Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
489
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 11:24:00 -
[151] - Quote
Seriously, the best thing CCP can do is to go back to 2005 or whenever it was when they added kill rights on theft. It was alot better when we all could just steal from any can, without any aggression. Poor miners did not like that tho. "Everyone shooting suspect" sounds cool, but the sec drops is just ridicilous, and instead of CCP just failing repeatedly for balancing the aggro mechanics - why not just remove them.
Let everyone steal anything. 
"but but our duels" - everyone knows they get dishonoured anyway "but but our duels!!11!!" - fine, add a /duel option in rightclick, that triggers a popup like when you get a fleet invite shiptoastin' liek a baws |

Azran Zala
Sicarius. When Hippos Attack
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 12:06:00 -
[152] - Quote
Wait... How do you accept a 1v1 then? |

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
615
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 12:19:00 -
[153] - Quote
No more aggro mechanics!
ANARCHY ONLINE!!!!
Ohwai.... Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |

Vladimir Norkoff
Income Redistribution Service
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 12:31:00 -
[154] - Quote
Durr... reading comprehension fail on my part. |

Gnaw LF
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 15:45:00 -
[155] - Quote
Azran Zala wrote:Wait... How do you accept a 1v1 then?
Form fleet with the other duelist, warp to safe spot, drop can, pvp. |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
421
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:24:00 -
[156] - Quote
I like it how people whine about station games and then advocate for mechanics that would basically force all non-war highsec PVP to occur on stations. |

Rivur'Tam
the united Negative Ten.
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 16:31:00 -
[157] - Quote
i couldn't agree moar with everything that was said
please gief me a liek Cry moar faggots |

Talus DeMedici
Cresent Hawk's Order of The Angels S E D I T I O N
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 18:13:00 -
[158] - Quote
I spend 90% of my time in high sec and have engaged in can flipping myself, along with ninja salvaging, trying to bait mission runners, war decing indy corps and all the other fun things you can do in high sec to make an ass of yourself. I don't apologize for my play style and don't care how other people choose to spend their time in eve. After looking at the op, I have to say I have no problems at all with the proposed "suspect" tag as long as 1) the suspect flag does not stop you from docking, gating or changing ships with an orca and 2) the sec status hit to the person with the suspect tag is removed.
This could however cause an unforeseen bonus in the new player systems. As everyone knows, there are people who sit in new player systems can baiting. Usually there are 2 or 3 of these guys bating. With the proposed changes, when a new player falls for the "free stuff" bait, instead of surprise butt seks from one thrasher, he/she will enjoy a surprise gang bang from many thrashers. And, all of the baiters will now be able to get in on the km. Just think of all the time this will save the baiters. (Before anyone jumps to conclusions, no I do not do this, as it is against the TOS/EULA. Just bringing this up for those who have brought up the "What you do drives off new players!" argument.)
Anyways, people are bringing up a lack of risk involved in high sec pvp. There are many ways and many locations to engage in pvp in eve, each with its own rules and its own level of risk. If you are flying around high sec with a suspect tag and anyone can take a shot at you then I would consider the risk requirement fulfilled. Your choice may not appeal to me and mine might not appeal to you. But, in the end, as long as ships go boom because of another player, isn't that pvp? I would imagine that, even with the proposed changes, you can still "bet on stupid" and come out ahead. All the suspect flag will do is give more people the chance to be stupid. |

Ubiquitous Forum Alt
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 18:30:00 -
[159] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:I like it how people whine about station games and then advocate for mechanics that would basically force all non-war highsec PVP to occur on stations.
Erm...How in the **** does this promote PvP on station?
Any/All non-war PvP on station would *guarantee* that the person who stole from the can would be blobbed by everyone in system.....Only a complete and utter MORON would PvP on station outside of war given the new mechanics....
And the current mechanics don't force you to PvP anywhere in particular....
And nobody has advocated any others that I know of.....
So what in the **** are you talking about?!?  I don't log in - I don't need to. My very existence griefs people. They see my name, and they instinctively fill with rage and indignation. Deny it all you want - but if you didn't care, you wouldn't have posted, would you? |

Starcaller Dredg
1st Contact Fade 2 Black
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 22:55:00 -
[160] - Quote
I for one am looking forwards to the Suspect flag.
My corp (bunch of mining carebears) has been harassed for quite a while by another corp that refuses to dec us, will dec shield if we attempt to dec him, and knows that he's annoying us with no way for us to retaliate without incurring a sec status hit unless we coax him into a wormhole or low sec, which is not going to happen. With the new mechanics, he'll have to leave the miners alone, or I'll kill him and send him packing with a massive sec status hit.
The status hit isn't really a big deal if you look at it from a pvp perspective. Even if you're forced out of high sec, your status can be redeemed if you hunt pilots on the other end of the spectrum. Instead of a gradual sec grind, you have an opportunity to instantly boost your sec status.
Furthermore, the suspect flag will ENCOURAGE new players to band together and hunt you down. Thrilling news if I do say so myself.
It'll be interesting to see if Socratic takes any more cans from "his" system after the changes, or if he stays docked all day and runs his mouth. |

Starcaller Dredg
1st Contact Fade 2 Black
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 23:06:00 -
[161] - Quote
Cannibal Kane wrote:People still don't get what the actual issue.  In any event, it's all just conjecture until CCP puts in a dev blog... THIS IS WHAT WERE GOING TO DO. Until then, I shall wait. Still don't like the idea of getting a sec hit for killing somebody that is shooting at me.
As much as I respect you as a pilot and enjoy your pvp stories, I must disagree.
This new system will help new pilots and carebears actually fight back and allow them to band together on the spot. I remember when I first started playing I was eager to start shooting people, and I learned the hard way about how sec status worked. a single hail in local can spur a flash flood of help from people who would love to be on the winning side in their formative months of EVE. It's a very good incentive for demonstrating the sandbox that EVE is.
Furthermore, as discussed earlier, just make an alt, get it to -10 (not at all hard) and use it purely to regain your main's sec status after every hi-sec adventure. Yes, it's part of the meta, but so are spy alts, scamming and multiboxing.
It should be an exciting new way for you to PVP, and since you like to call yourself a terrorist, you of all people should like the potential of this system. |

Immortis Vexx
Lupus Draconis Dragehund
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 00:15:00 -
[162] - Quote
I look at this as (and I'm going wayyy back on this one) grey status in Ultima Online. If you perform a criminal act you are in fact, a criminal. In UO if you were grey you had better watch your back, and it was all based on karma AKA sec status. The more criminal acts you racked up the lower your karma and you would then become Perma grey until you raised your karma. Guess what? No one likes criminals. A criminal is an outlaw supposed to live on the fringes of society. Society as a whole should not tolerate criminals. This does *NOT* mean that high sec should not have PVP. This also does not mean that EVE shouldn't have criminals. What happens in real life if you steal a car? The police hunt you down and capture you. This also means that you are on the run. You don't get help from people because they don't want to be associated with you.
I would like someone to try to steal a car in a busy parking lot in the south and see what happens. It wouldn't take long for every gun toting redneck (which is all of them ) to swarm you.
Why should EVE be any different? (other than the redneck part. I really don't want to see gun racks and confederate flags flying on ships)
Vexx
**Note: I do not support or endorse stealing of anything in the real world so please, don't do it. |

Starcaller Dredg
1st Contact Fade 2 Black
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 00:48:00 -
[163] - Quote
Immortis Vexx wrote:I look at this as (and I'm going wayyy back on this one) grey status in Ultima Online. If you perform a criminal act you are in fact, a criminal. In UO if you were grey you had better watch your back, and it was all based on karma AKA sec status. The more criminal acts you racked up the lower your karma and you would then become Perma grey until you raised your karma. Guess what? No one likes criminals. A criminal is an outlaw supposed to live on the fringes of society. Society as a whole should not tolerate criminals. This does *NOT* mean that high sec should not have PVP. This also does not mean that EVE shouldn't have criminals. What happens in real life if you steal a car? The police hunt you down and capture you. This also means that you are on the run. You don't get help from people because they don't want to be associated with you. I would like someone to try to steal a car in a busy parking lot in the south and see what happens. It wouldn't take long for every gun toting redneck (which is all of them  ) to swarm you. Why should EVE be any different? (other than the redneck part. I really don't want to see gun racks and confederate flags flying on ships) Vexx **Note: I do not support or endorse stealing of anything in the real world so please, don't do it.
Now i want a gun rack on my rifter. |

MIkhail Illiad
Fevered Imaginings DSM FOUNDATION
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 00:55:00 -
[164] - Quote
TEARS is the right alliance for you... need a tissue? On a one man mission against asshatery!-á |

El 1974
Bendebeukers Green Rhino
59
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:10:00 -
[165] - Quote
Cannibal Kane wrote:Still don't like the idea of getting a sec hit for killing somebody that is shooting at me. Happens in real life as well. You steal from a guy, he pulls a gun, you shoot him: you go away for a long time. |

Chicken Pizza
Penumbra Institute
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 13:18:00 -
[166] - Quote
Buck Futz wrote:I don't know, if its not PvP, How about we call it PvC? Carebears aren't really 'people' after all (mostly botters in my experience), so would calling it PvC would distinguish the two and not offend our 'nullsec PVP' betters? Wat u tink, guvnor? Is "PvC" a 'good enough' label for popping, oh, almost 600 Exhumers in 3 months......SOLO?
I think dealing about 115 Billion ISK in damage to the mining community - with only occasional play - is just a bit more than 'carebear ratting', so you might want to climb down from your pedestal. After all, I don't see very many kills on YOUR ledger........that aren't shared by 50 other people.  Doing something in large quantities doesn't change what it is.
Don't bother looking at my killboard, either. You won't find very many kills involving ships that only fit mining lasers. In highsec, for that matter. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
1205
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 14:32:00 -
[167] - Quote
El 1974 wrote:Happens in real life as well. You steal from a guy, he pulls a gun, you shoot him: you go away for a long time.
If I steal from you and you shoot me, YOU go away for a long time. Theft does NOT permit a violent response under most legal systems. Eve is different (also, it's a game).
Shooting me when I have a suspect flag is consenting to PVP. I should NOT be penalized for fighting with someone who has accepted the risk and started a fight. If they do go forward with this silly rule, the standard practice will become having a suicide alt on standby so that when you do burn them down to structure, you warp in the Tornado alt to do the killing and take the sec hit. It'll be a good way to repurpose all those neutral RR alts that will be obsolete. It's time to put an end to CCP's war on piracy. Fight your own battles and stop asking CCP to do it for you. |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1991
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 15:01:00 -
[168] - Quote
Baww (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Azran Zala
Sicarius. When Hippos Attack
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 15:07:00 -
[169] - Quote
El 1974 wrote:Cannibal Kane wrote:Still don't like the idea of getting a sec hit for killing somebody that is shooting at me. Happens in real life as well. You steal from a guy, he pulls a gun, you shoot him: you go away for a long time.
Well where I come from, if you get caught walking out someones front door with his TV in the middle of the night, he pulls a gun and shoots you... he goes to jail for murder/attempted murder.
Ones right to protect their property is never held higher than anothers right to live, at least in my country. (which is probly why we have a high crime rate). |

Azran Zala
Sicarius. When Hippos Attack
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 15:08:00 -
[170] - Quote
Talus DeMedici wrote:
This could however cause an unforeseen bonus in the new player systems. As everyone knows, there are people who sit in new player systems can baiting. Usually there are 2 or 3 of these guys bating. With the proposed changes, when a new player falls for the "free stuff" bait, instead of surprise butt seks from one thrasher, he/she will enjoy a surprise gang bang from many thrashers. And, all of the baiters will now be able to get in on the km. Just think of all the time this will save the baiters.
SOLD. I approve of this new mechanic.
|

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
1205
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 15:40:00 -
[171] - Quote
Azran Zala wrote:Happens in real life as well. You steal from a guy, he pulls a gun, you shoot him: you go away for a long time.
Well where I come from, if you get caught walking out someones front door with his TV in the middle of the night, he pulls a gun and shoots you... he goes to jail for murder/attempted murder.
Ones right to protect their property is never held higher than anothers right to live, at least in my country.[/quote]
I live in Texas (that bastion of gun violence, according to some) and that's the case here. Self defense requires a threat or use of force. It's time to put an end to CCP's war on piracy. Fight your own battles and stop asking CCP to do it for you. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
1205
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 15:42:00 -
[172] - Quote
Talus DeMedici wrote:there are people who sit in new player systems can baiting. Usually there are 2 or 3 of these guys bating. With the proposed changes, when a new player falls for the "free stuff" bait, instead of surprise butt seks from one thrasher, he/she will enjoy a surprise gang bang from many thrashers.
Except:
1) It's already a bannable offense to can-bait noobs, and 2) The proposed "safety switch" will prevent noobs from stealing from the can in the first place. It's time to put an end to CCP's war on piracy. Fight your own battles and stop asking CCP to do it for you. |

Soporo
27
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 16:08:00 -
[173] - Quote
Azran Zala wrote:El 1974 wrote:Cannibal Kane wrote:Still don't like the idea of getting a sec hit for killing somebody that is shooting at me. Happens in real life as well. You steal from a guy, he pulls a gun, you shoot him: you go away for a long time. Well where I come from, if you get caught walking out someones front door with his TV in the middle of the night, he pulls a gun and shoots you... he goes to jail for murder/attempted murder. Ones right to protect their property is never held higher than anothers right to live, at least in my country.
That thief above better not do that in Texas and a buncha other southern and some midwestern states. Some places still allow people to defend their property, even their neighbors too, thankfully. Risk/reward. Forget the north east and the left coast though, it's generally open season on law abiding citizens there. Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. - H.L. Mencken |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
1205
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 16:21:00 -
[174] - Quote
Soporo wrote:That thief above better not do that in Texas and a buncha other southern and some midwestern states. Some places still allow people to defend their property, even their neighbors too, thankfully.  Risk/reward. Forget the north east and the left coast though, it's generally open season on law abiding citizens there.
You shoot someone in Texas because they stole your TV, you'll probably go to jail. You have the right to defend yourself and others from harm, not from the loss of property. It's time to put an end to CCP's war on piracy. Fight your own battles and stop asking CCP to do it for you. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
1363
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 18:37:00 -
[175] - Quote
If I had a rookie ship kill on a day old noob I'd quit.
|

Proteus Maximus
New Eden Outcasts Malicious Intent Gentleman's Club
64
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 18:41:00 -
[176] - Quote
Quote:-10 players would actually be welcomed at lowsec stations where pirate factions control it...and positive standings players would be shot at by the station guns, the npc police and possibly the gate guns, depending on the security status of the system.
This... Would be most excellent! Eve... Burn it....Burn it All |

Kobalos
The Oasis Group Combat Mining and Logistics
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 20:50:00 -
[177] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Ohh Yeah wrote:This is going to own.
Now all I have to do is canflip my alt and I suddenly am flagged to everyone in EVE.
That is ******* amazing. The number of fights a high-sec PvPer can get all over high-sec now is amazing. Except that even if someone shoots you, you won't be able to shoot them back without going GCC.
I fail to see your point. A criminal is a criminal. If a criminal fights those who are attempting to punish him for his crimes, that is further criminal action and his guilt and punishment increase in proportion to his recalcitrance. Make sense? Ever play Grand Theft Auto? Ever watch TV? The sandbox is more true to life, with this change. You just have to have more ghanas, now.
- Kobalos  |

Kobalos
The Oasis Group Combat Mining and Logistics
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 20:51:00 -
[178] - Quote
Proteus Maximus wrote:Quote:-10 players would actually be welcomed at lowsec stations where pirate factions control it...and positive standings players would be shot at by the station guns, the npc police and possibly the gate guns, depending on the security status of the system. This... Would be most excellent!
On the flip-side, this would be amazing.
- Kobalos  |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
1216
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 21:22:00 -
[179] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:If I had a rookie ship kill on a day old noob I'd quit.
I think I have a few from a wartarget who was trying to troll us with his day-old alt. Sometimes you shoot just for the hell of it. It's time to put an end to CCP's war on piracy. Fight your own battles and stop asking CCP to do it for you. |

Zaltone
Lokresh Industries
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 21:32:00 -
[180] - Quote
I think its because of the inflation caused by the bot miner bans. CCP need the active miners to be safe to lower market prices back to a "normal level".      |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |