Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 .. 15 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 85 post(s) |
Gabriel Karade
Noir. No Not Believing
258
|
Posted - 2015.07.04 12:02:32 -
[391] - Quote
Just a minor thing (sure you'll be doing it anyway); on the attributes tab, there's still the legacy 'anchoring'/'unanchoring' e.t.c delay times mentioned - obviously we all know that those aren't relevant, but could still cause some confusion when it hits TQ.
(also the description on the TCU)
War Machine: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=386293
|
Gabriel Karade
Noir. No Not Believing
258
|
Posted - 2015.07.04 12:25:11 -
[392] - Quote
So, just seen a TCU with a 57 hour RF timer, is that kosher?
(9-F0B2)
War Machine: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=386293
|
utec asmo
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2015.07.04 13:04:48 -
[393] - Quote
Gabriel Karade wrote:So, just seen a TCU with a 57 hour RF timer, is that kosher?
(9-F0B2)
The system only has a 1,4 defense multiplier, so the vulnerability window is big. It was probably reinforced right after it exited vulnerability, so in addition to the ~48h of regular reinforced time are 9ish hours between the time it was reinforced and the prime time of the defending alliance.
|
Gabriel Karade
Noir. No Not Believing
258
|
Posted - 2015.07.04 13:12:43 -
[394] - Quote
Edit: nvm - understood, guessing it just happened to pick a random time towards the back-end of the vulnerability window, hence the +9 hours.
War Machine: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=386293
|
Redwyne Vyruk
Tr0pa de elite. Pandemic Legion
9
|
Posted - 2015.07.05 00:30:13 -
[395] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Redwyne Vyruk wrote:is the bills we're receiving in duality the real value it'll be on TQ at the launch? No, the bills are currently set to lower values in this build. You can expect overall costs to stay the same as current TQ numbers in this release, with the major change being the TCU cost being moved to the IHub.
tyvm for the answer |
Jayne Fillon
737
|
Posted - 2015.07.05 00:39:41 -
[396] - Quote
When is the official end of the tournament, 24hr or 48hr?
I don't see a specific time listed other than simply the 6th of July.
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
|
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans
2566
|
Posted - 2015.07.05 00:48:42 -
[397] - Quote
Heinrich Rotwang wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:Most recent timer list: Exit Time Solar System Structure Owning Alliance Defense Multiplier 2015.07.02 16:11 H6-CX8 Station Defense Fidelas Constans 6 2015.07.02 20:03 H6-CX8 IHub Defense Spectre Fleet Alliance 3.4 What I dont get is, how the H6 station can still have a 6x defense multiplier. They lost the TCU and the IHub and when I open the sov info tab it says 3.4 and rapidly dropping. Is there 3 different multipliers even tho there is only one visible and others are hidden or ... ? Confusion. Did they lose ihub/tcu before or after timer started? |
Jayne Fillon
737
|
Posted - 2015.07.05 00:53:27 -
[398] - Quote
Rowells wrote:Heinrich Rotwang wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:Most recent timer list: Exit Time Solar System Structure Owning Alliance Defense Multiplier 2015.07.02 16:11 H6-CX8 Station Defense Fidelas Constans 6 2015.07.02 20:03 H6-CX8 IHub Defense Spectre Fleet Alliance 3.4 What I dont get is, how the H6 station can still have a 6x defense multiplier. They lost the TCU and the IHub and when I open the sov info tab it says 3.4 and rapidly dropping. Is there 3 different multipliers even tho there is only one visible and others are hidden or ... ? Confusion. Did they lose ihub/tcu before or after timer started? H6 was FCON's Capital unless I'm crazy.
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
|
Kenneth Feld
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
244
|
Posted - 2015.07.05 01:06:09 -
[399] - Quote
Jayne Fillon wrote:When is the official end of the tournament, 24hr or 48hr?
I don't see a specific time listed other than simply the 6th of July.
Why wouldn't it be DT 11:00, that is 24 hours before patch (although this stuff doesn't come out in the patch) I am sure CCP devs will be busy with patch stuff and we start to wrap up last minute details on the test |
Zibru Povens
Hoover Inc. Pandemic Legion
13
|
Posted - 2015.07.05 07:04:24 -
[400] - Quote
Jayne Fillon wrote:When is the official end of the tournament, 24hr or 48hr?
I don't see a specific time listed other than simply the 6th of July.
In chat on Duality, Fozzie said the contest ends on Monday at 1100. |
|
Dizzop Bengal
Chamber Militant
1
|
Posted - 2015.07.05 08:01:17 -
[401] - Quote
In the corp menu under "alliances" under the "sovereignty" tab. When sorting by timer the ongoing timers are under the reinforced timers. This is slightly confusing, Is it possible to adjust the sorting to make the ongoing ones appear above the reinforcement timers? or is there a reason for them to appear above the ongoing ones? |
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE Fidelas Constans
2566
|
Posted - 2015.07.05 22:52:47 -
[402] - Quote
Jayne Fillon wrote:Rowells wrote:Heinrich Rotwang wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:Most recent timer list: Exit Time Solar System Structure Owning Alliance Defense Multiplier 2015.07.02 16:11 H6-CX8 Station Defense Fidelas Constans 6 2015.07.02 20:03 H6-CX8 IHub Defense Spectre Fleet Alliance 3.4 What I dont get is, how the H6 station can still have a 6x defense multiplier. They lost the TCU and the IHub and when I open the sov info tab it says 3.4 and rapidly dropping. Is there 3 different multipliers even tho there is only one visible and others are hidden or ... ? Confusion. Did they lose ihub/tcu before or after timer started? H6 was FCON's Capital unless I'm crazy. Now that you mention it, it does sound familiar. However I haven't been on there in a while, so I have no idea what has happened since then. |
Warmeister
Van Diemen's Demise Pandemic Legion
13
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 06:50:18 -
[403] - Quote
so when is the raffle gonna take place? |
Heinrich Rotwang
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
95
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 09:09:13 -
[404] - Quote
Rowells wrote:Heinrich Rotwang wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:Most recent timer list: Exit Time Solar System Structure Owning Alliance Defense Multiplier 2015.07.02 16:11 H6-CX8 Station Defense Fidelas Constans 6 2015.07.02 20:03 H6-CX8 IHub Defense Spectre Fleet Alliance 3.4 What I dont get is, how the H6 station can still have a 6x defense multiplier. They lost the TCU and the IHub and when I open the sov info tab it says 3.4 and rapidly dropping. Is there 3 different multipliers even tho there is only one visible and others are hidden or ... ? Confusion. Did they lose ihub/tcu before or after timer started?
AFAIR the other sov structures were gone by the time we reinforced the station, but the effective multiplier being calculated ahead of time explains it. I knew it was the FCON HQ - just didn't know the value is always a fixed one (guilty !rtfm)
I think a lot of the complexity comes once again from the UI. If the 3 rows in the sov tab representing the 3 sov structures would simply show the actual effective multiplier for the state the structure is currently in, everything would be fine. |
|
CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
13045
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 11:10:25 -
[405] - Quote
And the competition is officially over!
Final scores are: Pandemic Legion: 198 Spectre Fleet Alliance: 40 No Not Believing: 35 Affirmative.: 22 Fidelas Constans: 7
Big congrats to everyone who participated, especially to the final five alliances.
I've drawn the winners for the module naming using Chribba's dice, and those results will be revealed in an upcoming dev blog.
Remember that the drawn alliances don't get to name the module whatever they want. The default is for the alliance ticker of the winning alliances to be added to the name, and we're willing to consider other suggestions from the winning alliances as long as they completely and totally fit into the EVE universe. The bar for alternate suggestions is extremely high, and we expect to use the ticker for most of the modules.
Remember that Duality remains open and can still be used for testing, bug reporting and getting acquainted with the new system. We have another internal build ready to deploy soon that has another big batch of UI updates thanks to your feedback.
Game Designer | Team Five-0
https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie
http://www.twitch.tv/ccp_fozzie/
|
|
Neddy Fox
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
37
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 11:30:52 -
[406] - Quote
And Stella Nova ? |
|
CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
13047
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 11:35:34 -
[407] - Quote
Neddy Fox wrote:And Stella Nova ?
Stella Nova's starting constellation was taken by No Not Believing
Game Designer | Team Five-0
https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie
http://www.twitch.tv/ccp_fozzie/
|
|
BlitZ Kotare
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
134
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 11:37:55 -
[408] - Quote
Cool, looking forward to UI updates. How soon can we expect Duality to be reconfigured for AT testing? |
Ruune en Gravonere
Running with Dogs Stella Nova
36
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 12:54:05 -
[409] - Quote
Yeah the games went on a just a bit too long we ended up having to put all our efforts into TQ over the weekend |
Elise Randolph
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
1325
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 14:12:29 -
[410] - Quote
We did it!
~
|
|
Jayne Fillon
737
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 14:13:00 -
[411] - Quote
I'm assuming there are 4 meta modules that will be named?
Also, was the requirement for participants to "capture at least one system within the competition area" met by all 5 alliances?
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI.
|
|
CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
13049
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 14:18:50 -
[412] - Quote
Jayne Fillon wrote:I'm assuming there are 4 meta modules that will be named?
Also, was the requirement for participants to "capture at least one system within the competition area" met by all 5 alliances? Yup four out of the five Alliances left will get modules named after them. Which ones exactly will be revealed in an upcoming dev blog.
As for the "capture at least one system" requirement, it was for getting named in the BPO, not for the drawing itself. We'll be pretty generous with that prize though, everyone who was active testing the new system in just about any significant way will get their names on the BPO.
Game Designer | Team Five-0
https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie
http://www.twitch.tv/ccp_fozzie/
|
|
Redwyne Vyruk
Tr0pa de elite. Pandemic Legion
9
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 14:21:46 -
[413] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Jayne Fillon wrote:I'm assuming there are 4 meta modules that will be named?
Also, was the requirement for participants to "capture at least one system within the competition area" met by all 5 alliances? Yup four out of the five Alliances left will get modules named after them. Which ones exactly will be revealed in an upcoming dev blog. As for the "capture at least one system" requirement, it was for getting named in the BPO, not for the drawing itself. We'll be pretty generous with that prize though, everyone who was active testing the new system in just about any significant way will get their names on the BPO.
ETA for dev blog? quite interested :) |
Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
2765
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 15:15:43 -
[414] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:And the competition is officially over!
Final scores are: Pandemic Legion: 198 Spectre Fleet Alliance: 40 No Not Believing: 35 Affirmative.: 22 Fidelas Constans: 7
Big congrats to everyone who participated, especially to the final five alliances.
I've drawn the winners for the module naming using Chribba's dice, and those results will be revealed in an upcoming dev blog.
Remember that the drawn alliances don't get to name the module whatever they want. The default is for the alliance ticker of the winning alliances to be added to the name, and we're willing to consider other suggestions from the winning alliances as long as they completely and totally fit into the EVE universe. The bar for alternate suggestions is extremely high, and we expect to use the ticker for most of the modules.
Remember that Duality remains open and can still be used for testing, bug reporting and getting acquainted with the new system. We have another internal build ready to deploy soon that has another big batch of UI updates thanks to your feedback.
Honestly been kicking this around trying to figure out a non poop way to get [-10] into a name, nothing seemed to work our right at all or even come close to looking good, so then i started looking at our name and emblem, the best Ive got as far as sounding non crap I've come up with is the Legion's Viral Entosis Link.
Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.
|
Tappits
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
115
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 17:55:40 -
[415] - Quote
Grath Telkin wrote:Honestly been kicking this around trying to figure out a non poop way to get [-10] into a name, nothing seemed to work our right at all or even come close to looking good, so then i started looking at our name and emblem, the best Ive got as far as sounding non crap I've come up with is the Legion's Viral Entosis Link.
What about the GÇ£Telkin Unstable Entosis link IGÇ¥ A really angry mod that takes a lot of fitting with good range and reasonable cap use and has a 2min 30s cycle time.
CPU 15 Powergrid usage 120 Activation cost 450 Gj Optimal range 150 km Activation time 150 s Meta 4 Stront 1
|
Ruune en Gravonere
Running with Dogs Stella Nova
36
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 18:54:15 -
[416] - Quote
IN our defence we did take a system and would have given NO NOT a fight... if we'd turned up
But congrats all the winners and everyone who helped test the new sov... I'm pretty sure we all learned a lot and the final product is much improved by all the feedback...
Its all about having supportive 'critical friends' |
Elise Randolph
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
1325
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 19:02:25 -
[417] - Quote
I'm gonna laugh so hard when PL doesn't get a name on any module. Can we make our own lore post tho?
~
|
Gabriel Karade
Noir. No Not Believing
258
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 20:08:09 -
[418] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Neddy Fox wrote:And Stella Nova ? Stella Nova's starting constellation was taken by No Not Believing That was the longest period I've remained logged into Eve in 11 years...
#Nerds4Life
Edit:
Bridged a Freighter out to setup 'Siege' tower around 10:00 ish, logged for a bit, back on around 14:00, crawled into bed sometime after 00:00... I think.
Entosis'ing node times, best of times.
War Machine: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=386293
|
utec asmo
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 20:48:55 -
[419] - Quote
Inb4 the 0,3% chance strikes and PL isn't one of the four named alliances. |
Tappits
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
115
|
Posted - 2015.07.06 22:55:47 -
[420] - Quote
Elise Randolph wrote:I'm gonna laugh so hard when PL doesn't get a name on any module. Can we make our own lore post tho?
Good keeping our name off the thing that killed eve is a good thing tbh |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 .. 15 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |