Originally by: namesarehard

---

Originally by: Gealbhan

---

You can persecute us, nerf our standings, buff your concord and remove insurance for concord related deaths but you will NEVER, EVER stop us!

Pirates will Always be a part of Eve in every system from 0.0 to 1.0!

Yarrr with me brothers!!!!

P.S. This will increase war dec's on small empire corps 10x and turn empire into a warred out wasteland.

---

Thats the attitude! If anything pirate corps can just start wardeccing and atleast they get 24 hours to kill to their hearts content.

---

Originally by: agent apple

---

I believe I can safely speak for many of us when I say,

Dear Devs, Go Back to WOW

---

Originally by: Miklas Laces

---

Originally by: agent apple

---

I believe I can safely speak for many of us when I say,

Dear Devs, Go Back to WOW

---

This.

We have super-star game designers, they want to change everything. Here's the tip, dumb-asses: Eve is good as it is. At most it needs some minor tweak here and there over time. If you have an issue deal with it, don't change game mechanics that have nothing to do wit the issue and that are not broken.

Remove insurance for high-sec ganks, it's ok and it makes sense. An insurance company would never insure for illegal activities.

No, too easy for "CCP Fear", the super-game-designer has to show he really is a pro. And we get tons of crap ideas like in this dev blog. Look how smart he is, you get 1% less penalty loss for each point of relative difference in concord standing between aggressor and victim.

Lol pathetic.

-
not my singature

---

Originally by: Zoom Cheesedog

---

Sheesh. PvPers are always the biggest whiners in any MMO, but I swear, EVE's players raise it to a whole new level.

PvP is not going away. Want pew pew? Join faction warfare. Move to 0.0. Wardec somebody. Join a mercenary corp. Gank a faction-fit battleship.

We just got a huge content upgrade dedicated entirely to PvP, but when the rules are changes to make ganking newbies and mining barges less profitable, all you see is "WAAAAH CCP STOP CATERING TO CAREBEARS!! SO NOT FAIR!!"

---

Quote:

---

The changes to security standings will make it harder for players to casually gank another player, and creates a challenge, so that if you are going to kill someone, you better realize the consequences. We are also considering merging EVE Online with Hello Kitty Online.

---

Originally by: CCP Fear

---

But we want to discourage people to gank for giggles. It's just not sporting.

---

Originally by: namesarehard

---

I'm just gonna come out and say whats on everyone elses mind here. It is a lot more fun to ruin a carebears gameplay experience and drive him to quit the game then it is to shoot someone who wants to be shot in return. Most of us get a lot of enjoyment out of getting pubbies to cry and moan and talk about how life isn't fair and then rage quit over it. Nothing is more satisfying then ruining the game for someone else or for an ISK farmer.

---

Originally by: CCP Fear

---

Some answers to your questions;

These changes are on the test-server right now. So SISI is your way to go for testing this out.

Low security (0,3-0,1) is basically getting a reduction in security penalty from it's current values. So in essence, the lowest of security, just got harsher.

When we first started with this process, by brainstorming. We decided that it should not completely close off suicide ganking, but to raise the bar, make it so that it can be done, but will require some planning, thought and effort.

This is mainly focused on the no-risk no-thought ganking, that has killed thousands in the last few months.

I am in awe of those who spend weeks in planning, infiltrating, scheming and plotting against another player, just to be able to pop his freighter full of dysprosium. THAT is something i find amazing and i do not want to stop. And the reason for that, is the amount of work that went into the planning. That is cool IMO.

And that is still possible. But we want to discourage people to gank for giggles. It's just not sporting.

EVE is still harsh, and it punishes you for being careless and AFK. And this change, doesn't change that.

---

Originally by: MarcusCole

---

While you're nerfing different playstyles into oblivion would you care to take a look at the players who spend their entire careers in noob corps, unable to be attacked and generally not interacting with others at all.

If say after 3 months (arbitrary time) they were moved into their factions militia via some sort of graduation ceremony idea it would provide some sort of gradual introduction to the harshness of eve without making them entirely fair game in high sec. In addition they should not be allowed to rejoin the starter corp, the factional militia BECOMES their default corp.

the nerf bat should swing both ways

---

Originally by: CCP Fear

---

And that is still possible. But we want to discourage people to gank for giggles. It's just not sporting.

EVE is still harsh, and it punishes you for being careless and AFK. And this change, doesn't change that.

---

Originally by: Pesadel0

---

Originally by: Khatred

---

I have the solution for you all:

1. High sec gankers can go to WoW pvp servers, level to 70 and then gank 20's in Ashenvale.
2. High sec carebears can go to WoW pve servers and do whatever.

That will also solve Jita lag.

There, I want a Noble prize now.

---

Thank you for your input ,here take a buck of STFU.

---

Originally by: Apertotes

---

it will happen the same with this. there is no need of any evidence. it is just time, until CCP decides that paying insurance to criminals is no longer within the spirit of the game, and they will reafirm the change with lots of big words about honorability, morality, economy health and bOObs.

everybody will applaud them for doing so. a few will fill the forums with threats to leave the game with 400 alts, and fewer still will wonder how on earth that was not against the spirit of the game some weeks ago.

---