go on for this long. I mined ice before the changes and I'd rather have the old way rather than the current way as logging in and the ice belt either not being up (and you no idea how long until the next one spawns) or it so close to being empty that the only difference from the "not there" option is I at least know how long I have to wait on the next spawn. Ice prices are increasing because fewer people are mining it not because it's better. And don't even go suggesting I pick up the exhumer and go jumping to the other ice systems on the off chance they havent despawned as that takes way too much time in an exhumer. @epicurus...why use an automated program when you can just not ban the trolls for trolling and do ban the customers actually affected by the changes (or at least threaten to ban them hoping they will shut up) I still find it very hard to believe that a human could fail the turing test. But you are right, that would fail to work too, once the attitude becomes prevalent, that your customers are the enemy, then there is little hope left. speaking as someone who knows just how stupid a human can get, I'm going to recommend you stop seeking out info like that and just pretend that stuff didn't happen, sometimes ignorance really is bliss....sometimes the truth is a pain I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy. |
Serith Ellecon
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
39
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 11:13:00 -
[1974] - Quote
So, what do we do?
Perma-wardec any corp Chitsa Jason is in? Burn Narwhals out of their hole for the same reason? Apparently he's the idiot who suggested this change.
Alternatively we could just go and drop a massive fleet of all wormholers on the Jita monument. There aren't enough of us that a mass-unsub would make a big difference to CCP's bottom line. Inappropriate signature added.-á CCP Notarealdev. |
epicurus ataraxia
Lazerhawks
1176
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 11:23:00 -
[1975] - Quote
Serith Ellecon wrote:So, what do we do?
Perma-wardec any corp Chitsa Jason is in? Burn Narwhals out of their hole for the same reason? Apparently he's the idiot who suggested this change.
Alternatively we could just go and drop a massive fleet of all wormholers on the Jita monument. There aren't enough of us that a mass-unsub would make a big difference to CCP's bottom line.
Well neither of those are exactly "our thing" are they? We cannot blame the Narwhals, for i believe they are free of him now. And the original idea has been twisted into a luck based lottery, bearing little relation to the original thought.
If it had been based on mechanics, with velocity mass and entry direction, determining spawn point, that would have still been a poor idea, adding nothing but tedium, but at least the players could make decisions and tactics around that.
Lucky spawn? How do you adapt to that rather than just avoiding it entirely.
We do not have a media arm like the mitanni, we do not have large numbers, we are all naturally fiercely independent, and this would require a real "nationalistic" mentality that is so far from what we are we might is well live elsewhere if we were to change that much.
I doubt that there is any action we can take that will force them to read and think of what they have done, we can only request and show.
All we can hope is for a change of mind, and they are not exactly known for that are they?
But other than that, what can we actually do? I am completely open to suggestions? It all depends on the cause, is it a single rogue manager with power? Is it influence from elsewhere? Is it just an honest mistake?
It is not up to us to protect CCP from itself, sure, we are the victims, and it is us who lose the EVE that brought us here, exchanged for a completely different game, that has forgotten what made it appeal.
All we can do is decide whether we want to play this new game or not, but if they had changed the name, and asked us to rejoin this new version, then one would witness the silence and watch the tumbleweed move through the systems. Those who were there to see it.
So in short, they are betting their company on inertia. That usually does not end well. There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE |
Rroff
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
792
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 11:32:00 -
[1976] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:Anyone remember the ice miner tears? 95% were against the change to remove unlimited ice. Now ice mining is better and more profitable then ever.
Adapt and quit crying. The only mistake CCP made was letting safe-holes go on for this long.
Personally its pretty easy or me to adapt, doesn't change that it adds tedium for largely no good reason and doesn't change that it tends to result in people either logging off or leaving wormholes which is not good at all.
Regarding "safe holes" you really have no clue. |
Faren Shalni
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
49
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 11:53:00 -
[1977] - Quote
Sigh this thread is going nowhere CCP have already pretty much said screw you guys and did it anyway. All that's left are the trolls and the idiots who feed them
And btw we WH's have already adapted to this change we still keep going because we can field the people needed to combat this change (I feel sorry to the smaller guys who cant and therfore have left). but that doesn't mean we like having a piece of **** shoved down our throats and then being expected to say can I have another one
CCP needs to stop changing what works and Fix what's broken. So Much Space |
JTK Fotheringham
Infinity Engine Sleeping Dragons
85
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 11:57:00 -
[1978] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:This is actually a genuine question.
< words... >
I have just suffered a string of attacks, accusing me of all sorts of things, and even had the bot follow me onto mail in an attempt to cause outrage by accusing me of abusing animals.
Just weird phrases strung together.
My offence that triggered the program? Replying to a reasoned poster in a rational manner somehow made me a target for the trollbot. And I was then accused of all sorts as my "trigger" post quoted and contained the original post. Therefore it switched target to me and misapplied in each case.
Very mysterious.
I cannot believe a human was at the keyboard. It will be fascinating, to see what part of this post it will extract to continue the goal of thread derailment,
< moar words... .
And to think you called me a troll. Nothing constructive being said here, again.
What do you think of this:
JTK Fotheringham wrote: -1 for the changes. Please implement a fix. I'd settle for a mini-jump-drive, for caps only, that moves you 10km forward, and eats a chunk of your cap.
|
Rroff
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
792
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 12:02:00 -
[1979] - Quote
JTK Fotheringham wrote: -1 for the changes. Please implement a fix. I'd settle for a mini-jump-drive, for caps only, that moves you 10km forward, and eats a chunk of your cap.
[/quote]
It more or less puts you back where you were, so might as well not beat around the bush and just revert the change IMO. |
JTK Fotheringham
Infinity Engine Sleeping Dragons
85
|
Posted - 2014.08.31 12:13:00 -
[1980] - Quote
Rroff wrote:JTK Fotheringham wrote: -1 for the changes. Please implement a fix. I'd settle for a mini-jump-drive, for caps only, that moves you 10km forward, and eats a chunk of your cap.
It more or less puts you back where you were, so might as well not beat around the bush and just revert the change IMO.
Personally, I've never expected CCP to rollback. That's what ASDA do with supermarket prices, not games developers with much vaunted changes.
So, I'm prepared to look for a way forward, and I think that's a more realistic ask.
I think you still spawn 15-20km off the hole, and so risk is retained.
CCP like solutions that mitigate risk for those prepared to take steps to mitigate risk (i.e. not just remove risk).
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 .. 81 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |