Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Thargat
Caldari North Star Networks Executive Outcomes
|
Posted - 2008.10.22 09:27:00 -
[271]
Yuck, it's alive.... it's even worse than a crappy horrormovie.
and again to answer the question: How about NEVER? Is never a good time for you? 
There's only one sig that matters... and that's Radius. |

Odessima
Caldari The Black Rabbits The Gurlstas Associates
|
Posted - 2008.10.22 10:42:00 -
[272]
I can think of lots of reasons for why not, only reason why I can think of is lazyness. To me if you want the warp to 0, you may as well ask for everything else to be automated while your AFK as well, defences, weapons, shield, or armour activation ( because I am quite sure that that could all be automated as well so you dont get a sore mouse finger ). Some of us even actually enjoy not being afk. |

Belmarduk
Amarr M.A.R.S. Enterprises Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2008.10.22 19:24:00 -
[273]
No I disagree. warp to zero is fine as it is - It was needed to get rid of the millions of bookmarks. AP to zero is a completly different matter though !
Its fine as it is now: If you want to warp to 0 you must fly manual If you want to fly afk/semiafk - you take longer plus its less safe !!!
Risk/Reward !!
Mainchar:
|

Bobbechk
The Priory
|
Posted - 2008.10.22 20:55:00 -
[274]
AP is a rather inaccurate tool, and the 15km safety-zone is added for your safety as the AP might throw you tumbling into the gate itself causing structural damage to your internet spaceship!
there you go RP....
|

Hesod Adee
Federal Defence Union
|
Posted - 2008.10.23 23:42:00 -
[275]
Originally by: Odessima I can think of lots of reasons for why not,
So start listing them.
Quote: only reason why I can think of is lazyness. To me if you want the warp to 0, you may as well ask for everything else to be automated while your AFK as well,
Why ?
Only reason I can see here is the slippery slope fallacy which isn't a valid argument unless you can say why the first thing will lead to the second.
Quote: defences, weapons, shield, or armour activation ( because I am quite sure that that could all be automated as well so you dont get a sore mouse finger ).
Well up until your facing multiple targets, then how would you have the computer decide which target should be shot at ?
Quote: Some of us even actually enjoy not being afk.
So don't use WTZ AP if it comes out.
Originally by: Bobbechk AP is a rather inaccurate tool, and the 15km safety-zone is added for your safety as the AP might throw you tumbling into the gate itself causing structural damage to your internet spaceship!
there you go RP....
The 'safety' argument again 
Why is telling your ships navigition systems to warp to zero manually any safer than having the autopilot tell it to do the same thing ?
In fact, what does AFK even mean in a RP context ?
And before you answer, go read through my posts in this thread to make sure I haven't already answered the argument you bring.
Originally by: Belmarduk No I disagree. warp to zero is fine as it is - It was needed to get rid of the millions of bookmarks. AP to zero is a completly different matter though !
Its fine as it is now: If you want to warp to 0 you must fly manual If you want to fly afk/semiafk - you take longer plus its less safe !!!
Risk/Reward !!
So the current system is fine because the current system is fine ?
So why is having to chose between a longer trip, or being stuck playing a boring part of the game as a good thing ? Well unless I was playing Eve for a reason other than my own entertainment. And the areas where it isn't boring to use manual WTZ (gatecamps where you need to make the right choices to escape) are going to give the WTZ AP problems because it will ignore them and attempt to reach the next stargate, instead of trying to fight. Even if you are at the controls , WTZ AP will still decloak you before you get to see what ships are camping the gate. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |