Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 43 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 70 post(s) |
Akelorian
FinFleet Raiden.
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:00:00 -
[151] - Quote
Oh The tears! They are delicious! |
Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
195
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:01:00 -
[152] - Quote
Calmoto wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:[quote=CCP Greyscale][quote=Hakaru Ishiwara][quote=CCP Greyscale]...
- Remove Titan electronic warfare immunity, and give them a high amount of innate sensor strength and warp core stabilizers *** This change would put the fix to Titan tracking in the hands of electronic warfare ships and normal tacklers. It would enable coordinated efforts to counter Titans, as well as fixing the issue of tackling Titans in low sec. While this would remove some of the specialized role of hictors/dictors, these ships already have tremendous utility in combat in all areas (save dictors outside of 0.0), and their infinite points and bubbles would still be very useful for tackling anything.
There are plenty of options to consider which work within the current game mechanics. These are simply a few. they already have very high sensor strength and just 1 eccm (again screwing over shield titans) almost doubles that and in the end you have just glossed over the problem, should you not be able to correctly put some ewar strat into action youve still lost your fleet to something broken, just now you have some half cocked reason as a glossy excuse.
True, I'm not saying that this shouldn't be going hand in hand with a change to tracking and locked targets. I mainly was putting this forward as a method of addressing the difficulty of holding down Titans given their ability to blap dictors and hictors. If half a dozen or so ships with scrams fit can act as a substitute for one of these ships, engagements, especially in low sec, become less likely to be consequence free.
Current Titan sensor strength is somewhat of a moot number anyway, given their electronic warfare immunity. Just as the scan resolution change was balanced considering sensor strength, I'm sure any consideration of this idea would account for Sensor Boosters, Cap Boosters, Tracking Computers, and ECCM. |
Poaw
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:04:00 -
[153] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:Furthermore, the decision we've made is based partly on a desire to avoid special-casing so this sort of approach isn't really on the table right now.
Would you at least be open to not making it a special case and instead extending something like this to all turret classes? This kind of nuance is what leads to depth in the combat system, especially with regards to David v Goliath scenarios. |
Worker Bee1
Goonswarm Federation Human Resources Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:05:00 -
[154] - Quote
i propose that any titannerf has to clear the "titan-nerf-test" which consists of the following:
2 full fleets of bs-sized ships attacking 50 titans sitting on a pos (that is not stronted). No warping allowed. If the bs are not able to kill the titans and pos, this nerf is not enough. |
Styrling
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:05:00 -
[155] - Quote
Reilly Duvolle wrote:Styrling wrote: No no no no no structures, give dreads a role.
Titans today allready shoot structures. A modified DD would just compensate for the gun removal. But yes, I am all for a capital revamp.
I know bro, I have one, but that doesn't mean it needs to stay the status quo. Titans reinforcing POS' pre-aligned where they can just warp out the minute local goes up by one is boring as hell. Dread Siege mechanic forces fights and there's no reason that requiring Dreads to siege a POS is a bad thing. |
EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
692
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:06:00 -
[156] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote:EnderCapitalG wrote:Basically this shows that a Leviathan with perfect support against the target still does worse than a turret titan. Yup, but it is reliably doing ~200k EHP damage every single volley, which ought to be plenty enough to one-hit most battleships.
Incorrect. Its volley at full is 153k. Its volley at half (with 3x TP and 2x web in a "perfect" situation) is half that. Our Maelstrom fitting is approx 118k EHP, so even in this "perfect" situation, it still does not one-volley a Maelstrom. |
Calmoto
Magellanic Itg Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:09:00 -
[157] - Quote
Ironicly the sig res nerf actually did more for titan blapping than the tracking ever will as anyone who was sorting by transversal wouldnt of been able to lock the target fast enough to apply their deeps and would have to wait until the next repeat of the orbit |
Ivana Twinkle
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
175
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:10:00 -
[158] - Quote
Gnaw LF wrote:Ivana Twinkle wrote:Gnaw LF wrote:If you are going to do this then you will also need to split off the XL gun into a category used by Dreadnaughts and Titans. Otherwise the Dreads will be inadvertently nerfed. Currently dreads cant hit the broad side of a barn anyway. Correction, the dreads can't hit the broad side of a barn by themselves. However, paired up with some webbing support ships the Dreads are a great weapon. I understand that such support might not be feasible or practical in null sec but in w-space the Dreads have an important role. Nerfing them to fix Titans will inadvertently impact the game play of many w-space residents.
It would be equalised if support ships incl. players could dock in carriers and could cyno with them. |
XxTheKmanxX
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
41
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:13:00 -
[159] - Quote
still think that titans shouldn't be able to hit subcaps.. or if they are even able to too the biggest they can hit is a battleship that is at 0 speed and transversal with 100 TP's on it |
Kaj'Schak
Sensus Numinis Ev0ke
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:15:00 -
[160] - Quote
There is also the question, if you field 50 Ships worth 70b each, you should be somehow able to vaporize an enemy fleet, that has only the value of one or two of these ships
Battles which are effected by these masses of titans are between entities, which both can afford to lose dozens of these.
Ranges: Titans can only inflict their dread-compareable DPS at relativly short ranges (+ Doomsday all 10 Minutes). Motherships can inflict their fighterbomber dps at over 200km where titans won't hit them at all (except DDs)
DPS/Tank: Titans that are fitted for rapes, are not fitted to max tank. So they are realativly vuernable Motherships can always carry their nearly titan tank and to unleash their imense DPS
Signature: Titans **** these Drakes and Maelstroms because they have a huge signature. Shieldtanks (Maels/Drakes) do have a big signature which enables these tracking fitted/booster boosted titans (!) to hit subcaps at all. Aditionally, these perma mwding drakes also have a very big signature from their mwd-> easy to hit for titans. So there is a reason why these titans are effective at all.
You have to take on compromisses with Titans to kill supportfleets and have to put them into great danger of being lost.
Some entities made wrong decisions by not using their recources in the past to build a suiting fleet for their upcomming enemy. There never was a doubt how many Titans and Motherships are around and could be fielded against them. That these ships would knock on their door one day was expectable. Now these entities shoud should have to deal with their decissions they made in the past.
At least if this is a sandbox, where your decision matters and can have an influence on the entire universe. The ballance is fine. |
|
Magnifikus Erzverwirrer
Endstati0n Raiden.
12
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:18:00 -
[161] - Quote
XxTheKmanxX wrote:still think that titans shouldn't be able to hit subcaps.. or if they are even able to too the biggest they can hit is a battleship that is at 0 speed and transversal with 100 TP's on it
you know about stacking penalty of tps right?
one goon more that farts about game mechanics he dont even understand :D
really you are mwding with battleships (blown up to carrier signatur radius) away from titans and wonder why they hit you, your so terribad at eve |
EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
692
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:19:00 -
[162] - Quote
Cost is not a balancing tool, at all. |
Kun'mi
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:20:00 -
[163] - Quote
Kaj'Schak wrote: Titans can only inflict their dread-compareable DPS at relativly short ranges (+ Doomsday all 10 Minutes).
50 tracking titans are not vulnerable to anything they'd be fielded against.
No subcap fleet could take out any of them (except for situations where their pilots make mistakes, such as this weekend) and they are not brought onto the field when there is a thread from an equal sized tank-fitted titan fleet.
Even if they were dropped by a titan fleet of equal size, there is nothing stopping them from simply refitting.
|
Dungar's Sister
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:20:00 -
[164] - Quote
Kaj'Schak wrote:There is also the question, if you field 50 Ships worth 70b each, you should be somehow able to vaporize an enemy fleet, that has only the value of one or two of these ships
. So a handful of battleships should never be beaten by 50 frigates? |
Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
195
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:21:00 -
[165] - Quote
EnderCapitalG wrote: ... discussion of missile volleys... Incorrect. Its volley at full is 153k. Its volley at half (with 3x TP and 2x web in a "perfect" situation) is half that. Our Maelstrom fitting is approx 118k EHP, so even in this "perfect" situation, it still does not one-volley a Maelstrom.
This is the point I was getting at.
Essentially, the current state of 0.0 sub capital combat, given the role of logistics ships, works a fair bit around the concept of killing a ship in a single volley before reps are received. I won't go into detail about our fleet doctrine, but it uses a lot of support and ships with the ability to coordinate a high alpha strike on a single target which they are able to track to do this quite well. It's far from immune to counters, capital and sub capital, but the issue at hand is how a super capital fleet functions versus sub capital fleets, so I'll use this as the example.
Pre-Crucible, Titans were able to use their Doomsdays to directly and immediately remove critical support roles from this fleet, or any other fleet. In order, these were generally the fleet commander, any command ships, and hictors/dictors capable of tackling Titans, and any logistics ships capable of keeping the fleet alive. They did this in a single shot, so no amount of support could prevent it. They required no support to do this.
Post-Crucible, Titans are doing the exact same run down of critical targets, only they're using the fact their guns are perfectly capable of hitting any sized target given its angular velocity relative to a crowd of 20+ titans requires no support to hit with a shot that will kill it in a single volley. Titans were doing this pre-Crucible in low sec where they couldn't use doomsdays (see the end of the much celebrated first CCP fleet, a fun event for everyone). Given their immunity to friendly electronic warfare, this isn't due to support fleets. Looking at killmails, these targets are not target painted or webbed. They are simply being killed in single volleys. There is still no support fleet necessary.
The reason Leviathans are mentioned is because missile damage is not effective in this type of strategy, as the flight time of missiles means coordinating a volley does not work. Furthermore, the single volley damage from singular Leviathans is not killing sub capitals because it is actually mitigated by the missile damage formula.
As it stands, even assuming maximum target painting and webbing (which implies the necessity of a support fleet for Titans to function), Leviathans were never useful for this type of combat.
tl;dr:
-Single volley kills by turrets is what is dangerous -Titans do this without support while having 30m+ EHP -Missiles don't do this without support, or even with it.
|
Styrling
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:22:00 -
[166] - Quote
Kaj'Schak wrote:There is also the question, if you field 50 Ships worth 70b each, you should be somehow able to vaporize an enemy fleet, that has only the value of one or two of these ships
50 bombers can take 100000 Battleships to the ownzone.
**** you and **** balancing this game on Isk. |
Calmoto
Magellanic Itg Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:23:00 -
[167] - Quote
Kaj'Schak wrote:There is also the question, if you field 50 Ships worth 70b each, you should be somehow able to vaporize an enemy fleet, that has only the value of one or two of these ships
Battles which are effected by these masses of titans are between entities, which both can afford to lose dozens of these.
Ranges: Titans can only inflict their dread-compareable DPS at relativly short ranges (+ Doomsday all 10 Minutes). Motherships can inflict their fighterbomber dps at over 200km where titans won't hit them at all (except DDs)
DPS/Tank: Titans that are fitted for rapes, are not fitted to max tank. So they are realativly vuernable Motherships can always carry their nearly titan tank and to unleash their imense DPS
Signature: Titans **** these Drakes and Maelstroms because they have a huge signature. Shieldtanks (Maels/Drakes) do have a big signature which enables these tracking fitted/booster boosted titans (!) to hit subcaps at all. Aditionally, these perma mwding drakes also have a very big signature from their mwd-> easy to hit for titans. So there is a reason why these titans are effective at all.
You have to take on compromisses with Titans to kill supportfleets and have to put them into great danger of being lost.
Some entities made wrong decisions by not using their recources in the past to build a suiting fleet for their upcomming enemy. There never was a doubt how many Titans and Motherships are around and could be fielded against them. That these ships would knock on their door one day was expectable. Now these entities shoud should have to deal with their decissions they made in the past.
At least if this is a sandbox, where your decision matters and can have an influence on the entire universe. The ballance is fine.
they kill hurricanes with mwd off really easy, because in this game there is always going to be an chance to apply all 10k dps
cost is never an excuse |
Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
195
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:24:00 -
[168] - Quote
Kaj'Schak wrote:There is also the question, if you field 50 Ships worth 70b each, you should be somehow able to vaporize an enemy fleet, that has only the value of one or two of these ships
Isk value is entirely irrelevant given the ease with which money is made in EVE, and everyone is well aware of this. Otherwise, there would be more broad complaints about the capabilities of Tech 3 Cruisers. |
Akelorian
FinFleet Raiden.
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:28:00 -
[169] - Quote
This by the way is a diversion from the fact that The Mittani messed up at fanfest, and pulling out a new topic about titans to side track the real issue in eve at this time. |
EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
694
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:30:00 -
[170] - Quote
Akelorian wrote:This by the way is a diversion from the fact that The Mittani messed up at fanfest, and pulling out a new topic about titans to side track the real issue in eve at this time.
Trolling is against the forum rules. Please stop. |
|
Akelorian
FinFleet Raiden.
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:36:00 -
[171] - Quote
EnderCapitalG wrote:Akelorian wrote:This by the way is a diversion from the fact that The Mittani messed up at fanfest, and pulling out a new topic about titans to side track the real issue in eve at this time. Trolling is against the forum rules. Please stop.
This is exactly what this forum post is about, so that The Mittani's inexcusable behaviour at fanfest on the alliance panel can be quietly swept under the table. |
EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
694
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:36:00 -
[172] - Quote
Akelorian wrote:EnderCapitalG wrote:Akelorian wrote:This by the way is a diversion from the fact that The Mittani messed up at fanfest, and pulling out a new topic about titans to side track the real issue in eve at this time. Trolling is against the forum rules. Please stop. This is exactly what this forum post is about, so that The Mittani's inexcusable behaviour at fanfest on the alliance panel can be quietly swept under the table.
I apologize, but I'm going to have to report you for trolling. |
Caneb
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:37:00 -
[173] - Quote
Kaj'Schak wrote: Titans that are fitted for rapes, are not fitted to max tank. So they are realativly vuernable
No they're not, because a supercap fleet always has alternate fittings in the cargo and a bunch of supercarriers nearby.
Again, the problem isn't single titans. A single titan is vulnerable and an insignificant threat to a subcap fleet. The issue is large groups of titans supported by supercarriers, a doctrine which scales far beyond their numbers.
If a serious threat to the fleet appears, the titans will simply use the carriers to refit into a max tank fit. When there is no threat, they can fit for maximum damage, tracking and scan res.
|
Akelorian
FinFleet Raiden.
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:38:00 -
[174] - Quote
EnderCapitalG wrote:Akelorian wrote:EnderCapitalG wrote:Akelorian wrote:This by the way is a diversion from the fact that The Mittani messed up at fanfest, and pulling out a new topic about titans to side track the real issue in eve at this time. Trolling is against the forum rules. Please stop. This is exactly what this forum post is about, so that The Mittani's inexcusable behaviour at fanfest on the alliance panel can be quietly swept under the table. I apologize, but I'm going to have to report you for trolling.
If thats what you feel is needed to do, please go on, and while I am at it, I love the tears generated from this thread, they fuel my titans turret tracking. |
NimBetu Cayal
The Vorlon Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:40:00 -
[175] - Quote
CCP Greyscale wrote: This has a decent chance of being a good long-term fix (we'd have to think about it some more), but it's too large in scope for this release, unfortunately.
Capitals is the only means a smaller entity has to deal whit a much larger Blobb. The war in the north has showen us that a 200 man fleet can defend agains a 400 man fleet.
As an example: Raiden. has used Titans Successfully Couse Goonswarm was unable or unwilling to change there tactics.
They then field many Large Sig radius ships like Maelstroms or Drakes Permarunning MWDs. In addition to that there are many expamples that show us (read youtube recordings) that The Goon fleet is not even trying to have a high angular velocity.
Why did they not just bring Ahacs or Tengus whit low sig? Then titans would not have tracked them at all, unelss they where sitting still. Almost seems like the goon leaders are trying to make this a bigger problem then it really is. Isnt EVE all about adapiting to the enemy fleet? Countering it and overcome the obstical. Seems more like Goons try to whine change the game so they don't have to change tactics. Might be cause they have so many players that has skilled directly for the Alpha Maelstrom. i dont know.
I think the Proposed Change you poste on page one Mr. CCP Greyscale is a accaptable one. Important to keep in mind that Titans are 100Bill ISK ships and whit out them the largest blobb would always win. |
EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
694
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:42:00 -
[176] - Quote
Also, CCP Greyscale, since you've not replied I've taken this chance to produce 2 more graphs for you.
These are without MWD on, as all the others have had the MWD on for the target Maelstrom.
With webs: http://i.imgur.com/Meg3i.png
Without: http://i.imgur.com/2ez3h.png |
EnderCapitalG
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
694
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:43:00 -
[177] - Quote
NimBetu Cayal wrote:I do not understand how the tracking formula works..
Incorrect. At any time one of those Tengus or Armor HACs will end up with 0 transversal and get blapped just the same as any other ship.
Please stop posting fiction as fact, thank you. |
Dungar's Sister
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:45:00 -
[178] - Quote
NimBetu Cayal wrote:[quote=CCP Greyscale] Important to keep in mind that Titans are 100Bill ISK ships and whit out them the largest blobb would always win.
Important to keep in mind that costs rise exponentially as you increase between hull sizes and the power curve does not. |
Akelorian
FinFleet Raiden.
32
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:45:00 -
[179] - Quote
because you fly a missile titan, knowing full well how horrible they are, you are trying to push for the rest of the titans to do the same. Please can you make your next graphs into pie charts? |
Dungar's Sister
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:46:00 -
[180] - Quote
Akelorian wrote:because you fly a missile titan, knowing full well how horrible they are, you are trying to push for the rest of the titans to do the same. Please can you make your next graphs into pie charts? "Please don't nerf my titan it's the only thing I have in life that makes me feel special" |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 43 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |