EVE Search - Nerf the Rokh.

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Nerf the Rokh.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Arron S Gallente	Posted - 2006.07.26 02:02:00 - [91] Take Dr Tetrahydrocannabinol out back and beats him with a lead pipe Now What did you say?
Amerame Section XIII	Posted - 2006.07.26 02:21:00 - [92] It's fine as it is, BUT if they ever nerf long range t2 ammo, then the Rokh will be completely overpowered.
DisposableAlt	Posted - 2006.07.26 02:26:00 - [93] Originally by: Nikolai Nuvolari Last I looked, Javelin reduces a Rokh's shield HP by 80% and its max velocity by 80%...both of which are important at close range...in other words, it's completely useless on a Rokh. The penalties aren't additive, they're multiplicative. So you have .9^8=.430= 43% of your normal shields, a 57% reduction. Still huge, however.
Nikolai Nuvolari Caldari	Posted - 2006.07.26 02:29:00 - [94] Originally by: DisposableAlt Originally by: Nikolai Nuvolari Last I looked, Javelin reduces a Rokh's shield HP by 80% and its max velocity by 80%...both of which are important at close range...in other words, it's completely useless on a Rokh. The penalties aren't additive, they're multiplicative. So you have .9^8=.430= 43% of your normal shields, a 57% reduction. Still huge, however. Alright, but either way, it doesn't really make a difference for the Rokh. At 80% or 57%, Javelin DOESN'T WORK for the Rokh. ------------------ Originally by: kieron Buy ISK for RL cash here! Mebrithiel Ju'wien > Nik's bio 4tw btw Graelyn > Nikolai for Dev 108!
LoveKebab DAB RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2006.07.26 02:51:00 - [95] i like the way CCP made that ship :> since most of Caldari are using missiles it wont be so hard to train some for large rails and be usefull in fleetbattles. as for today they dont have any insta dmg-dealer that can be used in fleets from the other hand blasters could have over 15km optimal (+ about 15km falloff) - with t2 ammo dont neft this ship cuz it's good :>
DisposableAlt	Posted - 2006.07.26 03:10:00 - [96] Originally by: LoveKebab i like the way CCP made that ship :> since most of Caldari are using missiles it wont be so hard to train some for large rails and be usefull in fleetbattles. as for today they dont have any insta dmg-dealer that can be used in fleets from the other hand blasters could have over 15km optimal (+ about 15km falloff) - with t2 ammo dont neft this ship cuz it's good :> I have a feeling that the Rokh will make a very poor blasterboat. Like all caldari ships, it will be heavy and slow as hell, and its cap probably won't be too great either. Plus, how can any BS stand up to the hyperion, the tailor-made blasterboat?
eldiabloroho	Posted - 2006.07.26 03:38:00 - [97] this new cal ships is so good it came right in time, i have been mining in a retriver which isnt that good because its so weak ( in 0.0) so i was thinking about training for a cov so i would be a better miner but that would take over a month and its still weak and would have to warp out if rats target me, then i though why not an apoc its between a ret and cov mining output and can tank but its so damn ugly and i only have armarr frig 1, then boom along comes this awesome cal ship with 8 turrets for 8 miner 2s plus an awsome shield tank so i can fill the low slots with cargo expanders, man this has to be the most awesome ship in the game now.
Nikolai Nuvolari Caldari	Posted - 2006.07.26 03:53:00 - [98] Originally by: eldiabloroho this new cal ships is so good it came right in time, i have been mining in a retriver which isnt that good because its so weak ( in 0.0) so i was thinking about training for a cov so i would be a better miner but that would take over a month and its still weak and would have to warp out if rats target me, then i though why not an apoc its between a ret and cov mining output and can tank but its so damn ugly and i only have armarr frig 1, then boom along comes this awesome cal ship with 8 turrets for 8 miner 2s plus an awsome shield tank so i can fill the low slots with cargo expanders, man this has to be the most awesome ship in the game now. beats eldiabloroho to death with a baseball bat IKVAR SAY: NO MINING! ------------------ Originally by: kieron Buy ISK for RL cash here! Mebrithiel Ju'wien > Nik's bio 4tw btw Graelyn > Nikolai for Dev 108!
Kery Nysell Caldari	Posted - 2006.07.26 09:40:00 - [99] Originally by: DisposableAlt Originally by: Nikolai Nuvolari Last I looked, Javelin reduces a Rokh's shield HP by 80% and its max velocity by 80%...both of which are important at close range...in other words, it's completely useless on a Rokh. The penalties aren't additive, they're multiplicative. So you have .9^8=.430= 43% of your normal shields, a 57% reduction. Still huge, however. Wrong. The penalties for T2 ammo are indeed additive, and for each gun. That's an exception to the normal "multiplicative penalties" rule. I tried some Javelin S in the four rails of my Harpy, those things have a -20% shield/max speed, and I lost 80% of my 1105 shield points, for a modified shield of 221 ...
K Shara Caldari	Posted - 2006.07.26 11:51:00 - [100] at BS5 with 3 midslot trackers you will reach 250km or so with lead, which will be fun. anyone who is screaming for a nerf is an idiot. look at the moa, the eagle, the ferox. totally crap compared to their other racial counterparts. <><><><><><><><><> Contraband hpookde is so a word !!!!!!!! <><><><><><><><><>
welsh wizard	Posted - 2006.07.26 12:15:00 - [101] Originally by: K Shara at BS5 with 3 midslot trackers you will reach 250km or so with lead, which will be fun. anyone who is screaming for a nerf is an idiot. look at the moa, the eagle, the ferox. totally crap compared to their other racial counterparts. Aye :( For some reason they've always given Caldari less turret HP's and less damage on their turret ships. As a result we are left with 3 completely unbalanced rail ships that are knowhere near as good as the equivalent tier ships of the other races. Seems they're finally doing something about it with the Rokh. About bloody time, we finally get to deal respectable DPS. Still not going to outdamage the megathron though and damage is infinitely preferable to range. Now its time to fix the Moa, Eagle and especially the borderline obsolete Ferox.
Testy Mctest	Posted - 2006.07.26 12:25:00 - [102] Originally by: Tobias Rad** nerfing it just means that Caldari specialists still won't have a fleet BS. Ahahahahahah. Seriously, you people * me up. [center] Originally by:** Lord Violent EvE is slowly becoming a game for the stupid being catered to by devs, as they lack ability to kill/survive anything. http://tinyurl.com/lgpnsScraphe
Dr Tetrahydrocannabinol Imperium Technologies Firmus Ixion	Posted - 2006.07.26 14:49:00 - [103] Training of the skill Gunnery to level 5 has been completed i sure hope they dont nerf this before i finish training turret skills :s Caldari - BS idea
Taurgil Balanced Unity	Posted - 2006.07.26 16:53:00 - [104] Don't nerf ships, boost the underdogs. That's the general way it works.
Rafein Eye of God Axiom Empire	Posted - 2006.07.26 16:59:00 - [105] OMG, it is a Marginallly better sniper over the current #1 Blasterboat. NERF!!!!

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.