Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Robert De Lyse
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
12
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 11:17:01 -
[1] - Quote
It's dead simple really
You whine and complain when empire war decs are discussed as possible nerfs, costs to rise etc and you come up with this:
"Why should we be forced to PvP in low/null/wh's when we want to PvP in empire, we should be able to play EvE how we like"
Okay sure, sandbox and all that, BUT:
What gives you the RIGHT to force the empire population of EvE to PvP? To FORCE them to play how you want to play? To FORCE them to change there mission/industrial/exploration play styles to PVP against you?
What gives you the RIGHT to FORCE PLAYERS TO PLAY THE GAME how you want to? You don't want to be FORCED into low/null/wh's.
Stop being hypocrites.
Griefers - Cowards who fly speed fit ships such as 10mn ab fit sivpuls with medium boosts, or gank certain systems with spys in each gate within a 1j radius, we had 7 war decs and we took a 30 man fleet, what did they all do? They ran to a station and hid. Smacked in local, in all there fancy t3's, they ran from a 30 man frig/dessy gang.
Code - buncha noobs ganking barges and nearly causing a market crash, well done, well done
"Griefers slam wow" - K sure, u don't play it for one reason, u cant go around destroying everyones stuff
Buncha cowards, all of you. |
Omar Alharazaad
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
2424
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 11:28:18 -
[2] - Quote
Do go on. *popcorn* Also, things are made to be broken. It's kind of a fundamental bit of supply and demand.
Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.
|
Black Pedro
Yammerschooner
1320
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 11:31:47 -
[3] - Quote
Robert De Lyse wrote:It's dead simple really
You whine and complain when empire war decs are discussed as possible nerfs, costs to rise etc and you come up with this:
"Why should we be forced to PvP in low/null/wh's when we want to PvP in empire, we should be able to play EvE how we like"
Okay sure, sandbox and all that, BUT:
What gives you the RIGHT to force the empire population of EvE to PvP? To FORCE them to play how you want to play? To FORCE them to change there mission/industrial/exploration play styles to PVP against you?
What gives you the RIGHT to FORCE PLAYERS TO PLAY THE GAME how you want to? You don't want to be FORCED into low/null/wh's.
Stop being hypocrites.
Griefers - Cowards who fly speed fit ships such as 10mn ab fit sivpuls with medium boosts, or gank certain systems with spys in each gate within a 1j radius, we had 7 war decs and we took a 30 man fleet, what did they all do? They ran to a station and hid. Smacked in local, in all there fancy t3's, they ran from a 30 man frig/dessy gang.
Code - buncha noobs ganking barges and nearly causing a market crash, well done, well done
"Griefers slam wow" - K sure, u don't play it for one reason, u cant go around destroying everyones stuff
Buncha cowards, all of you. Eve is a PvP game at its core as I linked to you in another thread. This simple fact that this is how the game is designed is what gives other players the right for force you into PvP anywhere.
If you think they are cowards and want to do something about it, your energies would be better spent in-game rather than whining on the forums.
I hear that anti-ganking is still looking for help if you actually want to do something more than cry about those evil "griefers". |
Avvy
Republic University Minmatar Republic
82
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 11:31:53 -
[4] - Quote
Which bit of it's a PvP game didn't you understand?
Hmm, can only find sweet popcorn, prefer toffee popcorn myself. |
Avvy
Republic University Minmatar Republic
83
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 11:46:11 -
[5] - Quote
Robert De Lyse wrote: What gives you the RIGHT to force the empire population of EvE to PvP? To FORCE them to play how you want to play? To FORCE them to change there mission/industrial/exploration play styles to PVP against you?
What gives you the RIGHT to FORCE PLAYERS TO PLAY THE GAME how you want to? You don't want to be FORCED into low/null/wh's.
Nobody is stopping anyone doing missions, industrial or exploration. But as a PvP game they shouldn't expect to be able to do those professions risk free.
|
Odie McCracken
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 11:50:10 -
[6] - Quote
Griefing is a bannable offence in Eve. If someone if griefing file a petition with CCP.
|
Domino Vyse
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
276
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 12:00:26 -
[7] - Quote
Who got sand in your box? |
Mortlake
Devils Rejects 666
542
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 12:06:30 -
[8] - Quote
Christ, I just managed to yawn at both ends simultaneously!
|
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium. CODE.
14061
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 12:14:55 -
[9] - Quote
Robert De Lyse wrote: What gives you the RIGHT to force the empire population of EvE to PvP?
It's called player freedom, look it up some time.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
Anne Dieu-le-veut
Natl Assn for the Advancement of Criminal People
205
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 12:23:50 -
[10] - Quote
Less than week old NPC corp forum alt calling other people cowards...not sure if trolling or oblivious. |
|
Odie McCracken
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 12:25:16 -
[11] - Quote
Anne Dieu-le-veut wrote:Less than week old NPC corp forum alt calling other people cowards...not sure if trolling or oblivious. Based on grammar and writing style, I vote trolling.
Clearly a troll, but not a very bight one so it's entertaining :) |
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
24580
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 12:39:24 -
[12] - Quote
Robert De Lyse wrote:It's dead simple really
You whine and complain when empire war decs are discussed as possible nerfs, costs to rise etc and you come up with this:
"Why should we be forced to PvP in low/null/wh's when we want to PvP in empire, we should be able to play EvE how we like"
Okay sure, sandbox and all that, BUT:
What gives you the RIGHT to force the empire population of EvE to PvP? To FORCE them to play how you want to play? To FORCE them to change there mission/industrial/exploration play styles to PVP against you?
What gives you the RIGHT to FORCE PLAYERS TO PLAY THE GAME how you want to? You don't want to be FORCED into low/null/wh's. What's good for the goose is also good for the gander. Some missioners, industrialists and explorers have been demanding that CCP nerf hisec aggression for years, the current situation is the result of that. What gives them the right to demand that CCP make others change their playstyles to suit them?
The difference is that PvPer's are doing their own dirty work, the carebears are expecting CCP to do it for them.
Quote:Stop being hypocrites.
Griefers - Cowards who fly speed fit ships such as 10mn ab fit sivpuls with medium boosts, or gank certain systems with spys in each gate within a 1j radius, we had 7 war decs and we took a 30 man fleet, what did they all do? They ran to a station and hid. Smacked in local, in all there fancy t3's, they ran from a 30 man frig/dessy gang. What are they, cowards or griefers?
BTW CCP don't tolerate griefing, their definition of griefer probably doesn't match yours though
Quote:Code - buncha noobs ganking barges and nearly causing a market crash, well done, well done Citation needed
Quote:"Griefers slam wow" - K sure, u don't play it for one reason, u cant go around destroying everyones stuff It's the lowest common denominator, as such it's going to get slammed.
Quote:Buncha cowards, all of you. Would you say that to their faces or are you to cowardly to do so?
TL;DR You should stick to stealing stuff from fools.
Civilized behaviour is knowing that violence is barbaric, but paying other people to do it is business.
Nil mortifi sine lucre.
|
Valkin Mordirc
1361
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 12:40:08 -
[13] - Quote
Ladies and Gentlemen this man is here to take Veers place.
#DeleteTheWeak
|
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
24580
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 12:53:39 -
[14] - Quote
Valkin Mordirc wrote:Ladies and Gentlemen this man is here to take Veers place. That's a huge pair of shoes to fill.
Civilized behaviour is knowing that violence is barbaric, but paying other people to do it is business.
Nil mortifi sine lucre.
|
Lan Wang
V I R I I Ineluctable.
1341
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 12:57:36 -
[15] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Robert De Lyse wrote: What gives you the RIGHT to force the empire population of EvE to PvP?
It's called player freedom, look it up some time.
its really one sided player freedom, just sayin is all
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium. CODE.
14062
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 13:01:30 -
[16] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Robert De Lyse wrote: What gives you the RIGHT to force the empire population of EvE to PvP?
It's called player freedom, look it up some time. its really one sided player freedom, just sayin is all
Not at all, they have the freedom to avoid it if they so choose. They do not have any right to demand that it cease, in any way. If they want that, they can go play Star Trek Online with the rest of the cowards.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
Kooshti
Bargain Booze
28
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 13:01:40 -
[17] - Quote
why is this guy mad? was he violated in space? |
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
24582
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 13:05:28 -
[18] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Robert De Lyse wrote: What gives you the RIGHT to force the empire population of EvE to PvP?
It's called player freedom, look it up some time. its really one sided player freedom, just sayin is all Not really, I do all of the carebear things and have zero problems with mission invaders or suicide gankers, mainly because I actively take steps to minimise their impact on my gameplay.
Civilized behaviour is knowing that violence is barbaric, but paying other people to do it is business.
Nil mortifi sine lucre.
|
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium. CODE.
14062
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 13:07:59 -
[19] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Lan Wang wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Robert De Lyse wrote: What gives you the RIGHT to force the empire population of EvE to PvP?
It's called player freedom, look it up some time. its really one sided player freedom, just sayin is all Not really, I do all of the carebear things and have zero problems with mission invaders or suicide gankers, mainly because I actively take steps to minimise their impact on my gameplay.
Precisely this.
What carebears (as opposed to you, which I would call a PvE player. They don't get to be called players) want is to have the ability to NOT play the game even halfway correctly, while being completely immune to other people at the same time.
That is contrary to player freedom, because what they want can only be achieved by a harsh curtailing of player freedom. And since EVE is pretty much defined and sold on player freedom, what they want is the death of the game.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
Lan Wang
V I R I I Ineluctable.
1341
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 13:09:17 -
[20] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Lan Wang wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Robert De Lyse wrote: What gives you the RIGHT to force the empire population of EvE to PvP?
It's called player freedom, look it up some time. its really one sided player freedom, just sayin is all Not at all, they have the freedom to avoid it if they so choose. They do not have any right to demand that it cease, in any way. If they want that, they can go play Star Trek Online with the rest of the cowards.
I sit on the fence with both sides of this sort of thing, while you are having freedom to do what you want you are restricting the freedom of other to play your own game. yeah they can avoid it ofcourse but having to avoid something is not freedom to go where you want, but i only really look at this from wardec mechanics where they force people, and forcing something on someone is not freedom.
but the rules allow it so why even bother arguing about it
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
|
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium. CODE.
14062
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 13:12:53 -
[21] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote: I sit on the fence with both sides of this sort of thing, while you are having freedom to do what you want you are restricting the freedom of other to play your own game.
That's why it's PvP. The better player wins in a contest of opposite intents.
Since they are almost universally the inferior players, they hate that fact. That's why they argue to take the choice itself away from the other side.
Quote: yeah they can avoid it ofcourse but having to avoid something is not freedom to go where you want
Yes, it is. No one has the freedom to not have to defend themselves, however.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
Lan Wang
V I R I I Ineluctable.
1341
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 13:17:09 -
[22] - Quote
i cant really argue much about it as i would shoot them too, but i dont think wardecs are really player freedom for both parties
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
24583
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 13:18:30 -
[23] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Lan Wang wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Robert De Lyse wrote: What gives you the RIGHT to force the empire population of EvE to PvP?
It's called player freedom, look it up some time. its really one sided player freedom, just sayin is all Not at all, they have the freedom to avoid it if they so choose. They do not have any right to demand that it cease, in any way. If they want that, they can go play Star Trek Online with the rest of the cowards. I sit on the fence with both sides of this sort of thing, while you are having freedom to do what you want you are restricting the freedom of other to play your own game. yeah they can avoid it ofcourse but having to avoid something is not freedom to go where you want, but i only really look at this from wardec mechanics where they force people, and forcing something on someone is not freedom. but the rules allow it so why even bother arguing about it Avoiding being a victim in no way restricts what I do or where I go. I regularly haul through Uedama, I often mine in systems claimed by CODE.; still haven't exploded doing either.
*touches wood, not that kind of wood you perverts
Civilized behaviour is knowing that violence is barbaric, but paying other people to do it is business.
Nil mortifi sine lucre.
|
Lan Wang
V I R I I Ineluctable.
1341
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 13:20:02 -
[24] - Quote
what i mean is wardeccing a corp and forcing them to stay in a station because thats all they feel they can do is not really player freedom, wardecs are removing freedom from a player to benefit another player. sorta thing
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Anne Dieu-le-veut
Natl Assn for the Advancement of Criminal People
205
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 13:26:08 -
[25] - Quote
If only you could drop corp, or drop and reform to avoid a war dec... |
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium. CODE.
14062
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 13:27:08 -
[26] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:what i mean is wardeccing a corp and forcing them to stay in a station because thats all they feel they can do is not really player freedom, wardecs are removing freedom from a player to benefit another player. sorta thing
They still have player freedom. They are choosing to stay in station all day, that's not something forced on them except by their own mindset. But they still have the choice, even if they made a bad decision. They have options, in fact they have lots of options, the game is quite literally obscene about that kind of thing.
People who handcuff themselves should not reflect on the people playing the game correctly.
"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."
One of ours, ten of theirs.
Best Meltdown Ever.
|
Avvy
Republic University Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 13:35:05 -
[27] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:I sit on the fence with both sides of this sort of thing, while you are having freedom to do what you want you are restricting the freedom of other to play your own game. yeah they can avoid it ofcourse but having to avoid something is not freedom to go where you want, but i only really look at this from wardec mechanics where they force people, and forcing something on someone is not freedom. but the rules allow it so why even bother arguing about it
The fence tends to be uncomfortable, I prefer a chair myself.
Way I see it, this game is a PvP game so you can choose what you want to do but you can't choose what you want others to do to you (as long as it's not actual griefing).
I'll use WoW as an example only because of their different types of servers.
PvP servers - PvE players play on these as well as PvP player as they like to look over their shoulders and feel there's actually a threat to them.
PvE servers - as well as PvE players you get casual PvP players, the casual PvP players like to PvE and only PvP when they want to, via arenas and battlegrounds.
EVE being a PvP game, it's not really a casual PvP game only way not to PvP is to try and avoid it.
|
Avvy
Republic University Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 13:43:39 -
[28] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:what i mean is wardeccing a corp and forcing them to stay in a station because thats all they feel they can do is not really player freedom, wardecs are removing freedom from a player to benefit another player. sorta thing
Which is why a lot probably stay in NPC corps. If it wasn't for players choosing to suicide NPC corp. players they would be free from all PvP.
I don't see the issue being the players so much but the way high-sec is set up, one of the reasons I don't intend to stay in high-sec. High-sec is kind of an odd place for a PvP game, but I guess it depends what CCP is really trying to do with it. Of which that I don't know.
|
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
1485
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 14:16:47 -
[29] - Quote
Tried to read the OP, but almost drowned in his tears after only a few sentences.
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|
Lan Wang
V I R I I Ineluctable.
1341
|
Posted - 2015.08.11 14:19:49 -
[30] - Quote
Avvy wrote:Lan Wang wrote:what i mean is wardeccing a corp and forcing them to stay in a station because thats all they feel they can do is not really player freedom, wardecs are removing freedom from a player to benefit another player. sorta thing Which is why a lot probably stay in NPC corps. If it wasn't for players choosing to suicide NPC corp. players they would be free from all combat PvP. I don't see the issue being the players so much but the way high-sec is set up, one of the reasons I don't intend to stay in high-sec. High-sec is kind of an odd place for a PvP game, but I guess it depends what CCP is really trying to do with it. Of which that I don't know.
yeah and npc corps are another thing which need fixed, they are anti-social
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |