EVE Search - Here's proof EVE Dev Team want anti-social players to grief others

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Here's proof EVE Dev Team want anti-social players to grief others

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 4 post(s)
G'Kar Nomad	Posted - 2006.12.08 04:58:00 - [1] In the Community Relations Manager's own words... Quote: Although the patch notes have not been assembled yet, the Devs have been working on a number of fixes and improvements for Tuesday's Revelations 1.2 patch. Among the items under consideration for the patch are: *Adjustments to the scan system so that: -griefing mission runners in deadspace complexes is more difficult... The Dev's dirty little secret is out- DEVS LIKE TO SEE PLAYERS GRIEF EACH OTHER! CCP should change EVE-Online to Grief-Online! You could clearly see the Devs enjoy having a minority of losers grief other paying customers. I now suspect some of the Devs have actively griefed players (in-game) to get their kicks...
Aeaus Tabula Rasa Systems The Star Fraction	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:00:00 - [2] How is reducing the potential for griefing in missions make the developers biased for creating more grief play? Last Weeks Signature
Capt Harlock Band of Builders Inc. Firmus Ixion	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:03:00 - [3] oh shut up b4 i grief you!
Rudolfii Miller	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:13:00 - [4] Originally by: Aeaus How is reducing the potential for griefing in missions make the developers biased for creating more grief play? Because they could have made deadspace mission regions not scannable.
Skyy Caldari Veni-Vidi-Vici	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:18:00 - [5] Edited by: Skyy on 08/12/2006 05:18:55 Trust me... once it becomes "more difficult" the griefers will stop. Anything that is any form of effort is just too much for them.
ee21k	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:19:00 - [6] Originally by: G'Kar Nomad In the Community Relations Manager's own words... Quote: Although the patch notes have not been assembled yet, the Devs have been working on a number of fixes and improvements for Tuesday's Revelations 1.2 patch. Among the items under consideration for the patch are: *Adjustments to the scan system so that: -griefing mission runners in deadspace complexes is more difficult... The Dev's dirty little secret is out- DEVS LIKE TO SEE PLAYERS GRIEF EACH OTHER! CCP should change EVE-Online to Grief-Online! You could clearly see the Devs enjoy having a minority of losers grief other paying customers. I now suspect some of the Devs have actively griefed players (in-game) to get their kicks... Seriously. People. How hard is it to think for 20~30 seconds before posting and arrange your thoughts into an intelligable structure. You may have had a point put the manner in which you present it makes me not want to hear about it. be calm. be cool. be reasonable. then maybe you'll recieve an answer you will like as opposed to a thread full of flames as this is becoming.
Kwint Sommer	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:23:00 - [7] Edited by: Kwint Sommer on 08/12/2006 05:23:09 Originally by: ee21k Seriously. People. How hard is it to think for 20~30 seconds before posting and arrange your thoughts into an intelligable structure. You may have had a point put the manner in which you present it makes me not want to hear about it. be calm. be cool. be reasonable. then maybe you'll recieve an answer you will like as opposed to a thread full of flames as this is becoming. May I point out the irony that your response contains several typographical and grammatical errors which make it hard to read: intelligible not intelligable, but not put, capitalization is cool

Wrangler	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:25:00 - [8] That is an outright lie! We don't want to discriminate anyone! We want both anti-social and social players to grief each other! Wrangler Assistant Community Manager EVE Online Contact Support - Contact Moderators - Report Bug - Submit News Leads - Knowledge Base Player Guide - Policies - Join ISD - Fan Submissions - DevFinder LiteÖ

Skyy Caldari Veni-Vidi-Vici	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:26:00 - [9] Originally by: Wrangler That is an outright lie! We don't want to discriminate anyone! We want both anti-social and social players to grief each other! he made a funny
franny Phoenix Knights	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:27:00 - [10] Originally by: Rudolfii Miller Originally by: Aeaus How is reducing the potential for griefing in missions make the developers biased for creating more grief play? Because they could have made deadspace mission regions not scannable. how about, NO this is not WoW, where your safe unless your a brainless moron... this is a pvp game, like it or not, making deadspace pockets unscannable would make them the ultimate safespot in wars CEO - PKKP Recruitment
franny Phoenix Knights	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:28:00 - [11] Originally by: Wrangler That is an outright lie! We don't want to discriminate anyone! We want both anti-social and social players to grief each other! <3 CEO - PKKP Recruitment
Takanohana Deep Space Explorers	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:35:00 - [12] Quote: *Adjustments to the scan system so that: -griefing mission runners in deadspace complexes is more difficult... Poor choice of words perhaps ? I would have expected something with the meaning of "CCP does not accept griefplay, so we have prevented that by a change in something". The quote above could be interpreted as saying "griefing is acceptible, it should just be difficult to do", which I believe is the way the OP has interpreted it. I however chose to believe that CCP does not accept griefplay, that they strive to eliminate it, and p'haps that Rome wasn't built in a day. ///Taka
Voin	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:37:00 - [13] Originally by: franny Originally by: Rudolfii Miller Originally by: Aeaus How is reducing the potential for griefing in missions make the developers biased for creating more grief play? Because they could have made deadspace mission regions not scannable. how about, NO this is not WoW, where your safe unless your a brainless moron... this is a pvp game, like it or not, making deadspace pockets unscannable would make them the ultimate safespot in wars this is NOT only PvP game girl... DEV's can give some un-scannable modules to protect spot from jerk's and griefers...
Red Six Reikoku Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:40:00 - [14] When will you people learn, the devs have said on numerous occasions that this IS a PvP game. Originally by: Eridu Fallen Upon closer inspection, that Caldari BS doesn't even look like it got hit with the ugly stick, it looks like it is the ugly stick.
Red Six Reikoku Band of Brothers	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:40:00 - [15] Edited by: Red Six on 08/12/2006 05:40:27 Bloody forums! Originally by: Eridu Fallen Upon closer inspection, that Caldari BS doesn't even look like it got hit with the ugly stick, it looks like it is the ugly stick.
DiuxDium The Graduates	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:42:00 - [16] I grief mission runners using game exploits like scan-probes because my mother beats me with mustard, and I have no friends. Send Ketchup. Timeout! Party time.
Lord Frost Minmatar The Crystal Method	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:45:00 - [17] Originally by: Red Six When will you people learn, the devs have said on numerous occasions that this IS a PvP game. The devs also said cargo expander II bpos would be in the lottery. I'm not saying this isn't PvP... but its also PvE. Its both, so when will YOU and THEY learn? People prepare in PvE, they prosper in PvE, and they strive for better PvE... PvP is only the conflict between gaining more PvE.... period.
Rudolfii Miller	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:53:00 - [18] Originally by: franny Originally by: Rudolfii Miller Originally by: Aeaus How is reducing the potential for griefing in missions make the developers biased for creating more grief play? Because they could have made deadspace mission regions not scannable. how about, NO this is not WoW, where your safe unless your a brainless moron... this is a pvp game, like it or not, making deadspace pockets unscannable would make them the ultimate safespot in wars Dear .. I was just answering the question of why he feels this way. I have no issue with PVP. I would prefer that PVP be in the context of the greater story line of EVE. I, however, have no use for players that do something just to make someone unhappy and then revel in the joy of that person's pain.
Tsanse Kinske WeMeanYouKnowHarm	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:56:00 - [19] Originally by: G'Kar Nomad In the Community Relations Manager's own words... Quote: Although the patch notes have not been assembled yet, the Devs have been working on a number of fixes and improvements for Tuesday's Revelations 1.2 patch. Among the items under consideration for the patch are: Adjustments to the scan system so that: -griefing mission runners in deadspace complexes is more difficult... The Dev's dirty little secret is out- DEVS LIKE TO SEE PLAYERS GRIEF EACH OTHER! CCP should change EVE-Online to Grief-Online! You could clearly see the Devs enjoy having a minority of losers grief other paying customers. I now suspect some of the Devs have actively griefed players (in-game) to get their kicks... The devious rascals! Boosting griefing by nerfing it! /shakes fist at devs * * In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. -Douglas Adams, writing about EVE
Samirol Ore Mongers	Posted - 2006.12.08 05:59:00 - [20] Originally by: Wrangler That is an outright lie! We don't want to discriminate anyone! We want both anti-social and social players to grief each other! Great being a gallente blasterthron pilot, aint it?
Bobbit1 Caldari Barge Insurance Company Relief	Posted - 2006.12.08 06:05:00 - [21] Originally by: Wrangler That is an outright lie! We don't want to discriminate anyone! We want both anti-social and social players to grief each other! Wrangler, you are my Hero!!
Moraguth	Posted - 2006.12.08 06:40:00 - [22] Heh, this made me chuckle. I've been pouring over the forums alot lately because of the patch and all i see is complaining (with the exception of a few very well thought out and presented posts on the current status of things and a few theories). Thanks for the laugh, sorry the some of the first posters didn't get your joke, they'll get it soon though, maybe on tues. good game
Uuve Savisaalo Umbra Congregatio	Posted - 2006.12.08 06:51:00 - [23] Originally by: G'Kar Nomad The Dev's dirty little secret is out- DEVS LIKE TO SEE PLAYERS GRIEF EACH OTHER! CCP should change EVE-Online to Grief-Online! You could clearly see the Devs enjoy having a minority of losers grief other paying customers. I now suspect some of the Devs have actively griefed players (in-game) to get their kicks... Uh, and this is secret? Have you ever seen this? clearly, people who come to play eve know which game it is they're playing. your 'revelation' has surprised precisely no-one.
Cadela Fria Amarr eXin Alliance	Posted - 2006.12.08 06:52:00 - [24] Originally by: Samirol Originally by: Wrangler That is an outright lie! We don't want to discriminate anyone! We want both anti-social and social players to grief each other! I <3 CCP for that comment! -Knowledge is a priviledge, not a right
Jim McGregor	Posted - 2006.12.08 06:57:00 - [25] Originally by: Wrangler That is an outright lie! We don't want to discriminate anyone! We want both anti-social and social players to grief each other! Win! --- Eve Wiki \| Eve Tribune \| Eve Pirate
Zelakil	Posted - 2006.12.08 07:06:00 - [26] -Q- "May I point out the irony that your response contains several typographical and grammatical errors which make it hard to read: intelligible not intelligable, but not put, capitalization is cool" Apparently you read it well enough to identify the errors. Where is the punctuation at the end of your sentence? "May I" is a question. "Capitalization is cool" is not consistent with the previous items in your list and therefore is not gramatically correct. I am so sick of useless posts. Unfortunately I cannot resist the urge to fight back.
Kamal Drax	Posted - 2006.12.08 07:09:00 - [27] Originally by: Wrangler That is an outright lie! We don't want to discriminate anyone! We want both anti-social and social players to grief each other! LMAO .
Wrayeth Tabula Rasa Systems The Star Fraction	Posted - 2006.12.08 07:23:00 - [28] Originally by: Wrangler That is an outright lie! We don't want to discriminate anyone! We want both anti-social and social players to grief each other! EVE devs ftw! -Wrayeth "Look, pa! I just contributed absolutely nothing to this thread!" Might As well Train Another Race
Miss Overlord Gallente Ferrum Pugnus New Eve Order	Posted - 2006.12.08 07:41:00 - [29] well with the devs in BOB i think that says more than enough once again whiny carebears have made it harder for PVPers = see the more u whine the more they act now how about my whine on the lack of exploration sites any chacne of 3 per system These posts represent my personal views and not those of my corp or alliance. These do not reflect offical alliance or corp views This is a disclaimer
Victor Valka Caldari Archon Industries	Posted - 2006.12.08 07:45:00 - [30] Originally by: Wrangler That is an outright lie! We don't want to discriminate anyone! We want both anti-social and social players to grief each other! Wrangler wins the forums today! 'Nuff said. Originally by: Diana Marc Notice that BoB is agreeing with RA's concern. That's like Elrond and Sauron agreeing to reduce carbon emissions.

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.