| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Astasia Orian
Black Eclipse Corp
Band of Brothers
   |
Posted - 2006.08.06 23:42:00 -
[31]
Strong contender for best banner ever.
|
Gunship
Amarr
FATAL REVELATIONS
Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2006.08.06 23:48:00 -
[32]
lagged out 
So you want to join us? |
ParMizaN
Body Count Inc.
Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2006.08.06 23:53:00 -
[33]
BWF was an absolute nightmare for lag etc, i think the MC would have lost a few ships even though we had 100% superiority just because of the lag etc had we sought to take the station from BB there at the time, so I can totally sympathise with the coalition forces here. Sucks. Hard.
sig edited for lack of pink really
PINK -eris |
Archonon
Caldari
Section XIII
Tau Ceti Federation
|
Posted - 2006.08.06 23:56:00 -
[34]
After the log off, after the pos spamming, after the ebil ebayer, after the loging trap , after the complex runner, after the alt's char veldspar miners in jita, after the alt's char in RAT. killers of carebears, now we've got the ebil laggers.
Humm perhaps if u weren't 10 alliances(sry it's certainly more but i stopped here) against RA u would have less lag in the system.
Please stop crying on forums about ur unabilities to fight RA, and make useless post.
Make ur petition as everyone and simply  
_______________________
Exitus Acta Probat |
Edison Frisk
Minmatar
Shinra
Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2006.08.06 23:57:00 -
[35]
 Originally by: Astasia Orian
Strong contender for best banner ever.
I like it too
|
The Enslaver
Shinra
Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2006.08.06 23:58:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Archonon
After the log off, after the pos spamming, after the ebil ebayer, after the loging trap , after the complex runner, after the alt's char veldspar miners in jita, after the alt's char in RAT. killers of carebears, now we've got the ebil laggers.
Humm perhaps if u weren't 10 alliances(sry it's certainly more but i stopped here) against RA u would have less lag in the system.
Please stop crying on forums about ur unabilities to fight RA, and make useless post.
Make ur petition as everyone and simply
At what point did using 300 people become an invalid tactic?
We all know that the EVE servers can support it when setup to; Jita, Rens and EC-P8R (which wasn't that bad) as examples.
--------
|
Kusotarre
Cutting Edge Incorporated
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 00:01:00 -
[37]
I agree that the lag sucks very bad in full systems. One of the great things about Eve is the potential for huge fleet fights, epic battles, hundreds of battleships and support duking it out, that you can't get anywhere else.
Too bad you cannot actually get these things in Eve, either.
|
Altai Saker
Omniscient Order
Verisum Family
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 00:01:00 -
[38]
I look forward to the day when Red Alliance no longer exist on tranquility.
Good luck -LV-
|
ArcheryTXS
Russian SOBR
Red Alliance
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 00:05:00 -
[39]
Originally by: The Enslaver
At what point did using 300 people become an invalid tactic?
We all know that the EVE servers can support it when setup to; Jita, Rens and EC-P8R (which wasn't that bad) as examples.
next time send mail to GM so they can put more resource to the system u r trying to engage . 
**/**
City Sadness... |
Darkrydar
Destructive Influence
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 00:06:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Archonon
After the log off, after the pos spamming, after the ebil ebayer, after the loging trap , after the complex runner, after the alt's char veldspar miners in jita, after the alt's char in RAT. killers of carebears, now we've got the ebil laggers.
Humm perhaps if u weren't 10 alliances(sry it's certainly more but i stopped here) against RA u would have less lag in the system.
Please stop crying on forums about ur unabilities to fight RA, and make useless post.
Make ur petition as everyone and simply
Seriously, shut your piehole. If they didn't have overwhelming numbers RA would have just used a loging gank. I can't wait to read your forthcoming whine posts from tribute. You cn continue your RA fanboism from afar seeing that you quit out on them long ago when the going got tough.
|
Plutoinum
German Cyberdome Corp
Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 00:09:00 -
[41]
/signed
The dreads were there, around 30 (?), enough carrier support, a nice support fleet to protect the dreads and deal with the RED snipers and fighter drones, I'm not aware of any mistakes that happend during the engagement and I think the tactics was good today. Anyway it didn't work out.
It seems that it's a lot easier to kill a node with pos engagements than to get sovereignty. 
|
munchy
Alcatraz Inc.
Tactical Narcotics Team
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 00:10:00 -
[42]
Originally by: The Enslaver
Originally by: munchy
Originally by: The Enslaver
Originally by: munchy
omg u guys are brilliant, ur AWSOME way of hiding a blatant loss has fooled us all, you're not backing down to RA at all, its all CCP's fault.....yeah
You must be some insane tactical expert!
You know all the facts, take your fanboi attitude elsewhere please.
take your god complex eslewhere plz
So tell me how anyone could have taken the system? Yeah, exactly.
like u said ens, im just a fanboi now, i dont know the details of the fights etc, all i know is the combat/logistics skills of RA, and the coalition.
---
Originally by: Kaaii (UCC)
We had better things to do with our resources in region. Mining Crimson ark.
 |
Heinky
Amarr
BURN EDEN
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 00:12:00 -
[43]
I know how to fix your problem.
Fight them 1 alliance at a time , maybe the lag will reduce, tho your ship looses will just be worse.
|
The Enslaver
Shinra
Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 00:16:00 -
[44]
Originally by: ArcheryTXS
Originally by: The Enslaver
At what point did using 300 people become an invalid tactic?
We all know that the EVE servers can support it when setup to; Jita, Rens and EC-P8R (which wasn't that bad) as examples.
next time send mail to GM so they can put more resource to the system u r trying to engage .
We did. Several times.
--------
|
Dragerest
Total Warehouse Logistics
Dusk and Dawn
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 00:17:00 -
[45]
give them hell RA
|
Dillon Arklight
Shinra
Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 00:23:00 -
[46]
Edited by: Dillon Arklight on 07/08/2006 00:24:14
We all know the effect lag plays when fighting large fleet battles or trying to take a POS(for both sides) even with just a relatively few people.
Anyone who believes differently should leave Empire and come try for themselves. Instead of posting "omg how could you not win" or " i know about tactics this is how you should have done it blah blah blah"
|
IonHammer
Minmatar
Black Avatar
Firmus Ixion
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 00:48:00 -
[47]
I have examined the logs and my technical opinion is that ccp have a ferret in their trousers, its the only thing i can thing of that could cause such bad lag.
|
WRWR
Rage and Terror
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 00:59:00 -
[48]
coalitin bring 500+ people for fight 100 and cry about lags? yep, they just can't kill "dead" RED ALLIANCE
|
Catynia
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 01:04:00 -
[49]
Recient studies have shown a ferrit in the trousers to be a cure for lethargic behaviour, rather than a cause.
|
c0rn1
Seraphin Technologies
Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 01:07:00 -
[50]
Originally by: ArcheryTXS
Originally by: The Enslaver
At what point did using 300 people become an invalid tactic?
We all know that the EVE servers can support it when setup to; Jita, Rens and EC-P8R (which wasn't that bad) as examples.
next time send mail to GM so they can put more resource to the system u r trying to engage .
I did that, ArcheryTXS 24h before the assault and far before downtime.
Response:
"Hi. Unfortunately, we do not have the means to manually assign
server nodes to specific systems. Our apologies for any
inconvenience this may cause you. Best regards, GM Arkanon
Senior Game Master EVE Online Customer Support"
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
-V- Diplomat
-V- High Council Member
Life's a waste of time ...
|
Walter Model
CRICE Corporation
Center for Disease Creation
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 01:11:00 -
[51]
Good job Red Alliance! keep up the good work
CCP... plz make the server playable in large scale fights.
Chowdown.. kick ass banner
_______________________________________________
"If the tanks succeed, then victory follows.", Guderian, 1937.
|
Plutoinum
German Cyberdome Corp
Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 01:22:00 -
[52]
Originally by: Amthrianius
Question is will RA go for more stations now and if so, what will you do?
RA usually tries to get sovereignty by dropping large poses, not by destroying them.
When did RA kill the last real battle pos (large pos, well armed and well hardened) to get sovereignty back ? I have no idea. They probably stopped it, after they had a big number of dread losses some months ago.
C-J fell due to a huge anchoring act on free moons, too, probably the largest number of poses ever anchored in a single operation, the system didn't fell, because RED killed POSes.
So in the past RED has shown that they can anchor large amounts of pos, fuel and protect them, kill attacking dreads at their pos or at least revive their pos, after they got shot into reinforcement. (right ammount of strontium => pos leaves reinforcement and shields can be recharged at a daytime, when RED have superior numbers. )
But they haven't been in our position for a long time, where they actually had to destroy a dozen large towers to get sovereignty.
If they have to take down battle poses and get attacked while doing it, they'll face the same problems, like everyone else.
Currently RED can choose from long list of target systems. They are waiting for their chance to get another system cheap.
They know, they would lose dreads too, if they started a massive dread attack on a heavily secured system, so they just wait for a cheap chance / for a mistake to anchor at free moons or shoot offline towers or really weak pos during their prime time.
For us, the only target left was C-J and there was no easy way to get it besides kill these over 20 (?) poses.
Ok, done with my subjective analysis of the situation. 
|
DTee
Evolution
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 02:13:00 -
[53]
Edited by: DTee on 07/08/2006 02:13:45
I think a post along the lines of honourable retreat rather then blaming game mechanics would have been better.
|
Puncher
BIG Advanced Assault
R i s e
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 02:26:00 -
[54]
This is bordering on hilarious, the coalition of 10000+ sent off with it's collective tail between it's legs...
Grats RA!
|
Amthrianius
Destructive Influence
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 02:26:00 -
[55]
Can't RA just pos zerg another system like they did in C-J to gain sov or do you have 50%+ of moons in all your stn systems possed up? If not then they could do the same as before and take another station or 5 and you would find yourself in the same situation just a different system.
---------------
|
welsh wizard
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 03:38:00 -
[56]
Edited by: welsh wizard on 07/08/2006 03:38:18
I can't help but feel that CCP have provided us with the machine to fight huge battles but not the engine to drive it.
It's currently the number one concern the game faces, if you ask me.
|
Light Darkness
Seraphin Technologies
Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 03:44:00 -
[57]
Thats wasnt a honor fight on both sides.
Fact is...
- CCP isnt able to support 350 of thier paying members (extra server)for only a few days.
Fact is...
- The Game Mechanics isnt able to support a havy management for more alliances and a force with 40+ CS¦s + support.
Fact is...
- The Game Mechanics isnt able to allow a hugh ammount of forces to engage a alliance with only 30-50 fighting peoples.
Fact is...
- lets do it like RA and we own EvE with only 30 active people and a few large POSes.
Fact is...
- RA did a good job and they understand to use the Game mechanics.
Fact is...
- We will come back...
Regards
/LD
---------------------
-V-eritas Immortalis Killboard
|
Statics
A.W.M
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 04:01:00 -
[58]
Originally by: StiZum Hilidii
Edited by: StiZum Hilidii on 06/08/2006 23:12:48
hey RA next time your defending ill need the following sets while your doing them
querious delve and venal. just put them in a can marked for me
*Checks shady tactics handbook..."
Yep, thought so, that's in chapter 4. No wonder.
|
Garia666
Amarr
adeptus gattacus
Lotka Volterra
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 04:06:00 -
[59]
This is a very big problem.
In the current situation You cant play the game how its ment to be played.
|
Metal Dude
Destructive Influence
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2006.08.07 04:50:00 -
[60]
Originally by: StiZum Hilidii
Edited by: StiZum Hilidii on 06/08/2006 23:12:48
hey RA next time your defending ill need the following sets while your doing them
querious delve and venal. just put them in a can marked for me
Stan FTW 
The truth will set you free
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |