| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Panther X
High Flyers The Kadeshi
35
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:18:48 -
[121] - Quote
Juneau Chokis wrote:Tykonderoga wrote:Fighters get murdered by subcaps all the time. Except when they have a few DDA/DNC/tracking links on them and trash literally any ship in the game without any sort of ewar required. Not sure if the rest of your post is some high-level trolling, though. I'm laughing my ass off reading that, knowing that you're in the largest snoozefest blob alliance in the game since the death of the northern coalition. You perfectly described it with your post.
I thought that was Goons...huh. Well learn something new e'er day
My super smells of rich Corinthian Leather
|

Tykonderoga
FinFleet Northern Coalition.
14
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:19:52 -
[122] - Quote
Juneau Chokis wrote:Tykonderoga wrote:Fighters get murdered by subcaps all the time. Except when they have a few DDA/DNC/tracking links on them and trash literally any ship in the game without any sort of ewar required. Not sure if the rest of your post is some high-level trolling, though. I'm laughing my ass off reading that, knowing that you're in the largest snoozefest blob alliance in the game since the death of the northern coalition. You perfectly described it with your post.
And I guess you never saw a CFC harpie fleet destroy fighters like they were nothing and the fighters do nothing against them in ten percent tidi. Even ten ishtars can defang a super easily. Just shows how you never use them. |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
536
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:23:36 -
[123] - Quote
Tykonderoga wrote: And I guess you never saw a CFC harpie fleet destroy fighters like they were nothing and the fighters do nothing against them in ten percent tidi. Even ten ishtars can defang a super easily. Just shows how you never use them.
hmm yes lets use fighters against a swarm of assfrigs, this is surely the best idea yet
whats sentries precious |

Tykonderoga
FinFleet Northern Coalition.
14
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:25:37 -
[124] - Quote
Promiscuous Female wrote:Tykonderoga wrote: And I guess you never saw a CFC harpie fleet destroy fighters like they were nothing and the fighters do nothing against them in ten percent tidi. Even ten ishtars can defang a super easily. Just shows how you never use them.
hmm yes lets use fighters against a swarm of assfrigs, this is surely the best idea yet whats sentries precious
You are missing the point that fighters are not an I win button and never have been. You have a limited number and supers can be defanged easily. They don't need to be made even more vulnerable. |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
536
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:28:26 -
[125] - Quote
Tykonderoga wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:Tykonderoga wrote: And I guess you never saw a CFC harpie fleet destroy fighters like they were nothing and the fighters do nothing against them in ten percent tidi. Even ten ishtars can defang a super easily. Just shows how you never use them.
hmm yes lets use fighters against a swarm of assfrigs, this is surely the best idea yet whats sentries precious You are missing the point that fighters are not an I win button and never have been. You have a limited number and supers can be defanged easily. They don't need to be made even more vulnerable. so your grand idea is to concoct the worst possible target to use fighters on as the fulcrum for your argument
great plan
also wow everyone calm down, it's literally putting a small delay on the fighter or fighter bomber attacking, it's not the end of the world |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
536
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:29:19 -
[126] - Quote
actually i take that back, an online POS is the worst possible target for a fighter
swarms of afterburning assfrigs are probably #2 though |

Tykonderoga
FinFleet Northern Coalition.
14
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:33:08 -
[127] - Quote
You haven't disproved anything I said. This is not a fix to anything but a made up problem by developers who do not like capitals or supers. |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
536
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:35:47 -
[128] - Quote
Tykonderoga wrote:You haven't disproved anything I said. This is not a fix to anything but a made up problem by developers who do not like capitals or supers. i dunno seems pretty cut and dried to me, there existed an edge case where fighters and fighterbombers were able to shoot much more frequently than normal, and the edge case was handled in probably the most elegant way possible |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
536
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:36:46 -
[129] - Quote
the only case where this actually hurts someone using fighters or fighterbombers are as follows:
A) they were using the exploit 2) they are ratting with fighters (or fighterbombers lmbo)
since anyone doing 2 is a complete retard we are forced to assume that anyone complaining was doing A |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
536
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:38:52 -
[130] - Quote
qed b*tch |

Mr Omniblivion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
306
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:40:10 -
[131] - Quote
It was me- I did it. Supers were too effective against us in the "oh I didn't know we deployed" deployment so I personally went to our goon CCP developers homes and shared some delicious bourbon as we discussed how to kneecap only our most hated enemies.
I really don't understand the whining over lock time on fighters/bombers. That is, unless, you were reliant on assigning fighters from supers orbiting a POS at 31km offgrid. In any real battle with capital ships or battleships (lol), this doesn't really have much effect. |

Arthur Aihaken
X A X
4046
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:42:44 -
[132] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:I know that some people who are hoping for a major nerf to assigned fighters will be unhappy that this change will only have a small-moderate effect on that activity. Can you guys just maybe kill drone assist instead?
I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
|

Tykonderoga
FinFleet Northern Coalition.
14
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:45:27 -
[133] - Quote
Promiscuous Female wrote:Tykonderoga wrote:You haven't disproved anything I said. This is not a fix to anything but a made up problem by developers who do not like capitals or supers. i dunno seems pretty cut and dried to me, there existed an edge case where fighters and fighterbombers were able to shoot much more frequently than normal, and the edge case was handled in probably the most elegant way possible
O, dear lord! An undocumented case of an imaginary exploit! |

Mario Putzo
Welping and Dunking.
1015
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:45:56 -
[134] - Quote
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:I don't get the significance of this change. Fighters and Fighter Bombers aren't really an issue in Cap v Subcap fights.
"These aren't the drones you are looking for"...somebody, probably.
Nerf sentries my good man, we all know they are out of balance, and we all know why there has been mostly drone boat meta since you tweaked Drones as a dedicated weapons platform over a year ago.
Its not bombers, its not fighter bombers, its not the Domi, it wasn't the Gila, it isn't the Prophecy, its not the Ishtar...
Its Sentry Drones. Quit kicking the can when anyone with a set of functioning eyeballs can see that Sentry Drones are not in line with other weapons, or other drones....god damn. I'm not sure the problem really is sentries so much as how many ships are able to use them. They should be considered battleship-sized weapons for all intents and purposes and the ships that use them should absolutely be balanced with that in mind - mostly by having access to them removed or neutered. The Ishtar shouldn't be launching five sentries - no sub-battleship hull should be, especially not something cruiser-sized - and a capital ship shouldn't have subcapital-class tracking in the form of sentry and heavy drones. I'm sure someone will complain "but what if my carrier gets tackled and my fighters can't hit the ship?" and to that person I say "then you obviously shouldn't be operating a capital ship without subcap support".
Completely disagree. First there is nothing wrong with ships using drones to combat smaller class ships. This includes sentry carriers. The functionality of drones is not an issue with game play and they should not be restricted based on "ship size". Sentries are just to good at what they do and need to be scaled back some. Thats it.
Or better yet just get rid of them and allow Lights/Mediums/Heavies to have a "mode" switch.
1) Mobile Can move Low Damage per shot High Rate of Fire Short Range Good Tracking
2) Sentry Can't move High Damage per shot Low Rate of Fire Long Range Poor Tracking.
This allows drone boats at all levels to function as "brawlers" or "snipers" and gives added functionality to what is more or less a fire and forget weapon system.
I dunno, Sentries need to be looked at before CCP tweaks any more hulls thats for sure. |

Rawketsled
Generic Corp Name
40
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:46:16 -
[135] - Quote
Promiscuous Female wrote:the only case where this actually hurts someone using fighters or fighterbombers are as follows:
A) they were using the exploit 2) they are ratting with fighters (or fighterbombers lmbo)
since anyone doing 2 is a complete retard we are forced to assume that anyone complaining was doing A Why on earth would you want to stop anyone potato enough to rat with FBs from doing so?
Let idiots be idiots. Natural selection will take care of them. |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
536
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:46:40 -
[136] - Quote
Tykonderoga wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:Tykonderoga wrote:You haven't disproved anything I said. This is not a fix to anything but a made up problem by developers who do not like capitals or supers. i dunno seems pretty cut and dried to me, there existed an edge case where fighters and fighterbombers were able to shoot much more frequently than normal, and the edge case was handled in probably the most elegant way possible O, dear lord! An undocumented case of an imaginary exploit! i recommend the "sticking your fingers in your ears and humming loudly" response towards all game changes |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
536
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:47:49 -
[137] - Quote
Rawketsled wrote:Promiscuous Female wrote:the only case where this actually hurts someone using fighters or fighterbombers are as follows:
A) they were using the exploit 2) they are ratting with fighters (or fighterbombers lmbo)
since anyone doing 2 is a complete retard we are forced to assume that anyone complaining was doing A Why on earth would you want to stop anyone potato enough to rat with FBs from doing so? Let idiots be idiots. Natural selection will take care of them. i mean they can still rat with fighters (or fb rofl) after the patch, albeit at a very slight reduction in ISK / hr |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
536
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:49:58 -
[138] - Quote
like if you are seriously so invested in fridging red crosses as your reason to log in that DRONE LOCK TIME is something that you accrue upset feelings about then you may wish to re-evaluate a thing or two |

Mr Omniblivion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
307
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:50:59 -
[139] - Quote
If you guys are looking to offload your now "worthless" super carriers, I hear Black Legion is looking to replenish their fleet  |

Tykonderoga
FinFleet Northern Coalition.
16
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:51:26 -
[140] - Quote
I was a little shocked I did not see you post four times. Anyway, there is no reason for this nerf other than to nerf alliances that like to use them and to in turn slowly make them useless. At least Baltec is truthful about his intentions. Well, he should amend his words to say: "Death to your supers, but not ours." |

Mr Omniblivion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
308
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:59:00 -
[141] - Quote
Tykonderoga wrote:"Death to your supers, but not ours."
In all honesty, the entirety of the CFC* would be more than happy to trade our supers in for other ships or reimbursement.
Supers really weigh down the low/null experience and are the reason for the huge coalitions. Thousands of subcaps don't matter against the combination of caps/supers, so groups are defined purely on the number of supers that they can contribute.
*: I say entirety, but I'm sure there are a few scrubs in the CFC that would cry that their shiny epeen was taken away. |

Constantinee
Wrecking Shots Black Legion.
37
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 02:59:49 -
[142] - Quote
Mr Omniblivion wrote:If you guys are looking to offload your now "worthless" super carriers, I hear Black Legion is looking to replenish their fleet 
8 of 70.... our entire fleet is sacked whatever will we do..
Fozzie this still dont fix the archon spam that happens on a daily with sentries.... why hasent this even been adressed?
Constantinee video archive. http://www.youtube.com/user/Constvids?feature=mhee
|

Mr Omniblivion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
308
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 03:04:18 -
[143] - Quote
Constantinee wrote:Fozzie this still dont fix the archon spam that happens on a daily with sentries.... why hasent this even been adressed?
I would agree that sentries need to go in general. There really is no sufficient counter to carriers that can spit out hundreds of sentry drones and/or recall and redeploy them to dodge bombs. Except Supers!  |

Tykonderoga
FinFleet Northern Coalition.
16
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 03:05:48 -
[144] - Quote
Mr Omniblivion wrote:Tykonderoga wrote:"Death to your supers, but not ours." In all honesty, the entirety of the CFC* would be more than happy to trade our supers in for other ships or reimbursement. Supers really weigh down the low/null experience and are the reason for the huge coalitions. Thousands of subcaps don't matter against the combination of caps/supers, so groups are defined purely on the number of supers that they can contribute. *: I say entirety, but I'm sure there are a few scrubs in the CFC that would cry that their shiny epeen was taken away.
But somehow I feel that the 30k coalition you have cobbled together would not go away. And the only reason there has been a stockpiling of supers and titans has been to oppose your 30k man blob. And you say you want a healthy game, but how is a 30k man coalition, and that is most of EvE, healthy for the game? |

Mr Omniblivion
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
308
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 03:10:52 -
[145] - Quote
The current problem is that without a change from CCP, whoever acts first (and disbands or destroys their supers) loses.
I have a sneaky suspicion that the upcoming sov changes will pave the way for upcoming nerfs/removal of supers, and thus, the large coalitions. |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
539
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 03:17:34 -
[146] - Quote
Tykonderoga wrote: But somehow I feel that the 30k coalition you have cobbled together would not go away. And the only reason there has been a stockpiling of supers and titans has been to oppose your 30k man blob. And you say you want a healthy game, but how is a 30k man coalition, and that is most of EvE, healthy for the game?
nerf diplomacy ;-( |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
539
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 03:22:30 -
[147] - Quote
please allow me, as a representative of goonswarm federation, to apologize for using game breaking tactics such as "finding roles for low-SP doctrines," "making the game tolerable for new players," and "talking to people with the general goal of benefiting both parties" |

Mario Putzo
Welping and Dunking.
1015
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 03:29:18 -
[148] - Quote
Tykonderoga wrote:Mr Omniblivion wrote:Tykonderoga wrote:"Death to your supers, but not ours." In all honesty, the entirety of the CFC* would be more than happy to trade our supers in for other ships or reimbursement. Supers really weigh down the low/null experience and are the reason for the huge coalitions. Thousands of subcaps don't matter against the combination of caps/supers, so groups are defined purely on the number of supers that they can contribute. *: I say entirety, but I'm sure there are a few scrubs in the CFC that would cry that their shiny epeen was taken away. But somehow I feel that the 30k coalition you have cobbled together would not go away. And the only reason there has been a stockpiling of supers and titans has been to oppose your 30k man blob. And you say you want a healthy game, but how is a 30k man coalition, and that is most of EvE, healthy for the game?
Oh come on man settle down with the ideological hyperbole/ Obviously CFC is healthy for the game. You don't get 30K people working together to generate content for whatever the **** they want without having a healthy community. If any NS group was actually a cancer to the game they wouldn't exist because people just wouldn't play with them anymore.
Put down the pamphlets man.
|

d0cTeR9
Astro Technologies Apocalypse Now.
27
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 03:41:44 -
[149] - Quote
How about nerfing the thousands of interceptors, cov ops and ishtars instead of picking on a few supercaps that are trying to survive from the onslaught flying something expensive brings? Meaning everyone wants to kill it and will do almost anything to get that on that KM... |

Arkady Romanov
Hole Violence Whole Squid
563
|
Posted - 2015.01.06 03:46:20 -
[150] - Quote
Poor little you in your 25 billion ISK ship which was designed without proper consideration of its place in the context of the rest of the game. What an astonishing amount of effort it must have taken to maintain your account long enough for passive SP gain to skill you into it.
Truly, yours is the greatest burden to bear.
Whole Squid: Get Inked.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |