Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Ioci
Gallente Ioci Exploration
|
Posted - 2008.04.19 10:05:00 -
[61]
Ditch Concord. I'm all for it.
/sign |
Simon LBowerbank
|
Posted - 2008.04.19 10:29:00 -
[62]
/signed |
Bobson10
|
Posted - 2008.04.19 10:32:00 -
[63]
/Signed
Universal instant death for anyone breaking the law is just lazy game design |
Tippia
Caldari School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2008.04.19 10:46:00 -
[64]
Originally by: Bobson10 Universal instant death for anyone breaking the law is just lazy game design
Propose an alternative.
|
Bobson10
|
Posted - 2008.04.19 10:56:00 -
[65]
Turrets on all empire jumpgates that fire apon flagged criminals.
Roaming NPC concord gangs THAT CAN BE DEFEATED who hunt down criminals in empire space.
Payouts in ISK or items to people to hunt down and kill criminals in empire.
This is supposed to be a player run mmorpg is it not? Let us police the universe how we see fit.
|
baltec1
Antares Shipyards Phalanx Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.04.19 11:31:00 -
[66]
Or....
You can all stop crying over a non-existant problem.
I have never been attacked in high sec. Nobody I know has been attacked in highsec. If you undock in highsec now the chances of getting attacked are about as high as me solo navigating to the south pole.
Concord is doing its job.
|
Caleese
New Eden Research And Design School
|
Posted - 2008.04.19 11:37:00 -
[67]
As far as I know, nobody attacks someone in hi sec without losing their ship to concord. What's ineffectual about that?
Oh and by saying Quote: (Troll's can stay in the Goon threads. this is for adults)
You automatically disqualify yourself from your own thread. In fact your whole OP is just a poorly contrived troll. ----------------- Think of someone you consider of average intelligence... now realise this. Half the worlds population is dumber than that person. How does the world survive such stupidity? |
Shidhe
Minmatar The Babylon5 Consortuim
|
Posted - 2008.04.19 12:02:00 -
[68]
We have concord to maintain high sec, without which Eve would probably last just 6 months. So stop the anecdotes `concord stole my lollypop' and think about the future of the game.
Next question.
|
astowv
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2008.04.19 12:40:00 -
[69]
Originally by: Dont Tasemebro CONCORD doesn't provide security, it only provides consequences.
But then "Insurance" negates those consequences.
Something is broke, here. And it's not Concord.
Insurance paying out for losing your ship to Concord is like grounding your kid to his room where he has a TV, xbox, ****o mags, computer, etc. Not really much of a consequence.
To quote the words of a wize man in another thread. They should not pay out insurance on suiciding. But thenagain, they should not on that Ferrari (CNR) parked in the middle of Trafalgar Square (Motsu, Jita, etc.) that is filled with gold (gist mods). No sencible insurance ever would. So yes, plz, but that hurts more than the gankers :)
----
--- CCP Navigator is watching me. It scares me ! |
Slave 33231
|
Posted - 2008.04.20 04:40:00 -
[70]
If I destroy my car in a robbery my insurance company won't replace it. Why does concord reimburse criminals? |
|
Spaztick
|
Posted - 2008.04.20 05:49:00 -
[71]
No, we need to up CONCORD NPC reaction time if anything, otherwise miners and haulers might need to watch local for Jihad or *gasp* go with escorts!
|
F'nog
Amarr Celestial Horizon Corp. Valainaloce
|
Posted - 2008.04.20 06:40:00 -
[72]
Originally by: Spaztick No, we need to up CONCORD NPC reaction time if anything, otherwise miners and haulers might need to watch local for Jihad or *gasp* go with escorts!
The problem with this is that mining escorts are 100% useless in high sec unless the escorts want to be Concorded. Suiciders rely on their alpha strike potential, so they'll kill the miner and be ganked by Concord before the escorts can react.
If you mean someone to monitor the gates and stations to see who jumps in or undocks, then that's a different story and could be very useful. But that also cuts into profits, etc, etc. |
Mrsticks
Minmatar RNCGM Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.04.20 07:12:00 -
[73]
It Would make it Interesting for the People in Eve. All the Bears (self Included) that Dident Quit would have NO reason to play the game At All in High sec and would be Forced to join a 0.0 corp. That said all the 0.0 space ive seen Sucks. At this point It would Be come 1.0 is the Crappy space with Pve things to Do, and No other reason to be there. Vs 0.0 That has good ore and Protection from other Players (gate camps). In the End tho I feel it would kill Eve and It wouldn't recover.
There are Several Mechanics that could fix this tho.
The Abbility of the Escort ships to Actually Protect the haullers. (Transferd shields that Dont suck, Massive Bubbles like Outposts use, A Ecm tool that Messed with the Targeting of All ships in the area Makeing it Target them only for a few seconds(Taunt), Colision Detection for Weapons fire, So I can Block Friendlies *Tho this would Frack Fleet battles*, Ect.)
Giveing Us Bears Ships that can Haul and SURVIVE a attack from a Cheep Cruiser and Let us Pound them Back. (Serisouly WTF is Up With the Haullers in this game not Being able to fit a Desent gun??? Can ANY one name a SciFi show where the Transports Dident Upgrade to something that Dident Suck???)
Turrents at gates that Arn't Pea shooters. If there are 4 Turrents at a Gate and NO Concord and I hit a camp of 5 Battleships 2 Of those Basterds had Better DIE... as it is They are a Waste of server Load WAY more than Concoard for god sakes. At least Concord can Kill something!
And 2 more things. 1. Remove Local and give us Scanners that DONT SUCK! Let us warp to People and Intresting things Way Easier and make it Based off of the Size of the ship For the lock and Warp times,(If the target warps Aboart and track it so we have a Chance to Turn the tables on the attacker) 2. A Way around the Stupid gates!!! Nothing IS MORE ANNOYING than a F'ing gate camp. (Unless theres 4 Turents poping shots in the attacker dir thats tanking them in a BC...) I Under stand Gates were Put in so Eve's Massive Universe Dosent feel Empty, But Gess What it IS ITS F'ING EMPTY Except the Choke points and the High sec space(Even that has Huge areas that are pointless).
I Love Eve But as it is theres NO point to trying to go to 0.0 W/O a 0.0 Aliance's Blessing Because you cant get there!(Shy of luck or a Big Effert of alot of friends) and there are SO few stations that it feels pointless unless you can setup a bace camp and keep it hidden But if you log in for more than a few Min. the map shows 20 People in that Back water System.
Ahh well I Really should Dump my accounts and go to something else as Ill never have the time to have the Experience's Id like to have in Eve W/O Beeing ganked Raped by Other people getting their Jollies At my Expence, and DEVS that just dont care about those of us that Would Perfer to Explore and Seek Friends the old fashon way, By talking to them before joining a corp/alliance.
I Just cant shake the Idea of letting my 36 Mill Sp char Die like that.... Im Weak I Know. Hell Im still paying for my 2, 25 Mill Sp alts So I Must Really be weak :P
Long Live TEXAS! Texans join the Texas channel in game plz.
|
baltec1
Antares Shipyards Phalanx Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.04.20 11:06:00 -
[74]
Edited by: baltec1 on 20/04/2008 11:08:47 Edited by: baltec1 on 20/04/2008 11:06:35
Originally by: Slave 33231 If I destroy my car in a robbery my insurance company won't replace it. Why does concord reimburse criminals?
If I put 1 tonne of gold on an old transit van with a busted back door no insurance company will ever accept me. Why should they in eve if you fly a t1 hauler with a paper thin hull?
|
Arana Tellen
Gallente The Blackguard Wolves Black Star Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.04.20 11:18:00 -
[75]
Every time someone does NOT shoot you in high sec concord have protected you, don't be so short sighted. ---------------------------------
Oh noes!
Originally by: CCP Greyscale *moderated - mother abuse - Mitnal*
|
Fionnghuala Hue
|
Posted - 2008.04.20 19:50:00 -
[76]
Burn The Witch!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |