| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

PotatoOverdose
Royal Black Watch Highlanders DARKNESS.
2372
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 04:22:00 -
[91] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:Jenn aSide wrote: Just like now...Just like once neutral PL and XXDeath being not neutral... How many people who were soooo tired of shooting POSes would love to have pre-Dominion SOV back. I wonder if any of them can remember how happy they were that they didn't have to grind POSes any more??? lol
Hmmm...maybe I missed it, but what changes are you in favor of implementing? Changes that don't backfire and make a bad situation worse. To do that you have to look at the underlying realities of WHY a situation exists and also keep in mind that we are talking about a game (meaning you must take human nature into account). Wishful thinking and good intentions don't work. k...do you have any specific, detailed counter-proposals? It's very easy to say "this idea is ****." Doing so is also completely useless. Vague statements like "account for human nature" are scarcely less useless. Do you have any plan that involves specific buffs (preferably with numerics) e.g. add mexallon ore to nullsec grav sites, nerf/buff null income by x%, implement mechanic X instead of mechanic Y. You know, actual changes? |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
8603
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 04:37:00 -
[92] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:Jenn aSide wrote: Just like now...Just like once neutral PL and XXDeath being not neutral... How many people who were soooo tired of shooting POSes would love to have pre-Dominion SOV back. I wonder if any of them can remember how happy they were that they didn't have to grind POSes any more??? lol
Hmmm...maybe I missed it, but what changes are you in favor of implementing? Changes that don't backfire and make a bad situation worse. To do that you have to look at the underlying realities of WHY a situation exists and also keep in mind that we are talking about a game (meaning you must take human nature into account). Wishful thinking and good intentions don't work. k...do you have any specific, detailed counter-proposals? It's very easy to say "this idea is ****." Doing so is also completely useless. Vague statements like "account for human nature" are scarcely less useless. Do you have any plan that involves specific buffs (preferably with numerics) e.g. add mexallon ore to nullsec grav sites, nerf/buff null income by x%, implement mechanic X instead of mechanic Y. You know, actual changes?
I'm not a game designer. Being silent when you see a bad way of thinking being repeated for the umpteenth time because one doesn't have godlike powers to decern a better way is dumb.
The difference between me and you is that I KNOW I don't know how to fix 'the problem', and would rather accept that than just go "well DO something, anything" which is the thing that is actually useless. CCP is committed to what they are doing, none of this talk is gonna change anything (you see it din't stop Dominion or the Anom nerf) .
Feel free to ignore my (and others) warning, CCP does lol. But remember that you did so in 6 months after we've had time to see the results of the thing you are (wishfully and without thought) supporting. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6459
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 04:58:00 -
[93] - Quote
About sov though, at least we just ~naturally~ have fatigue (in real life) mechanics for shooting structures. ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |

PotatoOverdose
Royal Black Watch Highlanders DARKNESS.
2372
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 05:28:00 -
[94] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:Jenn aSide wrote: Just like now...Just like once neutral PL and XXDeath being not neutral... How many people who were soooo tired of shooting POSes would love to have pre-Dominion SOV back. I wonder if any of them can remember how happy they were that they didn't have to grind POSes any more??? lol
Hmmm...maybe I missed it, but what changes are you in favor of implementing? Changes that don't backfire and make a bad situation worse. To do that you have to look at the underlying realities of WHY a situation exists and also keep in mind that we are talking about a game (meaning you must take human nature into account). Wishful thinking and good intentions don't work. k...do you have any specific, detailed counter-proposals? It's very easy to say "this idea is ****." Doing so is also completely useless. Vague statements like "account for human nature" are scarcely less useless. Do you have any plan that involves specific buffs (preferably with numerics) e.g. add mexallon ore to nullsec grav sites, nerf/buff null income by x%, implement mechanic X instead of mechanic Y. You know, actual changes? I'm not a game designer. Being silent when you see a bad way of thinking being repeated for the umpteenth time because one doesn't have godlike powers to decern a better way is dumb. The difference between me and you is that I KNOW I don't know how to fix 'the problem', and would rather accept that than just go "well DO something, anything" which is the thing that is actually useless. CCP is committed to what they are doing, none of this talk is gonna change anything (you see it din't stop Dominion or the Anom nerf) . Feel free to ignore my (and others) warning, CCP does lol. But remember that you did so in 6 months after we've had time to see the results of the thing you are (wishfully and without thought) supporting. Your warning is worse than useless without an alternative. So far, we have 2 choices: CCP's sov revamp or the status quo. If both are ****, present an alternative. |

Schmata Bastanold
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
2855
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 05:39:00 -
[95] - Quote
Eve Online - the only game where it's mandatory for players to point out game design flaws, propose solutions, gather feedback on those solutions, react to said feedback and introduce required fixes to proposed solution and finally submit it to dedicated forum section where it can be ignored by devs and trolled even more by other players. Invalid signature format |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6459
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 06:01:00 -
[96] - Quote
Schmata Bastanold wrote:Eve Online - the only game where it's mandatory for players to point out game design flaws, propose solutions, gather feedback on those solutions, react to said feedback and introduce required fixes to proposed solution and finally submit it to dedicated forum section where it can be ignored by devs and trolled even more by other players. Mandatory?
I can stop posting anytime I want. There has not been a ping about a posting cta ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |

Schmata Bastanold
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
2855
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 06:04:00 -
[97] - Quote
But try to just post about problem and not propose at least 3 variants of solution including list of possible exploits and ways to counter those. Yeah, try it. I dare you. Invalid signature format |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
8603
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 06:07:00 -
[98] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote: Your warning is worse than useless without an alternative. So far, we have 2 choices: CCP's sov revamp or the status quo. If both are ****, present an alternative.
The 'alternative' is for the people actually doing the work to develop an evidence based thought process rather than relying on what amopunts to a game design ideology, one that has failed in the past. As i said, I'm not a game designer, unlike *others* i don't presume to know the job better than people who actually do it. I'm pointing out (as nothing more than a layman and customer) that the basic thinking that led to the problem is apparent in what CCP has so far revealed for null sec and that the most likely outcome is a WORSENING of the situation. I could be wrong and if so, great. But if i (and others) aren't, we're in for a lot of wasted time and frustration.
That '2 choices' thing is a part of the problem that led to Dominion and is leading to the current changes: Desperation. People were tired and desperate for change of pos grinding and thought "something is better than nothing". It's not, we ended up with a WORSE situation.
Your choices aren't "Sov revamp or status quo", it's "status quo or WORSE than the status quo" unless the underlying process and thinking about what null is and how it fits in the game is changed. Again, this is a layman's opinion only. |

LDMcFear
RAVEN INTERSTELLAR ARMAMENTS CORPORATION
0
|
Posted - 2014.10.18 22:42:00 -
[99] - Quote
Ra' zutao wrote:In All Honesty though it wouldn't be a bad idea to get a mass conglomerate together to harass these area's and start breaking up Null sec again.
For some reason this sounds like an awesome idea :)
|

Arsine Mayhem
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
346
|
Posted - 2014.10.19 13:11:00 -
[100] - Quote
We were out capping some renters yesterday.
This is your queue to cry "nerf intercepters". |

Syn Shi
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2014.10.19 16:00:00 -
[101] - Quote
What CCP should do is have the empires all thank the Null sec groups and move in and declare that HI-Sec is expanding its borders. |

Dean Wong
Black Serpent Technologies The Unthinkables
4
|
Posted - 2014.10.19 19:00:00 -
[102] - Quote
I never understand all the hate against renters. Been someone who use to hunt them in the north, I think they become an essential part of EVE.
Here are my reasons.
1. Causal players who, after a long day at work, just want to relax and shoot some red crosses. They are bored of HS so they move to renter space. Why hate players like that.
2. Renters are keeping market inflation low. (think of all the salvage and mods they bring up). Anything that reduces my isk grinding for PVP ships, me like.
3. Renters are not filling incursion fleet slots, that means less effort and time to grind isk and more time for me to PVP.
4. Renters, if you bring the right numbers and ship types, will undock and fight. They do provide alot of content in null sec. I never been blobs by renters and they bring good ships to PVP.
Can you imagine the day EVE have no renters. The outcome will be.
1. Desolated null sec. 2. Incursions sysytem overrun by fleets with alot of TIDI. 3. Rigs and meta 4 mods reaching 2012 price level. 4. Overcrowded mission systems. 5. Overcrowed HS
Renters to stay forever.  |

Solecist Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
11078
|
Posted - 2014.10.19 19:17:00 -
[103] - Quote
Can't believe this thread is still going.
Anyhow, according to Pasta there is serious lack of activity in the regions they are harassing ... ... because of their own doings. That's in the south I think, I forgot.
The north is a fortress, I've heard. Deklein ... CFC Central? We'll make a trip there.
I wanna see the highsec of nullsec myself.
I am Sol. I cook my bacon naked, with sparkles of cinnamon on my skin. You are my content, my shiny content - you make me haaappy, when skies are greeeeyyy - you'll never know dear, how much I loooooove you - don't you take my content away! |

Official Diplomat
Soft Blow LLC Irresponsible Use of Capital.
5
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 06:21:00 -
[104] - Quote
Contact me for protection from scary pvpers. |

Ka'Narlist
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
240
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 07:51:00 -
[105] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:About sov though, at least we just ~naturally~ have fatigue (in real life) mechanics for shooting structures. One would think so, but I someone complained in the thread about the sov structure hp rebalance that it wouldn't make any sense to lower their ehp because its allready too easy to grind them down in bombers..lol
Solecist Project wrote:I consider joining Pasta if the CEO of Love Squad approves ...
tell them I recruited you, maybe I get a commission  |

sHanQ Myteia
Hard Knocks Inc. Irresponsible Use of Capital.
24
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 07:57:00 -
[106] - Quote
As someone who cant get enough killing renters i can just say the more messed up nullsec is, the easier it is for us to gain content.
Even phoebe is helping us, since its harder to drop caps on us..
So btt: yes there are mostly wh people roaming through renterspace since its a good and fun way for us to get isk, we barely lose anything because renters are clueless and not able to learn...so basically a tackled rentercarrier is a dead carrier...
|

Solecist Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
11107
|
Posted - 2014.10.20 23:44:00 -
[107] - Quote
I am in Deklein.
I see dozens of sites ... ... in every system ... ... and no one seems to run them.
Seriously, wtf?
People can't complain that there is lack of isk making opportunity ... ... if they don't even take the opportunity that is right there ................................ I am Sol. I cook my bacon naked, with sparkles of cinnamon on my skin. You are my content, my shiny content - you make me haaappy, when skies are greeeeyyy - you'll never know dear, how much I loooooove you - don't you take my content away! |

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
8636
|
Posted - 2014.10.21 00:56:00 -
[108] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:I am in Deklein.
I see dozens of sites ... ... in every system ... ... and no one seems to run them.
Seriously, wtf?
People can't complain that there is lack of isk making opportunity ... ... if they don't even take the opportunity that is right there ................................ Why run them?
To do null sec sites in a way that is quick and profitiable takes an expensive ship. if you can afford that ship, you can aford to use the same ship in a high sec incurision and make better isk for less effort and risk. or you can do faction warfare missions is a much cheaper ship and not give a damn about if you die. Our you can use the same isk, get a carrier and do lvl 5 missions in low traveled low sec and make more isk. unlike null anoms, lvl 5 missions ar ein DEADSPACe pockets so if someone wans to kill you, they have to launch probes to find you.
This guy makes 300 mil an hour in low sec doing level 4s with a NAGA. Their is no way to make more than 60 mil per hour with an ABC in sov null. Null is baren and full of sites because CCP made sure sov null isk making activites suck. |

Solecist Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
11113
|
Posted - 2014.10.21 01:02:00 -
[109] - Quote
Caught this one before I turned off.
Why run them?
Why not? They are there. They are doable.
There is nothing keeping these people from doing them. There are sites available in abundance in systems that were EMPTY ... ... except my own presence, of course.
There is *no* reason not to run them, as they are there ... ... they are doable ... and there's barely any danger.
If all you see is ISK-making ... ... then I have to question your intelligence.
If the only reason to play ... ... is to make ISK ... ... then I think you don't get the point of a game.
You just more and more start to sound like a nullsec propaganda parrot.
That being said ... there's really nothing to add to your drivel.
Good night. I am Sol. I cook my bacon naked, with sparkles of cinnamon on my skin. You are my content, my shiny content - you make me haaappy, when skies are greeeeyyy - you'll never know dear, how much I loooooove you - don't you take my content away! |

Chopper Rollins
Lantean Empire
973
|
Posted - 2014.10.21 01:27:00 -
[110] - Quote
If you do null anoms pretty soon there will be reasons not to do them, ie. people coming to kill and camp. That's on top of the reasons Jenn listed, more isk elsewhere for less effort. PVE kills light up the map and draw PVE hunters like flies to poop. People own null to say they own it, pigeons scratch at the rental crumbs. If you want isk you do incursions or low/high PVE and if you really need isk and have no time you drop the chump change for a plex or two and sell em. Like all the pure pvp pilots i know who really don't have time to shoot red crosses for 2 to 6 dollars an hour.
Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good. |

La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2714
|
Posted - 2014.10.21 01:31:00 -
[111] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Caught this one before I turned off.
Why run them?
Why not? They are there. They are doable.
There is nothing keeping these people from doing them. There are sites available in abundance in systems that were EMPTY ... ... except my own presence, of course.
There is *no* reason not to run them, as they are there ... ... they are doable ... and there's barely any danger.
If all you see is ISK-making ... ... then I have to question your intelligence.
If the only reason to play ... ... is to make ISK ... ... then I think you don't get the point of a game.
And even IF ISK-making was the only thing that counts ... ... which is a bullshit argument to begin with anyway ... ... then they'd still make more money running these sites ... ... than by not doing them and just sitting around!
You just more and more start to sound like a nullsec propaganda parrot.
That being said ... there's really nothing to add to your drivel.
Good night.
There are other more profitable things you can do for less risk in other places. Some of those sites are more difficult than the time is worth doing them. I run one site and I make 30m isk or I import a bunch of crap from highsec, because nullsec industry still needs help, and sell it for 300m while I'm off doing other things. In other words highsec needs a nerf.
This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133 |

Solecist Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
11116
|
Posted - 2014.10.21 08:20:00 -
[112] - Quote
This just doesn't make sense!
Given any number of people, there must be a smaller number of people who would run them, yet nobody does that. It just makes no sense to me.
Hell, I'm no fan of PvE either but I acknowledge the fact that people exist who run it. How can it be that of thousands of people, nobody does them?
Because it lights up the PvE counter and people will come and drop onto them? I understand that it's no fun, but how is it possible that SO many people share the same opinion??
I just don't get it! :O I am Sol. I cook my bacon naked, with sparkles of cinnamon on my skin. You are my content, my shiny content - you make me haaappy, when skies are greeeeyyy - you'll never know dear, how much I loooooove you - don't you take my content away! |

Solecist Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
11118
|
Posted - 2014.10.21 09:57:00 -
[113] - Quote
Amyclas Amatin > Solecist Project we love you! Amyclas Amatin > don't listen to the nasties!
Awwwww <3 :D I am Sol. I cook my bacon naked, with sparkles of cinnamon on my skin. You are my content, my shiny content - you make me haaappy, when skies are greeeeyyy - you'll never know dear, how much I loooooove you - don't you take my content away! |

Solecist Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
11119
|
Posted - 2014.10.21 10:56:00 -
[114] - Quote
Screenshot of the fight:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vwur32d9ayvy17j/Screenshot%202014-10-21%2012.56.13.png?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7t1qyfxdadh6d7x/Screenshot%202014-10-21%2012.59.42.png?dl=0 I am Sol. I cook my bacon naked, with sparkles of cinnamon on my skin. You are my content, my shiny content - you make me haaappy, when skies are greeeeyyy - you'll never know dear, how much I loooooove you - don't you take my content away! |

Adrie Atticus
Shadows of Rebellion The Bastion
452
|
Posted - 2014.10.21 11:09:00 -
[115] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:This just doesn't make sense!
Given any number of people, there must be a smaller number of people who would run them, yet nobody does that. It just makes no sense to me.
Hell, I'm no fan of PvE either but I acknowledge the fact that people exist who run it. How can it be that of thousands of people, nobody does them?
Because it lights up the PvE counter and people will come and drop onto them? I understand that it's no fun, but how is it possible that SO many people share the same opinion??
I just don't get it! :O
Because you cannot comprehend what has been posted in this thread: 1) They're too low on income and even at maximum upgrades they cannot support more than a few pilots in space 2) They're extremely easy intel for other groups to come and camp the system for no income at all, see 1) 3) 90% of the sites are garbage, see 1) 4) Shooting crosses is boring |

Solecist Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
11119
|
Posted - 2014.10.21 11:10:00 -
[116] - Quote
Adrie Atticus wrote:Because you cannot comprehend what has been posted in this thread: 1) They're too low on income and even at maximum upgrades they cannot support more than a few pilots in space 2) They're extremely easy intel for other groups to come and camp the system for no income at all, see 1) 3) 90% of the sites are garbage, see 1) 4) Shooting crosses is boring I guess that sums it up nicely.
Do you have first hand experience?
Thanks! I am Sol. I cook my bacon naked, with sparkles of cinnamon on my skin. You are my content, my shiny content - you make me haaappy, when skies are greeeeyyy - you'll never know dear, how much I loooooove you - don't you take my content away! |

Adrie Atticus
Shadows of Rebellion The Bastion
452
|
Posted - 2014.10.21 11:13:00 -
[117] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Adrie Atticus wrote:Because you cannot comprehend what has been posted in this thread: 1) They're too low on income and even at maximum upgrades they cannot support more than a few pilots in space 2) They're extremely easy intel for other groups to come and camp the system for no income at all, see 1) 3) 90% of the sites are garbage, see 1) 4) Shooting crosses is boring I guess that sums it up nicely. Do you have first hand experience? Thanks!
Yes, I do, thanks for asking. I was playing as a carebear since 2007 and then amended my ways and turned that useless toon into a bag of meat like the idiot I was and went to PvP as I find it more fun. |

Solecist Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
11119
|
Posted - 2014.10.21 11:15:00 -
[118] - Quote
No I mean ... do you have first hand experience in the space we're talking about. I am Sol. I cook my bacon naked, with sparkles of cinnamon on my skin. You are my content, my shiny content - you make me haaappy, when skies are greeeeyyy - you'll never know dear, how much I loooooove you - don't you take my content away! |

Aralyn Cormallen
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
587
|
Posted - 2014.10.21 12:00:00 -
[119] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:This just doesn't make sense!
Given any number of people, there must be a smaller number of people who would run them, yet nobody does that. It just makes no sense to me.
Hell, I'm no fan of PvE either but I acknowledge the fact that people exist who run it. How can it be that of thousands of people, nobody does them?
Because it lights up the PvE counter and people will come and drop onto them? I understand that it's no fun, but how is it possible that SO many people share the same opinion??
I just don't get it! :O
I think the problem is that there is a fundamental fact about ratting/missioning/anomolies - it is all really, really dull. If it was in-and-of-itself fun and interesting, it would get people run it for its own sake (think people in other games who quest for the stories, or raid for the challenges). EvE PVE has neither of those qualities - the stories are tepid and you are repeating them (literally, not just figuratively in the "loot 10 boar tusks" sense) several times a day, and any challenge it might have had is broken down and clearly documented to be no challenge at all (unless you make your own challenge like I've seen Jenn mention in the past).
Therefore, in the absence of challenge or story, all you have is isk, which means you have two types of regular "consumers"; those of us who do the bare minimum to get the isk they need so they can run off and pvp, and those who play the game to see their bank balance increase (or to level up their Raven), neither of which want any more out of the experience than raw efficiency, and that's the point where nullsec anomolies trip over, since its not rawly (is that a word) efficient for either the "quick couple of hours without interruption" (because of the potential for interruption) or "putting a blingy at risk" (because of the blingy being at risk) crowds.
|

Jenn aSide
Smokin Aces.
8637
|
Posted - 2014.10.21 12:25:00 -
[120] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:
Hell, I'm no fan of PvE either but I acknowledge the fact that people exist who run it. How can it be that of thousands of people, nobody does them?
This has been explained. Even now, most of the 'good' content in null is run by renters and ninja ratter or guys in the 'big alliances' with carriers/super carriers who can get the most out of them (and who want to not have the headache of converting LPs or hauling blue loot etc).
In MOST of space, the belt rats and anomalies that spawn either naturally or via the upgrade system SUCK compared to plain vanilla lvl 4 missions in empire. And in high sec, you got CONCORD to back you up so you don't have to risk an expensive asset (like a pirate BS) out in null. The ONLY way to make good isk out of null sec content is with an expensive ship, not so in the rest of EVE.
People will talk about exploration and 10/10 DEd plexes, but those suck too. Because you have to have either multiple guys or multi box if you want to do them quickly (or you solo them in a tech 3 but that exposes you to danger because it takes so long), AND they got nerfed years ago so most of the rewards are chance based (used to be you got a guaranteed 500 mil out of a 10/10 from OPEs alone, not that like 130 mil maybe).
MEANWHILE, explorers are doing 5-6/10s in low sec, getting a chance at MONSTER loot like pithum invuls (better than anyting you can get in a null 10/10) and if they get nohing, they didn't waste much time at all.
Much of the poor state of Null sec income activities stems from this and similar changes.
This is a good article from back in the day also:
http://www.eve-tribune.com/print.php?no=6_15
Quote:CCP referred to the lower grade anomalies (which will now become the only ones available to most sovereignty holders) as 'filler' - and indeed that's how they are regarded by the players. So CCP are being quite open about the fact that they want most 0.0 systems to be useless again.
The apparent aim of Dominion was to get more people out in 0.0 which had for a long time been the preserve of already very rich and powerful organisations, and the aim of this reversal seems to be to get those people back to empire.
The Dev blog talks about promoting conflict, but I don't really see any possible change in the state of war in null-sec. The huge power blocks are always fighting, and everyone else is being packed off back to their level-four agents.
Quote: Because it lights up the PvE counter and people will come and drop onto them? I understand that it's no fun, but how is it possible that SO many people share the same opinion??
I just don't get it! :O
it's easy to understand if you open your mind to the realities. The fact that you see all that stuff out there being undone should tell you something. If it was worth doing, people would be doing it. I do have an alt in null sec to do anomalies because it's easy , liquid isk and once in a while you luck up on an escalation, but for the most part, it's suck grinding for less than you could make usign the same toon in a noctis sweeping up wrecks and salvage in high sec behind your pve main.
The purpose of pve in EVE is to make isk. Null content is bad for this. High sec, low sec (regular and FW) and wormholes are better places to make isk for veteran AND new players alike. If anomalies didn't give liquid isk (the one saving grace of the things), almost NO one would be in null for pve at all.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |