Originally by: Jagaroth

---

Originally by: Le Skunk

---

Originally by: Korad Konstentyn

---

Hi, Jenny
you bought your account, from someone we liked;

---

My god do people still believe this?

SKUNK

---

Yes.
Tried and tested.
Example (real Jen would know answer, false Jen won't answer at all) question:
"What would be your processor of choice?"

---

Originally by: Le Skunk

---

Balls. The 'new' jenny is ofc the old jenny. just trolling form a different angle. And indeed doing quite well at it.
SKUNK

---

Originally by: Jagaroth

---

Originally by: Le Skunk

---

Balls. The 'new' jenny is ofc the old jenny. just trolling form a different angle. And indeed doing quite well at it.
SKUNK

---

I'll believe that when I see the correct answer.

---

Quote:

---

wall of lulz

---

Originally by: Morn Judith

---

Dear "new"-Jenny. Play the game, get some experience, know what you're talking about, or leave us all alone.

---

Originally by: Crumplecorn

---

Originally by: Jagaroth

---

Originally by: Le Skunk

---

Balls. The 'new' jenny is ofc the old jenny. just trolling form a different angle. And indeed doing quite well at it.
SKUNK

---

I'll believe that when I see the correct answer.

---

Why would the old jenny answer when not answering promotes the idea of a 'new' jenny?

Faulty test is faulty.

---

Originally by: Jenny Spitfire

---

... a bit overpowered and imbalanced?

I am asking fellow pilots of this honest and noble community because I feel command ships are overpowered and imbalanced. I have heard and seen most pilots who are successful in their combat engagements usually have better kill : death ratio when they are flying command ships. If they fly non-command ships then their death : kill ratio would be higher.

What do you community think, are my observations accurate and precise? Please tell me your success stories with command ships.

---

Originally by: Goumindong

---

Edited by: Goumindong on 25/11/2007 18:36:31
Edited by: Goumindong on 25/11/2007 18:29:12

Originally by: Stitcher

---

I think your best bet at this point is to bring forward some more solid combat evidence than just "Command Ship pilots have a better kill/death ratio" to prove your point. It's my experience that command ships are rarely chosen as primary targets, because there's usually something more important and more fragile out there to deal with first.

---

Command ships have terrible/hood DPS/Hit Point ratios depending on how you look at it.

When calling primaries you want to call ships which have high DPS and low hit points first[and that your entire gang can get to]. So that these ships will die fast and the majoirty of the opponents DPS dies quicker. This means battlecruisers/Cruiesr/HAcs top the list then Battleships, then Command ships.

For instance going up against a gang of

"Thorax, Rupture, Harbinger, Abaddon, Astarte". With a similar sized gang you would want to call the Thorax, Rupture, Harbinger, Abaddon/Astarte in that order.

The thorax will be doing between 350-650 dps and will have between 12,000 and 25,000 hit points.

The Harbinger will be doing between 600-800 dps and will have between 42,000 and 59,000 hit points.

The Rupture will be doing between 300 and 600 dps and will have between 12,000 and 25,000 hit points.

The Astarte will be doing Between 600 and 1000 dps and will have between 50,000 and 70,000 hit points with a strong rep tank.

The Abaddon will have some 1000 dps and 140k hit points.

[All numbers assuming optimal hp/tank setups ingoring repair units and using damage drones]

As such the best way to attack this gang is to ewar the Abaddon, Astarte, Harbinger, Thorax, Rupture, in that order[depending on ewar availability of course, a BB does better primarying the harbinger, astarte, abaddon while jamming the rupture and thorax, TDs move the Harbinger in front of the astarte for ewar and after for primary and damps work in the manner above]. And primary the Thorax, Rupture, Harbinger, Astarte, Abaddon in that order. Even when the Astarte is very gank oriented it doesnt make sense to primary it in small gangs.

What this means is that as things go lopsided, the ships that are most likely to live are the Abaddon and Astarte... BUT the Abaddon is really slow, and the Astarte is not. Does it make the command ship overpowered? No, it just means that its not a good ship to shoot first in a gang since it is likely to have a lot of hit points and tank relative to its DPS capabilites.

Fleets its a bit different, you have so much DPS the primary thing that keeps you from killing things is locking time and tracking. So you go after the battleships first.

---

Originally by: Jenny Spitfire

---

... a bit overpowered and imbalanced?

---

Originally by: Surfin's PlunderBunny

---

New Jenny takes more crap than I do... and doesn't get into bitter arguements. I'm starting to like New Jenny, granted carebear as hell, but still

---

Originally by: Xtro 2

---

i have said in a few older posts before that command ships are nothign liek what their meant to be, they are meant to be ships that give gang bonus's and can take a bit of a pounding, instead they are simply better versions of HAC's in every way.

Command ships should be nerfed so they can only field utility modules in their highslots or small weaponry, if not they should be renamed to what they currently are, "Heavy Assault BattleCruisers".

---

Originally by: Jenny Spitfire

---

Scott, it is called balanced. A balanced game is a good game in my honest opinion. :)

---

Originally by: Jenny Spitfire

---

... a bit overpowered and imbalanced?

I am asking fellow pilots of this honest and noble community because I feel command ships are overpowered and imbalanced. I have heard and seen most pilots who are successful in their combat engagements usually have better kill : death ratio when they are flying command ships. If they fly non-command ships then their death : kill ratio would be higher.

What do you community think, are my observations accurate and precise? Please tell me your success stories with command ships.

---