| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Blind Man
Cosmic Fusion
   |
Posted - 2007.12.26 18:10:00 -
[31]
umm nerf nerfing? I like the idea of a boost patch and I hope apart from minor things there is no major changes in '08
|
Terraform
Gallente
Gemini Sun
Knights Of the Southerncross
|
Posted - 2007.12.26 18:32:00 -
[32]
Bad Bad Bad idea, all nerfing insurance will do is making people play it more safe, and not PvP nearly as much. The blob will be even more common and lots of people will move directly to high-sec. for security.
I vote no!
|
Insidi Us
Amarr
Suicidal Mercenaries
Pure.
|
Posted - 2007.12.26 18:58:00 -
[33]
Can we move beyond the OP's suggestion? He's been flamed enough.
My most-wanted nerf of 2008: Ban the words Risk and Reward from the forums and game.
-------------
RIP Constructive Criticism |
Elmicker
|
Posted - 2007.12.26 18:59:00 -
[34]
Edited by: Elmicker on 26/12/2007 19:00:33
 Originally by: Insidi Us
My most-wanted nerf of 2008: Ban the words Risk and Reward from the forums and game.
Nah, those words have an actual application. It's the words "adapt or die", when used with no other content that need to be banned.
As for the insurance suggestion: It's horrible. Removing insurance would just make big-ship PvP (BSes, Capitals) for personal multibillionaires only. They're the ones who dont bother to insure their ships anyway so don't give a monkies. Insurance is for those who rely on ****ty incomes like missions and npcing, to ease the blow of losing a bigger ship. It's needed.
|
Auron Shadowbane
Pelennor Swarm
|
Posted - 2007.12.26 19:12:00 -
[35]
most wanted nerf:
nerf forum whiners influence
most wanted buff:
buf racial strenghts & differences so crosstraining is more important if you want to be versatile (by switching to different race's ships).
make races as different as in starcraft, not as in age of empires...
|
Verone
Veto.
Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2007.12.26 19:34:00 -
[36]
One character per account.
It'd solve quite a few problems.
>>> TRIBUTE TO A FALLEN WINGMAN <<<
|
Taua Roqa
Minmatar
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2007.12.26 19:46:00 -
[37]
ideally an ingenious ban on alts. yes the game can lag absurdly and it has annoying bugs and that you can't change the warpsound/jump volume independantly makes me run the game with no sound etc....but alts just are this self perpetuating crapfest, you meta and gain an advantage or you dont and are at a 'disadvantage' so its quickly no longer meta but 'the done thing' as loads of people have more than 2 accounts even. It feels very ungamelike is what i'm trying to say.
of course it would only slash ccp's revenue by 103% and make the remaining -3% of players cancel. :rollyeyeballs:
--------------------------------------------
Threads are stacking-nerfed; the more posts you add the less effective those posts are. mooooooo. |
Vitrael
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2007.12.26 20:40:00 -
[38]
Originally by: UGWidowmaker
omg the flames for sugesting a nerf that would actually do somehting to the world of eve.. a way to win wars etc... u guys fails at looking further into the game than your own small carebear wallets..
i did not ask for a flame here.. i sugest a isd clean this crap up and please post constructive.
Congratulations, you've annoyed me straight out of General Discussion for at least a month.
I guess I'm down to Ships & Modules...
|
Vitrael
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2007.12.26 20:40:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Verone
One character per account.
It'd solve quite a few problems.
More like infinite characters per account, ONE EVE CLIENT RUNNING AT ANY ONE TIME.
|
Alz Shado
Ever Flow
Knights Of the Southerncross
|
Posted - 2007.12.26 20:46:00 -
[40]
The only thing that should reduce your insurance is your sec status.
The real nerf of 08 will be More Logistics Nightmares. We've only seen the tip of the iceburg with the Compression nerf that made transport ships useless, Carrier and Rorqual nerfs, 6b isk Jumphaulers, more POS management headaches...
The Amarr think they have it bad -- they don't have anything compared to the Industrialist.
CCP wants chaos, they'll get chaos. You'll see.
|
|
|
Don ZOLA
Caldari
Omniscient Order
|
Posted - 2007.12.27 11:04:00 -
[41]
Edited by: Don ZOLA on 27/12/2007 11:04:15
any kind of speed/nano setups. i hate that****gotry.
local chat.
alt posting - only char with most sp on acc should be allowed to post. or some other way which could sort them out.
nerf lag :|
nerf non competent GM`s too...
edit: spelling :/
|
Cagot
Gallente
Arcanus
|
Posted - 2007.12.27 11:42:00 -
[42]
Why not get rid of insurance altogether, except for protecting newbies from doing something stupid?
My idea: only characters less than two months old can insure a ship. The ship stays insured as long as the insurance policy runs, but no new policies after that period.
|
Speed Addict
|
Posted - 2007.12.27 11:50:00 -
[43]
most wanted nerf will be imune-nerf
affects every corp that wants to dec an other corp because of the warcost against an alliance
- - -
Hi Speed Devil You are receiving this notice to inform you that your posting privileges have now been permanently terminated.
now don't blame me for altposting :( |
Ironnight
Caldari
x13
|
Posted - 2007.12.27 11:57:00 -
[44]
Petition nerf, to save bandwidth, they will stop sending the Seemingly automated message "Our logs shows no errors on our servers, so s**** you, dont pvp".
The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est
Pro patria mori. |
Pesadel0
Vagabundos
|
Posted - 2007.12.27 12:04:00 -
[45]
Originally by: Franga
Explain to me what getting rid of insurance payouts to people who venture outside of empire would actually 'do' for the game?
Basically people in low-sec and 0.0 would actually "die" economicly,people would just kamikaze because they would feel the pain.In 0.0 it shouldnŠt even had insurence,IF you want to build empires you should be able to destroy them economilly and financlly.
Basically 0.0 would change and to a point low-sec too,but i donŠt see CCP doing the jump,because basically we are full off carebears now.
|
The Djego
Minmatar
FORTES FORTUNA ADIUVAT CORP.
Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2007.12.27 12:06:00 -
[46]
Originally by: Don ZOLA
Edited by: Don ZOLA on 27/12/2007 11:04:15
any kind of speed/nano setups. i hate that****gotry.
alt posting - only char with most sp on acc should be allowed to post. or some other way which could sort them out.
This
----
Nerf Tank - Boost Gank! [x)] |
Desh Craven
|
Posted - 2007.12.27 12:52:00 -
[47]
Edited by: Desh Craven on 27/12/2007 12:52:40
Thoughs from a new player regarding ship insurance.
A healthy economical system would ensure that there
would be no need for insurance at < 0.5. If the gains
can outweight the losses, then people would go to lowsecs,
regardless of potentially losing their 150 ISK million ship along with it's 300 mil ISK upgrades.
ISK and items coming out from thin air in terms of insurances etc., doesn't increase the depth of the game experience from my point of view.
Insurance should be no more than a way for protecting noobsters like me in the Empire space, until i got the some hang of the game.
I just fail to see that capical ships should be taken for granted through the insurane systems free ISK. Well, equipment does cost i agree, but seeing the amount of battleships flying around, it obviously doesn't cost that much.
Would you accept a world of EVE where you could lose your 300 mil worth ship down to every last penny? But in a world where you could potentially earn so much ISK that you could sustain that kind of losses, and still make profit? I would. It would definetily bring more excitement to my gaming experience.
Insurances and too large monetary rewards from NPCs reduce player interaction, and make the game a solitaire. The way i see, EVE should be about going out there, earning the ISK and getting the satisfaction through "job well done".
I hear people saying that mining in lowsec isn't just smart, because of too much pirates. Should there be actually be ISK to be made in there, people would go there even without insurance. Economics in this game between Empire and < 0.5 systems apparently don't go properly in relation.
|
SsjGhost
|
Posted - 2007.12.27 13:09:00 -
[48]
Nerf my girlfriend,
"I'll play as long as i bloody like!"
|
Arron S
Gallente
Rampage Eternal
Ka-Tet
|
Posted - 2007.12.27 13:15:00 -
[49]
Nerf the nerf bat.
And Nerf the guy who started the Carrier scare.
signature removed - please email us to find out why (include a link to the image URL) - Jacques([email protected])
|
Corpse Mage
|
Posted - 2007.12.27 23:23:00 -
[50]
nano-nerf ofc
|
|
|
Abrazzar
|
Posted - 2007.12.27 23:37:00 -
[51]
Next nerf: Heavy Interdictors.
Have fun while it lasts.
|
Khatred
Fluffy Mungoose
Guinea Pigs
|
Posted - 2007.12.27 23:46:00 -
[52]
I think the server hamsters are due to see some nerfs in the incoming year. Nothing serious tough, they will recover.
|
ProjectSeven
Rulers Of Mankind
Knights Of the Southerncross
|
Posted - 2007.12.27 23:51:00 -
[53]
hmm instead of the forum sensors can we just get a "sage goes in every field" system?
|
Swarmm
|
Posted - 2007.12.28 05:55:00 -
[54]
Seeing as we're on the topic of insurance,
How about being able to insure mods and rigs, that would be nice. Or if someone is flagged for can stealing or suicide ganking they loose insurance?
|
shinsushi
|
Posted - 2007.12.28 06:05:00 -
[55]
Originally by: Verone
One character per account.
It'd solve quite a few problems.
Ironic that this is getting quoted by an alt created specifically to troll forums, but
QFT
An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. |
Dufas
Amarr
Reikoku
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.12.28 06:51:00 -
[56]
I'd nerf every goon from posting on the corp forums 
----------------------------------------
|
Yazoul Samaiel
Caldari
Sharks With Frickin' Laser Beams
Mercenary Coalition
|
Posted - 2007.12.28 08:16:00 -
[57]
Nerf blobs
Then nerf blobs again
And after that nerf them again and again and again 
|
Winters Chill
Amarr
Dark-Rising
|
Posted - 2007.12.28 10:56:00 -
[58]
I don't think the OP thought this one through. That nerf would affect all aspects of the player base negatively; esp pirates and combat addicted players.
|
Lagar
Caldari
Core Domination
|
Posted - 2007.12.28 11:15:00 -
[59]
eum.. the only thing that can come out of this is that some players will leave 0.0 space beceause they will not risk exesive costs for fielding some of the more expencive ships.
this will not apply to everyone in 0.0 space but it will effect the number of people there in general..
it's much better actualy having the curent system due to the fact that it encurages people to actualy risk their ship more than they otherwise might have dared to.
and if they realy like an advanture they should take a T2 ship.
more risk but if handled correctly much more effective against other players and thus more fun 
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |