EVE Search - Official IAC Response to ISS's Escalation of Hostilities

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Official IAC Response to ISS's Escalation of Hostilities

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
Kaylana Syi Minmatar The Nest Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.12.13 00:50:00 - [1] I am sure Seleene will make a proper storyboarded post, one that I am looking forward to reading, but until then you will get this : ISS have escaladed the 0.0 war between IAC and ISS into an all out Outpost taking war. Mercenary Coallition with the help of Veto. and ISS are demonstrating that ISS are unwilling to listen to IAC diplomats when we said we had no interest in taking their outposts. As of now, IAC will not tolerate escallation into POS combat and ISS has shown that once again they cannot do anything but rely on their wallets. We will do what it takes with whom it takes to ensure the survival of our outposts. This will get ugly if ISS does not back off their military agenda. IAC had the intention of getting the ISS leadership's attention with negative standings to make them realize they need to keep their member corporations in check because of the abuse of the loose structure they employ. ISS I have no respect for the actions you have taken. This isn't going to be fun for anyone. This is a new war and by no means are you going to spin this into self defense. You brought the first attack on system sovereignty and you will be dealt with harshly. I would like to point out to the rest of the corporations and alliances : if ISS is your neighbor, this is how they work out their differences. Not by using their navy, not by reforming their structure or fixing THEIR problems. It is done by buying the help of someone to make sure they don't have to change. Their problem is your problem. Fair enough... too bad it goes against everything ISS claims to stand for. Pathetic. Kaylana Syi, IAC Diplomat Team Minmatar Carriers need Clone Vats
The Alien Primary Targets	Posted - 2006.12.13 00:51:00 - [2] Originally by: Kaylana Syi ...when we said we had no interest in taking their outposts. Orly?
Thor Xian Vertigo One E.A.R.T.H. Federation	Posted - 2006.12.13 00:53:00 - [3] My diplomats carry katanas. It's more fun that way. ~Thor Xian, Chief Administrator "For all your Material Needs, Vertigo One." Corp/Alliance Services
GO MaZ The Priory Shroud Of Darkness	Posted - 2006.12.13 00:56:00 - [4] Originally by: The Alien Originally by: Kaylana Syi ...when we said we had no interest in taking their outposts. Orly? If IAC had wanted the outposts, dont you think they would've started a POS war like 5 minutes after the standings change? It doesnt make sense to sit around for a day camping the ISS systems and NOT start working on the posses if you want to escalate it. GJ ISS, I have a feeling this is going to turn into 9UY Deux
DHB FooFighter FIRMA Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.12.13 00:58:00 - [5] Originally by: The Alien Originally by: Kaylana Syi ...when we said we had no interest in taking their outposts. Orly? If we had wanted their Outposts you think we would have done it when they only had 3 POS's and not when they knew we were gonna be hostile? We had many chances over the past few days to to take their POS's, as we held their systems for the duration of Monday anf tuesday. However, we never once even fired a blow against ISS POS or Stations, instead focusing on shooting ISS pilots in space because that is just sooo much more fun. Now its a POS war, and that is never fun.
xStarbuck	Posted - 2006.12.13 00:58:00 - [6] I find it rather delightful how your pilots try to lag out local by constantly spamming anything from "rabble" to "*****" for about 5mins.
Count TaSessine ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate	Posted - 2006.12.13 00:59:00 - [7] You have repeatedly declared your intentions to seize the outposts that ISS are managing. You have stated those intentions both in public and in private convos with me (n sx and Tyrrax). We are defending the interests of ISS, our pilots and the owners of the stations. Chairman, ISS
Krullzorzz Minmatar CYBERDYMEBAG INDUSTRIES	Posted - 2006.12.13 00:59:00 - [8] makes sense to me. most people keep a coupel days of stront in the pos. iac wouldnt want to escalate until A) They get more cap wielding allies, and B) thursday, wednesday at the earliest, so that the pos come out of reinforced during peak pilot hours:-p and iac threatened to take iss stations in local and in the other threads ive been reading here, i saw written in a thread... isnt that right?
AKULA UrQuan Caldari STK Scientific Ascendant Frontier	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:00:00 - [9] I'm going to take a wild guess and say Sel wanted a rematch. Hell, you set ISS to -10 and thought it was a good idea to make a big show of it on the forums. I like IAC but This is one case where you asked for it....with a giant flashing neon sign. Just how I see it. Nothing personal. Originally by: Wrangler Win ME is more a some sort of virus than a OS..
Kassad Gents with Big Sticks	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:01:00 - [10] Edited by: Kassad on 13/12/2006 01:02:03 What evidence do you have that this is turning into an outpost taking war? Let me guess, ISS were putting POS'S up in thier own systems again Spin it all you want Kaylana, because you are fooling no one. Don't swing at someone first, then be upset and shocked, or even have the audacity to complain, when they maybe swing back twice as hard.
Frools The Priory Shroud Of Darkness	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:01:00 - [11] Choo Choo! All aboard the mantrain! woot
Tyrrax Thorrk Amarr Umbra Congregatio Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:02:00 - [12] Originally by: Count TaSessine You have repeatedly declared your intentions to seize the outposts that ISS are managing. You have stated those intentions both in public and in private convos with me (n sx and Tyrrax). We are defending the interests of ISS, our pilots and the owners of the stations. You're lying again, how about posting some proof of your groundless claims ? http://eve.klaki.net/
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:04:00 - [13] lol YOU started the war. YOU 'escalted hostilities' by setting ISS to -10. YOU talked openly about taking their outposts on several occasions Now you're crying on the forums because they are responding to your aggression. You made some very unwise choices recently IAC. Bad things happen to carebears to start acting tough and pushing neighbours around. I have one thing to say. IN YOUR FACE, IAC Its Party Time Ö
Taka Caldari Quam Singulari Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:05:00 - [14] Originally by: DHB FooFighter Originally by: The Alien Originally by: Kaylana Syi ...when we said we had no interest in taking their outposts. Orly? If we had wanted their Outposts you think we would have done it when they only had 3 POS's and not when they knew we were gonna be hostile? We had many chances over the past few days to to take their POS's, as we held their systems for the duration of Monday anf tuesday. However, we never once even fired a blow against ISS POS or Stations, instead focusing on shooting ISS pilots in space because that is just sooo much more fun. Now its a POS war, and that is never fun. Yeah pos wars aint fun...but i guess your gonna have to get used to it :P -------------------- My Sig Got Podded!!
maGz The Priory Shroud Of Darkness	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:05:00 - [15] Originally by: Kassad Edited by: Kassad on 13/12/2006 01:02:03 What evidence do you have that this is turning into an outpost taking war? Let me guess, ISS were putting POS'S up in thier own systems again Spin it all you want Kaylana, because you are fooling no one. Don't swing at someone first, then be upset and shocked, or even have the audacity to complain, when they maybe swing back twice as hard. Hostile POS' in an IAC system enough evidence? ____________ The Priory Killboard
Halafian The Graduates	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:05:00 - [16] Edited by: Halafian on 13/12/2006 01:19:11 Edited by: Halafian on 13/12/2006 01:14:23 Originally by: Georgik Sojik May the best alliance win Tycho and Marginis. although I'm no official IAC Diplomat, I believe we'll have the same deal with the shareholders as ISS once had with you Originally by: Raem Civrie Anyway. Nice stations, we'll take them! Originally by: DHB FooFighter Just to clarify a few things for our members and others. We are not at this moment actively engageing ISS's stations or POS's... though time will only tell who will own what station when. http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=441969&page=1#15 Originally by: Tyrrax Thorrk I was quite clear about not knowing if we would attack your outposts or not. If you think I wasn't serious, that's your problem. ?[ 2006.12.10 22:07:32 ] Count TaSessine > is this just general shooty shooty or outpost assaulting we're talking about? ?[ 2006.12.10 22:07:55 ] Tyrrax Thorrk > who knows ! ?[ 2006.12.10 22:09:55 ] Tyrrax Thorrk > i don't atm ?[ 2006.12.10 22:09:57 ] Count TaSessine > Tyrrax, I'm serious, the whole tone of the conflict depends on it - I think a clear statement of intent is something on both our interests ?[ 2006.12.10 22:10:27 ] Tyrrax Thorrk > shooting pos is certainly not out of the question. Originally by: Tyrrax Thorrk IAC is not particularly interested in taking those two outposts, but that could change easily enough.
Press Officer Leaked Memo's	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:06:00 - [17] Sounds like some real "solid panties" in the IAC Leadership ..... 1) You tell all your special members and friends that you plan to attack the ISS 2 Weeks ago (hint I was one of those people) 2) You notify all "special" friends the attack is planned for Sunday 3) You start the official "forum wars" on Friday trying to make ISS the "bad guys" 4) You camp ZXIC and KDF with up to 200 pilots on Sunday / Monday 5) On Tuesday ISS / MC and friends turn up in F4, camp you in and start errecting POS's 6) You post message saying "its all been a mistake" you only wanted to get the ISS attention. LMFAO AT YOU !!!!! RUN TO JITA AND STAY OUT OF 0.0 YOU GIRLS
Count TaSessine ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:06:00 - [18] Originally by: Tyrrax Thorrk Originally by: Count TaSessine You have repeatedly declared your intentions to seize the outposts that ISS are managing. You have stated those intentions both in public and in private convos with me (n sx and Tyrrax). We are defending the interests of ISS, our pilots and the owners of the stations. You're lying again, how about posting some proof of your groundless claims ? Do you want me to post the convo I had with you and n sx right after someone lost your Imperial Apocalypse in the alliance tournament and you declared war on ISS on Eve-TV? Or do you want links to the various threads on these forums where the topic is up? Chairman, ISS
DHB FooFighter FIRMA Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:06:00 - [19] Originally by: Butter Dog lol YOU started the war. YOU 'escalted hostilities' by setting ISS to -10. YOU talked openly about taking their outposts on several occasions Now you're crying on the forums because they are responding to your aggression. You made some very unwise choices recently IAC. Bad things happen to carebears to start acting tough and pushing neighbours around. I have one thing to say. IN YOUR FACE, IAC Its Party Time Ö And so ISS dig their own grave. Let me step aside while you fall facefirst into the abyss of your own arrogance.
maGz The Priory Shroud Of Darkness	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:08:00 - [20] Originally by: Butter Dog lol YOU started the war. YOU 'escalted hostilities' by setting ISS to -10. YOU talked openly about taking their outposts on several occasions Now you're crying on the forums because they are responding to your aggression. You made some very unwise choices recently IAC. Bad things happen to carebears to start acting tough and pushing neighbours around. I have one thing to say. IN YOUR FACE, IAC Its Party Time Ö Reading comprehension isn't your strong side is it? Nowhere did IAC cry about this turn of events. They just managed something ISS failed for ages, to put a proper spin on a situation. ____________ The Priory Killboard
Tyrrax Thorrk Amarr Umbra Congregatio Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:10:00 - [21] Originally by: Count TaSessine Originally by: Tyrrax Thorrk Originally by: Count TaSessine You have repeatedly declared your intentions to seize the outposts that ISS are managing. You have stated those intentions both in public and in private convos with me (n sx and Tyrrax). We are defending the interests of ISS, our pilots and the owners of the stations. You're lying again, how about posting some proof of your groundless claims ? Do you want me to post the convo I had with you and n sx right after someone lost your Imperial Apocalypse in the alliance tournament and you declared war on ISS on Eve-TV? Or do you want links to the various threads on these forums where the topic is up? I already pasted that chatlog in the other thread you were lieing in, IAC has never said we're taking your outposts. That doesn't mean we aren't going to of course, but try to stick to the truth, I don't like people putting words in my mouth. http://eve.klaki.net/
The Alien Primary Targets	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:11:00 - [22] Originally by: DHB FooFighter Originally by: The Alien Originally by: Kaylana Syi ...when we said we had no interest in taking their outposts. Orly? If we had wanted their Outposts you think we would have done it when they only had 3 POS's and not when they knew we were gonna be hostile? We had many chances over the past few days to to take their POS's, as we held their systems for the duration of Monday anf tuesday. However, we never once even fired a blow against ISS POS or Stations, instead focusing on shooting ISS pilots in space because that is just sooo much more fun. Now its a POS war, and that is never fun. Originally by: Raem Civrie Anyway. Nice stations, we'll take them! Originally by: DHB FooFighter We are not at this moment actively engageing ISS's stations or POS's...though time will only tell who will own what station when. Originally by: Tyrrax Thorrk IAC is not particularly interested in taking those two outposts, but that could change easily enough. Well its certainly been on your mind that you will eventually want them, so it appears to be a flat out lie sir. -------
Butter Dog The Dead Miners Society	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:12:00 - [23] Edited by: Butter Dog on 13/12/2006 01:13:45 Originally by: DHB FooFighter And so ISS dig their own grave. Let me step aside while you fall facefirst into the abyss of your own arrogance. LOL Comedy Gold, keep it up IAC. Facts are as follows: * You started the war * You refuse to listen to ISS who asked for war to be avoided * You ignore Counts public post asking for freindly relations * ISS CHANGED THEIR CHARTER IN RESPONSE TO YOUR FEEDBACK * You still went to war with them * You make a big show of it on the forums * You brag more on the forums about your kills And now, in a pure comedy sketch, you claim ISS are the aggressor! Honestly, IAC. Get a grip.
n sx The Tidemark Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:13:00 - [24] Originally by: Count TaSessine You have repeatedly declared your intentions to seize the outposts that ISS are managing. You have stated those intentions both in public and in private convos with me (n sx and Tyrrax). We are defending the interests of ISS, our pilots and the owners of the stations. Keep spinning it count, you are the grand master. You know as well as I do, you asked us flatout 5 minutes after the announcement whether we were taking ISS stations. Our official response was 'I dunno, maybe'. This was merely a ploy to keep you guessing. You threatened us that it would curb your response actions and we didn't budge. The claims by pilots in threads regarding taking stations has been from both sides and none of them have been from IAC leadership team. It is now obvious however who had the real intentions of station and asset takedown. We acted on the back of intel stating you had the intent to take IAC stations, which now as most will argue has come true. Sure, IAC agressed first on the PVP front knowing full well of the scale of this engagement. We're just sick of sitting in your shadow of mind games and turning your back on us. We were waiting for you to show your cards, your allegiences and your true dirty workers. You have now done this and we welcome them to the party. In all honesty, IAC taking on any entity in the process of raising 500billion ISK in investment is pure lunacy. We all know 'money talks' and from the get go you always had more of it and will most likely always do so. I feel sorry for the minions who throw themselves on the front line for your 'rightous cause'. Money will never buy you honour, integrity nor respect. Death to you and your sugar coated empire.
Raste Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:13:00 - [25] This is why dogs don't chase parked cars.
Marovinchian Revelations Inc. Shroud Of Darkness	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:14:00 - [26] FFS....will someone put a shock collar on butter nub....posting every 3 minutes is just rediculous. Oh, and i would just like to say the results of the big shock and awe blob thus far have been hilarious. 2 iss friendlies killed, 1 iac stilletto killed 1 MC maelstrom lost gg
Steven Orzack Minmatar Altastic Harvesters	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:15:00 - [27] Edited by: Steven Orzack on 13/12/2006 01:15:09 Originally by: Tyrrax Thorrk Originally by: Count TaSessine You have repeatedly declared your intentions to seize the outposts that ISS are managing. You have stated those intentions both in public and in private convos with me (n sx and Tyrrax). We are defending the interests of ISS, our pilots and the owners of the stations. You're lying again, how about posting some proof of your groundless claims ? Do you really think the community is stupid? Excuse me but you and your minions stated on quite a lot occasions on this forums that you indeed have taking ISS stations in mind and now ISS is teh ebil agressor? Dont underestimate the intellect of the community by posting blatant lies and expecting us to believe them, that is insulting.
The Alien Primary Targets	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:15:00 - [28] Originally by: n sx Our official response was 'I dunno, maybe'. This was merely a ploy to keep you guessing. You're right, the whole thing has been a ploy. IAC will go down as having dug their own grave after this, not ISS. Count on it. -------
Dark Shikari Caldari Imperium Technologies Firmus Ixion	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:17:00 - [29] Edited by: Dark Shikari on 13/12/2006 01:17:13 OK, so you declared war on ISS. All is well and good here, but then... you complain when they attack you? Seriously, that's a bit silly. If you set someone to -10, they have every right to come attack your stations, regardless who they are. -[23] Member- Awesome new space games site, from the editor of E-ON!
Sgt Napalm ISS Navy Task Force Interstellar Starbase Syndicate	Posted - 2006.12.13 01:18:00 - [30] Greetings, GF & HF -Your greatest friend (I told you so) Sgt Napalm

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.