Originally by: dastommy79

---

Today gentelmen, we are about to embark on a long and dangerouse path. This was deemed necesary by us all. The reason for this aggression is simple...

Wesley Baird must be removed from Tri and placed in a Smashkill allied corp. All combat operations will cease when this objective is met. After the disbanding of MDK, we called dibs on Wesley but tri stole him from us. We want him with us. THat is all

---

Originally by: Sidewayzracer

---

Also Darknesss is my alt

---

Originally by: Nhoj Sllew

---

this one

---

Originally by: Graalum

---

Originally by: Sidewayzracer

---

Also Darknesss is my alt

---

me too, you wanna make out?

---

Originally by: dastommy79

---

Today gentelmen, we are about to embark on a long and dangerouse path. This was deemed necesary by us all. The reason for this aggression is simple...

Wesley Baird must be removed from Tri and placed in a Smashkill allied corp. All combat operations will cease when this objective is met. After the disbanding of MDK, we called dibs on Wesley but tri stole him from us. We want him with us. THat is all

---

Originally by: cas0

---

nice fight im watching it in my ship... well iv ben 1% str for like 20 min now lol funny thing is i have over 30fps

---

Originally by: Jebidus Skari

---

CCP YOU SUCK - seriously i need to vent

fleet battles are UNPLAYABLE in eve - FACT = CCP FAIL - EVE FAIL!!

Sick to death going into these battles only to be killed by lag, its a joke and a **** take.!!!

---

Originally by: Jebidus Skari

---

CCP YOU SUCK - seriously i need to vent

fleet battles are UNPLAYABLE in eve - FACT = CCP FAIL - EVE FAIL!!

Sick to death going into these battles only to be killed by lag, its a joke and a **** take.!!!

---

Originally by: Jebidus Skari

---

CCP YOU SUCK - seriously i need to vent

fleet battles are UNPLAYABLE in eve - FACT = CCP FAIL - EVE FAIL!!

Sick to death going into these battles only to be killed by lag, its a joke and a **** take.!!!

---

Originally by: Jebidus Skari

---

CCP YOU SUCK - seriously i need to vent

fleet battles are UNPLAYABLE in eve - FACT = CCP FAIL - EVE FAIL!!

Sick to death going into these battles only to be killed by lag, its a joke and a **** take.!!!

---

Originally by: Lee ChanKa

---

EPIC FIGHT!!! after HOURS looking who will atack who(no mater at all) FIGHT START I WARP LOAD 10 MIN FOR HOSTILE SHIPS....after thet im in half burning wreck..but ehej i see now battle//whoo kill me how i dont know but it was GF im now waching mine pod and cant do nothing EPIC EPIC!!

gf 2 all sides i love this game i must go in all ******* fleets call me or maill me who ever make fleet because i love this !!

2 future i hope it will be more epicly so fleets dont nead 2 faind each other node can crash 2 jumps before start fight thet will be bether option!!!

P.S. who ever write petention for ship i know the answer so i hope you will not get it back

---

Originally by: Rooster

---

game crashed and haven't been able to get past the "Entering game as Rooster..." for the last 20 minutes.

When are fleet battles in EVE going to actually work?

---

Originally by: Kenion

---

Edited by: Kenion on 11/02/2008 01:59:34

Originally by: Rooster

---

game crashed and haven't been able to get past the "Entering game as Rooster..." for the last 20 minutes.

When are fleet battles in EVE going to actually work?

---

Welcome to our world. But seriously, I've been trying to get into game for 40min now.

You know I can see frapsed material from BoB vs Goon where 700 people can be in one system fighting. But its like 250 or something in local and its lagging everyone BADLY.
Thx ccp for this unplayable evening.

---

Originally by: dormy

---

Fun to watch your ship go down very slowly without being able to do anything... Fleet battles fail..

great game otherwise

---

Originally by: consider telos

---

Same. I got into system started fight then crashed. I've been to the shop and had something to eat. Fights still going on. Hopefully more ppl (smashkill and friends ) die so I can get in.

---

Originally by: Virtuoso DeToure

---

Sounds like the North is getting to experience what the South has been dealing with for the past year and a half. >.<

---

Originally by: XxAngelxX

---

I warped out from the gate twice....go me!


...Then I died to npcs in a belt.

---

Originally by: Destr0math

---

Edited by: Destr0math on 11/02/2008 02:38:50
i can proudly say i shot one guy over the course of about an hour


**** yea

gf atlasmashkill

---

Originally by: CCP Atropos

---

Pure hell for EVE? I don't find that many issues with server performance when I play.

Additionally, the press release states that EVE is going to be available to download through Steam.

This doesn't mean that the server is going to explode with new users overnight, so you don't have much to worry about in terms of a sudden drop in performance.

We're constantly aiming to improve the server performance and we are working on doing just that. We can't trickle improvements in, one piece at a time, since this results in a continuous maintenance period for TQ, denying people the ability to play. As such, the performance of the server will stay as it is until such a time as we do roll out an update.

It will happen, that I can guarantee you, and as a gesture of good faith, I give you the projected time of arrival as SoonÖ.

---

Originally by: Oveur

---

Eve is primarily a PVP game and hence our focus is on making that experience balanced.

---

Originally by: The Pharcyde

---

I think we just decimated your capfleet and support fleet after being smacked in game and on the forum from you guys for like a month now, so we will just go ahead and spin this as a victory I'm thinking .

---

Originally by: Tonkin

---

LOL WE JUMPED IN WE BRAVED THE LAG, you camped the gate u had fighters out bubbles the lot.

and we still jumped in.


ITS EASY you do it next time ffs

---

Originally by: Azmat

---

Originally by: touchvill

---

I feel somewhat annoyed that you refused to come and do the job you set out to so was pleased to see we was leeroying in. Took ages to get into systema nd even longer to try and get targets locked down, however had you came and fought us how you planned we wouldn't be swimming in the cap kills so it's bittersweet I say!

Paper Tigers we are.

Nice fight Smash, if only it was a little more smooth!

---

you call that a leeroy looool..

for a fact having more caps (certainly more moms) and more numbers what a leeroy..
slight advantage on our side you have to jump in on us, there it stops..we staid put and fought... lets keep it there

nevertheless except for this clueless troll, gf to tri

---

Originally by: Tonkin

---

LOL WE JUMPED IN WE BRAVED THE LAG, you camped the gate u had fighters out bubbles the lot.

and we still jumped in.


ITS EASY you do it next time ffs

---

Originally by: touchvill

---

Originally by: Azmat

---

Originally by: touchvill

---

I feel somewhat annoyed that you refused to come and do the job you set out to so was pleased to see we was leeroying in. Took ages to get into systema nd even longer to try and get targets locked down, however had you came and fought us how you planned we wouldn't be swimming in the cap kills so it's bittersweet I say!

Paper Tigers we are.

Nice fight Smash, if only it was a little more smooth!

---

you call that a leeroy looool..

for a fact having more caps (certainly more moms) and more numbers what a leeroy..
slight advantage on our side you have to jump in on us, there it stops..we staid put and fought... lets keep it there

nevertheless except for this clueless troll, gf to tri

---

No you got trapped and died, HUGE difference.

It was a leroy because you had an ass load of caps with fighters out on the gate and we jumped into you. It took many of us about 30 minutes to load.

---

Originally by: Graalum

---

Originally by: touchvill

---

Originally by: Azmat

---

Originally by: touchvill

---

I feel somewhat annoyed that you refused to come and do the job you set out to so was pleased to see we was leeroying in. Took ages to get into systema nd even longer to try and get targets locked down, however had you came and fought us how you planned we wouldn't be swimming in the cap kills so it's bittersweet I say!

Paper Tigers we are.

Nice fight Smash, if only it was a little more smooth!

---

you call that a leeroy looool..

for a fact having more caps (certainly more moms) and more numbers what a leeroy..
slight advantage on our side you have to jump in on us, there it stops..we staid put and fought... lets keep it there

nevertheless except for this clueless troll, gf to tri

---

No you got trapped and died, HUGE difference.

It was a leroy because you had an ass load of caps with fighters out on the gate and we jumped into you. It took many of us about 30 minutes to load.

---

like the other guy said, you jump into an unguarded gate and warped to a grid load, and then warped to us, then our caps warped on you.

---

Originally by: Jogvan

---

Originally by: Tonkin

---

LOL WE JUMPED IN WE BRAVED THE LAG, you camped the gate u had fighters out bubbles the lot.

and we still jumped in.


ITS EASY you do it next time ffs

---

This tbh. We had been waiting since early evening, and Smashkill/Atlas had just been taunting us sitting about 7 jumps from our fleet. Even when we moved into position in the system next door to theirs they didn't jump into us, so finally we went for it and jumped to them.

GF Smashkill/Atlas, and cheers to all the tri guys who stayed awake, I'm sure it's way past normal bedtime for a lot of us

---

Originally by: Aya

---

I warped in and out about 3 times into the grid before it all finally loaded. Instead of sitting their and waiting 1 hour to show targets I just kept entering and exiting grid. After that I had no problems showing targets, just had to deal with about 30 second module lag.

GF but next time I could do without the convos from atlas members smacking the hell out of Tri.

---

Originally by: Graalum

---

since when is it our responsibility to do the jumping in?

---

Originally by: Jesnen

---

We should all petition our losses, but rather than actually try to get reimbursement (since they wont give it) we should just tell them to fu.ck themselves.

---

Originally by: Aya

---

Lets not forget ATF for bringing a very sizable force. Thanks for coming guys, you did good.

---

Originally by: Aypse

---

Edited by: Aypse on 11/02/2008 03:01:42
I find this post reassuring.

Originally by: CCP Atropos

---

Pure hell for EVE? I don't find that many issues with server performance when I play.

Additionally, the press release states that EVE is going to be available to download through Steam.

This doesn't mean that the server is going to explode with new users overnight, so you don't have much to worry about in terms of a sudden drop in performance.

We're constantly aiming to improve the server performance and we are working on doing just that. We can't trickle improvements in, one piece at a time, since this results in a continuous maintenance period for TQ, denying people the ability to play. As such, the performance of the server will stay as it is until such a time as we do roll out an update.

It will happen, that I can guarantee you, and as a gesture of good faith, I give you the projected time of arrival as SoonÖ.

---

Edit: Spent an hour going 5 jumps to get into the fight. Finally loaded grid about 10 minutes after the shooting stopped. Good times.

---

Originally by: Sokata

---

I have a question foe smashkillatlas: you didnt lost enough ships in this smashkillatlas vs TRI?
again gf everyone

---

Originally by: Graalum

---

ship out of control for like 5 mintes, im still reping armor

---

Originally by: Sokata

---

gf everyone
it was a great fight with alot of lag
smashkill said that they were blobed by us.not correct.they had alot of capitals,who are not on any killboard becouse they run when the others capitals started to pop.they had around 50-60 if i am correct and we had arround 40.so indeed it was a good fight(i am on 17 capitals kills with my chimera )
I have a question foe smashkillatlas: you didnt lost enough ships in this smashkillatlas vs TRI?
again gf everyone

---

Originally by: Graalum

---

You guys make us look like schoolgirls.

---

Originally by: Destr0math

---

Originally by: Graalum

---

You guys make us look like schoolgirls.

---

Looking like schoolgirls is not necessarily a bad thing cutie

---

Originally by: touchvill

---

Originally by: Azmat

---

Originally by: touchvill

---

I feel somewhat annoyed that you refused to come and do the job you set out to so was pleased to see we was leeroying in. Took ages to get into systema nd even longer to try and get targets locked down, however had you came and fought us how you planned we wouldn't be swimming in the cap kills so it's bittersweet I say!

Paper Tigers we are.

Nice fight Smash, if only it was a little more smooth!

---

you call that a leeroy looool..

for a fact having more caps (certainly more moms) and more numbers what a leeroy..
slight advantage on our side you have to jump in on us, there it stops..we staid put and fought... lets keep it there

nevertheless except for this clueless troll, gf to tri

---

No you got trapped and died, HUGE difference.

It was a leroy because you had an ass load of caps with fighters out on the gate and we jumped into you. It took many of us about 30 minutes to load.

---

Originally by: Matrixcvd

---

instead of smackin, lets just all fly to iceland and kick the servers with the empire players on it and call shenanigans... seriously, this crap out in 0.0 is garbage, we can all aggree on that. I really felt like canceling the subscript today over how poorly this game played out. And instead of the south, east, west, north turning up in this thread sayin "look what we had to deal with" lets all get together and do somethin! I say lets all go pull of some super ganks in high sec until our demands for good servers are met, lets hold all of empire hostage till they upgrade from x486 and put Pentium II's in....

---

Originally by: MohamedLoftie

---

I went to bed, guess I fail

Well done to both sides, TRI you make me proud ;)

---

Originally by: Gharthak

---

GF to all involved.. Hats off to those who did bring in their cap ships on both sides gutsy on either side.. The victor simply played their cards better.

---

Originally by: Oniko Sengir

---

Bah! I missed it!

Anyone fraps up? or by these reports, more likely anyone got a powerpoint or slideshow of it?

---

Originally by: Ulitmate Warrior

---

So, Is this the end of smashkillz campain or willl they be back for?

---

Originally by: Gods Coldblood

---

I guess i was one of the lucky ones, i was able to fight from the begining till the very end and i had a blast.. I hope this isnt tne end of the campaign for smashkill and co..

---

Originally by: Kenion

---

Originally by: Gods Coldblood

---

I guess i was one of the lucky ones, i was able to fight from the begining till the very end and i had a blast.. I hope this isnt tne end of the campaign for smashkill and co..

---

The only epic about this fight was the epic time I spent seeing nothing.
The end? This is barely the beginning.

---

Originally by: Butter Dog

---

Actually I do have a genuine question about the fight...

Why were the SmashKill carriers mostly fitted with remote shield reps?

Just curious... good for pos repping, not so good for spider repping when great majority of your carriers are native armor tankers... ??

---

Originally by: TOGCoNgO

---

Next time why dont we all got on the same TS server and we all make the sound effects.

Gallente can go dof dof.
Amarr can go Bzzz Bzzz.
Caldari can go Woosh Bang, Woosh Bang.
And Mini's can zoom zoom.

This way we all can at least experience the battle a little bit.

Iam in the future as well. TZ'z take even more fun away

---

Originally by: Koi Yokuma

---

Originally by: TOGCoNgO

---

Next time why dont we all got on the same TS server and we all make the sound effects.

Gallente can go dof dof.
Amarr can go Bzzz Bzzz.
Caldari can go Woosh Bang, Woosh Bang.
And Mini's can zoom zoom.

This way we all can at least experience the battle a little bit.

Iam in the future as well. TZ'z take even more fun away

---

LMFAO!!!!

Might I add that after every 10 sound effects made per a side some one has to self destruct on the opposite side.

---

Originally by: Kraken Kill

---

There were roughly 42 Tri Caps, Roughly 200 in the support fleet.

there was a Trinity or ATF support fleet that came in another gate but those numbers may have been part of the 200 man support fleet.

The RK numbers dropped over time to about 150 support fleet and less than 42 caps but i dont know our exact numbers, i was watching tri smack me in their system.

We knew you were coming so we decided to stay. We saw the moms jump to the interjump system ready to get in place. So we didnt really get trapped. We just wanted a Fight.

We didnt attack in VFK where your gang was because you have a Cyno jammer up there and it doesnt make much sense for us to hit 42 caps with 7 of those being moms with a BS fleet- thats about 450 Fighters.
+ that 200 man support fleet.

Anyway it was a moon mining training op ok?

We learned we needed more Rorquals.

---

Originally by: Wesley Baird

---

If you include ATF, our caps etc, our total gang was less than 150...in fact not even close...local never went above 300...so your numbers are off.

---

Originally by: RaV1N

---

Edited by: RaV1N on 11/02/2008 15:09:16
Hmmm that is interesting, taking a look at your kb and not counting people listed twice for your fleet (and friends) counted around 180 for the battle and counting RK ( and friends) we had around 130 for the battle.

You list 37 caps and 2 super caps, we list 22 caps and no super caps....just going by your kb because we know your is more accurate than ours.

GF to Tri though damn TZ ffs

Edit: that should tell you something about the lag enjoyed by all, let the lord of chaos (lag) rule

---

Originally by: RaV1N

---

Hmmm that is interesting, taking a look at your kb and not counting people listed twice for your fleet (and friends) counted around 180 for the battle and counting RK ( and friends) we had around 130 for the battle.

You list 37 caps and 2 super caps, we list 22 caps and no super caps....just going by your kb because we know your is more accurate than ours.

GF to Tri though damn TZ ffs

---

Originally by: Wesley Baird

---

Edited by: Wesley Baird on 11/02/2008 15:01:47

Originally by: Kraken Kill

---

There were roughly 42 Tri Caps, Roughly 200 in the support fleet.

there was a Trinity or ATF support fleet that came in another gate but those numbers may have been part of the 200 man support fleet.

The RK numbers dropped over time to about 150 support fleet and less than 42 caps but i dont know our exact numbers, i was watching tri smack me in their system.

We knew you were coming so we decided to stay. We saw the moms jump to the interjump system ready to get in place. So we didnt really get trapped. We just wanted a Fight.

We didnt attack in VFK where your gang was because you have a Cyno jammer up there and it doesnt make much sense for us to hit 42 caps with 7 of those being moms with a BS fleet- thats about 450 Fighters.
+ that 200 man support fleet.

Anyway it was a moon mining training op ok?

We learned we needed more Rorquals.

---

I don't want to argue too much with you, but there were 176 in local before we jumped in, with 4-5 of those being Tri.

Our gang dropped to 86 during the 'height' of battle due to people crashing.

If you include ATF, our caps etc, our total gang was less than 150...in fact not even close...local never went above 300...so your numbers are off.

---

Originally by: Arthur Guinness

---

EVERY massive fleet fight is going to be a lag fest. Either adapt and overcome, or die. It's ALWAYS been that way.

---

Originally by: Butter Dog

---

Actually I do have a genuine question about the fight...

Why were the SmashKill carriers mostly fitted with remote shield reps?

Just curious... good for pos repping, not so good for spider repping when great majority of your carriers are native armor tankers... ??

---

Originally by: dastommy79

---

Today gentelmen, we are about to embark on a long and dangerouse path. This was deemed necesary by us all. The reason for this aggression is simple...

Wesley Baird must be removed from Tri and placed in a Smashkill allied corp. All combat operations will cease when this objective is met. After the disbanding of MDK, we called dibs on Wesley but tri stole him from us. We want him with us. THat is all

---

Originally by: Arthur Guinness

---

EVERY massive fleet fight is going to be a lag fest. Either adapt and overcome, or die. It's ALWAYS been that way. Whining solves nothing. If you can't handle the lag, then don't bring the blob, then we won't have to bring ours.

You came to our space to show everyone that Tri is a "paper tiger", like many of you have stated on the forums. Well, you met with Lion that so many others were unfortunate to meet in the past, and he happily dined on most of your capitals and the support fleet. BTW, a LOT of our capitals logged or couldn't make this late op. So you've yet to see anywhere near our full capital fleet.

The next "epic" battle will be just as bad as this one lag wise. So make sure you can handle it next time or you won't have any capitals left. I suggest you guys read up on ways to reduce lag in fleet battles.

I took all possible steps to reduce lag, and it was manageable. Was on 18 capital killmails, if that says anything. YMMV.

---

Originally by: Koronos

---

Your numbers are wrong Wes. From two jumps out I watched a fleet of 110 tri then a fleet of 70 atf arrive, then onseytwoseythreesey people coming in regularly after that. Another scout reported people coming from the other direction. No real point having this argument I know, fair game bringing numbers, and the 8 moms was a bit rough on us, and we got our ass handed to us in the end, just please do not try to make it sound like you were outnumbered.

Also I understand that the numbers on either side before the jump and the max system numbers are also meaningless because people crashed, but believe me people crashed on our side too.

Koronos

edit: sp and to say, gf, good job on the cap kills.

---

Originally by: Lowa

---

stuff

---

Originally by: Annapolis

---

still as much as I was yelling at the screen to load up, Lock targets, activate mods

---

Originally by: Gods Coldblood

---

I think most people that have problems in fleet fights are peole with average computers and connection... I can tell you all now, since i upgrade to a 8800 gts and a 8mg speed connection my eve fleet fight experiance has improved big time where i can actually watch the fight at close range etc.....

---

Originally by: Mik kyo

---

Lag was ridiculous, i think i shot at one drake.
To the guys consistently on all the killmails, do you have super fast connections? computers? or ccp love?

---

Originally by: Arthur Guinness

---

smack

---

Originally by: Arthur Guinness

---

Edited by: Arthur Guinness on 11/02/2008 19:11:47

Originally by: Mik kyo

---

Lag was ridiculous, i think i shot at one drake.
To the guys consistently on all the killmails, do you have super fast connections? computers? or ccp love?

---

Intel Quad Core, 4gb DDR2, 8800GTX Superclocked, 10mb Cable connection.

Using the OLD Eve graphics as well. My screen locked up constantly and I got 2 FPS. 2-5 minute module lag. EVERYONE had bad lag, so it was a common factor to EVERYONE. Common thing on Eve is for the losers to say it was lag that made them lose, which is BS. There are certain things you can do to make fleet battles more playable. We did those things. If our enemies don't, then that's their problem. PVP alliances should know what needs to be done, and would have learned them a LONG time ago. People need to quit claiming lag as the reason for their losses, which includes us. That's like getting in a fist fight with a guy in a dark room, then claiming you lost because it was dark. Guess what, it's was just as dark for him.

In the end being better trained, having better leadership, more experience, and better equipment is what makes the difference in these battles.

To the guy that said he remembers 300 man battles with no lag: Yeah, I do to. Back in 2004. But the average number of people on the server then was maybe 10k. Average now is closer to 25k-30k. Big difference. Add to that the sheer number of drones on the field, and it that makes a big difference too. We can all whine all day long. But unless CCP does something drastic, the lag problem isn't going to get better anytime soon.

But guess what, I love this game and will deal with it. So will all of you, or you wouldn't still be here..

---

Originally by: Porgy

---

Edited by: Porgy on 11/02/2008 19:23:55
Edited by: Porgy on 11/02/2008 19:23:01

Originally by: Arthur Guinness

---

smack

---

Sooooo what you're saying is that not being able to turn on reppers or shoot anything is our own damn fault and not the reason ships died? Because I just read a lot of complaints from both sides saying they couldnt do anything so the "our fleet knows more than your dumb fleet" logic you are taking here doesnt really add up. Maybe you are just way too uber for everyone and your e-peen hangs out your trousers which is why we are sooooo bad. Or maybe, just maybe, you can't control yourself from not just ending it at GF, lag sucked. I am so happy for you that your client didn't lock up but it seems everybody else did.

To the rest of Tri: fun times, gf. You all did an excellent job and are a sizeable foe Moar please.

---

Originally by: Salliene

---

When local gets over 300, everyone should be split off into pairs and play a quick game of Checkers, the winner goes on to the next match, the loser blows up, and if they didn't get a single King, then they are podded as well.

I am sure we all agree that this is the best solution.

---

Originally by: Salliene

---

When local gets over 300, everyone should be split off into pairs and play a quick game of Checkers, the winner goes on to the next match, the loser blows up, and if they didn't get a single King, then they are podded as well.

I am sure we all agree that this is the best solution.

---

Originally by: Jebidus Skari

---

CCP YOU SUCK - seriously i need to vent

fleet battles are UNPLAYABLE in eve - FACT = CCP FAIL - EVE FAIL!!

Sick to death going into these battles only to be killed by lag, its a joke and a **** take.!!!

---

Originally by: Arthur Guinness

---

Tell you what, quit making excuses for why you got curb stomped, and I'll come on here and give you a "GF".

---

Originally by: touchvill

---

Originally by: Rutoo

---

Edited by: Rutoo on 11/02/2008 15:38:27

Originally by: Arthur Guinness

---

EVERY massive fleet fight is going to be a lag fest. Either adapt and overcome, or die. It's ALWAYS been that way.

---

Incorrect, Back in the good old days 200 vs 200 would cause no lag, minimal lag at best, I remember stain getting 230+ gangs all the time and there was no lag.


but continue to smack and think your always right.

---

There was I think I read about 400 fighters out.

In them circumstances it will always lag really bad. Not really acceptable as these are pretty much the standard numbers for such battles these days due to evolution. However, it is expected to lag that much in them circumstances.

---

Originally by: Dark Shikari

---

The problem with killing Jesus is he always just respawns 3 days later anyways.

Originally by: Mickey Knox

---

at this point, any Wow server performs better as people can actually play, and not watch a non interactive slideshow of this oh-so-awesome trinity**** engine.

---

Originally by: Jim Linger

---

Originally by: touchvill

---

Originally by: Rutoo

---

Edited by: Rutoo on 11/02/2008 15:38:27

Originally by: Arthur Guinness

---

EVERY massive fleet fight is going to be a lag fest. Either adapt and overcome, or die. It's ALWAYS been that way.

---

Incorrect, Back in the good old days 200 vs 200 would cause no lag, minimal lag at best, I remember stain getting 230+ gangs all the time and there was no lag.


but continue to smack and think your always right.

---

There was I think I read about 400 fighters out.

In them circumstances it will always lag really bad. Not really acceptable as these are pretty much the standard numbers for such battles these days due to evolution. However, it is expected to lag that much in them circumstances.

---

The blob of blue fighters and the blob of red fighters made an epic ying-yang symbol

---

Originally by: Arthin Mutin

---

I have teh epic farts smell like egg

---

Originally by: Wesley Baird

---

Edited by: Wesley Baird on 11/02/2008 20:45:47
Everyone had lag, some people more than others...no one knows what the results would be in a 100% lag free environment sadly...so no need for us to beat our chests about being uber, as the next time the lag monster may fall in the other direction...then what?!

So lets leave it at GF, lets do it again...with more caps please...and less drakes!!!

---

Originally by: Wesley Baird

---

Edited by: Wesley Baird on 11/02/2008 20:45:10
double post

---

Originally by: ferretedious

---

Edited by: ferretedious on 11/02/2008 23:29:42
Edited by: ferretedious on 11/02/2008 23:28:27
How about next time.
We decide to attack.

1. We inform the Alliance we are attacking.
2. We decide on the System we are to fight in.
3. The date ( give a range of a week or two maybe )

Inform CCP of the date etc and request that node for that area be reinforced.
for a week either side of those dates.

Then when the attack takes place we all act suprised, and suitably outraged that this has happened.

And we have a HUGE battle with little lag.

Well what do you think.

---

Originally by: ferretedious

---

Edited by: ferretedious on 11/02/2008 23:29:42
Edited by: ferretedious on 11/02/2008 23:28:27
How about next time.
We decide to attack.

1. We inform the Alliance we are attacking.
2. We decide on the System we are to fight in.
3. The date ( give a range of a week or two maybe )

Inform CCP of the date etc and request that node for that area be reinforced.
for a week either side of those dates.

Then when the attack takes place we all act suprised, and suitably outraged that this has happened.

And we have a HUGE battle with little lag.

Well what do you think.

---

Originally by: Oniko Sengir

---

How about next time.
We decide to attack.

1. We inform the Alliance we are attacking.
2. We decide on the System we are to fight in.
3. The date ( give a range of a week or two maybe )

Inform CCP of the date etc and request that node for that area be reinforced.
for a week either side of those dates.

Then when the attack takes place we all act suprised, and suitably outraged that this has happened.

And we have a HUGE battle with little lag.

Well what do you think.

---

Originally by: Semkhet

---

There's a solution which guarantees minimal lag.

We all forget the framework in which EvE is supposed to take place, all that scifi crap and so on, and since CCP can't provide any decent fleet battle performance despite being in business for a good 4 years (God forbid it's as important as things like ambulation...), we pragmatically organize our fights in the old good medieval flavor instead:

Each side choose a few champions and let's see who's the last one standing at the end of a fight.

Now I don't think it's the best way to get new subscribers, or retain actual players either

---

Originally by: ferretedious

---

Inform CCP of the date etc and request that node for that area be reinforced.
for a week either side of those dates.

---

Originally by: Lowa

---

TRI for the love of god STFU if you cant behave. Seriously.
When will people stop biting on even the slightest hint of troll?

We got destroyed by lag not to long ago remember? So, pls, stfu.
We dont need it, they dont need it, I to be frank, I dont need it.

We won. If we do the same dance 10 times more and does equally well
then I'll sign we handle lagg better. Or are just rolling double sixes like no one else.


Cheers,
Lowa - yes, you may call me names for this. A one time op to mention my mom too.

---

Originally by: ferretedious

---

Edited by: ferretedious on 11/02/2008 23:29:42
Edited by: ferretedious on 11/02/2008 23:28:27
How about next time.
We decide to attack.

1. We inform the Alliance we are attacking.
2. We decide on the System we are to fight in.
3. The date ( give a range of a week or two maybe )

Inform CCP of the date etc and request that node for that area be reinforced.
for a week either side of those dates.

Then when the attack takes place we all act suprised, and suitably outraged that this has happened.

And we have a HUGE battle with little lag.

Well what do you think.

---

Originally by: Semkhet

---

There's a solution which guarantees minimal lag.

We all forget the framework in which EvE is supposed to take place, all that scifi crap and so on, and since CCP can't provide any decent fleet battle performance despite being in business for a good 4 years (God forbid it's as important as things like ambulation...), we pragmatically organize our fights in the old good medieval flavor instead:

Each side choose a few champions and let's see who's the last one standing at the end of a fight.

Now I don't think it's the best way to get new subscribers, or retain actual players either

---

Originally by: Darknesss

---

It used to be when i sent a petition to GM's they thanked me in advance and reinforced the nodes.

The last time i tried this the GM sent me a mail saying they only reinforce the node when the node crashes.

...roll on supercomputer, i dream of what might be.

---

Quote:

---

How about next time.
We decide to attack.

1. We inform the Alliance we are attacking.
2. We decide on the System we are to fight in.
3. The date ( give a range of a week or two maybe )

Inform CCP of the date etc and request that node for that area be reinforced.
for a week either side of those dates.

Then when the attack takes place we all act suprised, and suitably outraged that this has happened.

And we have a HUGE battle with little lag.

Well what do you think.

---