EVE Search - [Rhea] The Confessor (T3 Destroyer #1)

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Test Server Feedback

[Rhea] The Confessor (T3 Destroyer #1)

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 19 post(s)

CCP Lebowski C C P C C P Alliance 328	Posted - 2014.11.26 15:49:56 - [1] - Quote Hello again quality conscious capsuleers, As of today's Singularity update the new Tech 3 Destroyer AKA the Confessor is available for testing! *[Please be aware that this ship is still very incomplete, and various changes and fixes will be hitting Sisi over this week]* The full market should now be seeded with the Confessor and the relevant skill book (Amarr Tactical Destroyers) There will be a forum thread and dev blog with the full stats and details of the Confessor, stay tuned. As always, I will update this thread with a list of known issues. Known/Reported Issues The mode change animation doesn't work correctly in warp. Contracts/View Contents/Ships Scanning/Killmails all display an item representing the ships current mode. Industry for the Confessor is incomplete. The cooldown for mode switching doesn't have its final message. Overview icon is incorrect The fitting window displays the subsystem symbols. The mode buttons do not have icon or final tooltips. One bonus is missing from the traits window (95% reduction to Probe Launcher CPU needs) Happy testing! CCP Lebowski \| EVE Quality Assurance \| Team Five-0 https://twitter.com/ccp_lebowski

Omnathious Deninard Novis Initiis 2552	Posted - 2014.11.26 16:01:20 - [2] - Quote I have a question regarding the tatical destroyers, not sure if it can/will be answered here so I will post it in the feedback thread also. Will tatical destroyers remain there own gimmic and not influence strategic cruisers? -
Querns GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation 1166	Posted - 2014.11.26 16:17:14 - [3] - Quote ~~Is there a general feedback thread for the Confessor yet?~~ Nevermind. I will be patient. :) This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
Yongtau Naskingar Yongtau Naskingar Corporation 79	Posted - 2014.11.26 16:24:06 - [4] - Quote Price for the skillbook is still 1M (stingy I know). Confessor seems only available in Thera on a small sell order (10k).
Adri Kinsan Spooky Scary Militants 0	Posted - 2014.11.26 16:30:43 - [5] - Quote Can we get the ship preview window to swap modes, like subsystem selection on t3 cruisers?
AnimeHeretic Starcade Group Elemental Tide 1	Posted - 2014.11.26 17:03:06 - [6] - Quote All the issues that i saw it looks like you covered. I would really like to get the bonuses working so i can test a proper fit. Also a question, are the bonuses stacking penalized in any way? and if so, how?

CCP Lebowski C C P C C P Alliance 329	Posted - 2014.11.26 17:14:12 - [7] - Quote AnimeHeretic wrote: All the issues that i saw it looks like you covered. I would really like to get the bonuses working so i can test a proper fit. Also a question, are the bonuses stacking penalized in any way? and if so, how? Its actually pretty frustrating, they were working in the previous build, we're investigating whats happened and we'll fix it as soon as we can. As to stacking, the bonuses provided by the modes are not stacking penalized. CCP Lebowski \| EVE Quality Assurance \| Team Five-0 https://twitter.com/ccp_lebowski


CCP Lebowski C C P C C P Alliance 329	Posted - 2014.11.26 17:14:46 - [8] - Quote Adri Kinsan wrote: Can we get the ship preview window to swap modes, like subsystem selection on t3 cruisers? Thanks for the suggestion. Ill pass it on to the relevant people. CCP Lebowski \| EVE Quality Assurance \| Team Five-0 https://twitter.com/ccp_lebowski


CCP Fozzie C C P C C P Alliance 12040	Posted - 2014.11.26 17:21:43 - [9] - Quote Omnathious Deninard wrote: I have a question regarding the tatical destroyers, not sure if it can/will be answered here so I will post it in the feedback thread also. Will tatical destroyers remain there own gimmic and not influence strategic cruisers? We think that the "Strategic" method of combining subsystems, and the "Tactical" method of switching between modes on the fly are both useful and viable branches of T3 ship design. You can expect us to keep working with both methods in the future, instead of trying to force all T3 ships into one or another. Game Designer \| Team Five-0 https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie http://www.twitch.tv/ccp_fozzie/

Ralph King-Griffin Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance 7104	Posted - 2014.11.26 17:35:48 - [10] - Quote allow me to be the first to say..... Yeaaaay!!!! "I'm also quite confident that you are laughing and it's the kind of laugh that gives normal people shivers." =]I[=

Harvey James The Sengoku Legacy 978	Posted - 2014.11.26 17:38:33 - [11] - Quote unsure why on sniper mode it needs 100% sensor strength bonus? Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic. Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
TheMercenaryKing StarFleet Enterprises Almost Awesome. 315	Posted - 2014.11.26 17:39:45 - [12] - Quote CCP Lebowski wrote: Adri Kinsan wrote: Can we get the ship preview window to swap modes, like subsystem selection on t3 cruisers? Thanks for the suggestion. Ill pass it on to the relevant people. Should be done for all ships like Rorqual, Marauders, dreads, and anything else that changes like that.
Harvey James The Sengoku Legacy 978	Posted - 2014.11.26 17:45:35 - [13] - Quote i like the T1 resist profile hope it carries on as the T3 default .. especially on the current cruisers... btw 33.33% beside the odd .33 why so high a bonus combined with the sig it might outtank AF's? Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic. Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
Omnathious Deninard Novis Initiis 2552	Posted - 2014.11.26 17:51:05 - [14] - Quote CCP Fozzie wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: I have a question regarding the tatical destroyers, not sure if it can/will be answered here so I will post it in the feedback thread also. Will tatical destroyers remain there own gimmic and not influence strategic cruisers? We think that the "Strategic" method of combining subsystems, and the "Tactical" method of switching between modes on the fly are both useful and viable branches of T3 ship design. You can expect us to keep working with both methods in the future, instead of trying to force all T3 ships into one or another. That is very pleasing to read, I believe the "Strategic" side of cruisers is something that has much potential for expansion once the balance pass has been hammered out. -
Harvey James The Sengoku Legacy 978	Posted - 2014.11.26 17:54:57 - [15] - Quote Omnathious Deninard wrote: CCP Fozzie wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: I have a question regarding the tatical destroyers, not sure if it can/will be answered here so I will post it in the feedback thread also. Will tatical destroyers remain there own gimmic and not influence strategic cruisers? We think that the "Strategic" method of combining subsystems, and the "Tactical" method of switching between modes on the fly are both useful and viable branches of T3 ship design. You can expect us to keep working with both methods in the future, instead of trying to force all T3 ships into one or another. That is very pleasing to read, I believe the "Strategic" side of cruisers is something that has much potential for expansion once the balance pass has been hammered out. strats . will need many changes before it works aswell as tactical , - remove rigs , completely kills flexibility and adds hefty price aswell on them ( 60mil ish) - make subs cheap (few mil) so that its worth having lots of them in cargo too swap around - remove T2 resists and nerf the HP/resist subs - make all fittings/stats attached too the hull and make subs bonus only Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic. Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
MidnightWyvern Night Theifs DamnedNation 73	Posted - 2014.11.26 18:15:21 - [16] - Quote CCP Lebowski wrote: Hello again quality conscious capsuleers, As of today's Singularity update the new Tech 3 Destroyer AKA the Confessor is available for testing! *[Please be aware that this ship is still very incomplete, and various changes and fixes will be hitting Sisi over the course this week]* The full market should now be seeded with the Confessor and the relevant skill book (Amarr Tactical Destroyers) There will be a forum thread and dev blog with the full stats and details of the Confessor, stay tuned. As always, I will update this thread with a list of known issues. Known/Reported Issues Mode bonuses not currently applying correctly. The mode change animation doesn't work correctly in warp. Contracts/View Contents/Ships Scanning/Killmails all display an item representing the ships current mode. Industry for the Confessor is incomplete. The cooldown for mode switching doesn't have its final message. Overview icon is incorrect The fitting window displays the subsystem symbols. The mode buttons do not have icon or final tooltips. One bonus is missing from the traits window (95% reduction to Probe Launcher CPU needs) Traits tab is missing details of cooldown time (10 seconds) Happy testing! Just the animations by themselves are worth flying that baby around. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=eaUaJUhTZfw#t=148s An excellent example of why pod killmails are the best feature to be implemented in EVE Online since warping at zero.
Harvey James The Sengoku Legacy 979	Posted - 2014.11.26 18:16:12 - [17] - Quote CCP Fozzie wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: I have a question regarding the tatical destroyers, not sure if it can/will be answered here so I will post it in the feedback thread also. Will tatical destroyers remain there own gimmic and not influence strategic cruisers? We think that the "Strategic" method of combining subsystems, and the "Tactical" method of switching between modes on the fly are both useful and viable branches of T3 ship design. You can expect us to keep working with both methods in the future, instead of trying to force all T3 ships into one or another. any clue when you are working on T3 cruisers? Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic. Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
Funzinnu BT Bread Fish 120	Posted - 2014.11.26 18:18:54 - [18] - Quote The design is cool I make a video http://youtu.be/TAY4Ts-1wXA
War Kitten Panda McLegion 5545	Posted - 2014.11.26 18:27:56 - [19] - Quote Funzinnu BT wrote: The design is cool I make a video http://youtu.be/TAY4Ts-1wXA Nice, thanks. So slots are 6/3/5, and speed mode didn't appear to speed things up any. CCP Fozzie - we need moar stats! Maek Poast! I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.
Harvey James The Sengoku Legacy 979	Posted - 2014.11.26 18:39:27 - [20] - Quote War Kitten wrote: Funzinnu BT wrote: The design is cool I make a video http://youtu.be/TAY4Ts-1wXA Nice, thanks. So slots are 6/3/5, and speed mode didn't appear to speed things up any. (Already noted in mode bonuses not applying) CCP Fozzie - we need moar stats! Maek Poast! a thread would be nice Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic. Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please

Masao Kurata Z List 163	Posted - 2014.11.26 18:46:21 - [21] - Quote Hmm, no secondary skill requirement, just amarr destroyer V (which is admittedly a skill most people who didn't get it in the skill split are unlikely to have). Is this the start of a change in how you view the skill tree, lowering the barrier of entry to T2 and T3 ships?
War Kitten Panda McLegion 5545	Posted - 2014.11.26 18:56:03 - [22] - Quote Masao Kurata wrote: Hmm, no secondary skill requirement, just amarr destroyer V (which is admittedly a skill most people who didn't get it in the skill split are unlikely to have). Is this the start of a change in how you view the skill tree, lowering the barrier of entry to T2 and T3 ships? They said there was a skill for it... maybe it's not in the reqs yet... "The full market should now be seeded with the Confessor and the relevant skill book (Amarr Tactical Destroyers)" I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.
Harvey James The Sengoku Legacy 979	Posted - 2014.11.26 18:57:47 - [23] - Quote Masao Kurata wrote: Hmm, no secondary skill requirement, just amarr destroyer V (which is admittedly a skill most people who didn't get it in the skill split are unlikely to have). Is this the start of a change in how you view the skill tree, lowering the barrier of entry to T2 and T3 ships? well really T3 shouldn't need any lv5 skills .. since they aren't specialist ships that being T2 and all Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic. Nerf web strength ..... Make the blaster eagle worth using please
Inir Ishtori Perkone Caldari State 59	Posted - 2014.11.26 19:38:42 - [24] - Quote Slot layout for Confessor shows for me as 7/3/5 with 6 gun slots in the fitting window as well on the data sheet from the market. Of those only 5 seems to fire while firing them as a whole group of six. The ship hull does display 7 hardpoints in total. If the ship is supposed to feature 6 guns, i'd like to see two on each side of the front part and 4 on top/bottom of the main body for a better visual impression. Likewise, if only 5 guns are planned, an even gun distribution on the ship's body is highly welcome. Other than that the ship looks mighty cool, very Ammarian and has nice high-tech feel to it. I feel that the speed configuration is not as impressive/distinctive as the sniper one, though.
Ralph King-Griffin Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance 7105	Posted - 2014.11.26 19:44:22 - [25] - Quote CCP Lebowski wrote: One bonus is missing from the traits window (95% reduction to Probe Launcher CPU needs) Oh my, that's interesting. "I'm also quite confident that you are laughing and it's the kind of laugh that gives normal people shivers." =]I[=
Daoden The Scope Gallente Federation 94	Posted - 2014.11.26 19:47:01 - [26] - Quote Cant wait for when the modes work, fairly impressed with the ship even without the modes.
Vesan Terakol Capsuleer Outfitters Bad Intention 114	Posted - 2014.11.26 19:49:25 - [27] - Quote Inir Ishtori wrote: Slot layout for Confessor shows for me as 7/3/5 with 6 gun slots in the fitting window as well on the data sheet from the market. Of those only 5 seems to fire while firing them as a whole group of six. The ship hull does display 7 hardpoints in total. If the ship is supposed to feature 6 guns, i'd like to see two on each side of the front part and 4 on top/bottom of the main body for a better visual impression. Likewise, if only 5 guns are planned, an even gun distribution on the ship's body is highly welcome. Other than that the ship looks mighty cool, very Ammarian and has nice high-tech feel to it. I feel that the speed configuration is not as impressive/distinctive as the sniper one, though. The hull displays 8 hardpoint slots - 4 on the front rail and 4 more around the body. If you want to evenly distribute them, the front rail uses sots 3,4 and 5. The forth fail slot is inaccessible. So how about the modes? Is there gonna be a cool down for swapping them? I ran into a bug, where the (already swapping) message appeared after the animation was long done aster my first speed>sniper swap. That is a bug compared to the current no cooldown swapping, OFC. P.S. The animations are pretty damn neat, although i'm not sure what the box that protrudes from the back in speed mode is supposed to be.
Masao Kurata Z List 163	Posted - 2014.11.26 20:04:38 - [28] - Quote War Kitten wrote: Masao Kurata wrote: Hmm, no secondary skill requirement, just amarr destroyer V (which is admittedly a skill most people who didn't get it in the skill split are unlikely to have). Is this the start of a change in how you view the skill tree, lowering the barrier of entry to T2 and T3 ships? They said there was a skill for it... maybe it's not in the reqs yet... "The full market should now be seeded with the Confessor and the relevant skill book (Amarr Tactical Destroyers)" Yes, there's a skill for it but unlike other T2 and T3 skills, the only requirement for training that skill is Amarr Destroyer V.
War Kitten Panda McLegion 5545	Posted - 2014.11.26 20:06:42 - [29] - Quote Masao Kurata wrote: War Kitten wrote: Masao Kurata wrote: Hmm, no secondary skill requirement, just amarr destroyer V (which is admittedly a skill most people who didn't get it in the skill split are unlikely to have). Is this the start of a change in how you view the skill tree, lowering the barrier of entry to T2 and T3 ships? They said there was a skill for it... maybe it's not in the reqs yet... "The full market should now be seeded with the Confessor and the relevant skill book (Amarr Tactical Destroyers)" Yes, there's a skill for it but unlike other T2 and T3 skills, the only requirement for training that skill is Amarr Destroyer V. Ah, I see what you meant by secondary skill requirements now... secondary skill requirements. Reading FTW. I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all.
Aquila Sagitta Blue-Fire 548	Posted - 2014.11.26 20:14:51 - [30] - Quote Is there going to be an option in the fitting window to change stance and see effects? or be able to change stance in station? Blue-Fire Best Fire



Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,05s, ref 20250829/1823
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

bitcoin: 1CHRiBBArqpw5Yz7x5KS2RRtN5ubEn5gF

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.