| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Toman Jerich
Ars ex Discordia
GoonSwarm
   |
Posted - 2008.06.26 12:49:00 -
[61]
Supported, but I would like to see every corp in an alliance allowed by the mechanics to join whatever faction it likes. The potential fun of shooting alliance mates is simply too great to pass up.
|
Deldrac
Bat Country
Aegis Militia
|
Posted - 2008.06.26 13:23:00 -
[62]
Yes. Obv.
|
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.06.26 13:36:00 -
[63]
 Originally by: Jade Constantine
1. If any corps from the alliance join X militia then the rest of the alliance corps can only join X militia too?
2. If any corps from the alliance join X militia then ALL the rest of the alliance corps MUST join X militia?
3. Only one corp from the alliance can join X militia?
Option 1 seems to be the best to me.
Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.
|
Ketora Kitana
Polaris Project
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.06.26 13:38:00 -
[64]
|
Tatsue Nuko
Stimulus
|
Posted - 2008.06.26 14:07:00 -
[65]
Go for it. (Especially since part of the outblobbing that was raised as a worry has happened but partially as an effect of various alliances not being able to join in, "their" side is getting blobbed...)
|
Wolf Soldier
Neh'bu Kau Beh'Hude
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2008.06.26 14:32:00 -
[66]
+1
|
Adrianis
House Ix
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2008.06.26 14:32:00 -
[67]
Originally by: Ryas Nia
+1 but with the stipulation that only one corp from each alliance may join FW.
+1 this cause has my support, but reguarding the above comment, you may as well create a corp outside the alliance in the name of the alliance, as many have done
In theory i'd like to see corps being able to join as they like, but in practise entire alliances signing up to 1 militia, or (as previously mentioned) if corp from alliance joins x militia, corps of that alliance can only join x militia
|
Theron Gyrow
Gradient
Electus Matari
|
Posted - 2008.06.26 15:20:00 -
[68]
Yes.
--
Gradient forum |
BryanHad
|
Posted - 2008.06.26 16:41:00 -
[69]
|
Shaikar
PIE Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.06.26 17:54:00 -
[70]
|
|
|
XLR Eight
Viziam
|
Posted - 2008.06.26 22:35:00 -
[71]
|
Vendrin
APEX Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2008.06.27 04:07:00 -
[72]
/signed.
Though I'd widen it to that if one corp of an alliance joins a militia, the corps have to join that militia or it's ally's militia.
|
Karze Dywine
Gradient
Electus Matari
|
Posted - 2008.06.27 09:41:00 -
[73]
this would be good
|
Cutter Isaacson
Hollow World Mining Corporation
QUANT Hegemony
|
Posted - 2008.06.27 11:42:00 -
[74]
Gets a thumbs up from me. I dont want to have to leave my Alliance to do this.
Originally by: Verone
Sweet baby jesus and his holy mother of pwn. 
|
StarCasher
Minmatar
Masuat'aa Matari
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2008.06.27 16:53:00 -
[75]
Signed
===============================================
Fight hard, die well and take as many amarr scum with you as possible |
Tarminic
Black Flame Industries
|
Posted - 2008.06.27 17:36:00 -
[76]
I will tentatively support this, but only on the condition that only one corporation per alliance can join.
----------------
Play EVE: Downtime Madness v0.81 (Updated 4/8) |
Leannte Salz
|
Posted - 2008.06.27 17:51:00 -
[77]
I support this motion.
|
Alz Shado
Ever Flow
|
Posted - 2008.06.27 18:11:00 -
[78]
Yes.
////
---------===
[]=
---------===
\\\\ Rifter(RedBad)
"Kill a man one is a murderer; kill a million, a conqueror; kill them all, a God." -- Jean Rostand |
Cosmomind
Neh'bu Kau Beh'Hude
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2008.06.27 21:51:00 -
[79]
+1
|
Tarun Thred
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2008.06.27 23:10:00 -
[80]
Supported with the proviso that sovereignty holding alliances are excluded.
I think that this would better reflect CCPs vision of 0.0 alliances as factions in their own right and avoid the possibility corps belonging to such alliances taking factional warfare æbreaksÆ to keep board PVPers happy. I believe CCP are right in thinking that this would distort the intention of FW.
At the moment an alliance is just too convenient from a mechanics point of view (war dec functionality etc.) for empire based groups to forgo. This has unfortunately resulted in many smaller groups ideally suited for factional warfare being denied the chance to participate.
What I would like to see eventually is a third tier of player organisation, the player controlled faction. These would have the option of being made up of multiple alliances and would be by definition exclusively sovereignty holding. In other words as soon as an alliance claimed sovereignty it would become a player controlled faction and as soon as it lost its last system they would be bumped back down to a plain old alliance. They would of course be barred from factional warfare.
tt
|
|
|
William Pierce
Caldari
Universal Army
|
Posted - 2008.06.28 00:02:00 -
[81]
I wouldn't support this because it would be bad if 2 corps in the same alliance chose opposing factions. Same goes for joining as an individual while within a corp.
|
Amira Silvermist
24th Providence Templar Division
|
Posted - 2008.06.28 08:50:00 -
[82]
Very important change!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
BuntBridges
Sarz'na Khumatari
Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2008.06.28 10:35:00 -
[83]
Supported.
|
Futchmacht
Foundation
R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2008.06.28 10:56:00 -
[84]
Edited by: Futchmacht on 28/06/2008 10:57:09
i would agree.. BUT only IF the CORPS in the same alliance can NOT sign up on opposite sides.
how disfunctional would that be.. hey in 0.0 we are best buds defending our space. but in the militia we are killing each other!!
either alliance as a whole picks a side and then the corps can join or not join that side.
or the first corp to join one side locks all other corps in that alliance to that side. (which i dont like as much because it could cause alliances to break up) but hey maybe thats what we need.
at least if its an alliance decision. then the corps in the alliance can vote.. and if they dont like where things are heading they can leave knowing in advance what the alliance is doing.
|
LaFond
Gradient
Electus Matari
|
Posted - 2008.06.28 11:36:00 -
[85]
|
Tharrn
Vigilia Valeria Expeditionary Forces
|
Posted - 2008.06.28 12:37:00 -
[86]
I want to get back into my corp tbh. Having to create an extra corp for the alliance
a.) added an extra administrative layer noone needed
b.) splits the alliance, which sucks
Now recruiting! |
Toman Jerich
Ars ex Discordia
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.28 14:13:00 -
[87]
Originally by: Futchmacht
Edited by: Futchmacht on 28/06/2008 10:57:09
i would agree.. BUT only IF the CORPS in the same alliance can NOT sign up on opposite sides.
how disfunctional would that be.. hey in 0.0 we are best buds defending our space. but in the militia we are killing each other!!
First of all, how can you not see how much fun that would be?
Secondly, what if you've taken the time to reach standing 10 with caldari and amarr on your only character, but your alliance does a vote on which faction to join and it comes up Minmatar. What are your options?
1) Grind minmatar standings and destroy the standings you worked to build with Caldari and Amarr
2) Make an alpha-clone character on your account and fly around in a no-skills frigate (and wish you were playing as your main the whole time)
3) Buy a second account just for FW.
I mean clearly CCP should just start forcing people to buy a second account when they subscribe at this point, because so many things require it. Seriously though I don't want to have to pay 2B to buy a decent character for FW; I just want to play my damn counter-strike in space already. |
Scagga Laebetrovo
Ammatar Free Corps
|
Posted - 2008.06.28 19:19:00 -
[88]
Not supported.
San Matari Official forums |
Windjammer
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.06.28 19:37:00 -
[89]
Apparently this was not the main consideration for the restriction. Listen to the most recent pod cast Warp Drive Active, an interview with CCP Zuulupark. During this interview CCP Zuulupark reveals that CCP was concerned with large alliances sweeping the field with sheer numbers. Thinly veiled reference was made to a specific alliance, but other large alliances seemed to be of concern as well.
Regards,
Windjammer
|
Andreus Ixiris
Mixed Metaphor
|
Posted - 2008.06.28 19:51:00 -
[90]
He may be an Amarrian, but damnit he's got it dead to rights on this issue. 
-----
CEO, Mixed Metaphor
Dance Commander
Asuka Smith > not even goons can make 30m ISK this interesting. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |