EVE Search - Empyrean Age issues thread

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

Empyrean Age issues thread

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 35 post(s)
Mack Dorgeans Camelot Innovations	Posted - 2008.06.22 06:02:00 - [211] The patch notes do not list changes made to the material requirements for building covert ops frigates. Based on what I'm seeing on the Helios blueprint, it appears certain mineral requirements were increased to compensate for the lower mineral costs needed to produce an Imicus (the new T1 base) vs. a Maulus (the old T1 base). I suspect similar changes were made to the Anathema and Cheetah blueprints, but I can't verify since I did not happen to save any data from the pre-patch blueprint stats like I did for the Helios. While I can understand why these changes may have been made, they represent a significant increase in minerals needed to build T2 ships of their size at the T2 BPO stage. For instance, a my ME 30 Helios BPO used to require 803 units of tritanium for a single build, but now requires 7,945. Overall cost to build the ships probably has changed very little because the new base ships are cheaper to build, but it does mean the T2 builders need to adjust their production methods and mineral supplies, especially if they buy the T1 ships rather than build them. This should have been put in the patch notes at the least. The sections of the patch notes I quoted below do not mention these changes; either spot might have been a good place to note the changes. Quote: CHANGES Ships * Heron: capacity increased to 320m3 to match the other astrometrics frigates. Volume increased to 18,900m3, maximum targeting range decreased to 37,500m and gravimetric strength decreased to 10. * The Imicus has had its mass decreased to 1,350,000kg and volume decreased to 21500m3. * The Probe has had its ladar strength increased to 7. * The Anathema has had its model changed. It will now use the Magnate hull instead of the Crucifer hull * The Helios has had its model changed. It will now use the Imicus hull instead of the Maulus hull. * The Cheetah has had its model changed. It will now use the Probe hull instead of the Vigil Hull. * Caracal Navy Issue: Increased CPU output to 415tf, decreased power output to 690mw, added a launcher hard point, decreased shield recharge time to 1650s and tweaked the sensor system to make it in line with the other tier 2 faction cruisers. * Apocalypse Navy Issue: The Apocalypse recent modifications have been mirrored to the Navy version. Changed the capacitor capacity bonus to a bonus to large energy turret optimal range bonus, increased capacitor capacity to 7500.0, increased CPU output to 505tf and increased power output to 20500mw * Stabber Fleet Issue: Velocity bonus changed to 10% bonus to Medium Projectile Turret tracking speed per level, moved a slot from high to low, added a turret hard point, increased max velocity, decreased the CPU output to 312tf, increased the drone bay and bandwidth to 40, increased power output to 950mw, increased armor HP and decreased shield HP Quote: FIXES Science & Industry * The search panel for finding your blueprints has been corrected to say "Types" and not "Copies". * The invention time of the Signal Distortion Amplifier has been corrected. It previously took too much time. * If you had an installed corporation research job in a station office when it expired, your blueprint was sometimes returned to an invalid location when you delivered the job. This has now been fixed and the blueprint will be delivered in the station in which it was installed. * Manufacturing waste amounts will now round correctly. * Some clipped text has been fixed on the ôAccept Quoteö window. * Waste calculations on all jobs from a Blueprint are now working correctly. Now when installing a single run or multiple run job, you will no longer receive an incorrect mineral requirement amount warning when the proper amount of minerals are available in your hangar. * An exception was thrown when right clicking mobile laboratories in the blueprints tabs of the Science & Industry window. This has been fixed.
Mack Dorgeans Camelot Innovations	Posted - 2008.06.22 06:21:00 - [212] By the way, the above mentioned change to mineral requirements on covert ops blueprints amounts to a nerf to invented BPCs, since their higher ME levels mean they are forced to overcompensate for the differences in T1 ship mineral reqs. Of course, this is a very small amount of minerals difference per unit, but it does add up over time.
voetius	Posted - 2008.06.22 21:19:00 - [213] I haven't heard anyone else mention this but since I applied the latest patch a couple of days ago: when I open my items instead of opening a new window it puts a tab on the chat window - which is a pain as I like to keep the chat small as I generally have a lot of items in the hangar of the station I am missioning out of. I have cleared the cache using the ESC menu but that had no effect.
Tuyook	Posted - 2008.06.23 01:57:00 - [214] Confirming disconnect issue, happens quite frequently now since the new patch. happens mostly in the evening as well, around 6pm-9pm CST (GMT -6). This is a consistent thing as well, I normally play around these hours and has been happening ever since the EA patch. Ive installed the bonus patch as well. Once disconnects start, I get maybe 2-4 minutes from login before I get kicked again. Ive gone thru 5 or 6 disconnects before giving up and trying again next day...very annoying.
MapleTiger	Posted - 2008.06.23 02:11:00 - [215] I'm getting alot of disconnect issues as well. Happend 7 times last night lol.
DoanEven Meswime	Posted - 2008.06.23 02:35:00 - [216] Guess you won't fix the disconnect issues until you get to work Monday, but this weekend has been the pits. It has been getting progressively worse as time goes on. This reminds me of your database issues some time back. Wouldn't have your job for anything.
Esmenet	Posted - 2008.06.23 02:50:00 - [217] Originally by: CCP Explorer Originally by: Siigari Kitawa I can't seem to find a way to suppress the message: Warning This action is an attack on your target. Attacking this target is a crime, will result in a security status penalty for you and will bring CONCORD to enforce the law by destroying your ship. CONCORD will kill you!Do you wish to proceed with this dangerous action? This message appears if you attack a non-war target in high security space and can't be suppressed. If you get this message under different circumstances then please file a bug report. Note that a similar message in low security space can be suppressed. This is a terrible change. Please let us suppress this message.

CCP Casqade	Posted - 2008.06.23 09:47:00 - [218] Originally by: DoanEven Meswime Guess you won't fix the disconnect issues until you get to work Monday, but this weekend has been the pits. It has been getting progressively worse as time goes on. This reminds me of your database issues some time back. Wouldn't have your job for anything. The connection issues people are experiencing is not related to the Empyrean Age expansion. The issues you are experiencing is on an Internet Service Provider level and there is not much other than relaying the information about the status of their work to you. Please read this thread: http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=803712


CCP Navigator C C P	Posted - 2008.06.24 11:08:00 - [219] The Empyrean Age Issues list has been updated. If you have any more information on any of these issues, please send us a detailed bug report here: https://bugs.eve-online.com/newbugreport.asp Navigator Community Representative CCP Hf, EVE Online Email / Netfang

TheTrueDeathAngel	Posted - 2008.06.24 22:35:00 - [220] Originally by: JeremyCrow No joy in patching so far. It says my client is corrupt so I'm downloading the full client. i've done this five or six times and it says the same thing over and over again.
Mordachai	Posted - 2008.06.25 16:05:00 - [221] Let me get this straight regarding those "waypost". You can scan all of them down with normal exploration probes just like we do currently with "unknown" (useing any type ladargravmagnoradar Cause im getting NO luck at all, Is is like we deploy our probes and use then cosmic signatures or anomalies after reading your explanation dev's it sounds blurry.
WorkingTheStreets	Posted - 2008.06.25 16:59:00 - [222] I did not see this on the topic list so here goes: When ice mining with mackinaws and a rorqual, the mackinaws get all bonuses. However, when you deploy the rorqual to compress the ore, all subsequent cycles of all mackinaws in gang will only produce 1 block of ice per laser per cycle, effectively halving it. Turning off the lasers and restarting them fixes it, but that is ridiculous to do if you must deploy the rorqual several times to compress all the ice. Thank you so much!
Lyrecos Romal Mining Ventures Ltd.	Posted - 2008.06.25 20:17:00 - [223] I didn't see this in the list, but when you dock/undock your overview settings return to some kind of default "unsaved" setting instead of whatever you left it at. Also, I would like to submit that if you get disconnected while in a fleet and you reconnect (within a reasonable time limit) you should still be a member of whatever squad you were a member of before.
Isilwen Nightfall Caldari Insurgent New Eden Tribe Systematic-Chaos	Posted - 2008.06.28 11:39:00 - [224] Edited by: Isilwen Nightfall on 28/06/2008 11:42:42 There is still the "Wrong color schemes bug" in Caldari AFs. I reported this bug in january, but it hasn't been fixed yet. Quote: Description: Hi:) I just noticed a little bug. Harpy and Hawk have inverted color schemes. Being Lai Dai, Hawk should be rust-colored. Harpy instead should be blue-camo, being Ishukone. Do not know if other ships are affected by this problem. /tested on chaos 47313 /BH Eliohann Reproduction Steps: /1. check Lai Dai ships (Manticore, Kitsune, Cerberus, ...) and notice the redish/rusty finish /2. check Ishukone ships (Buzzard, Vulture, ...) and note the silvery shiny finish /3. check Kaalakiota ships (Nighthawk, Onyx, Flycatcher, ...) and note the black finsih /4. check the Harpy and note, that although being Ishukone it looks like Lai Dai / -all other T2 ships are in line / -screen attached /BH Eliohann It says: "Reported by Isilwen . This report has been attached to a defect"
Banni Vinda Minmatar Kinda'Shujaa	Posted - 2008.07.02 09:26:00 - [225] Originally by: Blue Binary Originally by: Botia Macracantha ... 3. i STILL seem to get rendering-stop (3D images freeze) after some time playing when undocking / session change / in-flight (original bug rep 55612 - filtered). Sometimes resets on next session change but then returns on subsequent session change etc etc. Can only "fix" by logging off all accounts + cold boot (ie memory cleared). Happens quicker when using more than one account, but I have seen it even on a single account. This issue dates back to Trinity implementation, was bug repped by me and others - but still happens, and is yet still not acknowledged. I am convinced it is related to the way Eve progressively gobbles RAM until the fault occurs at some threshold usage level per account. I use a laptop and have a cooling base as well as external fans cooling it. In any case, I see no other artifacts associated with overheating (no BSODs, no flickers, so other visual issues, no issues with other games, just Eve) ... I was having a similar problem to what you describe. It always occurred when i was undocking. The 3D engine would stall but the 2D overview worked fine; you could see the brackets fly by while warping and the overview update, etc. It was resolved by enabling station environments. I had it disabled to keep my machine cooler, but it caused the symptoms above. I don't know if this solution applies to you. I also get this every so often. Clicking the zoom in/out or the 'look at my ship' button (looks like a shuttle, next to the 'cargo' button) fixes the issue (until the next time it happens). The camera appears to become locked in place, with an unusual view projection (almost isometric). Meanwhile 2d UI elements (brackets etc) move as normal. It happens most often if I try to warp immediately after undocking. My ship goes into warp, the brackets move off into the distance correctly, but the 3d rendering (models etc.) become locked in that unusual projection mode. Running on a newly installed version of the client, with all settings cleared prior to install. This has been happening since EA 1.0
Kaleb Kutler	Posted - 2008.07.05 20:18:00 - [226] When I tried to join faction warfare after dropping my old corporation, I was given an error saying my standings were only .22 and they needed to be .5 Its true, my base standings are .22 but they're adjusted higher with Connections 3 to something like 1.3, so faction requirements are only looking at the base standings instead of adjusted standings.
Fastercart Gallente Ihatalo Heavy Industries	Posted - 2008.07.06 00:53:00 - [227] Originally by: Kaleb Kutler When I tried to join faction warfare after dropping my old corporation, I was given an error saying my standings were only .22 and they needed to be .5 Its true, my base standings are .22 but they're adjusted higher with Connections 3 to something like 1.3, so faction requirements are only looking at the base standings instead of adjusted standings. Yes, working as intended (and stated numerous times before). (: __ Rorqual AKA Mega Maid Oh, my God. It's Mega Maid. She's gone from suck to blow.
Botia Macracantha Minmatar Stealth Operations	Posted - 2008.07.06 11:12:00 - [228] Edited by: Botia Macracantha on 06/07/2008 11:13:11 My fenrir icon (in hangar when docked) no longer has a ship in it - just the orange background and the ship name. Is this just me ? its the same on 2 different accounts (same computer, same eve install). See pic.
Patron Wizard	Posted - 2008.07.06 15:25:00 - [229] Originally by: CCP Casqade Originally by: Dreadbeard Squidhook I am unable to connect to the port.... I don't know what this means, but I do know that my roommate is playing as I am posting this Have you checked that your firewall is not blocking the updated client? I've notice that a Peer-to-Peer protection program.. Peer Guardian, blocks the CCP addresses. You can go into Peer Guardian and allow that address range with a right click.
BFish	Posted - 2008.07.07 15:28:00 - [230] I cannot access my API key, everytime I go on to http://myeve.eve-online.com/api/default.asp it comes up with a white blank page with the words "Failed to generate new API key, please try again..." Help?!
Woulvesbaine	Posted - 2008.07.11 18:19:00 - [231] posted elsewhere but as of yesterday I am getting tremendous lag when jumping into systems, accessing the market by selling items, browsing, etc. And accessing character info (clicking on a pilot to check them out) also causes extreme lag. Specifically 30 seconds freeze ups by any of these actions!
Dungheap Caldari Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2008.07.12 16:29:00 - [232] rarely, (~5 times since ea patch) drones ordered to return to bay will fly back to the ship, some will dock, others will act as if they were abandoned. i hot keyed the dock command and it still happens, various ships and drone type. another person mention in corp chat also having same problem, so it's not isolated to me. bug reported..
scutternut Amarr Capital Ships Inc.	Posted - 2008.07.19 18:47:00 - [233] isues? what issues?
Hirana Yoshida Behavioral Affront	Posted - 2008.07.22 08:44:00 - [234] The issue regarding the discrepancy between 'contested' showing on UI and map that you somehow 'tested OK' is still present. Furthermore most of the people actively capturing sites regularly encounter it, so doubtful that its a cache/setting issue. New Stuff. I need help testing these as they are intermittent. Also have no idea how to report them as bugs due their nature. 1. Friendly Navy aggro can switch to defender for no reason. Only seen it happen when range from Navy-to-Player is <100-150km. Happens frequently when a nano-ship is trailing them to hold aggro. Had a wingman report that I appeared to flash red for a second immediately prior to the Navy targeting me. (the fact that a single fast ship can tie up 20+ navy vessels is a different complaint) 2. Sites get 'stuck' fairly often. Have not identified any pattern to it. The timer will run out and sometimes credit is given, but not always. Site remains in space until downtime without beacon on overview. 3. The Amarr Navy's heavy reliance on EM as damage type makes them a lot easier to tank. Adding some heavy nossing/neuting or missile spamming ships in mix would solve that.
Nathanial Victor Minmatar	Posted - 2008.07.29 22:43:00 - [235] Originally by: CCP Navigator # Occupancy status does not always update correctly in the World Information area. A system can show as being uncontested yet show on map as under attack and yield militia standing on site captures. Most frequently happens when logging into system, but have seen it on a regular gate in as well. The map shows nothing about ôunder attackö. Not a defect or bug. I THINK YOU MISSED WHAT HE WAS SAYING As I detail in my thread here, there are persistent issues with both the map and the main screen 'current system' information that are unresolved. Everyone I talk with in FW that looks for this information have all confirmed the issue. THE ISSUE IS: Occupancy is not correctly reflecting if a system is in 'contested' state or not. Of course there are 2 places we get this info. Both off the map (which may simply not be updating) AND on the main screen in space under 'current system information'. Beside the Occupancy it should show both the faction that occupies AND if the system is contested or not. To further assist your troubleshooting: -if under 'current system information' it shows as contested, it most definitely is. If it doesn't say, it's anyones guess. -if on the map it shows as contested it likely was at some point. It is unclear if it simply takes a long time to update contested status, or if it simply doesn't update correctly at all. "one more spam thread will get you a warning. - Thanks Hutch. " isn't a warning of a warning a warning? or just a warning of a warning? didnt he just get 'the warning'? my head hurts
Nathanial Victor Minmatar	Posted - 2008.07.29 22:46:00 - [236] further... Sometimes after a relog the information will be correctly updated/reflected. I have tested to see if that is all that is necessary. Multiple times i have done several relogs in the same system with no changes being made in the contested system. Some times it showed contested, other times it didn't. Same system, totally random... just doesn't make sense and MUST be a bug. After going through this with several other pilots, there is no way this is a customer side issue. "one more spam thread will get you a warning. - Thanks Hutch. " isn't a warning of a warning a warning? or just a warning of a warning? didnt he just get 'the warning'? my head hurts
Hoshi Deep Core Mining Inc.	Posted - 2008.08.18 14:17:00 - [237] Originally by: CCP Explorer Originally by: Terranah Scysha Saving screenshots in classic client (used at my work) creates 0 byte, 0px high by 859px wide corrupted .bmps or .jpgs. Not able to reproduce this, can you send us a bug report with more details, please? At least for me this always happens when I run dual screen with the game window on the non primary display. ---------------------------------------- A Guide to Scan Probing in Revelations

CCP Casqade	Posted - 2008.08.18 15:35:00 - [238] Originally by: Hoshi Originally by: CCP Explorer Originally by: Terranah Scysha Saving screenshots in classic client (used at my work) creates 0 byte, 0px high by 859px wide corrupted .bmps or .jpgs. Not able to reproduce this, can you send us a bug report with more details, please? At least for me this always happens when I run dual screen with the game window on the non primary display. Hi Hoshi. Can you send us a bug report about this and we will look into it. Thank you!

Chandaar Minmatar Minmatar Mining Consortium	Posted - 2008.09.02 21:14:00 - [239] could you tell me why my cluster is not yet accepting? and how much longer please?
RogueMind Caldari	Posted - 2008.09.03 01:20:00 - [240] Originally by: Chandaar could you tell me why my cluster is not yet accepting? and how much longer please? Me neither. I cant connect to EVE at all. -- Opinions are my own. Torp Nerfing: A thousand BS Campers cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced... EVE Trinity: The first game where Vista pwned XP.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.