EVE Search - Sharkbait on TQ, a new Dev Blog and News Item

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Sharkbait on TQ, a new Dev Blog and News Item

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 10 post(s)
Mangold Freelance Unincorporated Ushra'Khan	Posted - 2006.09.22 21:04:00 - [61] Will you give weeks free of charge because of the server instability and lack of gameplay? If not, why the **** not?

Sharkbait	Posted - 2006.09.23 10:06:00 - [62] Originally by: Bazman I saw Sharkbait in H-ADOC today, docked in the 4-1 station. I said hello but got ignored :( Obviously he must have been busy chatting up the strippers and getting trashed on Mindflood instead of fixing TQ :P sry i wasn't being rude. i was helping out with petitions and wasn't really looking at the chat windows Spank You later


Sharkbait	Posted - 2006.09.23 10:12:00 - [63] ok. pokebelly added a fix onto TQ that made the code handle the Ram better on the nodes. this has helped so much it's unreal. the nodes are lot more stable since this fix got in and they do not seem to be using as much Ram. on another note there was alot of people here at ccp doing petitions yesterday. the goal was to get the queue down to 200 petitions, i just checked and the queue is at abot 800+. so it was a good day for us and more importantly for you. with the server stability fixes that have gone in, the petition queue will stay really low hopefully and petitions will get answered asap. so everyone is a happy chappy now, except those of us that went out and got blind drink last night and lost the ability to walk in a straight line and now feel like utter crap this morning. Spank You later

Brigitte	Posted - 2006.09.23 11:04:00 - [64] i didn't do it
Helen Baque Gallente Baque Industries	Posted - 2006.09.23 16:01:00 - [65] Originally by: Sharkbait Originally by: Bazman I saw Sharkbait in H-ADOC today, docked in the 4-1 station. sry i wasn't being rude. i was helping out with petitions and wasn't really looking at the chat windows Just some idle curiosity here. When you log in to to Dev/GM kind of stuff, are you just in an EVE client with extra features? You can dock and undock, fly around, engage in combat, et cetera? -- I already have a girlfriend. Her name is EVE. ;-)
Gabriel Karade Office linebackers Blood of the Innocents	Posted - 2006.09.23 17:19:00 - [66] Edited by: Gabriel Karade on 23/09/2006 17:22:17 Originally by: Jie Shi Edited by: Jie Shi on 22/09/2006 20:10:12 Originally by: Gabriel Karade Originally by: Jie Shi Edited by: Jie Shi on 21/09/2006 18:03:57 Originally by: Grimpak Originally by: Jie Shi The game is still laggy and the devs are still lying. They are lying because the servers never get any better no matter what they say they are doing to them. RAMSAN upgrade did nothing. Brand new cluster did nothing. Dragon code did nothing. Why would anyone beilieve a word they say anymore. Well you probably weren't around then, and thus have no real clue as to what you are talking about... The new cluster, the RAMSAN, did have a immediate, highly noticable effect on performance. And what are you basing your bad info on? I've been playing the game since release. It's as laggy as it ever was. None of those improvements had any effect. The reason why is simple. They didn't do the upgrades till the servers were already at their limit. All CCP seems capable of doing is playing catch up. When the new cluster was rolled out everyone noticed the increase in performance. When the RAMSAN was rolled out everyone noticed the decrease in loading times of, for example the market screen. Anyone here could look back at the threads at the time and see that hardware was universally praised, so the question should be what are you basing your bad info on? If you really have been playing since release post with your main, otherwise you're just another '!' with no credibility whatsoever... ---------- - Office Linebacker -

Sharkbait	Posted - 2006.09.23 17:25:00 - [67] Originally by: Helen Baque Originally by: Sharkbait Originally by: Bazman I saw Sharkbait in H-ADOC today, docked in the 4-1 station. sry i wasn't being rude. i was helping out with petitions and wasn't really looking at the chat windows Just some idle curiosity here. When you log in to to Dev/GM kind of stuff, are you just in an EVE client with extra features? You can dock and undock, fly around, engage in combat, et cetera? hmm. there is another client i use, it is the decompiled client with some other tools etc. i can't really go into it tbh. Spank You later

Mistica Caldari Cirrius Technologies O X I D E	Posted - 2006.09.24 12:20:00 - [68] I just want to say.. that.. there were times I was saying.. why just dont quit.. Reading posts like these made me not do it. Information :D I know now you are really doing all you can to fix all the trouble, I must say it surely is improving lately. My respect goes out to all of you there working hard to get TQ where it should be, coping with new issues every single time, petition queues exploding, forums cluttering. Yall are doing one heck of a job, keep it up.. If you do so, you keep me ingame lol! tbh.. i dont wanna quit eve, it is too darn good! good job guys ---------------------------------------------- Dream As You Will Live Forever... Live As You Will Die Today!!! :D
Naddz	Posted - 2006.09.24 21:57:00 - [69] Hey, I would love to pat people on the back here and say "keep up the good work", but it seems to me that TQ server issues are getting worse, not better. I have a couple of peeps Ive been trying to get into this game for a long time now and they finally tried it last week only to experience everything most of us are getting to hate. To the new peeps, it seems this is a terrible game. They get hung on gates. containers wont open and traffic advisories are popping up like zits on a teenager. I used to think it was grand everytime the EVE population grew when reading how new simultaneous user records would be broken, but am now finding those little notes quite repulsive. To me, 5k more peeps just means that much more lag we have to deal with. To make me really ****ed off, I am finding that macro miners arent canned like they should be when petitioned. I petition them and find the same macro miners in system next day. Just more money in CCPs pocket I suppose which I do hope is being used to buy a server that will allow some decent gameplay. This is not a problem that is new. This has been ongoing for weeks now. Enough is enough. Fix this and Ill be happy to pat you on the back and say "keep up the good work".
Miss Overlord Gallente Garoun Investment Bank	Posted - 2006.09.25 10:48:00 - [70] so whats next sharkbait (as much info as youre allowed give) say plans CCP has for the next 2-3 days in terms of TQ etc
Phoenix Lonestar Litanies of Hate	Posted - 2006.09.25 18:21:00 - [71] Don't get complacent, CCP. We're happier that you're slowly but surely fixing what you BROKE (please, let's remember that it was fine before Dragon, but Dragon screwed the pooch), but we won't be entirely happy until the game is running like it was pre-Dragon. I don't care how much you say "The servers are operating with 50% less CPU usage since Dragon!" I don't care what your performance figures say. If they said CPU usage was at 153%, but the game was running smoothly, THAT'S what I'd care about. I doubt anyone here is oohing or ahhhing over the increased performance that isn't translating over into the client side. My personal benchmark is as follows: The problems are fixed when you can have 650 people in Jita on a 28,000 player day with minimal (if any) lag... like PRE-DRAGON!!!!!!
Lojik Casting Shadows	Posted - 2006.09.26 09:22:00 - [72] Originally by: Jie Shi Edited by: Jie Shi on 21/09/2006 18:03:57 Originally by: Grimpak Originally by: Jie Shi The game is still laggy and the devs are still lying. Why would anyone beilieve a word they say anymore. Maybe because Eve online has had over 11 Major awards in multiple area's voted by over 1Mil ppl and has a constantly increaseing fan base. Why would anyone belive what u say ? ------------- cheer for the update sharkbait, i hope the lag spikes and node problems get nipped soon. Lojik BPO Organizer - Linkage

Sharkbait	Posted - 2006.09.26 15:25:00 - [73] bit more news. we thought that space was fully of crap so valar decided to have a clean around the place. at DT today he moved 650k drones and 142k ships to peoples hangers from space. this hopefully will reduce the ram being used on the nodes quite alot. Spank You later

Flitz Farseeker Gallente	Posted - 2006.09.26 15:52:00 - [74] Originally by: Sharkbait ...at DT today he moved 650k drones and 142k ships to peoples hangers from space..
Crunch Hardiron Caldari Dark Matter Collective	Posted - 2006.09.26 16:03:00 - [75] Originally by: Flitz Farseeker Originally by: Sharkbait ...at DT today he moved 650k drones and 142k ships to peoples hangers from space.. That's almost 800k. ---- Originally by: DigitalCommunist I'm a seven foot giant that chews steel and farts lightning. Beat that!
Par'Gellen Low Grade Ore	Posted - 2006.09.26 16:40:00 - [76] Edited by: Par''Gellen on 26/09/2006 16:40:12 Originally by: Sharkbait bit more news. we thought that space was fully of crap so valar decided to have a clean around the place. at DT today he moved 650k drones and 142k ships to peoples hangers from space. this hopefully will reduce the ram being used on the nodes quite alot. Do you mean he moved drones and ships left in space by players to those players' hangars? If so then I want to hug him! Any chance we might see something like this for anchored cans that have been abandoned? Maybe move the one's that haven't been accessed in years? --- Starmaps - An Insta Solution
TorTorden	Posted - 2006.09.27 01:27:00 - [77] Originally by: Phoenix Lonestar Don't get complacent, CCP. We're happier that you're slowly but surely fixing what you BROKE (please, let's remember that it was fine before Dragon, but Dragon screwed the pooch), but we won't be entirely happy until the game is running like it was pre-Dragon. I don't care how much you say "The servers are operating with 50% less CPU usage since Dragon!" I don't care what your performance figures say. If they said CPU usage was at 153%, but the game was running smoothly, THAT'S what I'd care about. I doubt anyone here is oohing or ahhhing over the increased performance that isn't translating over into the client side. My personal benchmark is as follows: The problems are fixed when you can have 650 people in Jita on a 28,000 player day with minimal (if any) lag... like PRE-DRAGON!!!!!! To my memory they rolled dragon because TQ had been experiencing realy bad lag for the past few weeks. What I believe they are saying here is that DRAGON fixed the major lag issiues we where having but as so many times before with software in general the fix has introduced new bugs with similar symptoms. (inow TQ has a new disease but running the same fever)
TorTorden	Posted - 2006.09.27 01:27:00 - [78] Originally by: Phoenix Lonestar Don't get complacent, CCP. We're happier that you're slowly but surely fixing what you BROKE (please, let's remember that it was fine before Dragon, but Dragon screwed the pooch), but we won't be entirely happy until the game is running like it was pre-Dragon. I don't care how much you say "The servers are operating with 50% less CPU usage since Dragon!" I don't care what your performance figures say. If they said CPU usage was at 153%, but the game was running smoothly, THAT'S what I'd care about. I doubt anyone here is oohing or ahhhing over the increased performance that isn't translating over into the client side. My personal benchmark is as follows: The problems are fixed when you can have 650 people in Jita on a 28,000 player day with minimal (if any) lag... like PRE-DRAGON!!!!!! To my memory they rolled dragon because TQ had been experiencing realy bad lag for the past few weeks. What I believe they are saying here is that DRAGON fixed the major lag issiues we where having but as so many times before with software in general the fix has introduced new bugs with similar symptoms. (inow TQ has a new disease but running the same fever)
TorTorden	Posted - 2006.09.27 01:27:00 - [79] Originally by: Phoenix Lonestar Don't get complacent, CCP. We're happier that you're slowly but surely fixing what you BROKE (please, let's remember that it was fine before Dragon, but Dragon screwed the pooch), but we won't be entirely happy until the game is running like it was pre-Dragon. I don't care how much you say "The servers are operating with 50% less CPU usage since Dragon!" I don't care what your performance figures say. If they said CPU usage was at 153%, but the game was running smoothly, THAT'S what I'd care about. I doubt anyone here is oohing or ahhhing over the increased performance that isn't translating over into the client side. My personal benchmark is as follows: The problems are fixed when you can have 650 people in Jita on a 28,000 player day with minimal (if any) lag... like PRE-DRAGON!!!!!! To my memory they rolled dragon because TQ had been experiencing realy bad lag for the past few weeks. What I believe they are saying here is that DRAGON fixed the major lag issiues we where having but as so many times before with software in general the fix has introduced new bugs with similar symptoms. (inow TQ has a new disease but running the same fever)
TorTorden	Posted - 2006.09.27 01:27:00 - [80] Originally by: Phoenix Lonestar Don't get complacent, CCP. We're happier that you're slowly but surely fixing what you BROKE (please, let's remember that it was fine before Dragon, but Dragon screwed the pooch), but we won't be entirely happy until the game is running like it was pre-Dragon. I don't care how much you say "The servers are operating with 50% less CPU usage since Dragon!" I don't care what your performance figures say. If they said CPU usage was at 153%, but the game was running smoothly, THAT'S what I'd care about. I doubt anyone here is oohing or ahhhing over the increased performance that isn't translating over into the client side. My personal benchmark is as follows: The problems are fixed when you can have 650 people in Jita on a 28,000 player day with minimal (if any) lag... like PRE-DRAGON!!!!!! To my memory they rolled dragon because TQ had been experiencing realy bad lag for the past few weeks. What I believe they are saying here is that DRAGON fixed the major lag issiues we where having but as so many times before with software in general the fix has introduced new bugs with similar symptoms. (inow TQ has a new disease but running the same fever)
TorTorden	Posted - 2006.09.27 01:27:00 - [81] Edited by: TorTorden on 27/09/2006 01:35:45 I have no Idea how this happend, Realy sry.
TorTorden	Posted - 2006.09.27 01:27:00 - [82] Edited by: TorTorden on 27/09/2006 01:35:41 I have no Idea how this happend, Realy sry.
TorTorden	Posted - 2006.09.27 01:27:00 - [83] Edited by: TorTorden on 27/09/2006 01:35:35 I have no Idea how this happend, Realy sry.
TorTorden	Posted - 2006.09.27 01:27:00 - [84] Edited by: TorTorden on 27/09/2006 01:35:31 I have no Idea how this happend, Realy sry.
TorTorden	Posted - 2006.09.27 01:27:00 - [85] Edited by: TorTorden on 27/09/2006 01:35:26 I have no Idea how this happend, Realy sry.
TorTorden	Posted - 2006.09.27 01:27:00 - [86] Edited by: TorTorden on 27/09/2006 01:35:22 I have no Idea how this happend, Realy sry.
TorTorden	Posted - 2006.09.27 01:27:00 - [87] Edited by: TorTorden on 27/09/2006 01:35:16 I have no Idea how this happend, Realy sry.
TorTorden	Posted - 2006.09.27 01:27:00 - [88] Edited by: TorTorden on 27/09/2006 01:33:17 I have no Idea how this happend, Realy sry.
TorTorden	Posted - 2006.09.27 01:27:00 - [89] Edited by: TorTorden on 27/09/2006 01:33:13 I have no Idea how this happend, Realy sry.
TorTorden	Posted - 2006.09.27 01:27:00 - [90] Edited by: TorTorden on 27/09/2006 01:33:06 I have no Idea how this happend, Realy sry.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.