Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Querns
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2500
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 17:35:54 -
[61] - Quote
Is the ill will being engendered here really worth making it so you don't take a tiny bump on the rightmost fortizar subcap undock? Would it not be better for all involved to just remove that undock from the list of places where subcaps can undock?
This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
|
Katerina Ivanovich
The Lost.
0
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 17:36:27 -
[62] - Quote
CCP, your really ruining this game, and your subscription rates are already low. Having the whale of a Rorq on the field to boost miners is quite ridicules, as it will be an easy target to kill. Oh, that is what your "shooting" for? I see. So mineral prices sky rocket as does the cost to plex accounts. Star Citizen, here I come. |
ISD Max Trix
isd community communications liaisons
372
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 17:36:36 -
[63] - Quote
Forum Rules of Conduct wrote:5. Trolling is prohibited.Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive, and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote. 31. Abuse of CCP employees and ISD volunteers is prohibited.CCP operate a zero tolerance policy on abuse of CCP employees and ISD volunteers. This includes but is not limited to personal attacks, trolling, GÇ£outingGÇ¥ of CCP employee or ISD volunteer player identities, and the use of any former player identities when referring to the aforementioned parties. Our forums are designed to be a place where players and developers can exchange ideas in a polite and friendly manner for the betterment of EVE Online. Players who attack or abuse employees of CCP, or ISD volunteers, will be permanently banned from the EVE Online forums across all their accounts with no recourse, and may also be subject to action against their game accounts. #
Two Post Removed for one or more of the above reasons.
ISD Max Trix
Lieutenant
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department
I do not respond to Evemails.
|
Regan Rotineque
The Scope Gallente Federation
462
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 17:38:36 -
[64] - Quote
another "out of touch" with your customer base type of change
fozzie do you even mine bro?
|
Wednesday Askira
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
7
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 17:40:03 -
[65] - Quote
Anoron Secheh wrote:Maybe CCP is just trying to make everything worth more? Less miners = lower supply = high prices = expensive ships. I am now applying my tinfoil hat. What if they secretly are trying to get all the miners to stop mining, increasing the cost of minerals, and everything minerals are used to make, forcing more players to buy plex.
|
Wednesday Askira
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
7
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 17:40:52 -
[66] - Quote
Regan Rotineque wrote:another "out of touch" with your customer base type of change
fozzie do you even mine bro?
I'm a firm believer that their ventures have never been undocked. |
Bobb Bobbington
Bros Before Holes The Devils' Rejects
342
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 17:43:12 -
[67] - Quote
I got so excited for some info on the indy citadel when I saw there were 57 posts in Upcoming Features...
This is a signature.
It has a 25m signature.
No it's not a cosmic signature.
Probably.
Btw my corp's recruiting.
|
Retar Aveymone
DJ's Retirement Fund Goonswarm Federation
1046
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 17:43:28 -
[68] - Quote
Kenneth Feld wrote:Sarah Flynt wrote:Kenneth Feld wrote:Once drilling platforms are introduced, citadel will lose their reprocessing bonus and rigs will be removed and returned to the owner to place in a drilling platform. Source? Last I heard was that they were thinking about removal of mining rigs from citadels without destroying them, which is quite a difference. Nah, before people spent 250 bil on XL reprocessing rigs, they asked and it was made clear you would get a one time refund of rigs are they hoping to get refunded the isk once they realize refining asshouses exist or something
who the **** bought those |
Wednesday Askira
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
7
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 17:44:10 -
[69] - Quote
NOVEMBER 2016: http://i.imgur.com/uzhaVk0.jpg Prepare yourselves |
FT Diomedes
The Graduates
2689
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 17:44:34 -
[70] - Quote
Querns wrote:Considering the rorqual's primary ability to haul ore, not to mention its (assumed) direct mining role coming with the rebalance, denying the rorqual the ability to dock in an Astrahus is, frankly, absurd.
I agree.
This has to be one of the dumbest changes you have made since you released citadels.
CCP should add more NPC 0.0 space to open it up and liven things up: the Stepping Stones project.
|
|
Querns
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2501
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 17:44:56 -
[71] - Quote
Retar Aveymone wrote:Kenneth Feld wrote:Sarah Flynt wrote:Kenneth Feld wrote:Once drilling platforms are introduced, citadel will lose their reprocessing bonus and rigs will be removed and returned to the owner to place in a drilling platform. Source? Last I heard was that they were thinking about removal of mining rigs from citadels without destroying them, which is quite a difference. Nah, before people spent 250 bil on XL reprocessing rigs, they asked and it was made clear you would get a one time refund of rigs are they hoping to get refunded the isk once they realize refining asshouses exist or something who the **** bought those Idiots, who thought they'd improve the yield on reprocessing nyxes, clearly.
This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.
|
Movilion
Perkone Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 17:48:04 -
[72] - Quote
And Carriers? Does anyone thinks about the Carriers?
So, a lot of drama about F, JF and Rorquals, but Carriers are Smaller than F and JF, and even smaller than some Battleships!;ok this is only visual, but... Even some Dreads are smaller than a J or JF, and non can dock in Astrahus.
Please, dont try to justify that Rorquals should be able to dock in Astrahus cause they are smaller than F and JF.
I think Rorquals should go as Carriers & Dreads, BUT as many people said if the new Industrial Structures are going to grant dock access to Rorquals, should be changed when those are release. |
Commander Spurty
1642
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 17:51:13 -
[73] - Quote
If you haven't already, please also sticky (in the biggest font you can afford), that bumping ships out of tethering is not only legal, but every pilots duty to punish the cheap and the lazy
There are good ships,
And wood ships,
And ships that sail the sea
But the best ships are Spaceships
Built by CCP
|
Pirokobo
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
38
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 17:52:12 -
[74] - Quote
I endorse this change and the anarchy it will cause. |
Katerina Ivanovich
The Lost.
0
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 17:56:25 -
[75] - Quote
Pure truth, can have my refund of 2.5 bil approximately or will they wait until their 100mil?
|
Anita Name
Perkone Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 17:56:46 -
[76] - Quote
http://imgur.com/a/ADT0A
The justification for rorqs is also that they are industrial, not combat ships. CCPs justification is likely that it doesn't line up with hisec gate permissions and are trying to 'fix' it regardless of whether or not it makes gameplay sense |
Kismeteer
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
886
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 17:57:26 -
[77] - Quote
Were people abusing the rorqual's abilities inside astrahuses?
Were there complaints from someone because of this? Or is this just CCP's fixing another non-existant problem because ... reasons?
Is there a reason a larger ship like a freighter (a charon is 16.2 mil m^3) can dock but a rorqual is only 14.5 mil m^3 can't dock?
Could this change wait till rorquals are 'fixed' as they are pretty crap already?
Was the CSM talked to about this? |
Anita Name
Perkone Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 17:59:28 -
[78] - Quote
Kismeteer wrote:Was the CSM talked to about this? Search your heart and you will find emptiness and also the answer to this question.
|
Bear Templar
iMine Industries The Five
15
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 18:02:47 -
[79] - Quote
Whilst not a current Rorqual or Astrahaus user myself, i feel this is a bad decision (with current information)
Many smaller industrial entities can afford an astrahaus together as well as Rorq so that they can have their little "island" of mining or whatever, but they'll struggle with a fortizar.
That being said - it depends on how the Rorq will interact with the new Engineering Complexes.
If a fish weighs 1 Kilogram plus half its own weight, how much does it weigh? (It's not 1.5kg btw)
|
DrZoid Berg
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 18:03:44 -
[80] - Quote
Kismeteer wrote:
CCP's fixing another non-existant problem because ... reasons?
This is basically what's happening with this magical bug fix. |
|
Boroth Kindeze
NED-Clan Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 18:06:51 -
[81] - Quote
ISD Max Trix wrote:[quote=Forum Rules of Conduct] 5. Trolling is prohibited. .
Can you redirect me then where I can make a complaint about a CCP employee, or is voicing my opinion against CCP in general forbidden? |
Katerina Ivanovich
The Lost.
0
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 18:09:45 -
[82] - Quote
Kismeteer wrote:Were people abusing the rorqual's abilities inside astrahuses?
Were there complaints from someone because of this? Or is this just CCP's fixing another non-existant problem because ... reasons?
"Khakis?" |
Creecher Virpio
Alcoholocaust. Test Alliance Please Ignore
7
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 18:11:02 -
[83] - Quote
Well thank God we got this game breaking bug fixed. I mean, who needs citadel bumping fixed, or bumping in general, or capital resizing when we had roquals docking in astra's? |
Arrendis
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2260
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 18:11:31 -
[84] - Quote
Movilion wrote:And Carriers? Does anyone thinks about the Carriers?
So, a lot of drama about F, JF and Rorquals, but Carriers are Smaller than F and JF, and even smaller than some Battleships!;ok this is only visual, but... Even some Dreads are smaller than a J or JF, and non can dock in Astrahus.
Please, dont try to justify that Rorquals should be able to dock in Astrahus cause they are smaller than F and JF.
I think Rorquals should go as Carriers & Dreads, BUT as many people said if the new Industrial Structures are going to grant dock access to Rorquals, should be changed when those are release.
They've repeatedly said the carriers' size needs to be addressed. |
Rowells
ANZAC ALLIANCE Mercenary Coalition
3105
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 18:17:26 -
[85] - Quote
I honestly think the mechanic should stay. At a minimum until the full rorqual changes acome out (possibly until we hear about whatever the refining array will be).
It would be much more seamless transition for whatever is on the table for it. |
Commander Spurty
1642
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 18:18:35 -
[86] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:They've repeatedly said the carriers' size needs to be addressed.
There's ZERO value in what people 'say'. It's what they do, which you judge them on.
There are good ships,
And wood ships,
And ships that sail the sea
But the best ships are Spaceships
Built by CCP
|
|
CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
14454
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 18:24:44 -
[87] - Quote
Tiberizzle wrote: please learn to recognize your limits and paint within the lines fozzie, industry is most assuredly not your wheelhouse
I find this comment especially amusing as this is literally a case of painting within the lines that were determined by others. :sigh:
Game Designer | Team Five-0
Twitter: @CCP_Fozzie
Twitch chat: ccp_fozzie
|
|
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
6401
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 18:26:12 -
[88] - Quote
Commander Spurty wrote:Arrendis wrote:They've repeatedly said the carriers' size needs to be addressed. There's ZERO value in what people 'say'. It's what they do, which you judge them on. Hilmar? That you? |
|
CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
14456
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 18:28:11 -
[89] - Quote
Hey folks. We hear your concerns, and a good point has been raised by some that it's especially awkward to fix this bug a month before the actual Rorqual changes hit.
Although we can't leave this bug in place long-term (it's not within my power to leave the docking access as it is long-term since Astrahus citadels don't have the correct docking port for a Rorqual-sized ship), after some discussion internally we can delay the bug fix until at least November so that it doesn't hit before the Rorqual revamp. There are a number of changes in the pipeline that should help address some of the concerns here, although they're not at a stage where I'm able to provide exact release dates.
One change we are working towards is the ability to place items into your personal hangar in an Upwell structure from outside of that structure (within docking range). I'm not going to lie and tell you that we know exactly when that feature will be done, but it is on our roadmap.
In the meantime TL:DR is that we're delaying this fix for now, at least until November.
Game Designer | Team Five-0
Twitter: @CCP_Fozzie
Twitch chat: ccp_fozzie
|
|
Commander Spurty
1642
|
Posted - 2016.09.20 18:32:56 -
[90] - Quote
Tau Cabalander wrote:Commander Spurty wrote:Arrendis wrote:They've repeatedly said the carriers' size needs to be addressed. There's ZERO value in what people 'say'. It's what they do, which you judge them on. Hilmar? That you?
lmfao - he did say that didn't he? He's correct as well.
If you don't believe me, "I'm sending you 4 trillion ISK".
There are good ships,
And wood ships,
And ships that sail the sea
But the best ships are Spaceships
Built by CCP
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |