EVE Search - [Rhea] The Confessor (T3 Destroyer #1)

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Test Server Feedback

[Rhea] The Confessor (T3 Destroyer #1)

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 19 post(s)
Vulfen Snuff Box Snuffed Out 156	Posted - 2014.11.26 20:17:22 - [31] - Quote Loving the styling to this ship, i think the attributes are well balanced aswell. 1 Question, is the resistance profile bugged or is that the intended level? (since the mode has a bug i thought id just ask to clarify) The T3 cruisers gain full T2 resistances but these seem to have only a 50% primary buff and 25% secondary buff to resistance trait. The Art Team have really outdone themselves. Cant wait to see what those geniuses come up with for the other races.
Vulfen Snuff Box Snuffed Out 156	Posted - 2014.11.26 20:22:18 - [32] - Quote Harvey James wrote: Masao Kurata wrote: Hmm, no secondary skill requirement, just amarr destroyer V (which is admittedly a skill most people who didn't get it in the skill split are unlikely to have). Is this the start of a change in how you view the skill tree, lowering the barrier of entry to T2 and T3 ships? well really T3 shouldn't need any lv5 skills .. since they aren't specialist ships that being T2 and all I think they have this right. It does require lvl 5 Destroyer but does not need any support lvl 5 skills. This follows the same line as the T3 cruisers, their only difference is you need the subsystem skills aswell by that's part of the "strategic" requirement. Personally i think they need to raise the timer that is there to swap between modes and add a skill that reduces that time, i believe the current skill requirements to fly this ship to perfection (skill wise) as being too low.
Inir Ishtori Perkone Caldari State 59	Posted - 2014.11.26 20:25:49 - [33] - Quote Vesan Terakol wrote: The hull displays 8 hardpoint slots - 4 on the front rail and 4 more around the body. If you want to evenly distribute them, the front rail uses sots 3,4 and 5. The forth fail slot is inaccessible. [...] True, totally missed the 4th slot on the front. Still, it would be pretty neat if the gun slots were chosen in a way that the guns would assume a symmetrical position on their own without the need of further fiddling while filling the gun row up from left to the right in the fitting window. An idea to "pimp up" the visuals for the speed mode a little bit: maybe the box that extends from the top back of the ships when engaging this mode could light up in a glow similar to the one of the marauder ship parts? Being some sort of propulsion stabilization field device or similar.
Aquila Sagitta Blue-Fire 548	Posted - 2014.11.26 20:41:59 - [34] - Quote I'd just like to say after playing around with these for a bit... THESE LOOK LIKE THEY WILL BE HELLA FUN!!! can't wait for the minnie one. Tried to make a kiting fit with the confessor and just too slow for my liking. Can't wait to try a brawly fit once modes bonus apply. Blue-Fire Best Fire
Aliventi Hard Knocks Inc. 776	Posted - 2014.11.26 21:47:02 - [35] - Quote CCP Lebowski wrote: Known/Reported Issues Industry for the Confessor is incomplete. Any idea what the cost of this ship will be?
Ned Thomas Hellbound Turkeys Alliance of Abandoned Cybernetic Rejects 277	Posted - 2014.11.26 22:06:18 - [36] - Quote CCP Lebowski wrote: One bonus is missing from the traits window (95% reduction to Probe Launcher CPU needs) What voodoo is this??? Vote Sabriz!
Alexa Coates Space Wolves ind. The Revenant Order 748	Posted - 2014.11.26 22:27:30 - [37] - Quote Get hype. This thing + Bowhead is going to change eve for a good long time. That's a Templar, an Amarr fighter used by carriers.
Sabriz Adoudel Glorious Revolutionary Armed Forces of Highsec CODE. 3764	Posted - 2014.11.26 23:55:27 - [38] - Quote Ralph King-Griffin wrote: CCP Lebowski wrote: One bonus is missing from the traits window (95% reduction to Probe Launcher CPU needs) Oh my, that's interesting. Oh wow. I cannot wait to see this in action. A ship that can probe down prey and take it on. I look forward to fleeting up with five or ten of these in highsec mission hubs, all of us probing people down hunting for wartargets, and when someone finds one, scram the mark in the tankier mode while the others fly in in sniper mode. Chaos. Opportunity. Destruction. Excitement... Sabriz Adoudel for CSM 10
Seymarr Valkyries of Night Of Sound Mind 0	Posted - 2014.11.27 00:11:16 - [39] - Quote Another Issue for you, though it may be already in the works for a fix: At least some Acceleration Gates for exploration Combat sites are not flagged for Tactical Destroyers, despite admitting much heavier ships (HACs, Strategic Cruisers, etc.). Specifically, the highsec sites Desolate Site and Guristas Guerilla Grounds for certain do not admit them; those were just the two I've found thus far to test. Even though I'm kinda having to close my eyes and pretend on the mode bonuses thus far, this thing seems like it should be a blast to fly!
Ralph King-Griffin Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance 7118	Posted - 2014.11.27 00:33:47 - [40] - Quote Sabriz Adoudel wrote: Ralph King-Griffin wrote: CCP Lebowski wrote: One bonus is missing from the traits window (95% reduction to Probe Launcher CPU needs) Oh my, that's interesting. Oh wow. I cannot wait to see this in action. A ship that can probe down prey and take it on. I look forward to fleeting up with five or ten of these in highsec mission hubs, all of us probing people down hunting for wartargets, and when someone finds one, scram the mark in the tankier mode while the others fly in in sniper mode. THINK ABOUT IT... it has a bonus to sig tanking...sig tanking AND probing....i foresee many many uses for this* *there are no emotes with a grin big enough for this, lets get those bonuses applied "I'm also quite confident that you are laughing and it's the kind of laugh that gives normal people shivers." =]I[=

Century 2100 Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 0	Posted - 2014.11.27 03:20:19 - [41] - Quote Just found a new "questionable" feature. Right now on sisi you can change modes with out breaking gate cloak. Betting this is an error tied with the not changing states/bonus problems but passing it on as appropriate.
Cannibal Kane Cannibal Empire 4446	Posted - 2014.11.27 06:28:05 - [42] - Quote Ralph King-Griffin wrote: Sabriz Adoudel wrote: Ralph King-Griffin wrote: CCP Lebowski wrote: One bonus is missing from the traits window (95% reduction to Probe Launcher CPU needs) Oh my, that's interesting. Oh wow. I cannot wait to see this in action. A ship that can probe down prey and take it on. I look forward to fleeting up with five or ten of these in highsec mission hubs, all of us probing people down hunting for wartargets, and when someone finds one, scram the mark in the tankier mode while the others fly in in sniper mode. THINK ABOUT IT... it has a bonus to sig tanking...sig tanking AND probing....i foresee many many uses for this* there are no emotes with a grin big enough for this, lets get those bonuses applied I am starting to think the future re-balance of T3's cruiser will also have this ability modes. If that is the case... oh wow. "Kane is the End Boss of Highsec." -Psychotic Monk*
Xindi Kraid Priano Trans-Stellar State Services Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive 832	Posted - 2014.11.27 07:27:58 - [43] - Quote CCP Fozzie wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: I have a question regarding the tatical destroyers, not sure if it can/will be answered here so I will post it in the feedback thread also. Will tatical destroyers remain there own gimmic and not influence strategic cruisers? We think that the "Strategic" method of combining subsystems, and the "Tactical" method of switching between modes on the fly are both useful and viable branches of T3 ship design. You can expect us to keep working with both methods in the future, instead of trying to force all T3 ships into one or another. So what you're saying is maybe at some point we might see Strategic Destroyers and Tactical Cruisers?
Ralph King-Griffin Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance 7127	Posted - 2014.11.27 11:22:51 - [44] - Quote Cannibal Kane wrote: I am starting to think the future re-balance of T3's cruiser will also have this ability modes. If that is the case... oh wow. Yeah, I'm wondering how they will handle the subsystems though. "I'm also quite confident that you are laughing and it's the kind of laugh that gives normal people shivers." =]I[=
Artassaut Suns Of Korhal Terran Commonwealth 3	Posted - 2014.11.27 12:37:31 - [45] - Quote Xindi Kraid wrote: So what you're saying is maybe at some point we might see Strategic Destroyers and Tactical Cruisers? They should combine them both. Subsystems that add tactical modes.
Nagarythe Tinurandir House of Freedom The Pursuit of Happiness 190	Posted - 2014.11.27 13:48:08 - [46] - Quote Artassaut wrote: Xindi Kraid wrote: So what you're saying is maybe at some point we might see Strategic Destroyers and Tactical Cruisers? They should combine them both. Subsystems that add tactical modes. please let them refrain from that. I'd rather see every class of T3 (destroyer, cruiser, frig?) have it's own unique mechanic. why more fun.

CCP Lebowski C C P C C P Alliance 334	Posted - 2014.11.27 13:56:00 - [47] - Quote Thanks for all the comments so far everyone. I've updated the known issues in the OP for today's Singularity build CCP Lebowski \| EVE Quality Assurance \| Team Five-0 https://twitter.com/ccp_lebowski

Salpun Global Telstar Federation Offices Masters of Flying Objects 807	Posted - 2014.11.27 14:01:21 - [48] - Quote ISIS does not show the Confessor yet probably included in the industry not complete line item. If i dont know something about EVE. I check https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/ISK_The_Guide See you around the universe.
Arthur Aihaken X A X 3969	Posted - 2014.11.27 14:04:48 - [49] - Quote The Confessor design doesn't seem very 'Amarr'-like. The prow on the front seems more like something that would be present on a Minmatar or Caldari ship. I hope the other three designs for tactical destroyers lend themselves more towards their respective races. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Gosti Kahanid GANOR Deep Space Explorers GANOR INC. 78	Posted - 2014.11.27 14:23:55 - [50] - Quote Arthur Aihaken wrote: The Confessor design doesn't seem very 'Amarr'-like. The prow on the front seems more like something that would be present on a Minmatar or Caldari ship. I hope the other three designs for tactical destroyers lend themselves more towards their respective races. http://i.imgur.com/QkR8QZb.png this is the conzept of the Caldari-Destroyer

Titus Tallang EVE University Ivy League 65	Posted - 2014.11.27 14:45:43 - [51] - Quote Confessors are currently not visible to combat probes. They don't show in any of the presets (including "show all"), and do not have an entry in the "edit probe filter" menu. Feature or bug? Teaching Manager - EVE University - http://wiki.eveuniversity.org/

CCP Lebowski C C P C C P Alliance 334	Posted - 2014.11.27 14:49:27 - [52] - Quote Titus Tallang wrote: Confessors are currently not visible to combat probes. They don't show in any of the presets (including "show all"), and do not have an entry in the "edit probe filter" menu. Feature or bug? Yep this has not yet been implemented, adding to the known issues, thanks! CCP Lebowski \| EVE Quality Assurance \| Team Five-0 https://twitter.com/ccp_lebowski


CCP Lebowski C C P C C P Alliance 336	Posted - 2014.11.27 16:48:11 - [53] - Quote Century 2100 wrote: Just found a new "questionable" feature. Right now on sisi you can change modes with out breaking gate cloak. Betting this is an error tied with the not changing states/bonus problems but passing it on as appropriate. I checked this out and this is by design actually. Modes aren't a module, so there's no precedent for them being disabled by a cloak. Plus, on a personal note, seeing a cloaked ship transform is pretty awesome CCP Lebowski \| EVE Quality Assurance \| Team Five-0 https://twitter.com/ccp_lebowski

Ralph King-Griffin Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance 7130	Posted - 2014.11.27 17:27:42 - [54] - Quote dam, dat probe bonus. love these things, im not getting any of the bonuses in sisi but its maaaaaaaaaad fun regardless. must login the boosting alt and see what that will do for it "I'm also quite confident that you are laughing and it's the kind of laugh that gives normal people shivers." =]I[=
Lil' Brudder Too Pistols for Pandas 57	Posted - 2014.11.27 17:44:20 - [55] - Quote How soon will be be able to test whether or not we can actually build these...you know...before it hits TQ and everyone has to wait a day because you (CCP) forgot to actually attempt an invent job on them...?

CCP Fozzie C C P C C P Alliance 12056	Posted - 2014.11.27 17:45:53 - [56] - Quote Lil' Brudder Too wrote: How soon will be be able to test whether or not we can actually build these...you know...before it hits TQ and everyone has to wait a day because you (CCP) forgot to actually attempt an invent job on them...? You'll be able to build them in the next SISI update. Currently the only thing holding you back on SISI is the fact that the Self-Assembling Nanolattice blueprint isn't on the market. Game Designer \| Team Five-0 https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie http://www.twitch.tv/ccp_fozzie/

Lil' Brudder Too Pistols for Pandas 57	Posted - 2014.11.27 17:56:03 - [57] - Quote CCP Fozzie wrote: Lil' Brudder Too wrote: How soon will be be able to test whether or not we can actually build these...you know...before it hits TQ and everyone has to wait a day because you (CCP) forgot to actually attempt an invent job on them...? You'll be able to build them in the next SISI update. Currently the only thing holding you back on SISI is the fact that the Self-Assembling Nanolattice blueprint isn't on the market. Soo, what Relic is flagged for reverse engineering this? because currently the Confessor is not listed as an outcome on any of them...(that are currently listed on the SiSi market)

CCP Fozzie C C P C C P Alliance 12062	Posted - 2014.11.27 18:02:38 - [58] - Quote Lil' Brudder Too wrote: CCP Fozzie wrote: Lil' Brudder Too wrote: How soon will be be able to test whether or not we can actually build these...you know...before it hits TQ and everyone has to wait a day because you (CCP) forgot to actually attempt an invent job on them...? You'll be able to build them in the next SISI update. Currently the only thing holding you back on SISI is the fact that the Self-Assembling Nanolattice blueprint isn't on the market. Soo, what Relic is flagged for reverse engineering this? because currently the Confessor is not listed as an outcome on any of them...(that are currently listed on the SiSi market) That would be the Small Intact Hull Section, Small Malfunctioning Hull Section and Small Wrecked Hull Section. They'll be on the market on SISI tomorrow, and they're actually accessible on SISI now through the old fashioned "hack a talocan wreck" method. Game Designer \| Team Five-0 https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie http://www.twitch.tv/ccp_fozzie/

Noxisia Arkana Deadspace Knights Galactic Skyfleet Empire 403	Posted - 2014.11.27 18:21:29 - [59] - Quote CCP Fozzie wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: I have a question regarding the tatical destroyers, not sure if it can/will be answered here so I will post it in the feedback thread also. Will tatical destroyers remain there own gimmic and not influence strategic cruisers? We think that the "Strategic" method of combining subsystems, and the "Tactical" method of switching between modes on the fly are both useful and viable branches of T3 ship design. You can expect us to keep working with both methods in the future, instead of trying to force all T3 ships into one or another. That is actually the coolest thing I have heard CCP say. T3s with subs or a more tactical T3. Way to not shirk from the subsystem balance/usefulness issues.
Ralph King-Griffin Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance 7131	Posted - 2014.11.27 18:35:06 - [60] - Quote k im noticing the "Fit" option is taking its time fitting the confessor, theirs a noticeable delay between pushing the button and the mods going on (and going in one rack at a time). Also im not sure what's going on here but sometimes ill activate the guns and there is no visual weapons fire, others there is no fire at all. ill mention it ifi see it again just got a socket closed , probably something to do with that "I'm also quite confident that you are laughing and it's the kind of laugh that gives normal people shivers." =]I[=



Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.