Originally by: Bella Fea

---

Originally by: Randay

---

If this doesnt affect you at all, why do you seem to be the only one here who is affected?

---

you mistake my argument about whether karma has anything to do with the kill, with me caring about the kill itself.

my first post compliments every facet of the kill, and my second makes clear that im not being sarcastic.

I corrected one thing, that being that the scammer himself was not in the least affected by the kill, and then twice fended off atempts at straw man arguments to the contrary.

this is the last i will say on the topic, because if you havent got my point in 4 posts, you wont.

just to be redundantly clear.

10/10 for planning.
10/10 for execution.
11/10 for documentation.
3/10 for justification.

---

Originally by: Krugerrand

---

Hey, we have gone after others for less justification

---

Originally by: Admentus Cor'vion

---

But in contrast, if an alliance that has no HAC bpo looses 30 hacs as opposed to bob who have all the BPO's, the cost differential is one of Sustainable versus Depleteable income.

---

Originally by: Admentus Cor'vion

---

To Derail you, in the context of pure marketeering and full value yes, they do hurt the same.

But in contrast, if an alliance that has no HAC bpo looses 30 hacs as opposed to bob who have all the BPO's, the cost differential is one of Sustainable versus Depleteable income.

IE, 30 man corp all make enough money to buy a HAC through NPC'ing, while BOB cooks HAC's. Hacs they don't use go to market.

Then consequentially, Both sides loose all thier hacs in a doomday misfire (or something)

While the immediate impact of the loss is not felt as badly on the side of the corporation with the BPO's, it will accumilate if it happens consistantly.

Where on the other hand, 2 days of ratting and boom, non-production corp has a brand new HAC purchased(and possibly built by BOB) and are back in the game.

Both sides loose similar value, but both sides feel it in completely different ways. Consiquentially if BOB were to loose a freightor like this every day for 6 months, there would be a drastic change in the profitability of a t2 production program.

Conversely, the same would happen to the guy who had to rat for a new hac every day (jeeze I'd hate to be him).

The difference is in the Kill Death Ratios.

Yeah thats right.

As long as BOB maintains a higher kill death ratio it's simply and consistantly stated that a HAC kill to bob will inevitably cost less to them as it does to someone else who maintains maybe even a lesser expensive ship yet looses it 3-4 times in a row before he claims a prize (such as a HAC or T2 battleship).

So yeah the trick is and always has been Get a positive K/D Ratio. In Short, your both right in your own terms.

Ok maybe not worth the long diatribe, but entertaining to say the least!

---

Originally by: Ifni

---

Doing a similar thing with the 20 available mails of the 21 ships involved, at a cost of approximately 65m per Dominix, 85m per Typhoon.

---

Originally by: Bella Fea

---

Originally by: Randay

---

If this doesnt affect you at all, why do you seem to be the only one here who is affected?

---

I corrected one thing, that being that the scammer himself was not in the least affected by the kill, and then twice fended off atempts at straw man arguments to the contrary.

---

Originally by: Selpy

---

Originally by: Krugerrand

---

Hey, we have gone after others for less justification

---

Yeh, just ask innerdrive

---

Originally by: Third Down

---

My corp internal sell price is well under 60m for both. In fact I make a small net profit after platinum insurance payout. Presumably 0utbreak are the same, for T1 fittings.

If yours isn't, find a corp that isn't ripping you off internally, hey.

---