| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Eternum Praetorian
Club Bear
257
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 19:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
A Thx To CCP & The Players
At present, EVE online is as visually spectacular as it has ever been. Crucible, was a welcomed surprise as is CCP's new direction. Let us not forget what led us here, and what restored a healthy balance back to this game. YOU, the player... sent a message that was heard loud and clear to the highest levels of CCP.
Although the CSM may claim responsibility (in part or in full) for this change, it is the voice of the players that precipitated CCP's return to a perspective that made this game one of a kind. Only here could protests be followed up by (mostly) unedited forum outrage. Only here could a collective voice of untold subscriptions shake the foundations of a multimillion dollar corporation in another country.
The Backstory
For years the CSM has been a fruitless band of individuals that spoke much and achieved very little. As the years past and the frustration of the players mounted, most of the parts of EVE that were being ignored... went ignored by the rest of us. But when the straw broke the camels back, the players finally reacted. And through the efforts of the players, CCP was forced to listen and in doing so, IMHO preserved the game that they created for many years to come.
A Final Word
I just wanted to through that out there, for the sake of all of those out there who helped make this change. Masked beneath "you hate goons" and "CSM emergency... blah blah" and all the rest of the propaganda that floods these forums, is a unique community that can inspire change that not only effects a digital universe, but the real universe as well. Without YOU none of this would have happened. It was a hard transition, but you may have saved EVE online in such a way that it can now proceed into the next decade. That transcends all in game politics, the CSM and anything else that people might come up with.
* Eternum bows to the player base, thx CCP and then flips the CSM the finger. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|

TuonelanOrja
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
175
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 20:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:A Thx To CCP & The Players At present, EVE online is as visually spectacular as it has ever been. Crucible, was a welcomed surprise as is CCP's new direction. Let us not forget what led us here, and what restored a healthy balance back to this game. YOU, the player... sent a message that was heard loud and clear to the highest levels of CCP. Although the CSM may claim responsibility (in part or in full) for this change, it is the voice of the players that precipitated CCP's return to a perspective that made this game one of a kind. Only here could protests be followed up by (mostly) unedited forum outrage. Only here could a collective voice of untold subscriptions shake the foundations of a multimillion dollar corporation in another country. The BackstoryFor years the CSM has been a fruitless band of individuals that spoke much and achieved very little. As the years past and the frustration of the players mounted, most of the parts of EVE that were being ignored... went ignored by the rest of us. But when the straw broke the camels back, the players finally reacted. And through the efforts of the players, CCP was forced to listen and in doing so, IMHO preserved the game that they created for many years to come. A Final WordI just wanted to through that out there, for the sake of all of those out there who helped make this change. Masked beneath "you hate goons" and "CSM emergency... blah blah" and all the rest of the propaganda that floods these forums, is a unique community that can inspire change that not only effects a digital universe, but the real universe as well. Without YOU none of this would have happened. It was a hard transition, but you may have saved EVE online in such a way that it can now proceed into the next decade. That transcends all in game politics, the CSM and anything else that people might come up with. * Eternum bows to the player base, thx CCP and then flips the CSM the finger.
well said
Not a veteran, just bitter.. |

Defecanda
LulzWaffe
36
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 20:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:A Thx To CCP & The Players At present, EVE online is as visually spectacular as it has ever been. Crucible, was a welcomed surprise as is CCP's new direction. Let us not forget what led us here, and what restored a healthy balance back to this game. YOU, the player... sent a message that was heard loud and clear to the highest levels of CCP. Although the CSM may claim responsibility (in part or in full) for this change, it is the voice of the players that precipitated CCP's return to a perspective that made this game one of a kind. Only here could protests be followed up by (mostly) unedited forum outrage. Only here could a collective voice of untold subscriptions shake the foundations of a multimillion dollar corporation in another country. The BackstoryFor years the CSM has been a fruitless band of individuals that spoke much and achieved very little. As the years past and the frustration of the players mounted, most of the parts of EVE that were being ignored... went ignored by the rest of us. But when the straw broke the camels back, the players finally reacted. And through the efforts of the players, CCP was forced to listen and in doing so, IMHO preserved the game that they created for many years to come. A Final WordI just wanted to through that out there, for the sake of all of those out there who helped make this change. Masked beneath "you hate goons" and "CSM emergency... blah blah" and all the rest of the propaganda that floods these forums, is a unique community that can inspire change that not only effects a digital universe, but the real universe as well. Without YOU none of this would have happened. It was a hard transition, but you may have saved EVE online in such a way that it can now proceed into the next decade. That transcends all in game politics, the CSM and anything else that people might come up with. * Eternum bows to the player base, thx CCP and then flips the CSM the finger.
I'm certainly not a vet player or anything, but this patch/expansion/whatever does seem to actually improve the game a little. Not sure how CCP works, but I hope some people got shuffled and Crucible is just the beginning. |

oldbutfeelingyoung
VIRTUAL EMPIRE VANGUARD Vanguard Ascendants
279
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 20:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
Thank CCP not yet ,they may be listening to those idiots. Thinking they represent the whole playerbase We Rabble Because We Care,BC CCP doesn,t seem to care much |

Rellik B00n
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
118
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 20:23:00 -
[5] - Quote
quite my war dec solution |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1406
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 20:32:00 -
[6] - Quote
Thanks to CSM6 the most effective CSM ever. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Eternum Praetorian
Club Bear
257
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 20:37:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Thanks to CSM6 the most effective CSM ever.
Equivalent copy/pasted response
Pathetic.
Did I do that right? Or do I need to give you a delicious tears as well? Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1406
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 20:50:00 -
[8] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Did I do that right? Or do I need to give you a delicious tears as well? You do every time you post.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Eternum Praetorian
Club Bear
258
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 21:00:00 -
[9] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Did I do that right? Or do I need to give you a delicious tears as well? You do every time you post.
It would appear that you're having trouble with attention not being directed towards you for five minutes. Don't worry the mean man will stop thanking CCP and the players soon. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|

Gripen
459
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 21:54:00 -
[10] - Quote
It's the first time I'm urged to use that Like button.
CSM people claiming the credits of so-called refocusing of CCP make me sick. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1407
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 22:06:00 -
[11] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote: Thanks Eternum. Your tearful posts about Goonswarm are much appreciated.
You should post some more stuff in the CSM forum.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Eternum Praetorian
Club Bear
262
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 22:19:00 -
[12] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote: Thanks Eternum. Your tearful posts about Goonswarm are much appreciated. You should post some more stuff in the CSM forum.
Is a diff person using your troll alt tonight? Usually you do a little better then this  I demand better content from you Harlot.
Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|

oldbutfeelingyoung
VIRTUAL EMPIRE VANGUARD Vanguard Ascendants
280
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 22:19:00 -
[13] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote: Thanks Eternum. Your tearful posts about Goonswarm are much appreciated. You should post some more stuff in the CSM forum.
did he mentioned he hates Goonswarm here ? **** i have to read it again We Rabble Because We Care,BC CCP doesn,t seem to care much |

Rixiu
North Star Networks The Kadeshi
63
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 22:19:00 -
[14] - Quote
Gripen wrote:It's the first time I'm urged to use that Like button.
CSM people claiming the credits of so-called refocusing of CCP make me sick.
Agreed. They failed for 2(?) years to convince CCP that they were running down a hill into a wall of spikes. It was up to the players (after they hit the spices/Incarna happened) to drag them off the spikes and tell them that doing so is bad for your health.
CSM basically stood on the top of the hill whispering "maybe you shouldn't run that fast". Silly CSM, U so funny. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1407
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 22:20:00 -
[15] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote: Thanks Eternum. Your tearful posts about Goonswarm are much appreciated. You should post some more stuff in the CSM forum. did he mentioned Goonswarm here ? **** i have to read it again Check his post history. He's real mad about Goons.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Eternum Praetorian
Club Bear
262
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 22:20:00 -
[16] - Quote
I did not, he just needs the attention evidently... ya know... since people have to ALWAYS be talking about goon(dot). Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|

oldbutfeelingyoung
VIRTUAL EMPIRE VANGUARD Vanguard Ascendants
280
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 22:23:00 -
[17] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote: Thanks Eternum. Your tearful posts about Goonswarm are much appreciated. You should post some more stuff in the CSM forum. did he mentioned Goonswarm here ? **** i have to read it again Check his post history. He's real mad about Goons.
its logic to bring up non relevant issues to this post it really helps you We Rabble Because We Care,BC CCP doesn,t seem to care much |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1407
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 22:27:00 -
[18] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:its logic to bring up non relevant issues to this post it really helps you Yes because if it wasn't for his negative feelings about Goons (especially the two Goons on the CSM) he wouldn't have made this thread. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

White Tree
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
721
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 22:29:00 -
[19] - Quote
Look at all those things the CSM didn't do like fix Hybrids and nerf sCaps. |

oldbutfeelingyoung
VIRTUAL EMPIRE VANGUARD Vanguard Ascendants
280
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 22:31:00 -
[20] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:its logic to bring up non relevant issues to this post it really helps you Yes because if it wasn't for his negative feelings about Goons (especially the two Goons on the CSM) he wouldn't have made this thread.
well he didn,t mention the goons in this thread . and in my opinion ,he makes a good point So maybe he has some hatred for the Goons,but that's not relevant in this post We Rabble Because We Care,BC CCP doesn,t seem to care much |

oldbutfeelingyoung
VIRTUAL EMPIRE VANGUARD Vanguard Ascendants
280
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 22:32:00 -
[21] - Quote
White Tree wrote:Look at all those things the CSM didn't do like fix Hybrids and nerf sCaps.
non-relevant ,that isn,t the topic of this thread ,is it? We Rabble Because We Care,BC CCP doesn,t seem to care much |

Race Drones
13th Squadron E C L I P S E
4
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 22:39:00 -
[22] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote: For years the CSM has been a fruitless band of individuals that spoke much and achieved very little.
+1 to your post. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1407
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 22:49:00 -
[23] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:its logic to bring up non relevant issues to this post it really helps you Yes because if it wasn't for his negative feelings about Goons (especially the two Goons on the CSM) he wouldn't have made this thread. well he didn,t mention the goons in this thread . and in my opinion ,he makes a good point So maybe he has some hatred for the Goons,but that's not relevant in this post Like I said it's relevant because the only reason he made this thread was to discount and belittle the efforts of the current CSM. This is not a difficult concept.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

oldbutfeelingyoung
VIRTUAL EMPIRE VANGUARD Vanguard Ascendants
281
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 22:53:00 -
[24] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:its logic to bring up non relevant issues to this post it really helps you Yes because if it wasn't for his negative feelings about Goons (especially the two Goons on the CSM) he wouldn't have made this thread. well he didn,t mention the goons in this thread . and in my opinion ,he makes a good point So maybe he has some hatred for the Goons,but that's not relevant in this post Like I said it's relevant because the only reason he made this thread was to discount and belittle the efforts of the current CSM. This is not a difficult concept.
yes maybe the CSM,but don,t see hate against Goonswarm in his text We Rabble Because We Care,BC CCP doesn,t seem to care much |

Eternum Praetorian
Club Bear
263
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 23:04:00 -
[25] - Quote
White Tree wrote:Look at all those things the CSM didn't do like fix Hybrids and nerf sCaps.
Are you suggesting that the CSM is responsible for those as well? You must be trolling silly CSM troll (or perhaps posting stoned)
Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|

Kent Reeves
66
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 23:06:00 -
[26] - Quote
White Tree wrote:Look at all those things the CSM didn't do like fix Hybrids and nerf sCaps. I hadn't realized the CSM was now programming EVE themselves. |

Eternum Praetorian
Club Bear
263
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 23:06:00 -
[27] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote: Like I said it's relevant because the only reason he made this thread was to discount and belittle the efforts of the current CSM's attempts to take credit for what the player base have done collectively. This is not a difficult concept.
Fixed that for you. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|

J Kunjeh
311
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 23:16:00 -
[28] - Quote
As much as I make fun of the CSM (well, Mittens in particular), I do think they were rather useful this time around (if horrible communicators to the player base). So, though I agree the players' actions also had a large impact on what came about, I personally think you're off to be discounting CSM6. "The world as we know it came about through an anomaly (anomou)" (The Gospel of Philip, 1-5)-á |

oldbutfeelingyoung
VIRTUAL EMPIRE VANGUARD Vanguard Ascendants
281
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 23:22:00 -
[29] - Quote
J Kunjeh wrote:As much as I make fun of the CSM (well, Mittens in particular), I do think they were rather useful this time around (if horrible communicators to the player base). So, though I agree the players' actions also had a large impact on what came about, I personally think you're off to be discounting CSM6.
i don,t think the csm could do anything ,if all of the playerbase kept silent. We Rabble Because We Care,BC CCP doesn,t seem to care much |

J Kunjeh
311
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 23:27:00 -
[30] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:J Kunjeh wrote:As much as I make fun of the CSM (well, Mittens in particular), I do think they were rather useful this time around (if horrible communicators to the player base). So, though I agree the players' actions also had a large impact on what came about, I personally think you're off to be discounting CSM6. i don,t think the csm could do anything ,if all of the playerbase kept silent.
I wouldn't go to that extreme, but I definitely agree that it's a symbiotic relationship and it takes a hard working and intelligent CSM, a supportive and vocal (but sane) player base, and an open minded stance on the part of CCP to influence Eve's direction for the better. "The world as we know it came about through an anomaly (anomou)" (The Gospel of Philip, 1-5)-á |

Eternum Praetorian
Club Bear
264
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 23:35:00 -
[31] - Quote
J Kunjeh, I disagree and I believe the content of Crucible is proof that CCP knew exactly what the players wanted this entire time, but chose to pursue other things instead. It is simply a collection of what we have all been asking for, and have been doing so for years. Even the trailer looked like it was intended to bring people back into the game.
Crucible appeared really fast after the realized failure of incarna and the lol Himlar fiasco. It's content is not an effort of an elected council, it is instead an effort of a panicking and downsizing RL corporation to make people very happy, very fast. I mean, it is pretty obvious isn't it?
& I don't mean that as a troll  The first time I saw the Crucible trailer I was like "Ah... they are saving their assets" (referring to CCP)
P.S.
The CSM did not invent "Hybrids need to be balanced", "Supers need nerf", "Dreds lost their role", "POS's need to be looked at", "fix oneiros" ex.) This has nothing to do with them and I can't understand how people can entertain the idea when people say otherwise (like whitetree) 
You can only get away with that kind of fabricated stupidity on the internet. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
968

|
Posted - 2012.01.04 23:49:00 -
[32] - Quote
As someone who has interacted with the CSM on many occasions I am not sure that the sentiments in the OP are just. Every CSM I have worked with have been productive, helpful and have worked to ensure that player concerns are addressed and fixed. Calling them a fruitless band of individuals is more than unfair.
Still, elections will be coming up in the next few weeks for the CSM so perhaps you can shift that focus, run a strong campaign and be a really good CSM member. Naturally, it is always easy to throw stones at a glass house. Try coming into the house instead and actually affect change. CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|

Eternum Praetorian
Club Bear
265
|
Posted - 2012.01.04 23:52:00 -
[33] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:As someone who has interacted with the CSM on many occasions I am not sure that the sentiments in the OP are just. Every CSM I have worked with have been productive, helpful and have worked to ensure that player concerns are addressed and fixed. Calling them a fruitless band of individuals is more than unfair.
Still, elections will be coming up in the next few weeks for the CSM so perhaps you can shift that focus, run a strong campaign and be a really good CSM member. Naturally, it is always easy to throw stones at a glass house. Try coming into the house instead and actually affect change.
Try getting them to represent themselves the same way when interacting with the general player base. Seriously, it would go a looooong way in terms of restoring the CSM name in the eyes of everyone else. While in the CSM chair, they are representing your company to the rest of the world. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
968

|
Posted - 2012.01.05 00:00:00 -
[34] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:CCP Navigator wrote:As someone who has interacted with the CSM on many occasions I am not sure that the sentiments in the OP are just. Every CSM I have worked with have been productive, helpful and have worked to ensure that player concerns are addressed and fixed. Calling them a fruitless band of individuals is more than unfair.
Still, elections will be coming up in the next few weeks for the CSM so perhaps you can shift that focus, run a strong campaign and be a really good CSM member. Naturally, it is always easy to throw stones at a glass house. Try coming into the house instead and actually affect change. Try getting them to represent themselves the same way when interacting with the general player base. Seriously, it would go a looooong way in terms of restoring the CSM name in the eyes of everyone else. While in the CSM chair, they are representing your company to the rest of the world.
Now we are talking about two completely different things 
Would you suggest that changing the personna of individuals would be a benefit? I would say that it is due to the difference in personalities that the CSM has become so effective.
You spoke in your OP about the power of the players and you are quite right about that in many ways. EVE constantly changes and evolves becuase of all you guys. If you feel that the CSM needs to change, due to percieved poor interaction with the players, then you also have the power to change that with your votes. CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|

Eternum Praetorian
Club Bear
265
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 00:02:00 -
[35] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:then you also have the power to change that with your votes.
Once you fix the exploited system in CSM voting sure! 
1 paying account = 1 vote, or it is meaningless and can be heavily exploited. Not only has it happened, I have seen it admitted too multiple times on these forums over and over again.
Quote:Would you suggest that changing the personna of individuals would be a benefit?
Everyone is expected to conduct themselves with some manner of professionalizm when representing something more then themselves. So I have to say yes. They don't have to be douchebags on the forums, regardless of what their habits are in game (or in RL) Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
496
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 00:14:00 -
[36] - Quote
Meh, this CSM wasn't nearly as entertaining as the last one. Mittens is ok for laughs, but Ank was the greatest.
On a serious note, I haven't followed the CSM as much as last year, so I don't know how much work they put in, but I'm sure they did something, either for the players or for CCP. |

oldbutfeelingyoung
VIRTUAL EMPIRE VANGUARD Vanguard Ascendants
282
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 00:21:00 -
[37] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:As someone who has interacted with the CSM on many occasions I am not sure that the sentiments in the OP are just. Every CSM I have worked with have been productive, helpful and have worked to ensure that player concerns are addressed and fixed. Calling them a fruitless band of individuals is more than unfair.
Still, elections will be coming up in the next few weeks for the CSM so perhaps you can shift that focus, run a strong campaign and be a really good CSM member. Naturally, it is always easy to throw stones at a glass house. Try coming into the house instead and actually affect change.
If you are right that every csm interacted in the way you say,then there would not be a need for the summerrage as it happend If the csm wasn,t told about the MT store in beforehand, then the CSM is useless if the csm was told ,the csm was made useless by the NDA
bc ,i don,t believe that a sane player in the csm , liked the idea when presented We Rabble Because We Care,BC CCP doesn,t seem to care much |

Kelsi Corynn
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
27
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 01:01:00 -
[38] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote: 1 paying account = 1 vote, or it is meaningless and can be heavily exploited. Not only has it happened, I have seen it admitted too multiple times on these forums over and over again.
If there really is/was a way to exploit the voting process, that would be... bad. |

Eternum Praetorian
Club Bear
265
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 01:07:00 -
[39] - Quote
Kelsi Corynn wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote: 1 paying account = 1 vote, or it is meaningless and can be heavily exploited. Not only has it happened, I have seen it admitted too multiple times on these forums over and over again.
If there really is/was a way to exploit the voting process, that would be... bad.
I have 2 accounts and so I get 2 votes. Do you know how many people in nullsec have more then just 2? People were activating dead accounts just to game the CSM vote. Why do you think that there are Pandemic and Goon CSM's? Coincidence? Nope. Wealthy alliances that are not only large, they also have many multiple account owners (like 4,5,6 accounts and more)
Guess what that means for the ordinary, run of the mill single account holder who only gets 1 vote? Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|

Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
365
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 01:10:00 -
[40] - Quote
still sucks that some of the well known forum ccp posters got fired. but other then that i think crucible and the new direction is exactly what is needed in the game. |

Disdaine
163
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 02:08:00 -
[41] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:percieved poor interaction with the players
The Mittani wrote:your respect is meaningless, and i only represent my constituents |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1411
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 02:10:00 -
[42] - Quote
Disdaine wrote:The Mittani wrote:your respect is meaningless, and i only represent my constituents He does have a way with words...and that's on top of being a strikingly handsome man.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Marlona Sky
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
329
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 03:58:00 -
[43] - Quote
At first I gave the OP a 'like', but then later withdrew it.
Only a fool would perceive this expansion as being the direct result of only one entity and not due to a massive amount of effort from multiple fronts. Those front being the players, CSM and CCP. Yes there will be certain individuals who will keep yapping like a Chatty Cathy doll screaming that they are the sole reason for any changes perceived as being good in this latest expansion. Only it wouldn't be someone else pulling the string, but they would be doing it. *yank-yank-YANK!!!* Sadly there is nothing that can be done about these attention starved individuals.
What a person has to realize is that just because a couple individuals who happen to belong to a specific group try and claim full responsibility for the expansion or any part of it; they in fact do not represent the entire group. It is unfair to brand the entire CSM or any group for that matter as trying to take full credit for the expansion when everyone knows damn well it was a full blown effort on everyone's part from all aspects of this game. Not just the one camp they are a part of.
I know for a fact this expansion is a direct result from all parties involved and in no way should full credit be given to just one group, much less one individual. Many of these fixes/changes have been on the table for a very long time. Sure some people/groups have put forth more effort than others, but we really should not be trying to find some savior for this game when the savior is all of us.
It's always darkest before the dawn and it seems to me; Crucible is the dawn. How about we all enjoy and look forward to the rest of the sun coming out instead of arguing over who deserves more credit. The fact remains everyone needed the help of everyone else to achieve anything they have accomplished so far. Let's not ruin that. 
|

Eternum Praetorian
Club Bear
272
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 04:16:00 -
[44] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Bridged...
& there are a whole lot of people that disagree with you regarding the CSM portion of your post. CCP + Player's = good. I will take a guess and say your a bit newer to EVE Online, maybe? If you are, then perhaps that is why you have the opinion that you do regarding the so called "Counsel of stellar management".
Some of us have seen EVE slowly go down hill since their institution. That is not to openly state that it is do to the CSM directly, but on the other hand, there is an uncanny correlation that cannot simply be ignored. I have a number suggestions as to how this pattern may have came into being, but that is not what this thread is about atm. I'm sure that it will degrade further though, at which time I will be happy to deviate and fence with the trolls some more.
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Crucible appeared really fast after the realized failure of incarna and the lol Himlar fiasco. It's content is not an effort of an elected council, it is instead an effort of a panicking and downsizing RL corporation to make people very happy, very fast. I mean, it is pretty obvious isn't it? The CSM did not invent "Hybrids need to be balanced", "Supers need nerf", "Dreds lost their role", "POS's need to be looked at", "fix oneiros" ex.) This has nothing to do with them and I can't understand how people can entertain the idea when people say otherwise (like whitetree)  You can only get away with that kind of fabricated stupidity on the internet. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|

Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
765
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 04:30:00 -
[45] - Quote
but is it really cheaper to fly a bunch of drunks to iceland for a free binge weekend and all the herring they can eat than it is to use focus groups and statistical analysis to pretend that you're listening?
 The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1411
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 04:33:00 -
[46] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:That is not to openly state that it is do to the CSM directly, but on the other hand, there is an uncanny correlation that cannot simply be ignored. It can be ignored and is by the vast majority of Eve players who don't buy into your Goon conspiracy theories.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

mkint
604
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 04:57:00 -
[47] - Quote
Corina Jarr wrote:Meh, this CSM wasn't nearly as entertaining as the last one. Mittens is ok for laughs, but Ank was the greatest.
On a serious note, I haven't followed the CSM as much as last year, so I don't know how much work they put in, but I'm sure they did something, either for the players or for CCP. I'm pretty sure Navigator is confusing "telling d!ck jokes on skype" with actually accomplishing something. And that's pretty much the current CSM's biggest accomplishment. At least above the board.
The current CSM has also seen some of the biggest buffs to RMT alliances (including people who've admitted to selling RMT in the past being on the CSM now), and the safest RMT culture the game has ever experienced. |

Professor Alphane
Alphane Research Co-operative
193
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 05:14:00 -
[48] - Quote
I think having an elected CSM is a bit of a PR nightmare in a political game such as EVE.
CSM's should apply for there jobs and be chosen by CCP based on there experience and what CCP are interested in learning.
Don't mean to single you out naviagtor but you did 'put your head above the parapet' as it where, where you for example voted by the forum community into your job because of your witty reparty and reputation for fairness, I think not you applied and where chosen because your skills best fitted what CCP wanted.
Anyway being that there are easier and fairer ways to poll player opinion, it is no more than a PR stunt by CCP to convince the playerbase that they are listening to them, kinda backfired IMO because it just leaves peope thinking 'if I'm not some EVE bigwig CCP don't want to hear my opinions'.
Also lols at the over defensiveness of the goons, the OP was about the CSM being a fail idea not about any sort of rant against the political power it might bestow.
just my 0.02 isk 
YOU MUST THINK FIRST.... |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1411
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 05:47:00 -
[49] - Quote
Professor Alphane wrote:Anyway being that there are easier and fairer ways to poll player opinion, Hey remember last year when CCP polled the playerbase about their most pressing issues with the game?
Docking games was the number one item.
Do you think docking games is the biggest problem in Eve right now?
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Professor Alphane
Alphane Research Co-operative
193
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 06:19:00 -
[50] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Professor Alphane wrote:Anyway being that there are easier and fairer ways to poll player opinion, Hey remember last year when CCP polled the playerbase about their most pressing issues with the game? Docking games was the number one item. Do you think docking games is the biggest problem in Eve right now?
Can't say I do remeber that just returning after a long break, don't see any docking games though 
YOU MUST THINK FIRST.... |

lior narkis
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 06:28:00 -
[51] - Quote
Its really easy to create a voting system for an online game like Eve Online.
Once Voting starts everyone with a full account gets a voting screen upon login WITHOUT any way to get around it. (like when you want to log in a character that doesnt have the new skin modell) You then see different choices of general playstyle, e.g. high sec, producer, wormhole, 0.0 and so on. (someone smarter than me will surely figure out better names for the typos of players in this game) After you chose one there will be different character/player names running for CSM that in general fit your previous choice. You can click on them and read a short introduction and their goals as CSM chairman. (limited number of words) After reading you can give him/her your Vote or check on the next volunteer. As soon as you chose one login procedure continues as normal. Of course there should always be the chance not to vote at all.
Right now its really easy for huge alliances (and huge alliances are mostly in 0.0) to build up and focus on one candidate of their own.
That might not be a bad thing and actually it is like in real life politics, BUT allow me one question: Is the CSM part of the sandbox as a real life politics simulator or isnt it just a tool for CCP to better understand the majority of the playerbase? Right now because of the way it works its impossible to monitor the majority of the playerbase.
Therefore CCP, do you want to change that and get a better CSM or do you rather keep your 0.0 alliance CSM with long term players you know and like? I imagine working with a more mixed up CSM and more mixed up opinions on this game will make it harder, but also more fruitfull. I am on sale right now: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=52023&find=unread 8 year old 84Mil SP pure and perfect industry char! |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1412
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 06:46:00 -
[52] - Quote
lior narkis wrote:Therefore CCP, do you want to change that and get a better CSM or do you rather keep your 0.0 alliance CSM with long term players you know and like? I imagine working with a more mixed up CSM and more mixed up opinions on this game will make it harder, but also more fruitfull. There is no doubt that CCP would prefer to have a bunch of people on the CSM with differing goals and agendas so they would spend all their time fighting with each other and ignore CCP. CSM1-CSM5 were like that.
CSM6 has been a publicity nightmare for them which is why this CSM has been so effective.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Professor Alphane
Alphane Research Co-operative
193
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 06:55:00 -
[53] - Quote
Effective in what way, have you any evidence to support this, how would crucible be any difffrent without the CSM?
YOU MUST THINK FIRST.... |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1413
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 07:10:00 -
[54] - Quote
Professor Alphane wrote:Effective in what way, have you any evidence to support this, how would crucible be any difffrent without the CSM? There is the very real probability that Eve wouldn't have survived to produce the Crucible expansion without the intervention of the current CSM. CCP was happy to basically ignore the entire playerbase until people started canceling their accounts in great numbers and even then they didn't really grasp what the problems were until the emergency CSM meeting they had over the summer.
But for some more concrete examples you can thank the CSM for jump bridges not being foolishly removed from the game, supercaps finally getting a balance pass, an actual plan to fix some of the glaring problems with the Dominion sov system, CCP backing away from selling gold ships and ammo through RMT and a bunch of smaller "quality of life" issues that they have been championing since their term started.
I get that some people don't like Goons and hate to see us succeed but keep in mind that there are only two Goons on the CSM and when I say that CSM6 has been the most effective CSM in history I mean all of them--not just Mittens and Vile Rat.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Disdaine
164
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 07:17:00 -
[55] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:There is the very real probability that Eve wouldn't have survived to produce the Crucible expansion without the intervention of the current CSM
Gold.
Thankyou for saving eve CSM6. We are forever in your debt.  |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1413
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 07:19:00 -
[56] - Quote
Disdaine wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:There is the very real probability that Eve wouldn't have survived to produce the Crucible expansion without the intervention of the current CSM Gold. Thankyou for saving eve CSM6. We are forever in your debt. 
Glad I could finally convince you.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Indahmawar Fazmarai
The I and F Taxation Trust
169
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 07:54:00 -
[57] - Quote
CCP Navigator wrote:As someone who has interacted with the CSM on many occasions I am not sure that the sentiments in the OP are just. Every CSM I have worked with have been productive, helpful and have worked to ensure that player concerns are addressed and fixed. Calling them a fruitless band of individuals is more than unfair.
Still, elections will be coming up in the next few weeks for the CSM so perhaps you can shift that focus, run a strong campaign and be a really good CSM member. Naturally, it is always easy to throw stones at a glass house. Try coming into the house instead and actually affect change.
Come on, you can't be serious. You SHOULD know that most of your playerbase is scatered into little flocks and "lone wolf" types. Which means that, albeit they are a massive majority, they can't overcome the mere fact of an uber-alliance leader telling his buddies to vote for him.
Actually as soon as a lone-wolf type reached the point of having its own clients to vote for him he no longer would be lone-wolf and would represent a guy wih a lot of clients to please. Preferably clients from nullsec. Preferably close to the uber-alliances. Preferably the kind of CSM we got now, who are asisting your company into flipping the bird to hiseccers, soloers, casuals and very specially those who hoped you (eventually) were true about Incarna and instead got four closets and have been waiting for two bloody months and 2,000 messages that you deign yourselves to say anything on WiS.
As far as we know, WiS was not on the table this december. That's nice. But now grow some balls and tell us you no longer want to think on WiS and so we can carry on and do whatever we see suit to do with whatever gameplay you will give to nullsecers, griefers, gankers and the rest of your First Class customers. |

Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
463
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 08:17:00 -
[58] - Quote
Gripen wrote:It's the first time I'm urged to use that Like button.
CSM people claiming the credits of so-called refocusing of CCP make me sick.
It is basicly what politicians do, the fact that their unintended pre-emptive strike in the media through the post of The Mittani had such widespread results is because of the earlier already widely reported protests and player backlash. The reaction of the CSM although late was the only course left to CSM 6 unless they chose to cooperate fully with CCP, become patsies and not only lose all credibility but also help ruin a game that they supposedly love.
I have no issue with the CSM doing what they where supposed do, they did jump on the bandwagon eventually, although it took a little time and prodding from the masses to get them to take that last step. It is not an easy thing to do even with the glaring problems we all saw (this includes the players AND the CSM) with CCP's approach. While I'll agree that some CSM's are annoying and sometimes not suited for their job I do think the majority them and certainly the "known names" like The Mittani, Seleene, Trebor and Two Step to name a few have been effective.
But in the end the CSM would have been proven wrong and powerless if they hadn't had the metrics on their side, the unsubs, the rage and the media. And those things came from the players who did what Hilmar himself suggested, they acted. All the rest followed.
- [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |

Maelle LuzArdiden
University of Caille Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 08:31:00 -
[59] - Quote
OP seems to think that forum whining, bittervetting and shooting some statues actually means anything to anyone else besides themselves. You are the minority and take yourselves too seriously, deal with it.
CSM, on the other hand has proven to be able to operate on a professional level and pursue long-term changes.
I voted for Seleene and I'm extremely satisfied with her(his) performance, but now could really vote for any other member, UAxDeath, White Tree, even Trebor- but most impressive has been the Mittani. I originally took him for a complete joke and jackass, but has proven to be both an entertaining character and an exceptional chairman.
CSM6 rocks, new CCP rocks and EvE is better than ever, why don't you all just enjoy it?
|

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
925
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 08:44:00 -
[60] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
* Eternum bows to the player base, thx CCP and then flips the middle finger at the CSM.
Fixed it for you.
+1 'Like' to all your posted replies in this thread.
|

Tore Vest
Vikinghall
130
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 09:04:00 -
[61] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:A Thx To CCP & The Players At present, EVE online is as visually spectacular as it has ever been. Crucible, was a welcomed surprise as is CCP's new direction. Let us not forget what led us here, and what restored a healthy balance back to this game. YOU, the player... sent a message that was heard loud and clear to the highest levels of CCP. Although the CSM may claim responsibility (in part or in full) for this change, it is the voice of the players that precipitated CCP's return to a perspective that made this game one of a kind. Only here could protests be followed up by (mostly) unedited forum outrage. Only here could a collective voice of untold subscriptions shake the foundations of a multimillion dollar corporation in another country. The BackstoryFor years the CSM has been a fruitless band of individuals that spoke much and achieved very little. As the years past and the frustration of the players mounted, most of the parts of EVE that were being ignored... went ignored by the rest of us. But when the straw broke the camels back, the players finally reacted. And through the efforts of the players, CCP was forced to listen and in doing so, IMHO preserved the game that they created for many years to come. A Final WordI just wanted to through that out there, for the sake of all of those out there who helped make this change. Masked beneath "you hate goons" and "CSM emergency... blah blah" and all the rest of the propaganda that floods these forums, is a unique community that can inspire change that not only effects a digital universe, but the real universe as well. Without YOU none of this would have happened. It was a hard transition, but you may have saved EVE online in such a way that it can now proceed into the next decade. That transcends all in game politics, the CSM and anything else that people might come up with. * Eternum bows to the player base, thx CCP and then flips the CSM the finger.

What do you goons need nerfed now ?  |

Maelle LuzArdiden
University of Caille Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 09:10:00 -
[62] - Quote
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: Actually as soon as a lone-wolf type reached the point of having its own clients to vote for him he no longer would be lone-wolf and would represent a guy wih a lot of clients to please. Preferably clients from nullsec. Preferably close to the uber-alliances. Preferably the kind of CSM we got now, who are asisting your company into flipping the bird to hiseccers, soloers, casuals and very specially those who hoped you (eventually) were true about Incarna and instead got four closets and have been waiting for two bloody months and 2,000 messages that you deign yourselves to say anything on WiS.
As far as we know, WiS was not on the table this december. That's nice. But now grow some balls and tell us you no longer want to think on WiS and so we can carry on and do whatever we see suit to do with whatever gameplay you will give to nullsecers, griefers, gankers and the rest of your First Class customers.
All cool and stuff, but you realize that "flipping the finger to soloers" is not actually true or real outside your imagination?
|

Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
236
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 09:13:00 -
[63] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:.... Please exclude me from that statement, I did not participate in the tantrum for I am an enlightened, civilized being. Most of my time (when I was not rolling around laughing at the stupidity unfolding), I was trying to help the irrationals come to terms with their delusions and misinterpretations of communiques. I did rage, but it was a private affair and happened approximately "18 MonthsGäó" prior to Incarna .. when BitterVetGäó syndrome kicked my teeth in and I could see Eve and CCPs direction for what it was under the shiny veneer.
The reason why CCP caved so readily has more to do with subs disappearing and that for the first time in ages taking a look at what they were doing as a whole .. the hate mongering and Jita crap likely had zero impact.
PS: You should not be embarrassed about hating Goons, the few redeeming qualities they possess are the proverbial drops in an ocean of crap that is the Goon. Wear it as a badge! PPS: The community failed .. HARD. It proved that it is every bit an illiterate bunch of lemmings as any other community in the world. Sorry for being the one to break it to you, but take it a look at the sequence of events and show me where/how I am wrong in that assessment. |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
1277
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 12:40:00 -
[64] - Quote
Ciar Meara wrote:I have no issue with the CSM doing what they where supposed do, they did jump on the bandwagon eventually, although it took a little time and prodding from the masses to get them to take that last step.
Well, sometimes we are a bit ahead of the curve. You will recall CSM5 and the infamous public letter (which I'm told got us called "terrorists" by some people at CCP, and was the subject of much criticism during the CSM6 elections).
The problem with being a canary in the coalmines is that you're usually the first to die... 
CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism! CSM 6 Activities Summary | My CSM blog |

Eternum Praetorian
Club Bear
289
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 12:53:00 -
[65] - Quote
Hirana Yoshida wrote:The community failed .. HARD. It proved that it is every bit an illiterate bunch of lemmings as any other community in the world. Sorry for being the one to break it to you, but take it a look at the sequence of events and show me where/how I am wrong in that assessment.
As stated, you can only get away with this kind of fabricated stupidity on the internet. I don't really have the time or inclination to give you a play by play. If you were not here to see it, or if you are to dumb/deluded to understand it, then no amount of words will convince you of your in ability to perceive said events.
Maybe you should run for CSM, your condescending tone and delusional state of mind would make you blend in perfectly. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|

Eternum Praetorian
Club Bear
289
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 13:01:00 -
[66] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Ciar Meara wrote:I have no issue with the CSM doing what they where supposed do, they did jump on the bandwagon eventually, although it took a little time and prodding from the masses to get them to take that last step. Well, sometimes we are a bit ahead of the curve. You will recall CSM5 and the infamous public letter (which I'm told got us called "terrorists" by some people at CCP, and was the subject of much criticism during the CSM6 elections). The problem with being a canary in the coalmines is that you're usually the first to die... 
Trebor Daehdoow, I am thinking of running for CSM. Here is my planned course of action... can you give me a second opinion?
Step 1. I will join a large alliance since that is a prerequisite Step 2. I will gain a leadership role in said alliance, or attain popularity through wealth, FC'ing or RMT Step 3. If I cannot attain a leadership role, I will do my best to convince the leaders of the alliance that I will represent the interests of said leadership. Step 4. I will asked said alliance (and allies) to vote for me. Step 5. I will use my easily acquired nullsec wealth (and general influence in game) to have multiple account holders vote for me. I have a few friends already who own several accounts per person. Step 6. I will use my acquired nullsec wealth to purchase new accounts with Plex, and help others do the same with said wealth. This will amplify the votes in my favor even more. If I have a leadership role (as I plan to) I can use alliance assets numbered in billions and trillions of isk to create even more temporary accounts, thus assuring my CSM seat.
That is the correct way to get voted into the CSM right? Did I miss anything? Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|

Indahmawar Fazmarai
The I and F Taxation Trust
171
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 15:18:00 -
[67] - Quote
Maelle LuzArdiden wrote:Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: Actually as soon as a lone-wolf type reached the point of having its own clients to vote for him he no longer would be lone-wolf and would represent a guy wih a lot of clients to please. Preferably clients from nullsec. Preferably close to the uber-alliances. Preferably the kind of CSM we got now, who are asisting your company into flipping the bird to hiseccers, soloers, casuals and very specially those who hoped you (eventually) were true about Incarna and instead got four closets and have been waiting for two bloody months and 2,000 messages that you deign yourselves to say anything on WiS.
As far as we know, WiS was not on the table this december. That's nice. But now grow some balls and tell us you no longer want to think on WiS and so we can carry on and do whatever we see suit to do with whatever gameplay you will give to nullsecers, griefers, gankers and the rest of your First Class customers.
All cool and stuff, but you realize that "flipping the finger to soloers" is not actually true or real outside your imagination?
It's a rude approach to CCP's factual policy of making life easier to uberalliances and fuk/ignore everybody else.
I've had fun in this game for three years, but when has come the time to look for something else to do... there was nothing left to do.
Because, OMG, I dare to play solo on a casual schedule (got a life, nonetheless) and sincerely don't see any fun in losing my hardly earned stuff to whatever flock of idiots come to bully me.
Yes, i should be playing X3 instead of EVE.
And I AM playing X3, again.
Just I miss having a 3D avatar, which has been the ultimate reason why I leave the game now and not with the Incarna disaster. (Not quiting completely, as this account, silly me, was pre-paid until April... so i'll keep bouncing around these forums for a while). |

Professor Alphane
Alphane Research Co-operative
197
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 15:57:00 -
[68] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Professor Alphane wrote:Effective in what way, have you any evidence to support this, how would crucible be any difffrent without the CSM? There is the very real probability that Eve wouldn't have survived to produce the Crucible expansion without the intervention of the current CSM. I think you actually believe that sadly enough CCP was happy to basically ignore the entire playerbase until people started canceling their accounts in great numbers and even then they didn't really grasp what the problems were until the emergency CSM meeting they had over the summer. Oh yes CCP are blind and deaf and needed someone to tell them again what everybody was screaming about. 'The emergenct summit turned things around', Well I ask you ever had the wool pulled over your eyes, it was PR stunt by CCP in a desperate attempt to communicate to the playerbase they are interested in our concerns, no more no less, just a propaganda excerciseBut for some more concrete examples you can thank the CSM for jump bridges not being foolishly removed from the game, supercaps finally getting a balance pass, an actual plan to fix some of the glaring problems with the Dominion sov system, CCP backing away from selling gold ships and ammo through RMT and a bunch of smaller "quality of life" issues that they have been championing since their term started. Or CCP could have polled the playerbase as an entriety and done the same thing, this doesn't justify the CSM or prove it's effectivnessI get that some people don't like Goons and hate to see us succeed but keep in mind that there are only two Goons on the CSM and when I say that CSM6 has been the most effective CSM in history I mean all of them--not just Mittens and Vile Rat. Get over yourself nothing to do with goons, it's to do with establishing a political structure when one wasn't needed and infact having one is detremental to the impartiality and overall effectiveness of the concept of a small focus group.
As I say nothing to do with Goons, can't remeber the context but I remeber someone mentioning EVE Uni using block voting to get something done or get someone elected, thats just as corrupt IMO as anyhting you seem to think I'm accusing the Goons of doing.
And while my opinion of goons ain't changed becaue 'thats how you roll' , this isn't about that it's about stupidity on CCP's part, lack of forethought, and basic laziness (oh lets create a focus group rather than going through the effort of actually finding out who thinks what and in what proportions across the entirety of the population of New Eden).
'CSM 6 is the best CSM ever' doesn't justify CSM's exsistance or make CCP's mistakes in this any less IMO.
YOU MUST THINK FIRST.... |

Kelsi Corynn
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
29
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 17:21:00 -
[69] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:I have 2 accounts and so I get 2 votes. Do you know how many people in nullsec have more then just 2? People were activating dead accounts, and buying accounts with plexes just to game the CSM vote. Why do you think that there are Pandemic and Goon CSM's? Coincidence? Nope. Wealthy alliances that are not only large, they also have many multiple account owners (like 4,5,6 accounts and more)
Guess what that means for the ordinary, run of the mill single account holder who only gets 1 vote?
20 people with 2 accounts can submit 40 votes That means that twice as many single account holders have to vote for it to break even (let alone have their choice win the CSM chair)
Ahh okay, I understand your point. However, what alternative to 1 account = 1 vote would CCP be able to reliably enforce? Isn't having multiple account holders getting that many votes just an extension of the degree to which they're invested in the game with their time or money? Also, block voting happens in every democracy, as does the leveraging of wealth or affiliations to command votes. Keep in mind that the voter turnout for CSM 6 was a record high, at only 14.25% of active subscriptions. While resubbing shenanigans might account for some votes, it is very minor compared to what more effective campaigning might yield. |

Eternum Praetorian
Club Bear
290
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 17:36:00 -
[70] - Quote
Kelsi Corynn wrote: While resubbing shenanigans might account for some votes, it is very minor compared to what more effective campaigning might yield.
Because of said Shenanigans, and because of the general low opinion of the CSM universal-wide, the other 86% of people don't feel like voting will matter. So they do not. 14% is not allot, and those 14% generate a small group of elected CSM's that gamed the system to a significant degree. Those people are supposed to represent 100% of people and that is just stupid.
CCP needs to stop being lazy and gather the information they need internally, and they need to do so for the bettering of their business. Better management of the changes they were trying to add into EVE Online, and better foresight through gathering the correct information from the general player base, would have yielded positive results for their investments into Incarna.
The CSM is a marketing gimmick and that is fine, but we need something more tangible in the grand scheme of things. Let them fly shlubs to Iceland if they want to, so long as they have something more legitimate behind the scenes collecting real information and gathering hard data. Every company does this, so I don't understand why here in EVE it is "revolutionary and absurd rocket science"
I mean ****... Dev's can randomly PM people in game and ask them a few questions. What they like and dislike, and what they wish that they could add into the game. 99% of people would respond to an actual GM Happily. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|

Taedrin
Kushan Industrial
307
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 17:54:00 -
[71] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:Thanks to CSM6 the most effective CSM ever.
Most effective? Completely and totally false. If CSM6 were the most effective then the Summer of Rage wouldn't have happened. CSM6 was simply the most public, which is still to their credit. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1418
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 22:53:00 -
[72] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Because of said Shenanigans, and because of the general low opinion of the CSM universal-wide, the other 86% of people don't feel like voting will matter. So they do not. 14% is not allot, and those 14% generate a small group of elected CSM's that gamed the system to a significant degree. Those people are supposed to represent 100% of people and that is just stupid. Then it sounds like you should be putting your energy towards getting more people to vote. That would be much more productive than making passive aggressive threads about the CSM because you hate Goons.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1418
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 22:55:00 -
[73] - Quote
Taedrin wrote:Ladie Harlot wrote:Thanks to CSM6 the most effective CSM ever. Most effective? Completely and totally false. If CSM6 were the most effective then the Summer of Rage wouldn't have happened. CSM6 was simply the most public, which is still to their credit. If you go back and read the CSM minutes you'll see clearly that CCP caused the summer of rage by ignoring CSM6.
The CSM has zero power to change anything that CCP does. They don't have the ability to say "You're being dumb so you need to stop" and have CCP do it. The reason they have been so effective is because they have used what power they *do* have (namely the ability to publicly shame CCP into action) to help CCP right the wrongs and fix the game. The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |

Professor Alphane
Alphane Research Co-operative
198
|
Posted - 2012.01.05 23:11:00 -
[74] - Quote
So let me get this straight CCP ignored CSM6 exactly like they ignored the community as a whole.
Then CSM6's kicked up a fuss, exactly like the community as a whole.
CCP relented and it's all because of CSM6's great work. 
Blinkered view point much.
I'd sit down if I where you . If you 'spin' anymore you'll get dizzy and fall over 
YOU MUST THINK FIRST.... |

P42ALPHA
DEAD-ON
31
|
Posted - 2012.01.06 00:02:00 -
[75] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:CCP Navigator wrote:As someone who has interacted with the CSM on many occasions I am not sure that the sentiments in the OP are just. Every CSM I have worked with have been productive, helpful and have worked to ensure that player concerns are addressed and fixed. Calling them a fruitless band of individuals is more than unfair.
Still, elections will be coming up in the next few weeks for the CSM so perhaps you can shift that focus, run a strong campaign and be a really good CSM member. Naturally, it is always easy to throw stones at a glass house. Try coming into the house instead and actually affect change. Try getting them to represent themselves the same way when interacting with the general player base. Seriously, it would go a looooong way in terms of restoring the CSM name in the eyes of everyone else. While in the CSM chair, they are representing your company to the rest of the world.
Time to be quiet now. You are pooping some nasty crap out of that mouth. "All hail Wang ... the little fella in Command. When 'trouble' starts to spread, I'm sure he will rise to the occasion."
Azahni Vah'nos (Best reply ever) |

Eternum Praetorian
Club Bear
291
|
Posted - 2012.01.06 00:06:00 -
[76] - Quote
P42ALPHA wrote:Try getting them to represent themselves the same way when interacting with the general player base. Seriously, it would go a looooong way in terms of restoring the CSM name in the eyes of everyone else. While in the CSM chair, they are representing your company to the rest of the world.
Time to be quiet now. You are pooping some nasty crap out of that mouth.
Yes... what an absurd concept... You're like daft aren't you? Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|

Brujo Loco
Brujeria Teologica
295
|
Posted - 2012.01.06 01:34:00 -
[77] - Quote
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:Thank CCP not yet ,they may be listening to those idiots. Thinking they represent the whole playerbase
Yeah thanking them for not mucking up the game anymore after the REAL userbase (not the forum posting one) decided to speak with their wallets.
This reminds me of the moment when Salvador Dali was hit by a taxi car in Paris and after finding out he was uninjured except for a few bruises, promptly faced the taxi driver and paid him with some bills and thanked him and everyone was confused and he said "I paid him and thanked him for not killing me".
Yep, thats how I see your thanks. 
Don't want to sound mean, and I have tantalizingly approved Crucible before in a note of optimism, but when I see back at how Crucible came to happen, it loses a lot of its glow. Yes it's good, no, WAS good, but so far, CCP seems prone still to fall for the same lame ploys of before.
They have a huge road ahead and we need to remind them where they are now and WHY.
All in all, I SOMEWHAT agree with your ... thanks to them, just a bit. Inner Sayings of BrujoLoco: http://eve-files.com/sig/brujoloco |

Hainnz
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
42
|
Posted - 2012.01.06 02:41:00 -
[78] - Quote
Why worry about CSM anyway? Players ultimately vote with their wallets. Don't get emotionally invested in this (or any online game). If it's fun, play. If it stops being fun, stop playing it. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |