| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 31 post(s) |

Luckytania
Bullets of Justice
5
|
Posted - 2011.04.07 23:36:00 -
[121] - Quote
NinjaSpud wrote:So, do you guys still want me to continue updating you all on the activities of the bot forums? I'm not gonna lie, it was fun.  I might have to make my own thread though...up to you, Sreegs.
Yes, please, NinjaSpud.
And, IIRC, Sreegs stated early in this thread that he was fine with your doing so here. |

Kogh Ayon
Modicudary Industry
0
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 00:04:00 -
[122] - Quote
Why being so harsh in botting?
Why not just releasing official bots that allows people to AFK mining,ratting , courier missioning, doing PI and market?
They are just very likely to be "bot works" with the technology in New Aden.
And also, it is weird to allow people to have a repetitive action for long (legally, not using macros). Either mechanically or manually by other players, the repetitive actions should be able to exist. It is a basic requirement for a real game and people are not paying to be a wool-factory worker. |
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
90

|
Posted - 2011.04.08 00:34:00 -
[123] - Quote
Juil wrote:There are a few ways that you can be 'hacked' from a pure 100% programming/security Point of view.
1. You give your username and password to some one else - This can be through phishing mail or whatever.. but your at fault for not double checking where you where putting your details into. 2. Keyloggers, Trojans, Virus's etc etc - Again where oh where have you been that you shouldn't have been and why oh why ain't your virus software up to date? 3. Brute force attack - Ok this is technically not your fault, sorry those who think it is but it's not.. a brute force attack simply runs through both a dictionary attack followed by random number and random letter attacks.. starting at the lower limit of the number set by the person running the BF attack (typically 4 - 6 characters) and ending at the largest (typically 10 - 12) however these attacks typically become rather obvious and should be noticed by the server side protection software.. I mean if you can't get your password right after the 50th time somethings up right? 4. Security leak at the Opposit end - This means a Leak at CCP's end in this case.. and honestly it's not exacty unheard of with CCP now is it? (Sorry Screegs no offense meant) CCP has had it's bad sheep, we have had Dev's who break rules to help people in game, we have obviously had Dev's who leaked entire source code releases.. and there is always the chance a dev could steal the authentication database.. or that CCP itself could be hacked or whatever.
Now there are a few ways to protect against hacking:
1. Change your password every few weeks/months - This means that your password isn't always the same and can stop those who tend to wait a time to use the data they have mined off you. 2. Make your password more complicated - this means using a mixture of UPPERCASE, lowercase and numeric characters, eg E424b8A7g9 <---- this would be an example of a randomly generated password that is not the easiest to hack, the reason being that it has all 3 of the items listed.. if eve supported non alpha/numeric characters i'd even suggest adding thoses ie #24A43%32nn13 etc. 3. Add an extra layer of authentication to the account:- in the form of a randomly generated number sequence that changes based on time/date etc where the serial number is tied into your account at the server level.. This is better known as an Authenticator and most already know how they work.. not only do you enter your user name and password but you also enter a number generated by the keychain fob or the iphone app etc with out this you can't authenticate. 4. The most basic one.. Keep your damned virus software up to date. Even the free software antivirus packages are good for basic protection AVG, Microsofts programs etc all can pick up most of the common trojans, paid antivirus tends to include a better overall protection package. 5. as with your virus protection keep your OS updated. - You may not realise it but Microsoft and Apple don't release all those 'updates' just to make your bandwidth cry. They are put out to address security issues and other bugs in the software.. with out them you are leaving your system open to attacks.
Now I could go on but lets face it CCP has a long ass list up on all of this.. but it's a reminder that not all 'hacks' are based on the end user.. some are just well.. bad luck.
You missed one of the most common which is reusing credentials on multiple sites. I'm pretty sure by now we all know that corp and alliance forums get hacked pretty regularly. If you use the same username and password there as you do on your EVE account that's a giant risk. |
|
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
90

|
Posted - 2011.04.08 00:37:00 -
[124] - Quote
Darth Skorpius wrote:NinjaSpud wrote:So, do you guys still want me to continue updating you all on the activities of the bot forums? I'm not gonna lie, it was fun.  I might have to make my own thread though...up to you, Sreegs. i think you should keep it up. also, can we get this thread stickied please? i would hate for it to drop off the front page and end up buried
I can have community do it tomorrow. |
|
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
90

|
Posted - 2011.04.08 00:39:00 -
[125] - Quote
NinjaSpud wrote:So, do you guys still want me to continue updating you all on the activities of the bot forums? I'm not gonna lie, it was fun.  I might have to make my own thread though...up to you, Sreegs.
I mentioned earlier that I have no issue with any bot discussion whatsoever in this thread. Your thread was on topic, so you're welcome to post it here or make your own, though Community will probably want to keep the threads about the same topic to a minimum. |
|
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
90

|
Posted - 2011.04.08 00:41:00 -
[126] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:NinjaSpud wrote:So, do you guys still want me to continue updating you all on the activities of the bot forums? I'm not gonna lie, it was fun.  I might have to make my own thread though...up to you, Sreegs. CCP Sreegs referenced your thread at the top of this new one, so I think that means you are invited to post bot war reports here. Im posting my market survey info here (looking for effects on the market from bot bans). Edit: Also, Sreegs is referencing the bots by name, so I do not think you need to hide them, unless you want to. CCP Sreegs: Maybe this thread needs: Links to all the security related dev blogs added to your initial post (the original unholy rage, your phishing blog, the protect your accounts blog, etc) To be made sticky.
Yeah I'll take care of that tomorrow I'm tired. Also I don't think I mentioned any bots by name. I think I quoted someone who did and we may rip those out. |
|
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
90

|
Posted - 2011.04.08 00:43:00 -
[127] - Quote
Kogh Ayon wrote:Why being so harsh in botting?
Why not just releasing official bots that allows people to AFK mining,ratting , courier missioning, doing PI and market?
They are just very likely to be "bot works" with the technology in New Aden.
And also, it is weird to allow people to have a repetitive action for long (legally, not using macros). Either mechanically or manually by other players, the repetitive actions should be able to exist. It is a basic requirement for a real game and people are not paying to be a wool-factory worker.
Because we prefer to have people who can be social playing our game which is at its core a social game. Whether one believes certain actions SHOULD be able to exist, the agreement everyone enters into when they agree to the EULA states that they won't. I may think murder's pretty awesome but if I do it I go to jail. No sense debating the system. |
|

dexington
Baconoration
21
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 00:51:00 -
[128] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:You missed one of the most common which is reusing credentials on multiple sites. I'm pretty sure by now we all know that corp and alliance forums get hacked pretty regularly. If you use the same username and password there as you do on your EVE account that's a giant risk.
Just one more reason why you should hurry up and make two factor authentication accessible to everyone :)
|

Galandil
Mad Bombers Merciless.
2
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 01:17:00 -
[129] - Quote
Damn CCP Sreegs, you are being vary active on the forum, more so then others. How are you able to do this between researching bots/malware and CCP related work. |

Darth Skorpius
m3 Corp Fidelas Constans
3
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 01:18:00 -
[130] - Quote
dexington wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:You missed one of the most common which is reusing credentials on multiple sites. I'm pretty sure by now we all know that corp and alliance forums get hacked pretty regularly. If you use the same username and password there as you do on your EVE account that's a giant risk. Just one more reason why you should hurry up and make two factor authentication accessible to everyone :)
exactly, as someone who is a bit paranoid abotu the security of my game accounts i would jump at the chance to get an authenticator for eve |

Elyssa MacLeod
GloboTech Industries
0
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 01:43:00 -
[131] - Quote
eeew dont know that Iike these forums |

Maverick2011
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 01:49:00 -
[132] - Quote
I think bots should be flagged by players after some hours of investigation and frapsed, then turn them red and shoot them to dust. Vigilate Police, tolerance ZERO. |

Dusk Lord
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 01:55:00 -
[133] - Quote
Will isk obtained from killing, harassing, ransoming, or even being paid to go away from a high activity system be subject to deletion if it turns out the residents of that system were violating the game EULA to allow such a high level of activity?
TL/DR: I want to harass easy targets to earn isk, if they are bots do I lose my isk?
Also, is there any way to send you beer or food as a token of appreciation for the work you are doing when it finally fixes this game? |
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
90

|
Posted - 2011.04.08 02:06:00 -
[134] - Quote
Galandil wrote:Damn CCP Sreegs, you are being vary active on the forum, more so then others. How are you able to do this between researching bots/malware and CCP related work.
It's 2am. I post here on my free time. |
|
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
90

|
Posted - 2011.04.08 02:08:00 -
[135] - Quote
Dusk Lord wrote:Will isk obtained from killing, harassing, ransoming, or even being paid to go away from a high activity system be subject to deletion if it turns out the residents of that system were violating the game EULA to allow such a high level of activity?
TL/DR: I want to harass easy targets to earn isk, if they are bots do I lose my isk?
Also, is there any way to send you beer or food as a token of appreciation for the work you are doing when it finally fixes this game?
We really REALLY don't want to impact the gameplay of people who are playing by the rules. You can buy me a beer if you're ever in Iceland. Customs is kind of a butt. |
|

Justin Cody
Instant Annihilation Everto Rex Regis
0
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 02:28:00 -
[136] - Quote
KaraStarbuckThrace wrote:In reply to what is being said in some of the bots/macro forums.
Mostly its people who use these bots saying that threads like these are fail and that we do not understand how they are helping the economics of the game and that eve would fail if the use of bots was stopped.
I'm not sure what the guide lines are for actually mentioning the names of these bots so I will go ahead anyway and I am sure CCP will let me know if it is not allowed :)
Roidripper is no longer available for download.
The last ETA was a few days.
The admin/dev of the program called Daredevil comes across quite confident that nothing that is done will stop bots.
As for the TinyMiners forums, other then people saying how great it is not much on there to be honest.
EvE-Bot forum, again not much being said there either.
The general feel appears to be that CCP does not care about botters and that so long as you find a quiet area you will never be bothered.
What many of these people who use bots do not realise is that they all require you to run eve in a certain way, i.e windowed mode, certain general and graphic settings, having your in game windows configured in a certain way etc etc.
I imagine that all these settings are recorded somewhere and accessible to CCP.
Also I must say I love the idea that if you are caught botting that a overlay will appear on your avatar for the duration of your ban so people will know what a loser you are :)
People who are botting have the same mentality as people who are pro-illegal immigration IRL and are in favor of depressing the standard of living for all and promoting wage slavery.
I like high prices for minerals...sowhat...its a pass on cost for builders that put it in ship prices. |

Siiee
Recycled Heroes
3
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 02:41:00 -
[137] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote: No sense debating the system.
That's outright silly, the system should always be up for debate. It may be your job to go "Derp, that's what the EULA says", but just because CCP enacts some rule doesn't make it right or good.
I'm of two minds about it, on one hand I really do appreciate the work you're doing, and I love reading about the bots burning, but on the other hand the more successful you are I feel takes even more pressure off CCP's game design. CCP should never be able to release a new feature where 90% of the "gameplay" can be replaced by a dumb macro auto clicking fixed locations on the screen, they've proven to be all too willing to do that in the very recent past, and curing the bot plague is not going to provide any extra incentive for them in the future.
I'd rather the EULA be updated, and your team spend more time hardening the client against injection, and allowing dumb macro\screen recognition automation as a way to keep the game designers honest. That would have much further reaching benefits for the game as a whole than if we could just ban all the botters tomorrow. |

Dusk Lord
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 02:48:00 -
[138] - Quote
I wish you the best of luck in stopping botting, but as long as we can run eve in a VM, or control it via VNC it will be impossible to detect that bot programs are running, and relatively easy to workaround. Using an IP KVM would get around absolutely any means you have of detecting if something fishy is interacting with the client. I think the best case results of your work would be making botters register 5 times as many accounts to avoid the 'can a human possibly play that much' detection. This would be a huge gain for CCP since replacing the thousands of 23.5/7 bots would generate tens of thousands of dollars a month in revenue, along with each PLEX deleted or lost in a banned account being $15 in profit. |

Apollo Gabriel
Brotherhood Of Fallen Angels Etherium Cartel
1
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 03:11:00 -
[139] - Quote
Truly marvelous thread, I am very impressed with the NEW CCP. |

Elyssa MacLeod
GloboTech Industries
0
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 04:06:00 -
[140] - Quote
Gotta keep the thread up... 20 topics per page is so these discussions get buried faster lol
and Ill be saddened by the number of people I see praising the honeyed words till the bot controlled regions become player controlled ones |

KaraStarbuckThrace
Proletariat Manifesto
1
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 06:06:00 -
[141] - Quote
bump |

Kogh Ayon
Modicudary Industry
0
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 06:23:00 -
[142] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:Kogh Ayon wrote:Why being so harsh in botting?
Why not just releasing official bots that allows people to AFK mining,ratting , courier missioning, doing PI and market?
They are just very likely to be "bot works" with the technology in New Aden.
And also, it is weird to allow people to have a repetitive action for long (legally, not using macros). Either mechanically or manually by other players, the repetitive actions should be able to exist. It is a basic requirement for a real game and people are not paying to be a wool-factory worker. Because we prefer to have people who can be social playing our game which is at its core a social game. Whether one believes certain actions SHOULD be able to exist, the agreement everyone enters into when they agree to the EULA states that they won't. I may think murder's pretty awesome but if I do it I go to jail. No sense debating the system.
You refered CCP wants to have EVE's core a social game,
But, firstly it does not forbid the game having solo features.
Secondly, as I listed, especially for belt ratting, courier missions, PI and market $0.01 war, are initially not designed to be a sociable game-play, at least they are most likely to be solo features.
Put the two points together, we could say the EVE does have lots solo feature, hard or almost impossible to be a sociable one. It is good to have these solo things changed into better sociable plays, or people just have the urgent need of macros.
Everybody agreed EULA to enter the game, and against EULA coud result a ban that's CCP's right, the rule must be followed I agree. But it is also the CCP's right to have the EULA changed, in the manner that makes the game more realisticly acceptable, or more profitable.
Murder is still a crime yet but divorce was. Rules are changing accouding to people's cognition and needs. |

Othran
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 06:27:00 -
[143] - Quote
Messoroz wrote:Ok, here's a ridiculously better question. Why are courier bots in low sec being rampantly ignored? Here's an example: http://eve-kill.net/?a=system_detail&sys_id=2560 and some more specific km whoring example http://kb.pleaseignore.com/?a=system_detail&sys_id=2560(You need to copy and paste the URLs above because it seems somebody broke the url handler for the redirect and html entified the ampersands like a boss). Having that many haulers being killed in a system is EXTREMELY abnormal. A large chunk is NPC corps and their cargo contains mission items.
I haven't even looked at the link but I'd be willing to bet 500mill ISK right now that the system is Ingunn and the vast majority of the courier bots were created during the last "Power of Two" offer.
Do I win?
If so then they've been petitioned multiple times (more than 10) and I've personally witnessed one undocking 9 times within 15 minutes and being blown up each time. Pod warps off, pod warps back and docks. Hauler undocks, blows up, pod warps off.....
Repeat ad nauseum. |

Othran
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 06:34:00 -
[144] - Quote
Marconus Orion wrote:They should simply prohibit character transfers if the account was flagged for botting. Even if it was just the first offense.
A far better idea would be to leave a read-only (ie can't be deleted) notification of the ban within the mail client. Then make it compulsory that you must declare whether the character has been banned and why prior to any sale.
That way people don't end up spending a load of ISK on a character which may be a well-known botter.
Frankly it'd make sense to do that for any sort of ban, never mind botting. Would make CEOs/recruiters lives easier too. |

Othran
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 06:41:00 -
[145] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:You missed one of the most common which is reusing credentials on multiple sites. I'm pretty sure by now we all know that corp and alliance forums get hacked pretty regularly. If you use the same username and password there as you do on your EVE account that's a giant risk.
That was the way my very first character (Reikoku director) got compromised in 2004. I temporarily (3 days IIRC) reused a password (alphanumeric, non-dictionary) but not the username - forums were closing/moving anyway.
I was fortunate in that all the hacker wanted to do was cause friction between directors, which he succeeded in.
It wasn't something I normally did but when I signed up for Eve it wasn't immediately apparent that you COULD have 3 characters, so my username was the same as my character. Bad move I know and not my normal practice, but like I say it wasn't immediately apparent in May 2003 that your account COULD have a different login username. |

Koragoni SkyKnight
LOST IDEA C0VEN
7
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 07:10:00 -
[146] - Quote
Bots are an issue, but only the ones that run 24/7. MMOs are all failures in that they all install "grind". Any time you simply click a button and wait an amount of time for a result, you aren't gaming... you're involved in some sadistic electronic treadmill. This game supposedly rewards player persistence and intelligence. Why is it wrong that a few enterprising players have figured out how to automate things so they can enjoy the game on their own terms? Now if you're using software to extend playing time into the absurd, you're draining away resources that you didn't pay for. That's a different mess...
Want to stop macro's from mining? Want to get more humans doing it? The solution to both is the same, fix mining so that it's a dynamic, rewarding, and engaging experience.
Want to stop macro's from ratting? Stop them from plexing? Get more players doing it? Same answer, CCP apparently gets this concept since they just installed incursions which I think are very well done, but very under utilized.
Don't even get me started on courier missions... who ever thought those would be fun?
This game has over half of its available space in a 0.0 format. This area is designed to be a PvP smack house where groups of players play Simcity in space to build mini-empires and fling themselves at each other. The only way a dedicated PvPer can compete on the current playing field is to bot. There is not enough playing time available to the average gamer to keep his isk up, and stay active in the PvP fights. CCP makes this process worse every time they make a change that essentially forces players into larger and larger ships. SC blobs anyone? Want to take away the JBs? Ok, great idea... way to hand the game over to the titan pilots... How is this helping the small alliances again? But, I digress.
The larger issue is that wars are won and lost based on the depths of alliance, corporate, and personal wallets. There are alliances in this game that are made of people that earn their living selling ISK. These groups have amassed untold quantities of the most powerful ships this game has to offer, and they can afford to lose them like noob frigates. These alliances are over time going to take up all of sov 0.0 unless CCP, or the players to something about it. I don't know about you guys, but having Tranquility turn into a China server isn't my idea of fun. It's coming, I've been watching it build for three years.
I sure hope CCP comes to grips with a realistic way to deal with botting, and I mean in a game changing way not some lame security group throwing around the ban hammer. Bans have never worked against botters in any MMO ever. I see no reason why that will change now. Get creative, make the game fun to play, toss all the repetitive trash into the past where it belongs and get a grip.
This is the modern age, we automate boring and repetitive things all the time. It's what the computer was created for. Stop trying to punish people for having a brain cell, and start expending your energies creating the next level of interactive experience. |

Gnulpie
Miner Tech
2
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 07:24:00 -
[147] - Quote
Do you guys from CCP security look at global statistics like NPCs killed/hour also? Or do you just look at statistics on the individual level?
I mean ... Dotlan-stats are pretty nice and they currently show 28k npc kills per 24 hours in mn5n-x in Fountain, this smells already fishy. If you then combine this number with the amount of people active in this system, an automated system could ring some alarm bells for you to investigate more.
|

KaraStarbuckThrace
Proletariat Manifesto
1
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 07:31:00 -
[148] - Quote
CCP could make every aspect of this game fun and exciting and people will still use bots.
The kind of people who use bots/macro's couldn't give a crap about fun and exciting.
They see it as an opportunity to earn more isk or to make rl life money.
The Alliances who use bots again could not care less about whether something is fun and exciting, they just want to earn more isk with little to no effort.
You will probably find that the large majority of bots/macro's are not being used by players trying to supplement their own isk income, but by Big Alliances and RMT merchants.
When CCP succeed, I do believe they will in massively reducing the number of bots in game, you will probably find its the Big Null Sec Alliances that are hit hardest and will cry the most.
Also if you want to see how well CCP are doing in regards to reducing the number of bots, just keep an aye on the prices of isk on RMT sites.
At the moment you can purchase 2.5bil isk for -ú47.14 / $73.54 from one of the biggest RMT merchants.
Now if in the coming months you start to see the prices rise then we will all know that CCP are having an effect.
Another thing that will need to be done is to bring the fight to those sites like Iskbank.com. |

Mikk36
E-x7 Network Saints Amongst Sinners
5
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 08:03:00 -
[149] - Quote
KaraStarbuckThrace wrote:At the moment you can purchase 2.5bil isk for -ú47.14 / $73.54 from one of the biggest RMT merchants. Or in a more manageable number, $29.4 / bil. |

Lallante
Reikoku Cascade Imminent
3
|
Posted - 2011.04.08 08:44:00 -
[150] - Quote
Dear CCP Sreegs
First, thank you for this thread and for all CCP's recent efforts against what has to be one of the most damaging things to Eve.
I have a few questions based on your replies in this thread and CCP's in general over the last 8.5 years that I've been playing Eve.
1. Could you explain the reasoning behind the (complete lack of) severity of the current punishments for being caught botting (not RMT)? Is there a good reason to give warnings for something that is so self-evidently against the rules?
2. From a players perspective, botting for personal isk is just as disruptive/unfair an advantage as botting for RMT, in some ways more so. CCP's recent communications seem to basically ignore personal botting, as only RMT botting hits your bottom line directly. Could you address this disadvantage? In particular, with a large (but minority) portion of the 0.0 community, in some cases openly - what are your thoughts on the statement (which I believe to be true) that PvP means a lot less than it did 4 - 5 years ago because for many, ISK is free and zero effort so losses don't count.
3. Could you explain the split in CCP that I sense on the issue of keeping penalties taken against player accounts secret rather than, as many many people have advocated, publishing them to "name and shame"?
4. In particular, and assuming you dont agree with me that botting should be a 1 time perma ban offence, it seems to me that the single greatest thing you could do to discourage botting is a permenant "This player has been punished for the use of bots" tag in each of the account characters biographies AND disabling the ability of those accounts to transfer their characters - could you explain to us the problems or concerns CCP has with this or a similar approach?
5. Much harmful botting can be achieved with an account that is little more than a few weeks old (courier botting, running missions/npcing in a drake etc) - here banning is not really a disincentive - can you elaborate on what other actions CCP is considering?
6. This is sort of similar to a previous question, but the sentiment bears repeating - why is CCP so soft on people caught botting? Please explain the debate inhouse on not being harsher in your retribution? In particular can you explain CCP policy on the confiscation of ISK/assets? I think you can agree that over the last couple of years, your chance of being caught has been low. When people are caught, they have generally been botting for many many months, and have benefitted to the tune of vastly more isk than will currently be on their account - does CCP take account of this? Why not? |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |