Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
2111
|
Posted - 2015.08.17 14:11:38 -
[181] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:I would suggest that, so long as wars are completely voluntary due to the dec dodge exploit, that wars do not need to be made any weaker. I agree and I'm open to discussing this as well.
I feel like the current mechanic too heavily favors defenders who don't want to fight, but some of the proposals I've read I think are too harsh. I still think you should be able to, just not as easily and consequence-free as you can now.
Relatively Notorious By Association
My Many Misadventures
A brief history of C&P Thunderdome
|
Zeus Maximo
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1004
|
Posted - 2015.08.17 14:14:00 -
[182] - Quote
Capitals in high-sec would probably equate to the disease that plagues the test server.
You want to test out the new marauder? Nope, Blap dread.
You want to fly the new destroyer? Nope, Archon puts 10 warriors on you.
The only real positive that I see coming from dreads in high-sec would be to take out poco's and pos's. CCP is already one step ahead of us though by replacing pos's entirely. #Entosis #JoveWand
"It is not possible either to trick or escape the mind of Zeus."
U-MAD Membership Recruitment
PoH Corporation Recruitment
|
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
3052
|
Posted - 2015.08.17 14:20:25 -
[183] - Quote
Can we juse replace guns and RR with entosis links already? Want a ship killed? Entosis it, it goes into reinforced mode for 5 minutes, when it comes out there is a entosis tug of war between the two fleets, if the hostile fleet wins the ship is destroyed.
Much easier than all this "shooting guns at the thing you want to blow up" nonsense. |
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
2111
|
Posted - 2015.08.17 14:24:40 -
[184] - Quote
Zeus Maximo wrote:Capitals in high-sec would probably equate to the disease that plagues the test server.
You want to test out the new marauder? Nope, Blap dread.
You want to fly the new destroyer? Nope, Archon puts 10 warriors on you.
The only real positive that I see coming from dreads in high-sec would be to take out poco's and pos's. CCP is already one step ahead of us though by replacing pos's entirely. #Entosis #JoveWand I agree that unlimited capitals everywhere in hisec would be a bad thing for a long list of reasons that I won't get into here.
I'm not convinced that allowing caps into parts of hisec under limited circumstances is entirely bad. I've proposed an idea for this and see pros and cons to it; I'm not sure yet which comes out on top.
Relatively Notorious By Association
My Many Misadventures
A brief history of C&P Thunderdome
|
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
24811
|
Posted - 2015.08.17 14:55:40 -
[185] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Generally the "Leader" of a "Newbie Corporation" and yes, both of those terms require quotations, aren't actually new themselves and are aware of the game mechanics. I was giving them the benefit of the doubt for the purposes of the post, and you're right they should be in quotations.
Quote:The problem with carebears facing war is timeless. They're paranoid, don't trust anyone and have no connections that aren't other carebears. If they want help and aren't the pets of a highsec PVP corp they're probably going to have to pay for their allies, against a group like BAW your options are limited, expensive and questionably effective. Not to mention that they hate to negotiate, don't like spending money and are intensely distrustful of everyone. 90% of the time generic carebear corp/alliance is going to be alone and going for the full duration because of their own nature. As I said, they reap what they sow. They go "waaahh wardec" yet refuse to help themselves, then wonder why they're continuously wardecced.
Civilized behaviour is knowing that violence is barbaric, but paying other people to do it is business.
Nil mortifi sine lucre.
|
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
2111
|
Posted - 2015.08.17 14:57:26 -
[186] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Can we juse replace guns and RR with entosis links already? Want a ship killed? Entosis it, it goes into reinforced mode for 5 minutes, when it comes out there is a entosis tug of war between the two fleets, if the hostile fleet wins the ship is destroyed.
Much easier than all this "shooting guns at the thing you want to blow up" nonsense. Obligatory "Welcome to Entosis Online".
Relatively Notorious By Association
My Many Misadventures
A brief history of C&P Thunderdome
|
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium. CODE.
14168
|
Posted - 2015.08.17 15:32:54 -
[187] - Quote
Bronson Hughes wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:I would suggest that, so long as wars are completely voluntary due to the dec dodge exploit, that wars do not need to be made any weaker. I agree and I'm open to discussing this as well. I feel like the current mechanic too heavily favors defenders who don't want to fight, but some of the proposals I've read I think are too harsh. I still think you should be able to, just not as easily and consequence-free as you can now. EDIT: Say, for sake of argument, make it so that after a war is declared, corp members gain a mandatory 48 hour cooldown in order to leave corp. This would be based on when the player first attempts to leave corp (rather like a director or someone with roles), not when the war starts. This would guarantee aggressors at least 24 hours of corp membership while still leaving players able to leave the corp if they choose. Directors or those with roles could drop them immediately upon wardec notification, but wouldn't be able to leave until both the 24 hour role cooldown and the 48 hour war cooldown have passed.
My perspective on the matter remains unchanged.
The problem is incentives, and the ability to have your cake and eat it too by having the best of NPC corps and player corps at the same time. This devalues both combat oriented gameplay and entrenching a social structure, neither of which being so devalued is good for the game.
If we finally address the sacred cow and nerf NPC corps, then player corps become something worth fighting for. A large part of the problem right now is that it is simply not worthwhile to fight, and that the tools for actively not fighting are distinctly superior to literally everything else in the mechanic.
Would these suggestions destroy the typical highsec corp as we know it? Yes, but that's not just a good thing, it's a great thing. We'd be incentivizing balanced corps who actually defend themselves and play the game, and that's what EVE needs.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
2112
|
Posted - 2015.08.17 15:44:12 -
[188] - Quote
I posted a few thoughts in that thread just recently. I think you and I are of similar mind on the topic even if we may have different approaches. (I really like some of your ideas though.)
To fix wardecs, I think you need to start with the fees, but then you need to finish with corps being worth fighting for. Otherwise, nothing will change except how much wardecs cost.
Relatively Notorious By Association
My Many Misadventures
A brief history of C&P Thunderdome
|
Marlin Spikes
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
229
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 11:45:44 -
[189] - Quote
Well said Kaarous. It's almost hard to believe this insight came from code...lol
Bombers Rule!!!
|
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium. CODE.
14260
|
Posted - 2015.08.20 11:48:23 -
[190] - Quote
Marlin Spikes wrote:Well said Kaarous. It's almost hard to believe this insight came from code...lol
I've been saying that **** since well before I ever joined CODE.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |