EVE Search - Let stealth bombers fire while cloaked!

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Let stealth bombers fire while cloaked!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Last Wolf Templars of Space	Posted - 2008.03.03 16:55:00 - [1] Edited by: Last Wolf on 03/03/2008 16:56:28 Yes, let stealth bombers lock a target and fire cruise missiles while cloaked Except... When a stealth bomber fires cloaked, It shows up on the overview but is not able to be locked by anything but another cloaked stealth bomber. Once something closes the range and uncloaks the bomber, Its free game to being locked by anything. Think of it this way, once it fires its missiles you know where it is at, but you cannot shoot at it till it is uncloaked. uncloaking and re-cloaking will remove it from the overview again, assuming none of it's missiles are still en route to a target Also, besides the missiles, activating anything other than self-"buffing"(sensor boosters, damage control etc..) modules will uncloak the bomber (Warp scrams, passive targeters, sensor damps etc...) MWD/AB will also uncloak the bomber. Originally by: Liang Nuren wrong forum isroy i am vjery drunm
Erotic Irony 0bsession	Posted - 2008.03.03 16:58:00 - [2] ahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahaha ___ Eve Players are not very smart. Support Killmail Overhaul
Avan Strega Thunderstruck.	Posted - 2008.03.03 17:02:00 - [3] why is this idea necessary?
Cogswin Iannyen	Posted - 2008.03.03 17:03:00 - [4] I think thats a bit silly. I think that SB's need to be looked at, but wouldn't your solution make them pretty much invulnerable to anything slower than it? It really just encourages the Nanofaggotry thats so prevalent. I'd think that a better adjustment would be to add a cruise missle velocity bonus of +150%, and possibly a +5%/level of CovOps ROF on cruise launchers? That would get the missles to the target faster, at least allowing the SB's to do their job and possibly recloak before someone can target them back. Would turn it into an actual sniper/surgical striker.
Waxau	Posted - 2008.03.03 17:04:00 - [5] The laughter... Its... Taking.... Over.... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
xxxak	Posted - 2008.03.03 17:05:00 - [6] As proposed, your idea sounds like it could almost work. I think it would need a lot of tweaking though, because it does not scale well. Imagine 20 bombers who could fire while cloaked. You could kill an entire fleet. lol
VaderDSL Caldari Personal Vendetta Reavers.	Posted - 2008.03.03 17:05:00 - [7] I sign this only for the fact I could go round in my Manticore spamming Quote: Our revels now are ended. Cry havoc, and let slip the dogs of war!
RuleoftheBone Minmatar Veto. Veto Corp	Posted - 2008.03.03 17:06:00 - [8] Originally by: Erotic Irony ahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahaha For once I am in complete agreement with you . "Lead Me..Follow Me..Or get the **** out of my way" General George Patton USA
Bahhs Deep	Posted - 2008.03.03 17:07:00 - [9] no... Ever heard of "overpowered"?
Last Wolf Templars of Space	Posted - 2008.03.03 17:08:00 - [10] Originally by: Cogswin Iannyen I think thats a bit silly. I think that SB's need to be looked at, but wouldn't your solution make them pretty much invulnerable to anything slower than it? It really just encourages the Nanofaggotry thats so prevalent. They could just warp away, if the SB tries to warp scram them they will be targetable. Or they could use a MWD.. i'm pretty sure even a battleship with an AB is faster than most SB cloaked. (again, if the SB tries to use an AB/MWD they'll be targetable) Originally by: Liang Nuren wrong forum isroy i am vjery drunm
Batelle HOMELESS.	Posted - 2008.03.03 17:08:00 - [11] in before the lock.
arbalesttom Caldari Glauxian Brothers	Posted - 2008.03.03 17:09:00 - [12] Although this idea is way overpowered, how about missiles will do damage while your cloaked? Stealthbombers can use a buff imho.. *Sig* Originally by: Cpt Branko That is a JoJo, a forum troll used by Amarr whiners. Originally by: Mitnal Locked, one troll after another. Mitnal, Community Representative
CareBeer	Posted - 2008.03.03 17:10:00 - [13] Originally by: Erotic Irony ahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahaha You took the word right out of my mouth
Last Wolf Templars of Space	Posted - 2008.03.03 17:11:00 - [14] Originally by: xxxak As proposed, your idea sounds like it could almost work. I think it would need a lot of tweaking though, because it does not scale well. Imagine 20 bombers who could fire while cloaked. You could kill an entire fleet. lol Even now, 20 stealth bombers could ruin anyone not in a large fleet's day. But a single interceptor could kill the whole gang (assumming it went at least 5km/s +) Originally by: Liang Nuren wrong forum isroy i am vjery drunm
Hannobaal Gallente Igneus Auctorita GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.03.03 17:19:00 - [15] Originally by: Cogswin Iannyen I think thats a bit silly. I think that SB's need to be looked at, but wouldn't your solution make them pretty much invulnerable to anything slower than it? It really just encourages the Nanofaggotry thats so prevalent. I'd think that a better adjustment would be to add a cruise missle velocity bonus of +150%, and possibly a +5%/level of CovOps ROF on cruise launchers? That would get the missles to the target faster, at least allowing the SB's to do their job and possibly recloak before someone can target them back. Would turn it into an actual sniper/surgical striker. The post above shows the real source of whining about Stealth Bombers, which is people just don't know how to use them. 1. Using a stealth bomber solo, uncloaking to snipe at a target with one volley and then cloaking again, is a complete waste of time and ammo. Don't do it. These are small gang ships, to be used with interceptor and interdictor support. Hammer and Anvil. The Stealth Bombers are the hammer. And a gang like that is very, very difficult to catch and pin down, yet they can easily kill anything sub-capital that comes their way. 2. You should have at least 2 sensor dampeners on your ship to prevent your target from locking you. 3. If you do get locked (say from undamped ship near the target), a Stealth Bomber sits so far outside of any kind of scrambling range, that there is no way you can't safely warp out at that point. And aligning for warp is something you should have done before you even uncloaked. There is no other frigate sized ship in the game that can deliver the kind of dps that stealth bombers can deliver from the kind of range, and safety, that stealth bombers can do. Any other frigate size ship that does anywhere near that kind of damage, does it within web range. This, and their cloaking bonuses, makes Stealth Bombers excellent ships.
xxxak	Posted - 2008.03.03 17:19:00 - [16] It is an innovative idea, and something like it could work. But as proposed, it would make a fleet of SB literally invincible, and that is no good.
Haradgrim Tyrell Corp INTERDICTION	Posted - 2008.03.03 17:46:00 - [17] A fleet sized stealth bomber gang would decimate anything, this is by far the dumbest idea I've ever read on these forums. I mean did the OP even think about it?? have they even flown a stealth bomber????? Originally by: CCP Oveur ...every forum whine feels like a baby pony is getting killed
Willy Joe	Posted - 2008.03.03 17:52:00 - [18] Originally by: Batelle in before the lock. You don't understand ... the lock is never coming , this thread can fire while cloaked woosh
X99 Z990	Posted - 2008.03.03 17:54:00 - [19] What about decloaking after it activates missiles? And requires a passive targeter to get the lock while cloaked... And... yea its probably a bad idea.
Wideen Eon Project Legion of Honor	Posted - 2008.03.03 18:19:00 - [20] How about no? Go use one of the available I-win ships instead Originally by: F'nog Your math intrigues me, and I wish to subscribe to its newsletter.
RuleoftheBone Minmatar Veto. Veto Corp	Posted - 2008.03.03 18:22:00 - [21] Originally by: Hannobaal The post above shows the real source of whining about Stealth Bombers, which is people just don't know how to use them. 1. Using a stealth bomber solo, uncloaking to snipe at a target with one volley and then cloaking again, is a complete waste of time and ammo. Don't do it. These are small gang ships, to be used with interceptor and interdictor support. Hammer and Anvil. The Stealth Bombers are the hammer. And a gang like that is very, very difficult to catch and pin down, yet they can easily kill anything sub-capital that comes their way. 2. You should have at least 2 sensor dampeners on your ship to prevent your target from locking you. 3. If you do get locked (say from undamped ship near the target), a Stealth Bomber sits so far outside of any kind of scrambling range, that there is no way you can't safely warp out at that point. And aligning for warp is something you should have done before you even uncloaked. There is no other frigate sized ship in the game that can deliver the kind of dps that stealth bombers can deliver from the kind of range, and safety, that stealth bombers can do. Any other frigate size ship that does anywhere near that kind of damage, does it within web range. This, and their cloaking bonuses, makes Stealth Bombers excellent ships. 100% spot on. And who says Goons don't know how to fly other than T1 pap . "Lead Me..Follow Me..Or get the **** out of my way" General George Patton USA
Weeka Amarr Imperial Shipment	Posted - 2008.03.03 19:34:00 - [22] wipes beer from his monitor
Annowyn	Posted - 2008.03.03 19:45:00 - [23] Originally by: Last Wolf Edited by: Last Wolf on 03/03/2008 16:56:28 Yes, let stealth bombers lock a target and fire cruise missiles while cloaked Except... When a stealth bomber fires cloaked, It shows up on the overview but is not able to be locked by anything but another cloaked stealth bomber. Once something closes the range and uncloaks the bomber, Its free game to being locked by anything. Think of it this way, once it fires its missiles you know where it is at, but you cannot shoot at it till it is uncloaked. uncloaking and re-cloaking will remove it from the overview again, assuming none of it's missiles are still en route to a target Also, besides the missiles, activating anything other than self-"buffing"(sensor boosters, damage control etc..) modules will uncloak the bomber (Warp scrams, passive targeters, sensor damps etc...) MWD/AB will also uncloak the bomber. K.
Trevor Warps	Posted - 2008.03.03 19:45:00 - [24] No, it would make the rogue overpowered and I like the Paladin better. So, no.
Kell Braugh	Posted - 2008.03.03 20:04:00 - [25] The only thing that could remotly be a nice buff but not TOO overpowered (like the OP's lol suggestion), would be the abilty to passively target while clocked, and forced uncloaking on module activation. But then it should not be able to cloak again till the weapon module cycle is done (in which case if someone gets a lock during such time they are locked and unable to cloak), and if they cloak before the cruises hit, they cause no damage (since cruises are ACTIVELY guided). Its a step in the right direction, imo, but not a giant leap like wtf pwning absolutely no viable counter. You idea, in its many flaws, fails to realize that under that situation, any ship approaching the cluster**** of stealth bombers to 'uncloak' it, will be insta primaries and MIGHT last 2 volleys from a good sized gang. Plus this would mean that Stealth bombers would effectively make gate camping in low sec Easy-mode wtfpwnage. - EFT screen shots are NOT an accurate example of a ship's abilities.
Insur Yamakkei	Posted - 2008.03.03 20:10:00 - [26] Just wondering... does activating a MWD uncloak you or not? I'm guessing it does, but I'm not sure.
Erotic Irony 0bsession	Posted - 2008.03.03 20:13:00 - [27] Originally by: Insur Yamakkei Just wondering... does activating a MWD uncloak you or not? I'm guessing it does, but I'm not sure. The one mine gate cloak may break on module activation but when cloaked nothing will activate until the cloak is offlined. ___ Eve Players are not very smart. Support Killmail Overhaul
MeeKai Native Freshfood	Posted - 2008.03.03 20:13:00 - [28] Originally by: Erotic Irony ahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahaha
Hannobaal Gallente Igneus Auctorita GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.03.03 20:18:00 - [29] Edited by: Hannobaal on 03/03/2008 20:18:13 Originally by: Insur Yamakkei Just wondering... does activating a MWD uncloak you or not? I'm guessing it does, but I'm not sure. You simply can't activate a mwd while cloaked. It won't let you. However, you can turn on your mwd and then cloak, and it will run out that cycle while you're cloaked and then turn off. That's the only possible way of using an mwd while cloaked.
Haradgrim Tyrell Corp INTERDICTION	Posted - 2008.03.03 20:19:00 - [30] Teh tech 2 ship "To Nerf or Not to Nerf" Checklist: 1) Does the ship in question perform better than its t1 variation? 2) DPS or utility far above that of its t1 couterpart? 3) Does it have a role in which it is very effective? 4) Is it possible to be effective without expensive rigs/implants? 5) Easier to fit / more slots than t1 version? If your answer to all these questions is "YES" please PUT THE NERF BAT DOWN and step away from the ship. Combine that with the fact that SBs can use bombs (which are useful in the right circumstances, though somewhat overpriced), and its prety hard to argue for a nerf.... Originally by: CCP Oveur ...every forum whine feels like a baby pony is getting killed
sov68n True Foundation	Posted - 2008.03.03 21:09:00 - [31] Stealth bombers are fine, since their role is to decloack, loose a volley, recloak, move to another location and repeat. this process instapops an enemies frigates with the proper skillz.
Marcus Druallis Quantum Industries Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2008.03.03 22:43:00 - [32] LOL? And people yell at me for wanting a covops cloak... --
Marcus Druallis Quantum Industries Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2008.03.03 22:45:00 - [33] Originally by: Last Wolf Originally by: xxxak As proposed, your idea sounds like it could almost work. I think it would need a lot of tweaking though, because it does not scale well. Imagine 20 bombers who could fire while cloaked. You could kill an entire fleet. lol Even now, 20 stealth bombers could ruin anyone not in a large fleet's day. But a single interceptor could kill the whole gang (assumming it went at least 5km/s +) That's not true. Sensor damps are your friend. --
Ivan Kinsikor Amarr International Multi-Player Consortium Interstellar Alcohol Conglomerate	Posted - 2008.03.03 23:02:00 - [34] Fail troll is fail 2/10 Killing is business and business is good.
Kuzya Morozov Gallente Organized Combat Consortium Fang Alliance	Posted - 2008.03.04 00:20:00 - [35] Edited by: Kuzya Morozov on 04/03/2008 00:20:33 Nothing personal, but are you honestly ***** ******? edit: LOL
Mo Steel Caldari Sanguis vix Dignatio	Posted - 2008.03.04 06:21:00 - [36] I'd love to see stealth bombers improved. This is not the way to go about it. Hell, I'd be happy with the ability to use a Covert Ops cloak. ----- Want a sig made? Eve-Mail me, signatures made for 5 million isk each.
Riho Mercenary Forces	Posted - 2008.03.04 10:59:00 - [37] this has got to be the stupidest thing i vahe heard for months on these forums... even the dude whit sniping carrier wasnt that stupid :P fire while cloakded... and can be uncloakd by another cov ops only.... LOL i really cant stop laughing at this one ---------------------------------- This is Me, fighting stupidity one post at a time. PS: There are no computer BUGs, there is stuff called "Random Features"
Lyria Skydancer Amarr Home 0f Bored Occultists	Posted - 2008.03.04 11:23:00 - [38] Originally by: Hannobaal The post above shows the real source of whining about Stealth Bombers, which is people just don't know how to use them. 1. Using a stealth bomber solo, uncloaking to snipe at a target with one volley and then cloaking again, is a complete waste of time and ammo. Don't do it. These are small gang ships, to be used with interceptor and interdictor support. Hammer and Anvil. The Stealth Bombers are the hammer. And a gang like that is very, very difficult to catch and pin down, yet they can easily kill anything sub-capital that comes their way. 2. You should have at least 2 sensor dampeners on your ship to prevent your target from locking you. 3. If you do get locked (say from undamped ship near the target), a Stealth Bomber sits so far outside of any kind of scrambling range, that there is no way you can't safely warp out at that point. And aligning for warp is something you should have done before you even uncloaked. There is no other frigate sized ship in the game that can deliver the kind of dps that stealth bombers can deliver from the kind of range, and safety, that stealth bombers can do. Any other frigate size ship that does anywhere near that kind of damage, does it within web range. This, and their cloaking bonuses, makes Stealth Bombers excellent ships. QFT. If theyd nerf nano hacs these would be used alot more because nano gangs would only be viable with frigs like inties and SBs. SBs are still fine. -------------------------------------- [Video]Skirmish Warfare
Real Poison Minmatar Mutually Assured Destruction Angels Of Discord	Posted - 2008.03.04 11:26:00 - [39] agree on the lols :P but the idea of a cruise missile speed boost per covop level sounds good to me. the only bad thing about SBs is the fact that from like 100km every target a single SB could possibly one volley are ships that shouldn't have any problem warping out before the missiles arrive (unless the targets pilot is afk or waiting for the cyno to run out). but even that could make them overpowered.
Phoenicia Black Sea Industries Insurgency	Posted - 2008.03.04 11:27:00 - [40] Despite the fact that this is overpowered, the coding behind it would require more than you'd think: Missiles work as decloakers within 2km as much as any other object- Your own missiles would decloak you. I much prefer the old way of stealth bombing: Allowing the recloak while missiles are still in flight.
Lyria Skydancer Amarr Home 0f Bored Occultists	Posted - 2008.03.04 11:28:00 - [41] Originally by: Real Poison the only bad thing about SBs is the fact that from like 100km every target a single SB could possibly one volley are ships that shouldn't have any problem warping out before the missiles arrive (unless the targets pilot is afk or waiting for the cyno to run out). SBs arent solo ships. Your targets should be tackled by inties. Every ship with a cloak isnt a solo ship. Its not like the force recons are good solo ships either. -------------------------------------- [Video]Skirmish Warfare
Lyria Skydancer Amarr Home 0f Bored Occultists	Posted - 2008.03.04 11:29:00 - [42] Originally by: Phoenicia I much prefer the old way of stealth bombing: Allowing the recloak while missiles are still in flight. So the only way a SB would die is if he ran through a gate camp and got caught? I think thats a bit too overpowered. -------------------------------------- [Video]Skirmish Warfare
Phoenicia Black Sea Industries Insurgency	Posted - 2008.03.04 11:32:00 - [43] Originally by: Lyria Skydancer Originally by: Phoenicia I much prefer the old way of stealth bombing: Allowing the recloak while missiles are still in flight. So the only way a SB would die is if he ran through a gate camp and got caught? I think thats a bit too overpowered. You still have to sit there and not warp until the missiles hit. In that time you can be uncloaked (or forced to warp, in which case your missiles miss). A good SB still only dies if it's caught in a camp. After all, with any significant risk, a good SB does not uncloak.
Lyria Skydancer Amarr Home 0f Bored Occultists	Posted - 2008.03.04 11:38:00 - [44] Originally by: Phoenicia You still have to sit there and not warp until the missiles hit. In that time you can be uncloaked (or forced to warp, in which case your missiles miss). A good SB still only dies if it's caught in a camp. After all, with any significant risk, a good SB does not uncloak. hehe, no. A SB today can be forced back to cloak, and by that foced missing, by a fast inty rushing towards it. You know youd be invincible if you would be able to cloak right after firing a missile. It wont happen. -------------------------------------- [Video]Skirmish Warfare
Tuncan	Posted - 2008.03.04 13:02:00 - [45] They should have give the ability to change ammo while cloaked. That is neccesary i think
Kagura Nikon Minmatar Infinity Enterprises Odyssey.	Posted - 2008.03.04 13:27:00 - [46] Aaa for god sake, just stop trying to do everything alone!! Not even battleships are able to fight alone these days. Why woudl a SB be able to? Just pack 8 SB and you can pretty much pop a HAC in 5 seconds and a battleship in about 15-20 seconds ( very close to its warp time) ------------------------------------------------- If brute force doesn't solve your problem... you are not using enough
Slayed Caldari Toys R Us Nocturnal Legion	Posted - 2008.03.04 13:48:00 - [47] this is actually one of the most stupid things i ever heardROFLOLCOPTER ]
Tha Pusher III ELEMENTS ANTHRAX DEATH	Posted - 2008.03.04 23:09:00 - [48] Originally by: Last Wolf Edited by: Last Wolf on 03/03/2008 16:56:28 Yes, let stealth bombers lock a target and fire cruise missiles while cloaked Except... When a stealth bomber fires cloaked, It shows up on the overview but is not able to be locked by anything but another cloaked stealth bomber. Once something closes the range and uncloaks the bomber, Its free game to being locked by anything. Think of it this way, once it fires its missiles you know where it is at, but you cannot shoot at it till it is uncloaked. uncloaking and re-cloaking will remove it from the overview again, assuming none of it's missiles are still en route to a target Also, besides the missiles, activating anything other than self-"buffing"(sensor boosters, damage control etc..) modules will uncloak the bomber (Warp scrams, passive targeters, sensor damps etc...) MWD/AB will also uncloak the bomber. This is an epic example of an absolutely horrible idea, born of self pity and endless whining. Learn how to use a SB, or dont use it. EVE!! It's like a party in your mouth, and everyone's throwing up
BABARR PARABELUM-Project	Posted - 2008.03.05 00:37:00 - [49] And you want a doomsday on your bomber too? no? really? ... "Si vis pacem, parabellum"
Lrd Byron	Posted - 2008.03.05 05:20:00 - [50] what are people opinion of letting stealth bombers fit seige launchers?
General Meridus Brutor tribe	Posted - 2008.03.05 06:15:00 - [51] Originally by: Lrd Byron what are people opinion of letting stealth bombers fit seige launchers? As the ship is now, at least in solo or small gang, the tactic is to engage with passive targeting, fire salvo, warp out. The ships are paper thin, and rate of fire is low. The faster your missile hits the target, the sooner you can leave before being turned to dust. Throwing slow moving torps, from a scary close range, in my view equals an insurance claim. Remember with high skills, and faction missiles, damage per cruise is in the 900 range X 3.
Lrd Byron	Posted - 2008.03.05 07:25:00 - [52] Originally by: General Meridus Originally by: Lrd Byron what are people opinion of letting stealth bombers fit seige launchers? As the ship is now, at least in solo or small gang, the tactic is to engage with passive targeting, fire salvo, warp out. The ships are paper thin, and rate of fire is low. The faster your missile hits the target, the sooner you can leave before being turned to dust. Throwing slow moving torps, from a scary close range, in my view equals an insurance claim. Remember with high skills, and faction missiles, damage per cruise is in the 900 range X 3. I get what you are saying, but it just seems like the bombers fighting style is completely at odds with the concept of stealth and more specifically the bombers speed bonus. Who cares how fast you can travel cloaked if you are just sitting at 100km taking pot shots at people? Seems like it could be an interesting tactic to sneak 10 bombers up close to the enemy in a largish fleet engagement and alpha the **** out of some battleship. At that close range you might even be able to get away with recloaking after the torps hit, and then you could use your nifty speed bonus to get away, reposition, and do it again.
techzer0 IDLE GUNS	Posted - 2008.03.05 09:24:00 - [53] Hahaha... I'll /sign this because first place I'm going is to NOL- and killing every inty/dictor/frigate that I see ------------ Originally by: CCP Mitnal It's great being a puppetmaster
Andreask14 Alterum - Infinitus - Fabula Dragons Of Oceans	Posted - 2008.03.05 09:26:00 - [54] Originally by: BABARR And you want a doomsday on your bomber too? no? really? 7 SB can launch 7 bombs at the same location with all bombs exploding for full effect creating half a DD¦s damage in a 15km radius. Its nifty.
Lee DeMonico	Posted - 2008.03.05 10:10:00 - [55] Willy Joe Posted - 2008.03.03 17:52:00 - [18] - QuoteReport You don't understand ... the lock is never coming , this thread can fire while cloaked woosh
HellSpreader Amarr Fleeting Moments of Insanity	Posted - 2008.03.05 10:24:00 - [56] I think that they should be able to fire without decloaking and that depending on the type of weapon, they should partially uncloak for a pre-defined period of time. Potentially introduce a skill that will allow hardcore Stealth Bomber pilots to reduce this time by a set % per level. this means you can sneak up, fire off quickly, then slowly return to the stealth side without having ever fully uncloaked. The higher skill yuo have the less decloaked you get and the harder it is to target you. Just a thought. Hell hath no fury like mine...
Karyuudo Tydraad Caldari Whiskey Pete's Drycleaning Services	Posted - 2008.03.05 10:43:00 - [57] That sounds like a great idea! On a related note, let my Armageddon fire while docked. It could show up on the overview, but nothing would be able to target it back besides, get this, another docked Armageddon.
Lord Myre	Posted - 2008.03.05 11:01:00 - [58] I think SB should be able to fire Citadel Torps and use a Siege module as well, but as there stealthy they should be able to stop the siege module after 1 volley. This coupled with a 250km scram like the other nub said would make them worthwhile to use. I funnly endore the geddon firing whilst docked could be the amaar boost you were looking for. My 1 question is that is this guy a troll or not? if yes i give you 7/10
Nasta443	Posted - 2008.03.05 11:17:00 - [59] op is serious person this is serious thread
Phoenicia Black Sea Industries Insurgency	Posted - 2008.03.05 11:33:00 - [60] Originally by: Karyuudo Tydraad That sounds like a great idea! On a related note, let my Armageddon fire while docked. It could show up on the overview, but nothing would be able to target it back besides, get this, another docked Armageddon. Please, won't someone think of the docking ramps? And the number of people you kill with each miss?

Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.