Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
1002
|
Posted - 2016.06.18 17:33:34 -
[151] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:Dracvlad wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:I sure hope Liek was talking about bumping in that out of context chatlog you posted, because if not, then he, like yourself, are completely 100% incorrect.
I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.
GM Banana helped James 315 create the mining permit to justify BUMPING. NOT GANKING.
I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.
I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.
Herzog, what kind of carebear fantasy world do you live in? Why don't you file a petition and ask a GM if this subject if so difficult for you? Are you afraid of what they're going to tell you? [Spoiler Alert] it's going to be: "You do not have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game."
No, he agreed that to make sure that your ganking and bumping and tear gathering could not be defined as simple griefing and petitioned by your victims. I have no attitude whether it be right or wrong, it just is and I fight it in game which for me is fun. Ganking can never be "defined as simple griefing" because a killmail counts as an in-game reward or benefit. That's what I keep trying to tell you forum-dwellers but you just just can't seem to comprehend it. No, he agreed that to make sure that your campaign of ganking and bumping and tear gathering could not be defined as simple griefing and petitioned by your victims. Just to repeat the sentence with the addition of "campaign of" ro make it clearer, which is obviously not about just ganking is it? One could say that the focus of your website on individual players and their upset reaction is griefing, but those players have an option to join the AG movement and do something about it in game, rather than get all upset with eve mails and idle threats. EDIT: As for forum warriors lol, Herzog blew up lots of wrecks before CCP changed the wreck EHP and yesterday I was next to a bumped Obelisk with two Guardians and another player in an Augorer and the gank fleet came in and then left as they knew they could not break our logi. I did not see them gank for quite a few hours after that, forum warriors lol...
Our campaign of 100% completely allowed in-game activities? Oh okay, big difference. I mean, killing a retriever once is fine, but if you make a CAMPAIGN out of it, then you're a griefer unless you justify it some way with the help of GM Banana. Got it. 
WHERE DO YOU GET THIS STUFF?!?
Also, I never said forum warriors, train reading to level 3 before you post.
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|

Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
1002
|
Posted - 2016.06.18 17:36:36 -
[152] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:Now that I've completely schooled Herzog in front of everyone, so much so that he abandoned his fallacious, blatantly false claims in favor of ad-hominim style attacks against me, I claim this as YET ANOTHER victory for the New Order, and take my leave with 1000 likes.
*Drops microphone* You didnt answer my question, where is this james 315 that you all worship
Right now, I'd imagine he's gently helping a kitten out of a tree, or other Savior business.
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|

Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
1002
|
Posted - 2016.06.18 17:37:29 -
[153] - Quote
eddie valvetino wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:I realize that CCP aims to nerf highsec freighter ganking, but do they intend to end it all-together?
When the nerf to Awoxing was on the horizon, a desperate plea was made by the players and CCP had the good judgement to implement the toggle-switch, thus saving awoxing from total death.
Now, a nerf to freighter suicide ganking comes in the form of a 3-minute warp timer, and we need to try and reason with CCP to allow us more than just 3 measly minutes.
Just making it 5 minutes would make a world of difference.
I implore you, noble Devs, reconsider the practicality of recently proposed mechanics changes to bumping/warping.
Thank you. Perhaps if you weren't playing Eve PvP on easy mode, you would have more friends and there for more ships and more dps.. just saying Also, if you are no grid for longer than 3 mins... why can you not fit scrams? Perhaps your base level of "PvP" as yet to come across this most basic of offensive mods
So much lack of understanding of the issue displayed here I just can't even begin to...
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
7792
|
Posted - 2016.06.18 19:44:37 -
[154] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:Now that I've completely schooled Herzog in front of everyone, so much so that he abandoned his fallacious, blatantly false claims in favor of ad-hominim style attacks against me, I claim this as YET ANOTHER victory for the New Order, and take my leave with 1000 likes.
*Drops microphone*
I was out all night. Why are you making a parody of yourself?
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Second-Dawn
1777
|
Posted - 2016.06.18 20:53:06 -
[155] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:Dracvlad wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:Dracvlad wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:I sure hope Liek was talking about bumping in that out of context chatlog you posted, because if not, then he, like yourself, are completely 100% incorrect.
I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.
GM Banana helped James 315 create the mining permit to justify BUMPING. NOT GANKING.
I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.
I say again, you don't have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game.
Herzog, what kind of carebear fantasy world do you live in? Why don't you file a petition and ask a GM if this subject if so difficult for you? Are you afraid of what they're going to tell you? [Spoiler Alert] it's going to be: "You do not have to justify the killing of spaceships in this spaceship killing game."
No, he agreed that to make sure that your ganking and bumping and tear gathering could not be defined as simple griefing and petitioned by your victims. I have no attitude whether it be right or wrong, it just is and I fight it in game which for me is fun. Ganking can never be "defined as simple griefing" because a killmail counts as an in-game reward or benefit. That's what I keep trying to tell you forum-dwellers but you just just can't seem to comprehend it. No, he agreed that to make sure that your campaign of ganking and bumping and tear gathering could not be defined as simple griefing and petitioned by your victims. Just to repeat the sentence with the addition of "campaign of" ro make it clearer, which is obviously not about just ganking is it? One could say that the focus of your website on individual players and their upset reaction is griefing, but those players have an option to join the AG movement and do something about it in game, rather than get all upset with eve mails and idle threats. EDIT: As for forum warriors lol, Herzog blew up lots of wrecks before CCP changed the wreck EHP and yesterday I was next to a bumped Obelisk with two Guardians and another player in an Augorer and the gank fleet came in and then left as they knew they could not break our logi. I did not see them gank for quite a few hours after that, forum warriors lol... Our campaign of 100% completely allowed in-game activities? Oh okay, big difference. I mean, killing a retriever once is fine, but if you make a CAMPAIGN out of it, then you're a griefer unless you justify it some way with the help of GM Banana. Got it.  WHERE DO YOU GET THIS STUFF?!? Also, I never said forum warriors, train reading to level 3 before you post.
You are trying too hard, first of all you do a whine thread and then you try to come over edgy and smart with stupid comments, CODE is definately going downhill fast..., keep posting mate its golden 
COHE, the Coalition of Hisec Entities is now in operation, time to make hisec work for people who operate there.
|

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite CODE.
2606
|
Posted - 2016.06.18 20:54:46 -
[156] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:WHERE DO YOU GET THIS STUFF?!? AG has a very extensive Intel network composed of Lucas Kell who makes the stuff up, Dracvlad who adds the word tears to the end of every sentence and Herzog who just repeats it and gets upset about it.
Let's just say, our schedules are save.
the Code ALWAYS wins
Elite PvPer, #74 in 2014
|

Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
1009
|
Posted - 2016.06.18 22:04:32 -
[157] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:Now that I've completely schooled Herzog in front of everyone, so much so that he abandoned his fallacious, blatantly false claims in favor of ad-hominim style attacks against me, I claim this as YET ANOTHER victory for the New Order, and take my leave with 1000 likes.
*Drops microphone* I was out all night. Why are you making a parody of yourself?
Well everyone is still waiting for you to back up that big steaming pile of BS you plopped all over the thread.
Have you filed that petition?
Why are you afraid to just file a petition and ask a GM?
You clearly need help understanding this game but refuse to ask the people who are the authority on these matters. Being Ignorant is excusable, but refusing to educate yourself is known as stupidity.
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|

Dom Arkaral
Kiss. Kill. Destroy. Section.Nine
507
|
Posted - 2016.06.18 23:58:45 -
[158] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:CODE is definately going downhill fast..., said every miner and whiny carebear since 2012
I think I got a bingo boys 
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester. #b4r
Gù+Montreal EVE Meet Organiser
Gù+Come talk in the ingame chan "EVE Montreal" for more info or just to chill!
|

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Second-Dawn
1779
|
Posted - 2016.06.19 07:56:07 -
[159] - Quote
Dom Arkaral wrote:Dracvlad wrote:CODE is definately going downhill fast..., said every miner and whiny carebear since 2012 I think I got a bingo boys 
He was the one whining, go look at the first post in this thread, it is basically please CCP don't make it harder for me, please please please, pathetic...
COHE, the Coalition of Hisec Entities is now in operation, time to make hisec work for people who operate there.
|

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Second-Dawn
1779
|
Posted - 2016.06.19 07:58:36 -
[160] - Quote
Ima Wreckyou wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:WHERE DO YOU GET THIS STUFF?!? AG has a very extensive Intel network composed of Lucas Kell who makes the stuff up, Dracvlad who adds the word tears to the end of every sentence and Herzog who just repeats it and gets upset about it. Let's just say, our schedules are save.
Safe not save. 
COHE, the Coalition of Hisec Entities is now in operation, time to make hisec work for people who operate there.
|

Rana Rama
State War Academy Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2016.06.19 10:00:36 -
[161] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:I realize that CCP aims to nerf highsec freighter ganking, but do they intend to end it all-together?
When the nerf to Awoxing was on the horizon, a desperate plea was made by the players and CCP had the good judgement to implement the toggle-switch, thus saving awoxing from total death.
Now, a nerf to freighter suicide ganking comes in the form of a 3-minute warp timer, and we need to try and reason with CCP to allow us more than just 3 measly minutes.
Just making it 5 minutes would make a world of difference.
I implore you, noble Devs, reconsider the practicality of recently proposed mechanics changes to bumping/warping.
Thank you.
when you need more than 3 minutes to gank a freighter you're in the wrong business anyway, so why are you whining about it ?
|

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
7794
|
Posted - 2016.06.19 19:45:22 -
[162] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:Now that I've completely schooled Herzog in front of everyone, so much so that he abandoned his fallacious, blatantly false claims in favor of ad-hominim style attacks against me, I claim this as YET ANOTHER victory for the New Order, and take my leave with 1000 likes.
*Drops microphone* I was out all night. Why are you making a parody of yourself? Well everyone is still waiting for you to back up that big steaming pile of BS you plopped all over the thread. Have you filed that petition? Why are you afraid to just file a petition and ask a GM? You clearly need help understanding this game but refuse to ask the people who are the authority on these matters. Being Ignorant is excusable, but refusing to educate yourself is known as stupidity.
Showing so much salt while making demands to support your own strawmen. I could bother with giving you more attention but im using a phone right now as my computer is a bit far away. I just came in to check on your hyper defensive meltdown for my own pleasure before i continue an adventurous and productive weekend.
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|

Dom Arkaral
Kiss. Kill. Destroy. Section.Nine
510
|
Posted - 2016.06.19 20:24:56 -
[163] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:Now that I've completely schooled Herzog in front of everyone, so much so that he abandoned his fallacious, blatantly false claims in favor of ad-hominim style attacks against me, I claim this as YET ANOTHER victory for the New Order, and take my leave with 1000 likes.
*Drops microphone* I was out all night. Why are you making a parody of yourself? Well everyone is still waiting for you to back up that big steaming pile of BS you plopped all over the thread. Have you filed that petition? Why are you afraid to just file a petition and ask a GM? You clearly need help understanding this game but refuse to ask the people who are the authority on these matters. Being Ignorant is excusable, but refusing to educate yourself is known as stupidity. Showing so much salt while making demands to support your own strawmen. I could bother with giving you more attention but im using a phone right now as my computer is a bit far away. I just came in to check on your hyper defensive meltdown for my own pleasure before i continue an adventurous and productive weekend. the simple fact that you post here is a victory for Galaxy Pig GG G.P., you won again by harvesting the tears of the Quote:plebs that give no damns 
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester. #b4r
Gù+Montreal EVE Meet Organiser
Gù+Come talk in the ingame chan "EVE Montreal" for more info or just to chill!
|

Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
1011
|
Posted - 2016.06.20 13:07:54 -
[164] - Quote
You're right, I do get a little defensive when people blatantly and publically lie about the rules of the game.
I mean, think of the poor noobies who might believe your tripe.
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
7795
|
Posted - 2016.06.20 16:06:11 -
[165] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:You're right, I do get a little defensive when people blatantly and publically lie about the rules of the game.
I mean, think of the poor noobies who might believe your tripe.
Also, strawman? Is it not your position that ganking for the sake of ganking would be against the rules? Try saying that out loud, you might hear how ridiculous that sounds if you say it out loud.
Part of me is wondering if you're going to try to backpedal your way out of this.
My God, you're still here. Just admit CODE is one big whine over crimewatch and loot abandonment and I won't haunt you with truth any further. That's all.
Don't forget it was you who came in here whining about three minutes. Tell me, what's do big about those 2 minutes? You have not made a real case for that extra 2 minutes.
I know what it is. See sentence 1.
Is it that you fear you might gank a freighter and right then another comes along but you got global for 15 minutes and won't be able to (no consequence scram via bumping) hold it in place until the timer is up? As if another one won't come along at all after that? Or you know that freighter pilots will take that opportunity perhaps? Fatter loot might get away because your target selection was poor?
Deal with itGäó
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|

Dom Arkaral
Addicted To Chaos Archetype.
511
|
Posted - 2016.06.20 16:33:07 -
[166] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: My God, you're still here
Herzie, drop the ball... let the adults talk 
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester. #b4r
Gù+Montreal EVE Meet Organiser
Gù+Come talk in the ingame chan "EVE Montreal" for more info or just to chill!
|

Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
1013
|
Posted - 2016.06.20 18:58:05 -
[167] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:You're right, I do get a little defensive when people blatantly and publically lie about the rules of the game.
I mean, think of the poor noobies who might believe your tripe.
Also, strawman? Is it not your position that ganking for the sake of ganking would be against the rules? Try saying that out loud, you might hear how ridiculous that sounds if you say it out loud.
Part of me is wondering if you're going to try to backpedal your way out of this. My God, you're still here. Just admit CODE is one big whine over crimewatch and loot abandonment and I won't haunt you with truth any further. That's all.
http://www.minerbumping.com/2012/10/how-will-crimewatch-and-bounty-changes.html?m=1.
Above is James 315's analysis of the then yet to happen crimewatch changes and how they might affect the operations of the New Order. As you can see, the blog was already up and running well before Crimewatch was even announced, and mind you that James 315 and the New Order predate even the blog.
So here's my question: How can the New Order have been created in response to something that hadn't happened yet?
Are you saying that James 315 can see the future?
Your propaganda skills are weak, bro. Google the words "minerbumping" and "crimewatch" and the top result proves your tinfoil incorrect.
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|

Lan Wang
Knights of the Posing Meat FETID
3190
|
Posted - 2016.06.20 19:22:33 -
[168] - Quote
why dont you just adapt.....htfu 
FETID now recruiting pvp pilots & corporations | lowsec pvp & piracy - Join FETID
Loyalist to Angel Cartel & Serpentis
|

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Second-Dawn
1784
|
Posted - 2016.06.20 19:39:31 -
[169] - Quote
I find Galaxy Pig's denials about James315's reaction to the then new crimewatch very telling, I will give him the same reply I did to Iamwreckingyou, or something like that.
Crimewatch went through an extended period of discussions and debate before it was implemented, members of the CSM knew about the changes well before they were implemented and I am pretty certain there was a discussion at Fanfest. To pretend that this was not known about when CODE was formed is total mis-information by a player trying to hide the fact that CODE was built on a butthurt reaction to game changes. Just as the player concerned posted this thread as a butthurt reaction to the change in bumping mechanics which is no longer a totally consequence free act of warp disruption and means he will have to have friends or another account for suicide alts.
As people have said, you Galaxy Pig need to HTFU!
COHE, the Coalition of Hisec Entities is now in operation, time to make hisec work for people who operate there.
|

Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
1013
|
Posted - 2016.06.20 19:55:10 -
[170] - Quote
Denial of James 315's reaction? I provided a link to James 315's reaction...
Are you actually reading my posts?
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Second-Dawn
1784
|
Posted - 2016.06.20 20:13:46 -
[171] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:Denial of James 315's reaction? I provided a link to James 315's reaction...
Are you actually reading my posts?
Seeing as you asked I will now explain why I no longer go to your alliance website, the last time I went on that website was 16th June, which was a link left in local alongside the kill mail of a freighter they had killed just before I had arrived, the link was to a to a comment by Lawrence Lawton a member of CODE, it was a couple of posts under CODE's previous leaders rant about a tragic event, and in my opinion this was done deliberately by that player. I decided at that point to no longer look at your website. Perhaps if you clean it up so people like Lawrend Lawton can no longer play such games then players like me will go back to that site.
You asked the question on this and I gave you my reasons for refusing to vist that site following a CODE players stupid game. I do not wish to expose myself to such stupidity and contempt and I remind you that it is a shame that people like the player I mentioned bring it down to such a level. Can you tell him that I have utter contempt for him as a person for doing that.
If you personally guarantee to me that I will not be subject to viewing such posts then I may reconsider.
COHE, the Coalition of Hisec Entities is now in operation, time to make hisec work for people who operate there.
|

Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
1013
|
Posted - 2016.06.20 20:20:39 -
[172] - Quote
Dracvlad wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:Denial of James 315's reaction? I provided a link to James 315's reaction...
Are you actually reading my posts? Seeing as you asked I will now explain why I no longer go to your alliance website, the last time I went on that website was 16th June, which was a link left in local alongside the kill mail of a freighter they had killed just before I had arrived, the link was to a to a comment by Lawrence Lawton a member of CODE, it was a couple of posts under CODE's previous leaders rant about a tragic event, and in my opinion this was done deliberately by that player. I decided at that point to no longer look at your website. Perhaps if you clean it up so people like Lawrend Lawton can no longer play such games then players like me will go back to that site. You asked the question on this and I gave you my reasons for refusing to vist that site following a CODE players stupid game. I do not wish to expose myself to such stupidity and contempt and I remind you that it is a shame that people like the player I mentioned bring it down to such a level. Can you tell him that I have utter contempt for him as a person for doing that. If you personally guarantee to me that I will not be subject to viewing such posts then I may reconsider.
So that's a 'no', then?
Pfff lol you take the internet too seriously, brother.
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|

Lan Wang
Knights of the Posing Meat FETID
3191
|
Posted - 2016.06.20 20:21:32 -
[173] - Quote
think code. need permits for posting on the forums 
FETID now recruiting pvp pilots & corporations | lowsec pvp & piracy - Join FETID
Loyalist to Angel Cartel & Serpentis
|

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Second-Dawn
1784
|
Posted - 2016.06.20 20:26:48 -
[174] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:Denial of James 315's reaction? I provided a link to James 315's reaction...
Are you actually reading my posts?
Let's dig deeper, shall we? How did crimewatch in any way affect the operations of the New Order? Sure, it gave carebears a few more mechanisms to strike back at us, but we all knew they'd be too cowardly to actually use any of them. All it did was provide us with even more tools to stick it to carebears. e.g. killrights
There were plenty of other changes that actually did affect us. These would have been better choices for your tinfoil theories.
Learn to propagandize.
The new crimewatch enabled the AG players to act as they do now, no one would have dared do anything in the previous mess because it was spaghetti code of the worst order sometimes making you go suspect for no known reason. At least now we have a certain level of control. This has created dynamic content over ganks and any true player would welcome it. Killrights work both ways, no issues with them at all apart from the way they are used to scam people.
If you have issues with the new system then feel free to detail them rather than a throw away line with no detail.
The reaction to the loss of can flipping by baltec1 has been noted by me. Lucas Kell as a member of Miniluv would not just come out with that about James315's reaction, Lucas Kell has a proven track record of saying it as he sees it, which almost got him kicked out of the Imperium. I trust his words because I have seen him over an extended period tell it as it is and see no reason to doubt it. You on the other hand are twisting Herzog's words to say something he never said and then accuse him of saying it.
Propoganda is not what I am interested in.
COHE, the Coalition of Hisec Entities is now in operation, time to make hisec work for people who operate there.
|

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
12426
|
Posted - 2016.06.20 20:32:58 -
[175] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:think code. need permits for posting on the forums 
Happy to sell them one, a bargain at 100m for a single day
Cheap at the price
Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .
Bumble's Space Log
|

Lan Wang
Knights of the Posing Meat FETID
3192
|
Posted - 2016.06.20 20:38:51 -
[176] - Quote
Bumblefck wrote:Lan Wang wrote:think code. need permits for posting on the forums  Happy to sell them one, a bargain at 100m for a single day Cheap at the price
i was thinking per post, monitor it for tears before allowing them to post
FETID now recruiting pvp pilots & corporations | lowsec pvp & piracy - Join FETID
Loyalist to Angel Cartel & Serpentis
|

Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
1013
|
Posted - 2016.06.20 20:43:46 -
[177] - Quote
And highsec players actually getting out and fighting each other is contrary to the Code?
Oh, it's one of the stated goals of our organization? Shrug, the Code always wins! Aways!
We did welcome crimewatch, which is explained in that link I posted which you refuse to click on.
You're right, the crimewatch changes cut both ways, giving both sides more tools to get at the other, though only one side would actually have the cajones to use them...
Herzog was trying to claim that the shooting of spaceships requires some sort of justification and that is just plain wrong. Is this really under dispute?
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|

Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
12429
|
Posted - 2016.06.20 21:12:23 -
[178] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:Bumblefck wrote:Lan Wang wrote:think code. need permits for posting on the forums  Happy to sell them one, a bargain at 100m for a single day Cheap at the price i was thinking per post, monitor it for tears before allowing them to post
That's a much better idea
Tea. Earl Grey. Hot
Make it so!
Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .
Bumble's Space Log
|

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
7797
|
Posted - 2016.06.20 21:43:03 -
[179] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Galaxy Pig wrote:You're right, I do get a little defensive when people blatantly and publically lie about the rules of the game.
I mean, think of the poor noobies who might believe your tripe.
Also, strawman? Is it not your position that ganking for the sake of ganking would be against the rules? Try saying that out loud, you might hear how ridiculous that sounds if you say it out loud.
Part of me is wondering if you're going to try to backpedal your way out of this. My God, you're still here. Just admit CODE is one big whine over crimewatch and loot abandonment and I won't haunt you with truth any further. That's all. http://www.minerbumping.com/2012/10/how-will-crimewatch-and-bounty-changes.html?m=1. Above is James 315's analysis of the then yet to happen crimewatch changes and how they might affect the operations of the New Order. As you can see, the blog was already up and running well before Crimewatch was even announced, and mind you that James 315 and the New Order predate even the blog. So here's my question: How can the New Order have been created in response to something that hadn't happened yet? Are you saying that James 315 can see the future? Your propaganda skills are weak, bro. Google the words "minerbumping" and "crimewatch" and the top result proves your tinfoil incorrect.
Propaganda? Truth is not propaganda. It's a force of nature. Speaking of propaganda, what website.... ah one controlled by the same people who are known to lie and gaslight the rest of the playerbase.
BTW, anybody can look at a future change and be butthurt about it, which is what this "prediction of the future" really it. You know how I know that happens?
Look at the first post in this thread.
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|

Brokk Witgenstein
Extreme Agony The Wraithguard.
336
|
Posted - 2016.06.20 22:13:19 -
[180] - Quote
Aye.
The code always whines. |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |