EVE Search - Summer Expansion: Pick 3 Major Features (Poll)

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Summer Expansion: Pick 3 Major Features (Poll)

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Ardamalis Vanguard Corp Bounty Hunters 29	Posted - 2011.12.23 03:41:00 - [1] - Quote The summer expansion development schedule is upcoming so I thought that I would start this thread to see what is on everyone's wish list. I have no doubt that this upcoming expansion will deliver much needed and highly anticipated content to Eve Online; however, the devs can only provide so much content in a single expansion. As such they need to prioritize which time-consuming features they will work on. So I ask, if you could pick three main features and only three main features, what would you, my fellow capsuleer, choose? Here is a list of some commonly requested features: (feel free to add your own also) Faction warfare changes Tiericide Dust 514 integration Incarna establishments & contraband POS revamp/modular POS's Built in battle recorder/player Bounty system overhaul Sovereignty mechanics changes Random mission generator Alliance/Corp logos for ships UI overhaul Wardec mechanics changes Lowsec overhaul Local chat/intel gathering
Obsidian Hawk RONA Corporation RONA Directorate 319	Posted - 2011.12.23 03:42:00 - [2] - Quote Pos revamp alliance / corp logos for ships. low sec overhaul.
Ardamalis Vanguard Corp Bounty Hunters 29	Posted - 2011.12.23 03:48:00 - [3] - Quote Here is my wish list for summer: -Tiericide It's a (relatively) easy way to introduce a lot of viable ships for everyone to fly at once. -Faction warfare changes Those poor folks desperately need it. -Soveriegnty mechanics changes I stopped living in nullsec because I got bored of shooting massive structures all the time.
Alexila Quant United Vigilance Royal Flush. 5	Posted - 2011.12.23 03:49:00 - [4] - Quote Reinstatement of Team Papercuts. PERMANENTLY. Battle Recorder. -> MACHINIMA!! Effects overhaul that was mentioned last fan-fest (along with more ship improvements (Graphics wise))
Disdaine 59	Posted - 2011.12.23 03:50:00 - [5] - Quote UI Overhaul Lowsec Overhaul Establishments
Karn Dulake Souls Must Be Trampled The.Alliance 161	Posted - 2011.12.23 03:52:00 - [6] - Quote 1. A mechanic to block pointless threads 2. Automatic endless wardec on those who make pointless threads by Concord who can also travel to nullsec and lowsec and fire cloaked on the author of pointless threads 3. Everything i want is in the top two threads Something Awful. A beacon for tearful, lonely neckbeards.
Jenshae Chiroptera 276	Posted - 2011.12.23 03:59:00 - [7] - Quote Ardamalis wrote: Tiericide POS revamp/modular POS's Sovereignty mechanics changes SOV wouldn't affect me directly but I think it would be good for the game over all. I am guessing that by "Tiericide" you mean making some changes like boosting tier one battle cruisers so that they are viable options against tier 2 ones? Ardamalis wrote: Local chat/intel gathering That isn't time intensive, mostly it is copying and pasting what they already have in different places. Ideas and stuff EVE - the game of sand castles, either building them or kicking them down.
Kent Reeves 37	Posted - 2011.12.23 04:05:00 - [8] - Quote -Tiericide -Modular Starbases -Moons/T2 reworked (not listed but I think it should be)
Endeavour Starfleet Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 53	Posted - 2011.12.23 04:06:00 - [9] - Quote Implement my idea to give balance to AFK cloaking. POS to a modular system Faction Warfare changes
Atticus Fynch 44	Posted - 2011.12.23 05:03:00 - [10] - Quote Bounty system overhaul: as of now placing a bounty on someone is as good as depositing the isk in their account. This needs to change. Random mission generator: too many redundant missions. Need more variety. Alliance/Corp logos for ships: not necessary but nice for those into it. We do need more variety in Corp logos though so that needs updating. UI overhaul: UI can alsways use improvement as the game changes. Wardec mechanics changes: one thing I would like to see change is disallowing the ability to wardec "1 man" corps by larger corps. It's really extortion in disguise. Mining overhaul: something (anything) that gives miners a fighting chance agains Hulkaggedon. Local chat/intel gathering: Local should not give you away when you are cloaked. It defeats the purpose. Better visual/sound effects in space: always a plus.
Jimi Crackcorn Directed Evolution Corp 7	Posted - 2011.12.23 05:07:00 - [11] - Quote New hair for males. Hair that doesn't suck.
Alara IonStorm 680	Posted - 2011.12.23 05:32:00 - [12] - Quote -Tiericide -Tiericide -Tiericide Get this one right.
Riley Moore Sentinum Research 140	Posted - 2011.12.23 05:53:00 - [13] - Quote POS revamp/modular POS's UI overhaul Mining overhaul Need Researched BPO's? Be it drones, ammo, charges, you name it, visit my forum store now! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=445524#post445524
gobbybobby The Suicide Kings Test Alliance Please Ignore 0	Posted - 2011.12.23 05:58:00 - [14] - Quote I agree on sound the annoying sounds RATS make make me mute the game.
KrakizBad Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension 126	Posted - 2011.12.23 06:01:00 - [15] - Quote You forgot lag killing. Other than that though, a battle recorder/playback for movie making would be truly awesome. I might even stop calling myself bitter. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/39006524/DumbHiseccers.jpg
Taiwanistan Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation 37	Posted - 2011.12.23 06:05:00 - [16] - Quote -Tiericide -FW -Low Sec and Karn Dulake wrote: 1. A mechanic to block pointless threads 2. Automatic endless wardec on those who make pointless threads by Concord who can also travel to nullsec and lowsec and fire cloaked on the author of pointless threads 3. Everything i want is in the top two threads don't **** up this thread, it's actually important it is like if i went on second life and raged where's the spaceships
Shukuzen Kiraa 0uter Ring Excavations Outer Ring Excavations Syndicate 0	Posted - 2011.12.23 06:06:00 - [17] - Quote Wardec mechanics changes Mining overhaul Lowsec overhaul
Ioci Space Mermaids 20	Posted - 2011.12.23 06:06:00 - [18] - Quote Allow Black Ops to light covert cyno in high sec. GCC blocks it. Increase jump range on Black ops by ditching the trivial turet bonus and making it 20% range. Add 20 things to the loot table and don't under any circumstances tell us how to find them, what they are or what they do.
Nova Fox Novafox Shipyards 668	Posted - 2011.12.23 06:47:00 - [19] - Quote All the above. All the sensible ones below. *All of the things the developers blind side us with. Nova Fox Shipyards Inventory
HevyDevy Ministry of War Amarr Empire 1	Posted - 2011.12.23 07:08:00 - [20] - Quote Alara IonStorm wrote: -Tiericide -Tiericide -Tiericide Get this one right. This, with FW and POS revamp as close runners up.
Kwilyn Bathana Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 0	Posted - 2011.12.23 07:11:00 - [21] - Quote How about adding "Allow CCP to add Bot checking software to game client"
Jimi Crackcorn Directed Evolution Corp 7	Posted - 2011.12.23 07:13:00 - [22] - Quote Kwilyn Bathana wrote: How about adding "Allow CCP to add Bot checking software to game client" Yes. CCP is so lenient about the rules of the game. It disgusts me. They need to start cracking down.
ACE McFACE Acetech Systems 146	Posted - 2011.12.23 07:14:00 - [23] - Quote Sovereignty mechanics changes Alliance/Corp logos for ships Better visual/sound effects in space Real men wear goggles and a Navy shirt!
Tristan O'Connor Lone Star Exploration Lone Star Partners 1	Posted - 2011.12.23 07:17:00 - [24] - Quote Tiericide Incarna establishments & contraband Better visual/sound effects in space Also...I would like to see the old probing system return, or some other system that actually rewards people who learn how to scan things/ships down. It's insanely easy the way it is now, so every idiot with a probe launcher is out there scanning down all the valuable sites in hisec/losec.
Florestan Bronstein United Highsec Front The 99 Percent 210	Posted - 2011.12.23 07:44:00 - [25] - Quote Faction warfare changes POS revamp/modular POS's Sovereignty mechanics changes

Chribba Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire 1274	Posted - 2011.12.23 08:08:00 - [26] - Quote Seriously needs a science & industry fix - especially the ability to install multiple blueprint jobs with the same settings in one go! /c GÿàGÿàGÿà Secure 3rd party service GÿàGÿàGÿà Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar' Follow me on Twitter @Chribba

Lexmana Imperial Stout 110	Posted - 2011.12.23 08:46:00 - [27] - Quote Tristan O'Connor wrote: As for Incarna establishments/contraband...I chose this because I would like to see blockade running become something of a mini-profession that requires player skill (not skillbook skill). It already is ... or how did you think the drugs came into Jita? The theme for 2012 is "War" according to new senior producer CCP Unifex and I really hope this means they are making FW have consequences in EVE, like if one faction lose space part of highsec becomes lowsec cutting off popular trading routes . That would be awesome.
Tristan O'Connor Lone Star Exploration Lone Star Partners 1	Posted - 2011.12.23 09:32:00 - [28] - Quote Lexmana wrote: Tristan O'Connor wrote: As for Incarna establishments/contraband...I chose this because I would like to see blockade running become something of a mini-profession that requires player skill (not skillbook skill). It already is ... or how did you think the drugs came into Jita? The theme for 2012 is "War" according to new senior producer CCP Unifex and I really hope this means they are making FW have consequences in EVE, like if one faction lose space part of highsec becomes lowsec cutting off popular trading routes . That would be awesome. My point is that I would like to see that part of the game expanded. Right now, there is not much to it, IMHO.
IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 Angry Mustellid 60	Posted - 2011.12.23 09:55:00 - [29] - Quote Faction Warfare - Fix all the problems around repping -5 fleet members and the standing hits it gives. - Changes to make occupancy matter. - Changes to how occupancy is gained and lost (not much the current system is good since the last patch) Low sec - Stop fighter bomber deployment, if titans can't DD then why can SCs use FBs? - Buff mineral / ice value, low sec is by far the most dangerous area of space (possibly bad WHs) it should have rewards to match Economy - Address the massive influx of ISK, reduce the ISK payout of incursions in favour of more LP. Find more ways of getting ISK out of the system. Losses don't really hurt any more and soon they will be trivial to most. Not long ago fitting T2 on a ship was pretty much pimp, and faction was only for the carebears. Now many ships are lol-fit if they don't have a significant amount of faction on them. Other worthy changes - Tiericide (frigs, BCs, cruisers) BS seem fine, POS changes, BO buff, EAF buff, science and industry changes including multiple identical job installations
Generals4 Caldari State 570	Posted - 2011.12.23 10:10:00 - [30] - Quote Mining overhaul Lowsec overhaul Incarna *-Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily.*
Zyrbalax III Goldcrest Enterprises 35	Posted - 2011.12.23 10:16:00 - [31] - Quote Sovereignty mechanics Lowsec fix SMALLHOLDING / HOMESTEADING (not on your list) Would also like randomisation of missions and more depth / variety / complexity to exploration...
Ancy Denaries Frontier Venture 80	Posted - 2011.12.23 10:24:00 - [32] - Quote Difficult, to be honest. But here's my list: Tiericide Mining overhaul Modularized T1 production (similar to T2 and capital production. Ores -> Minerals -> Parts -> Ships/modules) Make parts unreprocessable. And just for the heck of it: REMOVE MINERALS FROM DRONE LOOT. Let miners make money. k?
Ivan Joukov Astromechanica Maxima Astromechanica Federatis 3	Posted - 2011.12.23 10:26:00 - [33] - Quote - Buff low sec - AS revamp - FW revamp -áDavai!
DeBingJos T.R.I.A.D 155	Posted - 2011.12.23 10:27:00 - [34] - Quote HevyDevy wrote: Alara IonStorm wrote: -Tiericide -Tiericide -Tiericide Get this one right. This, with FW and POS revamp as close runners up. THIS Fix FW !
Rek Seven Probe Patrol Project Wildfire 84	Posted - 2011.12.23 11:08:00 - [35] - Quote In order: UI overhaul Incarna establishments & contraband Bounty system overhaul
Myz Toyou Bite me inc. Narwhals Ate My Duck 14	Posted - 2011.12.23 11:11:00 - [36] - Quote - role/access management for POS ( player hangars without handing out UBER acces roles ) - role/access management for POS ( player hangars without handing out UBER acces roles ) - role/access management for POS ( player hangars without handing out UBER acces roles )
Mechael Helhest 1st Prospectors' Collective 25	Posted - 2011.12.23 11:12:00 - [37] - Quote Bounty Systems Sov Mechanics Mining Overhaul. Ideally, they'd all tie in together as well. I'd rather die in battle against a man who will lie to me, than for a man who will lie to me.
Jada Maroo Mysterium Astrometrics 499	Posted - 2011.12.23 11:20:00 - [38] - Quote Modular POS and overhaul of POS interface! Other stuff too but... for me, this is the priority.
Halcyon Ingenium Warm Holes 69	Posted - 2011.12.23 11:27:00 - [39] - Quote A lot of people have already said some good stuff. So I'll just through in my personal want of the ability to change bloodline and/or race. That which always was, and is, and will be everlasting fire, the same for all, the cosmos, made neither by god nor man, replenishes in measure as it burns away. -Heraclitus
Velicitia Open Designs 231	Posted - 2011.12.23 12:00:00 - [40] - Quote only three? 1. POS 2. Corporation roles/rules management 3. Tiericide 4. KILL MORE BOTS!
Marcus JuniusBrutus Martial Artisans 5	Posted - 2011.12.23 12:04:00 - [41] - Quote Chribba wrote: Seriously needs a science & industry fix - especially the ability to install multiple blueprint jobs with the same settings in one go! /c Yes please. + HI-SEC covert jumping allowed to allow gtr use of black-op ships etc + Mining overhaul
Takeshi Yamato eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred 48	Posted - 2011.12.23 12:18:00 - [42] - Quote - Tiericide. Equal opportunities for every ship! - Modular POS'. Pretty, functional starbases. - Science & Industry UI overhaul. Too much clicking and where's the 24h queue for jobs? Imo in these three areas changes are long overdue. Lowsec overhaul too... but that makes four items.
Hemmo Paskiainen Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities 66	Posted - 2011.12.23 12:25:00 - [43] - Quote Moons rebalance Black Op buff More ship buffs (this is space ship game yes?) CCP FIX BLACK OPS FFS
YuuKnow Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic 21	Posted - 2011.12.23 12:28:00 - [44] - Quote Ardamalis wrote: The summer expansion development schedule is upcoming so I thought that I would start this thread to see what is on everyone's wish list. I have no doubt that this upcoming expansion will deliver much needed and highly anticipated content to Eve Online; however, the devs can only provide so much content in a single expansion. As such they need to prioritize which time-consuming features they will work on. So I ask, if you could pick three main features and only three main features, what would you, my fellow capsuleer, choose? Here is a list of some commonly requested features: (feel free to add your own also) ---list updated--- Faction warfare changes Tiericide Dust 514 integration Incarna establishments & contraband POS revamp/modular POS's Built in battle recorder/player Bounty system overhaul Sovereignty mechanics changes Random mission generator More live events Alliance/Corp logos for ships UI overhaul Wardec mechanics changes Mining overhaul Lowsec overhaul Local chat/intel gathering More isk sinks Better visual/sound effects in space Forum / Eve gate upgrades FW Changes Lowsec overhaul Wardec mechanics
Drew Solaert University of Caille Gallente Federation 19	Posted - 2011.12.23 12:44:00 - [45] - Quote Faction warfare changes Tiericide Faction warfare changes Faction warfare x3 came close but Tiericide is still the dream. Has to be added.
Louis deGuerre The Dark Tribe Against ALL Authorities 105	Posted - 2011.12.23 12:50:00 - [46] - Quote Bounty system overhaul Faction warfare changes Wardec mechanics changes In order of preference FIRE FRIENDSHIP TORPEDOES !
David Grogan The Motley Crew Reborn 233	Posted - 2011.12.23 12:54:00 - [47] - Quote t3 industrial subsystems that fit on existing t3 hulls to be honest it would take much effort to achieve this all that is needed is as follows new subsystem skillbooks for each race industrial subsystems then offer 4x types per race Ore mining subsystem - cannot be fitted inconjuction with interdiction nullifer subsystem adds a basic cargo hold of 500m3 (for crystal storage) + an orehold of 10000m3 - industrial subsytem skill bonus - 10% increase in orehold size per level + 7.5% increase in ore yield per level + 7.5% bonus to mining drone yield per level Ice mining subsystem - cannot be fitted inconjuction with interdiction nullifer subsystem adds an orehold of 10000m3 - industrial subsytem skill bonus - 10% increase in orehold size per level + 7.5% decrease in ice harvestor duration per level Gas mining subsystem - cannot be fitted inconjuction with interdiction nullifer subsystem adds a cargohold of 5000m3 - industrial subsytem skill bonus - 100% increase in gas harvestor yield + 7.5% decrease in gas harvestor duration per level Cargo Hauling subsytem- cannot be fitted inconjuction with interdiction nullifer subsystem adds a base cargo hold of 10000m3 & a base PI commodities hold of 5000m3 & 3000m3 command centre hold - industrial subsytem skill bonus - 10% increase in cargohold & PI commodities hold size per level Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless you are from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs.
Takseen University of Caille Gallente Federation 89	Posted - 2011.12.23 13:54:00 - [48] - Quote Fuuuuuu...so hard to just pick three. Bounty system overhaul Wardec mechanics changes Mining overhaul Bounty system has potential but is hopelessly broken atm. No one seems really happy with wardecs as they are. Mining is just for botters and people watching tv or reading books.
Ancy Denaries Frontier Venture 81	Posted - 2011.12.23 14:02:00 - [49] - Quote Takseen wrote: Fuuuuuu...so hard to just pick three. Bounty system overhaul Wardec mechanics changes Mining overhaul Bounty system has potential but is hopelessly broken atm. No one seems really happy with wardecs as they are. Mining is just for botters and people watching tv or reading books. As a person who cannot train a single skill to increase the mining yield, I agree SO much with this. Fix my profession please :/
oldbutfeelingyoung VIRTUAL EMPIRE VANGUARD Vanguard Ascendants 42	Posted - 2011.12.23 14:18:00 - [50] - Quote Ardamalis wrote: The summer expansion development schedule is upcoming so I thought that I would start this thread to see what is on everyone's wish list. I have no doubt that this upcoming expansion will deliver much needed and highly anticipated content to Eve Online; however, the devs can only provide so much content in a single expansion. As such they need to prioritize which time-consuming features they will work on. So I ask, if you could pick three main features and only three main features, what would you, my fellow capsuleer, choose? Here is a list of some commonly requested features: (feel free to add your own also) ---list updated--- Faction warfare changes Tiericide Dust 514 integration Incarna establishments & contraband POS revamp/modular POS's Built in battle recorder/player Bounty system overhaul Sovereignty mechanics changes Random mission generator More live events Alliance/Corp logos for ships UI overhaul Wardec mechanics changes Mining overhaul Lowsec overhaul Local chat/intel gathering More isk sinks Better visual/sound effects in space Forum / Eve gate upgrades all of it sounds good to me except i am afraid they will put the ship logos in failNEX So Incarna no WIS yes effects yes pls ui overhaul yes pls
thekiller2002us Order of Celestial Knights 35	Posted - 2011.12.23 14:23:00 - [51] - Quote lowsec- please please please ccp. Lowsec is currently like ivory coast in africa- except without the diamonds.
Max Von Sydow Droneboat Diplomacy 95	Posted - 2011.12.23 14:38:00 - [52] - Quote Alara IonStorm wrote: -Tiericide -Tiericide -Tiericide Get this one right. I was going to say that.
Zevina Atomic Core Industries and Science 16	Posted - 2011.12.23 14:39:00 - [53] - Quote Cant tell what this tiericide is all about? Whats wrong with having different tiers for different ships? There is absolutely nothing to change about it, nothing. My pref is: Factional Warfare Walking in Stations (not just your captains quarter) Proper Dust 514 integration PLUS I want unscannable ships back
thoth rothschild First Aid Emergency Service 43	Posted - 2011.12.23 14:41:00 - [54] - Quote UI Balance general Gameplay Sov Mechanics as usual....
IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 Angry Mustellid 60	Posted - 2011.12.23 14:57:00 - [55] - Quote Zevina wrote: Cant tell what this tiericide is all about? Whats wrong with having different tiers for different ships? There is absolutely nothing to change about it, nothing. The tiers system is just silly, there shouldn't be ships in eve that just better than each other without trade-off Ships should have not different roles not just worse/better. How many ferox/brutix (bar suicide gank)/cyclone/prophecy do you see around?
Ardamalis Vanguard Corp Bounty Hunters 34	Posted - 2011.12.23 16:39:00 - [56] - Quote Good to see everyone making their wishes known. I updated the list with some of the other major changes listed here by other folks. If this thread gets enough responses, I can edit the original post with a number count for each feature.
Aargolos Estrale Frontiers Project Wildfire 9	Posted - 2011.12.23 16:59:00 - [57] - Quote 1. Faction Warfare change so these folks shut the **** up about it already, and it needs fixing anyways. 2. POS overhaul x eleventybillion 3. Lowsec needs some lovlin'
Gogela Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance 206	Posted - 2011.12.23 17:02:00 - [58] - Quote 1) ISK Sinks 2) Nerf Jumping / Teleportation 3) Fix Black Ops All GëíGêçGëí Ships \| GëíGêçGëí - sñÜpüÅpü«sÑçsªÖpü¬péópéñpâåpâá \| <-- Links to ShowInfo in-game FX7 - No Tax... No Rules... No Problem
Dr Karsun Coffee Lovers Brewing Club Care Factor 41	Posted - 2011.12.23 17:09:00 - [59] - Quote 1. Faction warfare changes 2. Dust 514 integration 3. Incarna establishments & contraband Maybe not this order, but those are the 3 things I'm looking forward to. Can't wait till I can: 1. Actually see FW work, have the pvp noobs go there and learn, conquer, etc. 2. Jettison our PS3 boys into space to make em notice how cool it actually is to see the barrel of a neutron blaster from up close. 3. Get some stuff into my CQ. "Have you had your morning coffee?" -> the Coffee Lovers Brewing Club is recruiting! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=363976#post363976
Astrid Stjerna Teraa Matar 170	Posted - 2011.12.23 17:51:00 - [60] - Quote Kwilyn Bathana wrote: How about adding "Allow CCP to add Bot checking software to game client" There would be a ton of false positives with software verification alone. I think what we really need to properly combat bots is a greater level of community involvement in-game.
Cearain Imperial Outlaws 104	Posted - 2011.12.23 19:13:00 - [61] - Quote Takeshi Yamato wrote: - Tiericide. Equal opportunities for every ship! ... I agree the tier system is pretty weak but I think there are plenty of ships that are viable. Its not that big of a deal. Would the mineral requirements for each ship change? if so would all ships require the minerals of tier 3 ships? Would they nerf the teir 3 ships and buff the tier one ships to make them all like tier 2? Its not a big priority. Faction War Low sec overhaul Sov Mechanics In short I agree entirely with their theme of "war!" Get people fighting. No conflict = boring game. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
Revii Lagoon The Foreign Legion Test Alliance Please Ignore 5	Posted - 2011.12.23 19:33:00 - [62] - Quote My top 3 -Faction Warfare Overhaul Seriously these people have been asking for years, I really feel sorry for them that they have had no love from CCP since it's release -Moons / Moon Goo changes Tech is absurd, having to fight over resources is one of the reason people fight in 0.0, but currently tech is just too centralized and worth 5-100x more valuable than any other resource available. -UI Improvements Fix small bugs, keep adding useful features, find some way to fix the lag of the overview in large fleet fights. Team papercuts has been doing a great job and I hope they keep up the work
Laken Starr Integrated Astromechanics Corp. Zeta Conglomerate 0	Posted - 2011.12.23 19:36:00 - [63] - Quote 1) WiS Upgrades It doesn't have to be anything major, just something to make WiS more useful than it is currently. Something like either separating your portrait from your current clothing choice, or adding a social area that we can venture to outside our cabin. 2) PI Polish Like WiS, it's a feature that still feels rather incomplete. The recent changes are nice, but some more polish and streamlining would be nice. While more skills would be nice, you can't do that without adding more depth to the PI gameplay, which is what I really want anyway. 3) Alliance/Corp logos for ships I would expand this to being able to customize our ship's paint job completely. It's win-win, since you can use it as both an isk sink as well as an avenue for increased character customization.
Velani Askiras Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 0	Posted - 2011.12.23 19:46:00 - [64] - Quote 1) WIS It would be just sad to completly ignore it now after so much "very good" work has been spent for WIS. Of course right now it is not useful at all, and the store... let's just call it "failNEX", needs some serious adjustments. 2) Faction Warfare Overhaul Just give them finally some love. 3) Low sec overhaul
Vincent Athena V.I.C.E. The Lostboys 185	Posted - 2011.12.23 19:48:00 - [65] - Quote Incarna establishments & contraband Random mission generator More live events Although as the items listed by the OP all have different effort requirements, it might be nice to guess how hard each is, assign a value to each and say we can pick items up to some total. CCP employees should never proclaim a feature to be awesome. Only subscribers should. Subscribers can never answer a question posed to CCP. Only CCP can.
Pak Narhoo Knights of Kador 74	Posted - 2011.12.23 19:52:00 - [66] - Quote What is, or does Tiericide mean?
Herping yourDerp Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 197	Posted - 2011.12.23 19:53:00 - [67] - Quote wardec changes faction warfare dust integration
Xorth Adimus Blackwater USA Inc. Against ALL Authorities 4	Posted - 2011.12.23 19:53:00 - [68] - Quote Sovereignty mechanics changes No more awful single massive high HP structures for sov, multiple smaller activities and facilities create incremental sov influence over this and nearby solar systems. All Sov should require wide scale player use and structure to maintain and improve not isk and multiple timers. Running and protecting Sov should be profitable for the people that use it (higher risk = higher reward) All sov profitability and level should be damaged slowly over by abuse or failure to protect Attacking sov should be profitable (raiding)/ improving your sov nearby (increases influence by fear) Lowsec overhaul Lowsec should have improved profitability Lowsec should be a haven for illegal activities Some level of illegal/corrupt 'sov ownership' in the form of system upgrades and more should be possible as part of a illegal 'cartel' Faction warfare changes Needs complete rewrite something more like the incursion system Faction warfare needs to make a real differance improved low sec level of legal 'sov ownership' in the form of system upgrades and more should be possible as part of lowsec overhaul.
Jimi Crackcorn Directed Evolution Corp 8	Posted - 2011.12.23 19:53:00 - [69] - Quote Pak Narhoo wrote: What is, or does Tiericide mean? It means get rid of tiers and make all ships equal, or some hippie crap like that.
Vimsy Vortis Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation 164	Posted - 2011.12.23 19:55:00 - [70] - Quote Capitals in highsec.
Alara IonStorm 684	Posted - 2011.12.23 20:14:00 - [71] - Quote Pak Narhoo wrote: What is, or does Tiericide mean? Ships of a lower tier have less HP, CPU, Fitting, Slots, Drone Space, Weapons and are just generally worse then the Tier above them. This makes the higher Tier ships more valued then the lower Tier ships because they can preform there roles better. Tieracide is the taking away of the Tier System and rebalancing the ships around there role instead of the extra day of training making one ship better for ever. That way Grid, CPU, Slots, Bonuses, HP, Cap are given on a case by case basis of what is needed for a ship to optimally function. If not done lazily they can look at each ships roles and make all the ships considered to be pretty much useless or ineffective and bring them back into the fold.
Covert Kitty SRS Industries SRS. 93	Posted - 2011.12.23 20:48:00 - [72] - Quote POS revamp/modular POS's UI overhaul Local chat/intel gathering
Mr Epeen It's All About Me 554	Posted - 2011.12.23 21:00:00 - [73] - Quote 1) Open the door. And have a good reason to do so. 2) Lets get the Black ops/cov ops thing sorted. 3) Industry needs some love. (not mining so much as the invention/ manufacturing end of it). Mr Epeen Me too!-á I ate one sour, too!
Jojo Jackson Dead Red Eye 24	Posted - 2011.12.23 21:01:00 - [74] - Quote Wardec overhaul -> only posible if BOTH side agree ! Killright overhaul -> can be traded real punishment for highsec gankers - it's a flat joke atm, sero risk (risk can not be calculated. It's maybe or maybe not. Buying Ship X with fitting Y is calculated and NO risk!) Risk can be: maybe CONCORD jails me for 1 week .. or not . When jailed NO trade, NO undock, NO PI, LIMITED chat downszie of corps/allys/blues ... you cry "to many blobs, no small/mid skale PvP" not me ;) Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship!
Brujo Loco Brujeria Teologica 40	Posted - 2011.12.23 21:30:00 - [75] - Quote Black Ops, plz for the love of the Amarr God, pretty plz. Low Sec revamp or a new permutation wherein we find a new island of hi sec surrounded by low sec to establish a new hi-sec dominion better pve solo content, i usually play missions just to get sleepy before going to bed. Inner Sayings of BrujoLoco: http://eve-files.com/sig/brujoloco
Brynhilda Massive PVPness EntroPraetorian Aegis 66	Posted - 2011.12.23 22:22:00 - [76] - Quote -Tiericide -Lowsec -POS Changes How may I drug you with drugs?
Elson Tamar Lion Investments 70	Posted - 2011.12.23 22:22:00 - [77] - Quote Smuggling, FW, tiericide.
Shizuken Venerated Stars 4	Posted - 2011.12.23 23:04:00 - [78] - Quote 1. Incarna establishments & contraband 2. Ship Crews 3. Wardec mechanics changes
Shizuken Venerated Stars 4	Posted - 2011.12.23 23:05:00 - [79] - Quote Elson Tamar wrote: tiericide. define this term, I have no idea what anyone means by it.
Cearain Imperial Outlaws 104	Posted - 2011.12.24 00:15:00 - [80] - Quote Shizuken wrote: Elson Tamar wrote: tiericide. define this term, I have no idea what anyone means by it. Each class of ship has different tiers. Tier 1 -3 of frigates - battleships. Tier 3 cost more becasue they take more minerals to make. They are generally better than the tier 1 version. Some people want that to end. They don't want any differences in tier and want all the ships in each class to be balanced. I don't know what they want to balance them with though. Do they want all the ships to be as weak as tier 1 or as a strong ast tier 3? Do they want them all to take as many minerals to make? If so would they all take the same amount as tier 2 ships? Without any specific proposal its hard to know what they are looking for. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
Ris Dnalor Fleet of Doom Ushra'Khan 106	Posted - 2011.12.24 00:36:00 - [81] - Quote POS revamp/modular POS's Lowsec overhaul Bounty system overhaul
Sarah Schneider EVE University Ivy League 23	Posted - 2011.12.24 01:13:00 - [82] - Quote Tiericide UI overhaul (seriously, ccp should fire the original UI designer and hire someone else who got more sense of the game and is experienced in fluid and ergonomic UI design)
Marduk Nibiru Physical Chaos Skunk Works. 5	Posted - 2011.12.24 01:38:00 - [83] - Quote Flash support in the in-game browser. Sick of having to tab out for **** vids.
Lexmana Imperial Stout 116	Posted - 2011.12.24 17:21:00 - [84] - Quote FW - Make it have real consequences for citizens of new eden. Objectives for militias that will lower security of key systems in opposing militias empire (trading routes, mission hubs) from highsec to lowsec. Thus, factions would have to defend their space to enable safe travel and missioning in highsec. And scanning, local, cloak changes. It is too digital today. I think this thread "Hiding in Eve- Why We Cloak" gives a good idea of how to change the mechanics and create a kind of "terrain" in space. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=47868
Mai Khumm Apple Construction Inc Northern Associates. 73	Posted - 2011.12.24 17:36:00 - [85] - Quote FW - If this is fixed, then and only then will I decide to go back to it... Moons / moon goo changes - They should deplete and regenerate... More live events - This is a really great idea for the whole community... Not on list... Make ICE deplete and re-spawn just like roids. That alone would stop botting. (It'll upset the goons, so that will NEVER happen) Make ICE deplete and re-spawn just like roids. That alone would stop botting. (It'll upset the goons, so that will NEVER happen)
Solstice Project Cult of Personality 305	Posted - 2011.12.24 17:38:00 - [86] - Quote The ability to slap people remotely, for a billion ISK. Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire
Xorv Questionable Acquisitions 26	Posted - 2011.12.24 18:00:00 - [87] - Quote Local Chat Intel removal with new DScan added Wardec Overhaul (doesn't need to be major though they can just reverse all the nerfs and boost NPC corp tax) Making player character's NPC standings meaningful, I would say Faction War, but the current incarnation of it is so far removed from what I think it should be it's kind of a lost cause.
Borun Tal One More Corp 17	Posted - 2011.12.24 18:07:00 - [88] - Quote * Bug fixes (this is on every list I mention) * FW could use some fixing * Spend some time working on storyline (not mission, but the interactions and consequences of actions by players and NPC's on the STORY of Eve)... Hire some game designers to work on actual storyline, not just purdy graphics and walls in CQ. (PS: I'm available for hire as such...) Personally, I'd like to see the same ship restriction on low as there is on high. Might make things a bit more interesting in low (but then, I don't quite understand why so many people thing low needs to be "fixed", but hey...)
Marlona Sky Caldari Provisions Caldari State 207	Posted - 2011.12.24 18:26:00 - [89] - Quote There is so many things that need love picking three is impossible. 1. Remove all forms of instant, zero risk, effortless forms of intel gathering. Introduce a scanner that has a vast degree of results depending on ship, pilot skill and most of all effort put into gathering intelligence. 2. Power projection needs a swift and hard colossal kick in the nuts. Being friends with someone eight regions away is fine, but the fact you can be there to help blob out a three man battlecruiser gang in a matter of a couple minutes is ***** ****. 3. Moon and POS revamp. Get rid of all forms of static income for that matter. Flight of a Thousand Rifters: A Player Event**
Runawaypally The Stampede. 3	Posted - 2011.12.24 18:47:00 - [90] - Quote FW Tierecide Retribution getting 2nd mid!
Lexmana Imperial Stout 116	Posted - 2011.12.24 18:56:00 - [91] - Quote Runawaypally wrote: Retribution getting 2nd mid! Looks like your wish will come true if the dump from a chaos build is worth anything :)
Riedle Paradox Collective Choke Point 36	Posted - 2011.12.24 19:08:00 - [92] - Quote My Three: Alliance/Corp logos for ships Lowsec overhaul Bounty system overhaul
MadMuppet Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic 18	Posted - 2011.12.24 19:13:00 - [93] - Quote Faction warfare changes Random mission generator UI overhaul FW needs to be more like a war rather than an arena event tacked on to a low-sec area. Non FW players in war zones should be deemed spies and valid targets for both sides. Sorry 'alt' folks. Missions are stale, and no matter how good the argument is that they are a stepping stone and not a main focus of the game, they are something that turn players away after a while. Really the interaction with NPCs needs an overhaul so that your standing has a more dynamic effect on your play. The UI is horrible, hard to understand and hard to read. With it D-scan needs an overhaul as well and both need to be integrated as one unit. Yes, I only have a Vigil, I've had a bad bit of luck Ok?
Poetic Stanziel Arrakis Technology 456	Posted - 2011.12.24 19:15:00 - [94] - Quote Ardamalis wrote: Faction warfare changes Bounty system overhaul Wardec mechanics changes Lowsec overhaul I'm picking four. All these deal with Empire space, and are tied in together to varying degrees. Today I lost my common sense, It slipped away between Amamake and Rens, I think it happened in highsec, Using a Brutix to gank a Providence. -- Flunk
Pak Narhoo Knights of Kador 74	Posted - 2011.12.24 19:21:00 - [95] - Quote Alara IonStorm wrote: Pak Narhoo wrote: What is, or does Tiericide mean? Ships of a lower tier have less HP, CPU, Fitting, Slots, Drone Space, Weapons and are just generally worse then the Tier above them. This makes the higher Tier ships more valued then the lower Tier ships because they can preform there roles better. Tieracide is the taking away of the Tier System and rebalancing the ships around there role instead of the extra day of training making one ship better for ever. That way Grid, CPU, Slots, Bonuses, HP, Cap are given on a case by case basis of what is needed for a ship to optimally function. If not done lazily they can look at each ships roles and take all the ships considered to be pretty much useless or ineffective and bring them back into the fold. Ok, thank you for that explanation. +1 from me. TBH I kinda liked it that I could not fly the Hyperion for a long time or properly make use of the Abaddon. Gave me something to work for and long towards. My top 3 would be then: 1: POS overhaul, as mentioned in the dead horse thread. 2: moon goo overhaul, make moons deplete and spawn new goo on random moons elsewhere or something like that. 3: fix low sec somehow
Alvar Kesh Ealurian Shipyards 3	Posted - 2011.12.24 19:36:00 - [96] - Quote POS overhaul/ modular POS, aka dead horse stuff Science / industry / blueprints changes Ealurian Shipyards' BPC shop
Ines Tegator Towels R Us 71	Posted - 2011.12.24 20:02:00 - [97] - Quote Tiericide UI Updates Mining Overhaul + Anti Botting (these two must go together) As much as I personally hate mining, I must admit that it is a foundational element of the game. As such, a well-done overhaul could benefit every player in EVE. Still high but not top 3: Sov FW Lowsec Bounties
Ines Tegator Towels R Us 71	Posted - 2011.12.24 20:07:00 - [98] - Quote Pak Narhoo wrote: TBH I kinda liked it that I could not fly the Hyperion for a long time or properly make use of the Abaddon. Gave me something to work for and long towards. There's been a lot of discussion, and consensus is that tiers in the BS class are pretty much fine as they are. The tiericide movement is focusing on t1 BC and lower hulls.
Shaalira D'arc Quantum Cats Syndicate 270	Posted - 2011.12.24 20:13:00 - [99] - Quote - FW - Tiericide - Lowsec Overhaul UI overhaul is a close 4th, but it seems like fixing the UI should go without saying.
Max Von Sydow Droneboat Diplomacy 95	Posted - 2011.12.24 20:30:00 - [100] - Quote Cearain wrote: Shizuken wrote: Elson Tamar wrote: tiericide. define this term, I have no idea what anyone means by it. Each class of ship has different tiers. Tier 1 -3 of frigates - battleships. Tier 3 cost more becasue they take more minerals to make. They are generally better than the tier 1 version. Some people want that to end. They don't want any differences in tier and want all the ships in each class to be balanced. I don't know what they want to balance them with though. Do they want all the ships to be as weak as tier 1 or as a strong ast tier 3? Do they want them all to take as many minerals to make? If so would they all take the same amount as tier 2 ships? Without any specific proposal its hard to know what they are looking for. This will be the sixth time we have created a thread about it. And we have become exceedingly efficient at it.
Super Chair Project Cerberus 73	Posted - 2011.12.24 20:43:00 - [101] - Quote -tiericide -FW changes -Lowsec revamp
Teleni Pavle Republic University Minmatar Republic 5	Posted - 2011.12.24 21:02:00 - [102] - Quote Alara IonStorm wrote: -Tiericide -Tiericide -Tiericide Get this one right.
Jimi Crackcorn Directed Evolution Corp 17	Posted - 2011.12.24 23:08:00 - [103] - Quote The ability to sort your overview by more than one category. I would love to be able to sort by icon, and then by distance, rather than being limited to just one. Also, custom columns for each overview tab would be lovely.
Arcathra Technodyne Ltd. 39	Posted - 2011.12.24 23:24:00 - [104] - Quote Hm , let's see... 1. Low-sec overhaul - balancing the risk vs. reward (especially industrial stuff and missions) 2. Mining overhaul - needs a lot of love (boring, bots, barges too fragile etc.) 3. first establishments (eg Corp Offices) That would be my personal choices. Of course most other people picked even more urgent things .
Issler Dainze Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord 392	Posted - 2011.12.24 23:30:00 - [105] - Quote Faction warfare changes Incarna establishments & contraband POS revamp/modular POS's Bounty system overhaul Sovereignty mechanics changes Random mission generator More live events More anti-botting measures Alliance/Corp logos for ships Corporation roles & management changes Wardec mechanics changes Science / industry / blueprints changes Moons / moon goo changes Mining overhaul Lowsec overhaul Local chat/intel gathering Better visual/sound effects in space Any out of that list would be wondiferic!
Clyde ElectraGlide Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 0	Posted - 2011.12.24 23:46:00 - [106] - Quote 1. Tiericide 2. FW changes 3. Tiericide 4. FW changes 5. Tiericide More random missions, lowsec overhaul and more live events are all good things but FW and getting rid of tiers are absolutely imperative.
Destination SkillQueue Are We There Yet 218	Posted - 2011.12.24 23:51:00 - [107] - Quote Revamp mining - Been **** for years and has been taking beatings for years. Not really worth doing at all at this point. They deserve the revamp more than anyone else. Fix wardecs - Was bad, is now borderline broken. Needs to be fixed to form a coherent working system to handle empire hostilities. UI overhaul - Everyone will benefit from this and EVE really needs additional improvements on this front. Those are my choices, but I wouldn't be disapointed if something else would be implemented instead and certain choices will come no matter what we choose. For example the DUST connection is a must have and FW people have recieved some promises, so they'll propably get love no matter what people choose and it's a bit pointless to even make the DUST connection a choice here. Continual visual improvement for the game are also a must to keep the game relevant in the gaming market, so visual improvements will be part of the expansion no matter what.
Seleia O'Sinnor Arklight Project Fade 2 Black 102	Posted - 2011.12.24 23:53:00 - [108] - Quote - POS revamp - Excellence: Do features right, even if it means to iterate many times and fix lots of bugs. - UI Overhaul Eve community: An angry mob of bright people hunting witches, more torches, more hay forks, growing and growing.
Obsidian Hawk RONA Corporation RONA Directorate 321	Posted - 2011.12.25 02:41:00 - [109] - Quote tiericide wont fix the ferox or the prophecy. Besides more people need to follow killboards, often times you will see surprising results of what ships appear on it. anyway I want to re-iterate. FIX POS TOWERS AND ROLES AND ALLIANCE POS TOWERS AND ALLIANCE STRUCTURES WITH ALLIANCE HANGERS! I shoudl be able to use research and manufacturing arrays if the structure belongs to the alliance.
Alara IonStorm 717	Posted - 2011.12.25 03:11:00 - [110] - Quote Obsidian Hawk wrote: tiericide wont fix the ferox or the prophecy. It will go along way. People think of Tiericide in simple terms, giving it the same base HP or Slot Number or fittings as the higher tier. That is the lazy way and why as I said earlier if done they should get it right. At its heart Tiericide is looking at a ship and instead of arbitrarily buffing stats you look at what the ship is and what it means to fly it and ask why, why is it seeing less action then her piers. It means looking at the Higher Tiers that are less used and asking the same. For Example: perhaps the prophecy could use a Dmg Bonus, perhaps it should have more base tank then the Harbinger or the Harbinger needs less. Perhaps the Harbinger could use an optimal range bonus and some speed for an example to make it a good ranged DPS Boat. Then you test them and see how you like there roles. Are they good with there old roles? Do they need new ones? Do there old roles work but the bonuses, speed, fitting, slots, drones are not up to the task. You look at each ship, there stats and the ships they will be competing against and try not to make them equal but give them there own tactical niches and weaknesses. When you have that sorted you watch them and see what people are doing for future rebalance. If all works out then the goal of Tiericide is simple, the ships that are used continue as such and the ones who are not get a breath of new life. This ideally includes the T2's which often have the same role but better, many of them can not preform them to snuff so you look at the positive changes to there base models and work at improving them as well or in the case of successfeul Advance Ships pass the love down such as the Zealot to the Omen or Vegabond to the Stabber. In all it means more fearsome competition between ships. An EVE where there is as much to fear from a Bellicose or Celestis on Field as a Blackbird but for entirely different reasons and for entirely different opponents.
Dbars Grinding Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation 78	Posted - 2011.12.25 03:18:00 - [111] - Quote Mining PVE content
Ines Tegator Towels R Us 72	Posted - 2011.12.25 18:03:00 - [112] - Quote Alara IonStorm wrote: Snip I'm going to cross post this excellent post to the tiericide thread over in the suggestion forum. +1
Shag Sheep 5	Posted - 2011.12.25 18:17:00 - [113] - Quote 1) Mining overhaul.
hippity hopity Leftfield Synergy 0	Posted - 2011.12.25 22:51:00 - [114] - Quote Alara IonStorm wrote: -Tiericide -Tiericide -Tiericide Get this one right. this
Opertone Signal 7 60	Posted - 2011.12.25 23:10:00 - [115] - Quote Mining system overhaul Botting counter measures (aka software script blocker) Low sec overhaul. Mining is a priority - it will solve botting and low sec possibly.
Kikia Truzhari Teraa Matar 3	Posted - 2011.12.25 23:17:00 - [116] - Quote Faction warfare changes Tiericide UI overhaul Lowsec overhaul couldn't narrow it to three
SpaceSquirrels 42	Posted - 2011.12.26 01:11:00 - [117] - Quote Bots, mining, updating older ships/grievances. Oh yeah no more off grid boosting.
Lord Okinaba 14	Posted - 2011.12.27 11:05:00 - [118] - Quote UI overhaul Wardec mechanics changes Bounty system overhaul
Cpt Greagor Liquid Relief 60	Posted - 2011.12.27 11:12:00 - [119] - Quote Tiericide More Live Events Audio/Visual effect overhaul.
Fidelium Mortis Quantum Cats Syndicate 5	Posted - 2011.12.27 14:58:00 - [120] - Quote 1. Faction Warfare Changes 2. Mining Overhaul 3. More Isk skinks Dust 514 integration should be a given. ICRS - Intergalactic Certified Rocket Surgeon
Henry Haphorn Aliastra Gallente Federation 95	Posted - 2011.12.27 15:37:00 - [121] - Quote Quote: Faction warfare changes More anti-botting measures Mining overhaul These three are currently the most important to deal with first. Let me elaborate. Faction Warfare I haven't dove into this yet, but after seeing so many requests from others here in the forums to reform FW I can't help but feel this should be the #1 priority. Anti-Botting Measures I. Hate. Bots. With. A. Passion. I hate them so much they are the very reason why I endorse ganking in the first place. They are the scourge of all MMOs and deserve no safe haven. Mining Overhaul This has to be overhauled. The sooner CCP overhauls the mining system, the better we will be able to deal with the bot users. I will enjoy the day when bot tears will be at their freshest. After all, CCP needs more tears to quench the thirst of their hamsters. I hear that bot tears are the purest form of tears in the universe.
Alistair Cononach The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance 72	Posted - 2011.12.27 15:53:00 - [122] - Quote Ardamalis wrote: Here is my wish list for summer: -Tiericide It's a (relatively) easy way to introduce a lot of viable ships for everyone to fly at once. -Faction warfare changes Those poor folks desperately need it. -Soveriegnty mechanics changes I stopped living in nullsec because I got bored of shooting massive structures all the time. This.
Jake Blackstone Guns Rocks and Probes Reverberation Project 2	Posted - 2011.12.27 16:51:00 - [123] - Quote -Mining overhaul -More anti-botting measures -More isk sinks
RUSROG Beasts of Burden 95	Posted - 2011.12.27 16:56:00 - [124] - Quote More Anti-Botting Measures Corporation roles & Management Changes Bounty system overhaul -áE .-+ ` ' /-+. F Your tears fuel me. And as always, have nice day.
FloppieTheBanjoClown The Skunkworks Petition Blizzard 460	Posted - 2011.12.27 17:09:00 - [125] - Quote Make lowsec more profitable and give it something unique so that there's a compelling reason to be there other than a lack of concord. Overhaul FW, the wardec system, and bounty hunting. I really think CCP could do a lowsec-focused expansion that fixed FW problems and added cool new content like the concord-based pseudo-sovereignty that I proposed a while back. At the same time, fixing highsec mechanics like wardecs and bounty hunting could fit nicely into the overall theme of it. I even named the expansion I'd make: Enforcement.
Vaako Horizon Casual Slackers Daily Operations 24	Posted - 2011.12.27 17:28:00 - [126] - Quote 1 Drones ( Drone control improvments / drone bug fixes / Drone implants / actual battleship sized drone carrier ( able to weild more then 5 drones ) ) 2 Alliance/Corp logos for ships 3 POS revamp/modular POS's
Razin The xDEATHx Squadron Legion of xXDEATHXx 147	Posted - 2011.12.27 17:37:00 - [127] - Quote 1. All Local changed to delayed, d-scanner updated to become the new intel tool. 2. Sov mechanics changed to account for occupancy activity. 3. Lvl 4 missions moved out of hi-sec.
Hibernator X Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact 1	Posted - 2011.12.27 17:57:00 - [128] - Quote -Tieicide -Lowsec overhaul aaaand enough beating around the bush CCP.. -GIVE US THE JOVE (or at least a little in the coming expansions sheesh)
Ancy Denaries Frontier Venture 91	Posted - 2011.12.29 07:22:00 - [129] - Quote IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 wrote: Zevina wrote: Cant tell what this tiericide is all about? Whats wrong with having different tiers for different ships? There is absolutely nothing to change about it, nothing. The tiers system is just silly, there shouldn't be ships in eve that just better than each other without trade-off Ships should have not different roles not just worse/better. How many ferox/brutix (bar suicide gank)/cyclone/prophecy do you see around? While I agree on everything, I'd like to add that Club Bear wants to have a word with you about Brutixes. "Shoot at anything that moves. If it doesn't move, shoot it anyway, it might move later." "Do not be too positive. The light at the end of the tunnel could be a train." - Franz Kafka
Residium Fall Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic 0	Posted - 2011.12.29 12:55:00 - [130] - Quote Bounty system overhaul Wardec mechanics changes Lowsec overhaul Thank you.
Elistea Seedless Inc Shadow of xXDEATHXx 12	Posted - 2011.12.29 13:38:00 - [131] - Quote Please after 9 years do something with audio side of the game. Make ppl wish to turn on in-game sounds/soundtrack More (MUCH MOAR) songs in in-game playlist, most of weapons could use audio overhaul, ...etc
Siigari Kitawa Push Industries Push Interstellar Network 67	Posted - 2011.12.29 14:21:00 - [132] - Quote Open Jove space. Seriously. Need stuff moved? Push Industries will handle it. Servicing highsec and lowsec - and we do it faster and more reliably than anyone else. Ingame channel: PUSHX
Taiwanistan Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation 41	Posted - 2011.12.29 14:28:00 - [133] - Quote Elistea wrote: Please after 9 years do something with audio side of the game. Make ppl wish to turn on in-game sounds/soundtrack More (MUCH MOAR) songs in in-game playlist, most of weapons could use audio overhaul, ...etc agree, could be crowd-sourced, have a contest wis: a roman orgy of all-you-can-eat social /dance o7m8 dressup, unrestrained do ask do tell out and proud at the space bar dollhouse, all the evolving new and exciting things you've ever wanted.
Widemouth Deepthroat Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 7	Posted - 2011.12.29 15:29:00 - [134] - Quote Anti-botting improvements are sorely needed. Either that or just allow botting so everyone can make a few hundred mil per day afk instead of just the cheaters.
Karash Amerius Sutoka 26	Posted - 2011.12.29 15:48:00 - [135] - Quote I would just settle for a functioning sound system and redone effects (sensor booster disco baby!) Lowsex revamp would be good as well.
Jerick Ludhowe Mongoloids Inc. 28	Posted - 2011.12.29 15:52:00 - [136] - Quote 1. Command Ship rebalance. As a ship class Command ships are wholefull underpowered for their price tag and more importantly their training time. I'm not going to get into hyper specific details comparing training times of commands vs t3s however I will point out a blantantly obviously issue that the majority of "Field Commands" suffer from. Take a look at the total slots available to tier 2 BCs, now take a look at the total slots of the field commands. Other than the Sleipnir and Astarte they all have 1 less slot than tier tech 1 brothers, this needs to change if these ships are ever to be commonly used/trained for. On a more focused note, the Myrm has 1 less total slots than other tier 2s, so the Astarte actually has same number of slots as the Myrmidon. This should have no effect on the point i'm trying to make which is +1 slot for Absolution, Astarte, and Nighthawk. 2. Ratting... I know this is a rather broad issue to be brought up however I strongly believe that the majority of ratting in this game needs to be reworked to function more similarly to that of incursions and W space. This does not mean that the total difficulty will be increased, instead it would be an improved to the rats AI as well as seed many of the hulls on pirate/navy rats that are not present. Examples would be tier 2 bcs, tier3 bcs, tier 3 BS and maybe even some capitals. The other point I'd like to touch on is variation in sites by greatly varying the types of spawns and even the rooms associated with each site. This would in the end allow for potentially hundreds of combinations for each site making every ratting experience slightly more unique and thought provoking over the static and predictable isk faucets we have atm. 3. High sec incursions. Nerf this vastly overpowered isk faucet please... High sec incursions have had a very detrimental effect on eve's economy as a whole. Null and low-sec incursions should remain unchanged.
Sernum Total Mayhem. Northern Coalition. 4	Posted - 2011.12.29 16:09:00 - [137] - Quote Dust 514 integration - hoping this will be released on PC still! Sovereignty mechanics changes - Need more battles! Lowsec overhaul - Miss pirating :( A lot of good ones to choose from was hard to decide. Hopefully they touch a little bit of each of them.
BugraT WarheaD Astromechanica Federatis 33	Posted - 2011.12.29 17:09:00 - [138] - Quote I'm waiting for at least a bette Incarna integration (as mentionned here ;)). Wardec and Bounty overhaul would be nice :)
Sirinda Offworld Miners and Fabricators Guild 20	Posted - 2011.12.29 17:28:00 - [139] - Quote Tiericide POS revamp/modular POS's Better visual/sound effects in space While I'd like to see most of what the OP listed these three would be my picks. Tiericide is the one I'm a bit torn on actually. Basically, you can't take a WW1 dreadnought and expect it to hold its own against a WW2 battleship. Considering some of Eve's ships are recent developments with others having been around for hundreds of years, I'd expect this to be the same. On the other hand, you can always upgrade a viable hull to modern standards, especially when your defensive systems are mostly modular. There are examples of the same ship hull being utilized for the next generation of ships in RL, notably the successor to the Nimitz class as it will still use a Nimitz-class hull. POS revamp: I've always hated the way POSes looked. A way to have several different modules docked to one another and the POS control tower would make a lot more sense to me. I think the way Egosoft's upcoming X Rebirth is supposed to be handling this is more or less the best alternative. Just my two cents, of course. Also, lots of work, artwork especially. Visuals/sound effects: Who are you kidding, you're in this for either pew or for mining. Shiny effects make either occupation more fun.
Sirinda Offworld Miners and Fabricators Guild 20	Posted - 2011.12.29 17:28:00 - [140] - Quote Stupid forum...
Abdiel Kavash Paladin Order Fidelas Constans 236	Posted - 2011.12.29 17:31:00 - [141] - Quote 0.0 industry balancing. (Local industry needs to be as profitable as importing stuff in. I made a lot of posts on this already.) Complete industry and POS interface overhaul. Corporation and alliance security, more corp/alliance management tools.
Shizuken Venerated Stars 9	Posted - 2011.12.29 18:24:00 - [142] - Quote Xorv wrote: Local Chat Intel removal with new DScan added I think this is a fantastic idea. Local Chat needs to be passive and only there if you want to join. In addition to changing DScan they need to add a "Hail Ship/Fleet" button to immediately put you in contact with a non-friendly ship/fleet. I am not sure if there is already a fast way to do this but I have not seen it.
Ardamalis Vanguard Corp Bounty Hunters 44	Posted - 2011.12.31 07:15:00 - [143] - Quote Giving this a bump. BTW, i found this info about upcoming development: Future expansion/updates Seems like we might be getting an effects overhaul.
Trainwreck McGee Ghost Ship Inc. 202	Posted - 2011.12.31 07:53:00 - [144] - Quote expanded exploration make mining more dynamic add sparkly vampire unicorn justin bieber mounts for 50 bucks a piece that give a 10% damage buff o and make POS's actually stations instead of the **** we have now. CCP Trainwreck - Weekend Custodial Engineer / CCP Necrogoats foot stool
lwxsky oli lwxsky oli Corp 0	Posted - 2011.12.31 07:56:00 - [145] - Quote Dust 514 more isk sinks moons
Cyprus Black Tears of Redemption NEM3SIS. 91	Posted - 2011.12.31 08:26:00 - [146] - Quote All new music to replace the old dinosaur EvE music. The music themes and the game themes just seem so mismatched and foreign. Much of it is peaceful and serene melodies which doesn't fit. We need mysterious, somber. and ominous music. Also, replace all Titan models with monster trucks. Didn't think we'd forget that little proposal to CCP now did we, former CSM Mazz. I am neither fanboy nor flamer. I am logic, dispassionate and cruel.
DelBoy Trades Enslave. GIANTSBANE. 108	Posted - 2011.12.31 08:29:00 - [147] - Quote I would love an in game recorder, something that you can set to be constantly running, saving say, the last 10 minutes of footage, no idea how hardware hungry this would be, but I'm getting alot of "Why the **** didn't I fraps that" fights at the moment. Damn nature, you scary!
Llyandrian Livestock Science Exchange 24	Posted - 2011.12.31 08:34:00 - [148] - Quote UI improvements should be continuous. Expansion of lore with live events. Rouge Drones Incursions with an eye on other Pirate Factions for future.
Mutnin Mutineers 5	Posted - 2011.12.31 08:53:00 - [149] - Quote Ardamalis wrote: The summer expansion development schedule is upcoming so I thought that I would start this thread to see what is on everyone's wish list. I have no doubt that this upcoming expansion will deliver much needed and highly anticipated content to Eve Online; however, the devs can only provide so much content in a single expansion. As such they need to prioritize which time-consuming features they will work on. So I ask, if you could pick three main features and only three main features, what would you, my fellow capsuleer, choose? Here is a list of some commonly requested features: (feel free to add your own also) ---list updated again--- Built in battle recorder/player CCP should really have a look at High Tech Creations game called Aces High II. It has a pretty nice in game recording system, that just records to a flat txt like file that is then replayed via a player that uses the game models and graphic from the installed game. This means you can record hundreds of videos if not hours and hours of video with no issues of size concerns. You can then export to AVI to create an actual video or just give other players the recording of the basic data that they can then view in their recorder/player. It's actually a pretty ingenious solution that I'm really surprised other games haven't copied. Would work pretty damn good with EVE. The really cool part is it then allows you to select various camera angles to view from and not just a single view from the player perspective.
Van Upier The Scope Gallente Federation 0	Posted - 2011.12.31 09:26:00 - [150] - Quote More anti-botting measures Alliance/Corp logos for ships Mining overhaul With mining overhaul as my number 1 priority :) IMO this can be done in a way that also helps fight bots.
Odelya d'Hanguest Khanid-damashii 39	Posted - 2011.12.31 22:27:00 - [151] - Quote Faction warfare changes Incarna establishments Oh, and school uniforms!
Taiwanistan Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation 131	Posted - 2012.01.02 04:10:00 - [152] - Quote bumpin wis: a roman orgy of all-you-can-eat social /dance o7m8 dressup, unrestrained do ask do tell out and proud at the space bar dollhouse, all the evolving new and exciting things you've ever wanted.
Arrinlay Gateway Mining Division 3	Posted - 2012.01.02 04:30:00 - [153] - Quote Faction Warfare - This is a given. CCP seems to not understand that FW is severely affecting new player recruitment by virtue of the fact that every new player wants to join militia and is promptly informed in their first week of play that EVE has at least one horribly flawed major feature...and they almost joined it. New Tech 3 Modular Ships - I believe CCP is working on Frigates iirc, but I personally think a modular battleship would be very fascinating and give the potential for BS's to have a role in small gangs more often in all areas of space. New Industrial Ships and Missions - Mining (gas/ice/ore) could use an overhaul, mobile manufacturing (think orca/rorq that has say 2/6 lanes manufacturing) would be very fun and add a new dimension to supplying wars throughout the game hisec to WH, and revamp of courier, mining, industrial missions - much of which could be improved if industrials had a way to use even basic combat tech effectively.
Dyaven Aliastra Gallente Federation 10	Posted - 2012.01.02 04:46:00 - [154] - Quote Tiericide Bounty System Overhaul Low Sec Overhaul
Ma'kal The Imperial Commonwealth E.Y 3	Posted - 2012.01.02 08:45:00 - [155] - Quote POS revamp/modular POS's Bounty system overhaul Lowsec overhaul These are the three things I would really like to see changed. If I could go for a bonus one I would go for a change in mining.
MotherMoon Huang Yinglong 463	Posted - 2012.01.02 09:51:00 - [156] - Quote Dust 514 integration Incarna establishments & contraband Factional warfare
Tiberius Sunstealer Phantom Soulreavers 12	Posted - 2012.01.02 10:22:00 - [157] - Quote Incarna establishments & contraband Only for the contraband. It adds another layer of being a pirate. Alliance/Corp logos for ships It would be cool to have something like this. It is the big things that get someone to play but usually the little things that keep them playing. Mining overhaul Only because i'm a miner. If I wasn't, it'd be something to do with faction warfare, sovereignty, missions, etc.
Mistrala DeLegra Novus Alba FerrumSus 24	Posted - 2012.01.02 13:00:00 - [158] - Quote More Incarna vanity releases Establishments Reworking of AUR and it's pricing
Elessa Enaka State War Academy Caldari State 9	Posted - 2012.01.05 01:33:00 - [159] - Quote Alright, I would have to say that my big three for the Summer Expansion would be GÇ£Military-Industrial ComplexesGÇ¥. Allow me to explain. I) Military A) Faction Warfare needs attention. i. Make it impossible to dock in systems that are hostile to your Militia. (i.e. no 24th Imperial Crusade docking in a system with Minmatar Sov) ii. Make anybody who fleets with or tries to Logi/RR milita members in hostile territory GCC for the hostile milita (i.e. TLF being RRed by a non-militia neutral in a system with Amarr Sov causes the non-militia neutral to go GCC while in Amarr Systems) iii. Make FW plexing require more PVP rather than PVE, when the plex starts have it sound an alarm to members of the defending milita within say 5-10 jumps (they should get a notification similar to when a POS is under attack) B) Wardecs need some attention as well i. Make the cost of a wardec scale with the ratio of GÇ£combat-skillGÇ¥ points between the aggressor and the target corp (i.e. aggressor corp has 15:1 ratio of total GÇ£combat-skillGÇ¥ points with the target corp, the aggressor corp is going to pay 150m ISK per week, make it a nominal fee of maybe 100k ISK if the ratio is <=1:1) ii. Make the above cost be recalculated everytime someone joins/leaves the aggressor corp after the war is initially declared. Immediately issue a bill for the difference from the initial cost if it is increased. If the cost decreases, it will be the new cost of the war bill the next time that bill would come due (Sorry, CONCORD has a no refunds/no exchanges policy) continued.... Devour to survive, so it is, so it's always been
Elessa Enaka State War Academy Caldari State 9	Posted - 2012.01.05 01:34:00 - [160] - Quote ii. II) Industrial A) Mining should receive some Love. i. Increase EHP for Exhumers to something like 100k, 250k and 500k (divide by 2 for T1 Barges). Make them wholly unable to fit modules that aren't Ice Harvesters, Mining Upgrades, Shield Boosters/Extenders/Hardeners and Strip Miners. Drones/Rigs should remain unaffected. IMHO, these changes should discourage ganking and encourage fleet mining ops (which in my experience are social events that are not botted). ii. MAKE ICE FIELDS DEPLETE though to balance this, every constellation should have at least 1-2 Ice Fields iii. Reduce the number of GÇ£Asteroid BeltsGÇ¥ in every system to a maximum of 2 though give every system 8-12 gravimetric sites (include the ice fields with these) with quality of the sites increasing as the systems security level decreases. The basic asteroid belts that are available shouldn't contain anything aside from basic Scordite and basic Veldspar. Also make all ices/ores potentially available in any system though only from the gravimetric sites seeded throughout. iv. Add random events to the new gravimetric sites which cause them to become hybrid sites of a sort. Perhaps an unusually large asteroid is concealing a source of solid Mykocerosin which is vaporized by the mining laser causing a huge explosion that damages every ship in the site as well as dispersing the remaining asteroids in the site leaving behind only a gas cloud of the type of Mykocerosin that had been stored within. Maybe there are already NPC pirates mining the grav site with their own barges as well as a security detail. These are just two examples, I am sure that there are many other possibilities. v. Make belt rats escalate, if they aren't taken care of fairly quickly, they call for backup (especially if they come across a fleet mining op). Give them better AI as well. vi. Make Scrapmetal Reprocessing required to reprocess anything, without it, you can only sell your loot on the market. You can still refine minerals from ore, but no reprocessing any non-ore items without Scrapmetal Reprocessing. Even then, the amounts should be reduced from current. B) Corporations should get some Love. i. Make them them a little more intuitive as far as assigning roles is concerned. Also, more granularity as far as granting access would definitely be a welcome change. Why must I grant access to a tab in every office if I want someone to have access to the tab in more than just one office. Even if I only want them to have access to two offices, it is either only one or every. ii. Corporations should be able to choose to either be specialist or generalist corporations. Generalist corporations would grant the most flexibility, though that would be sole benefit. Specialist Corporations could be divided into categories such as Industrial, Mercantile and Mercenary. Maybe Industrial Corporations get two extra Corporate Science and Industry slots per member (which could be handed out by Directors), but they are restricted from initiating Wardecs. Perhaps Mercantile Corporations get a .1% reduction in fees and taxes for market sales though at the cost of not having any Corporate Science and Industry capability at all. Maybe Mercenary Corporations get slight reduction in the cost of initiating Wardecs though are restricted to using Contracts for buying/selling. Devour to survive, so it is, so it's always been
Issler Dainze Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord 524	Posted - 2012.01.05 02:38:00 - [161] - Quote OK, top 3 Incarna establishments & contraband Moons / moon goo changes Lowsec overhaul

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.