I'm glad to see that CCP is focusing on fixing the real issues rather than wasting time on silly things like sov or incentives to fight over it. I quite look forward to seeing my titan wreck getting shot multiple times when I die in lowsec because of the poorly thought out jump range and fatigue changes.

+1 I support this change and other important issues like this one.

This would be awesome.
+1

You do realize that this is a massive buff to freighter ganking?

When can we expect a fix for risk free looting in highsec via a fleet hangar/freight container/can and a laundering alt in return?

Hehe, wreck popping was one of the few effective ways of interrupting work of large freighter ganker groups in hisec (primarily goons and thier code alts), so it is nice to see that CSM is working for the null block interests as per usual.

Now, I have nothing against this proposal but there is a major caveat - if you're gonna do this please fix the ability to loot other people's cargo while avoiding getting suspect flagged for it.

What I'm referring to is the fact that one can get next to a yellow wreck with a ship with fleet hanger (e.g. Deep space transport or an Orca) and a character in a noob ship, use the character in the noob ship to transfer cargo to DST and only the noob ship guy will get suspect flagged while DST will merrily warp away with stolen goods.

Please fix this so that Fleet hanger ship can't receive such (illegal) loot or can do it but gets flagged in the process (obviously, make it so that it is not prone to abuse). Do that, and I don't think many will care about EHP of the wrecks.

LMAO clever use of game mechanics.
And no, your proposal makes no sense. Loot is loot, it's just stuff, there's no such thing as 'illegal loot'.
Anyway, good change makes sense.

Very good change. Will provide good gameplay options for currently uncounterable tactics.

What about MTUs?

[...] Will it affect salvaging times?

Also, can we probe down wrecks now please?

[...] Also +1 for probe-scan wrecks: if it's in space - it may be scanned. May
bring some interesting opportunities.

[...]
Can you also change so capital wrecks don't disappear when salvaged, and stay on grid until downtime ( maybe even longer) ?
This are also big changes , but...... why?
[b]
Because of this : http://i.imgur.com/UhHrWHj.jpg
A single image posted across the web will affect more people than the BR we get from zkill.
People that never played eve will ignore BR, but if he is slightly interested in spaceships, he will not ignore screenshot.
Trust me. After each capital battle, you will get tons of screenshots posted across the web.
They will be a free eve commercials.
Capital graveyards will be good place to generate short therm hot zones, many people will want to see them.
You put a lot of work in creating this wreck graphics, why are you allowing them to be instantly gone after the battle? [...]

[...] Wreck popping? You mean murdering all of the defenseless crew who may have survived the original encounter? Seems like popping any wreck should be a crime far worst than podding a capsuleer. It should bring concord for the lives of the hundreds or even thousands of baseliners you are murdering in cold blood! [...]

this is about ppl destroying ganked freighter wrecks before gankers could loot them; i guess they cried long enough that their CSM representatives went to CCP and managed to implement this change "for the good of the game" ofc

I'm all for this change, but with one amendment......the loot should not be so easily accessible.

Dropped loot should be easily accessible, but cargo should not. Cargo should be dropped in containers that need to be hacked just like data/relic sites. The higher the cargo value.....the harder the hack!

Successful hacking - no CCP police....blow it up.....and they will chase you down!

Never...that actually goes against Goons/CODE and obviously some CSM members looking out for the greater good of Goonswarm Online!

Could be a little bit higher imo.

I like the idea that new game play could come from wrecks. But to be fair to attackers I would say convert the loot distribution model from dropped/destroyed to dropped/deployed/destroyed; where a part of the loot behaves as it does now and there is a chance for a portion of the loot to drop as an invulnerable container with part of the loot in it. The container must be hacked to retrieve the contents and has no suspect flags.

As far as the people saying the CSM are in favor of this because of goons.... Please direct your attention to the reddit.... READ, Form a thought, then come back.. and possibly complain.