Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 23 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
BFish
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 20:47:00 -
[241]
So, Gallente and Minmatar are going to lose faction warfare.
[sarcasm]Great[/sarcasm]
|
ArmyOfMe
Developmental Neogenics Amalgamated
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 20:48:00 -
[242]
great dev blog guys. im actually quite impressed how you only managed to have the nice easy questions posted here and avoiding all major issues this nerf raises
Originally by: deadmaus
Because by the time we had calmed Plague down after he heard BoB were back in the vicinity it was too late to do anything |
Azura Skye
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 20:49:00 -
[243]
*looks around*
A lot of constructive Ideas here. Obviously there has got to be some place in the game for speed tanking and hit-n-run style warfare, but the fact that a cruiser can achieve speeds of over 5K/S is simply game breaking. The idea to hard code top speeds in makes sense, but it removes the open ended feeling we all enjoy in this game. The idea to have speed affect hull or armor is nifty, but simply put, overcomplicated. It seems like a simple fix to me. Simply adjust the stacking penalty for speed related mods. Have it take into account the mass of a ship (so things like plates, ship class) are still important. Just make the bell curve for speed mods steeper. This, in addition to the changes already proposed to Nanos and MWD's should balance out nicely. This solution seems to tick everyone off equally, no?
|
Antgunner
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 20:50:00 -
[244]
CCP always has to screw things up! why? whats the point? Why change the entire pvp mechanics when it wasn't broke to begin with? Listen to your subscribers that are paying $15 a month to play this game that gets sillier by the patch. if disabling a MWD is a must, why not create a new mid slot mod to do just that, and let the player decide what he wants, not make a combo item that scrams and kills the mwd. And why nerf the web? The web is about the only reason people die in 0.0 otherwise they just run back to the gate.
and what a ridiculous developers blog that was. like listening to a soap opera USELESS!
Do something productive instead of counter productive
I'm disgusted
|
Xeax
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 20:52:00 -
[245]
The way it stands from that convo is that webs will be getting a nerf. Why not just base the duration webs slow down ships on thier mass.
Big ships take a long time to slow down with webs. Firgate size ships slow down almost instantaniously.
You can still keep thier nerf of how much they are slowed down by, but boost the time it takes them to slow down and keep the heavier ships with a fighting chance to carry on moving. This way your mass based speed change still works, afterburners still work, everything in your nano nerf ideas still work except that webs won't be nerfed.
If the patch stays the way it has been stated goodbye hugins.
It needs to go back to the way it was when battleships could beat the crap out of little ships, instead of a small group of frigates killing battleships.
CCP need to stop worrying about upsetting the nano blobs and make EVE the way it should be with Big ships reigning supreme.
|
ishkabibble
Aztec Industry
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 20:54:00 -
[246]
You can really see ITT who is pro-nano's and who is anti-nano's. You should all just stfu and adapt, one trick horse doesnt last forever.
Cant wait for the day i kill my first vaga with an AB on it, ohh the joy Always remember that it's never your fault when you lose.Ö |
Fistme
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 20:55:00 -
[247]
Why does patch after patch just promote blob warfare...
I'm disgusted...
|
S1r Minealot
Shade.
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 20:56:00 -
[248]
i hope a lot of people think like me when this goes through just stop playing this game.
|
Melegaunt Tanthul
Gallente Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 20:57:00 -
[249]
I get the feeling that the questions asked were so carefully chosen. They didn't even address the real issues of Blasters/ACs/MWD bonus ships/close range combat. They just asked generic stuff. And on top of that some of the answers were really sad:
Quote:
Black ops fuel bay will counteract the loss of mobility in guerilla style small get-in get out gangs.
Right...
|
Fistme
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 20:57:00 -
[250]
Originally by: S1r Minealot i hope a lot of people think like me when this goes through just stop playing this game.
I'll tell ya, Warhammer Online is looking a whole lot better all of a sudden
|
|
Eivy
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 20:58:00 -
[251]
My only concern in regard to balence is the lack of choice in freighter class ships. I would very much love to see this expanded. I use a Charon but I never need the maxium amount of space in the cargohold. Perhaps a Freighter Ship with smaller cargo space but bigger engines for greater speed would fit well in eve.
|
Cailais
Amarr VITOC
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:00:00 -
[252]
Interesting blog - if a bit on the short side.
Testing the changes when they were on SISI and I was quite encouraged. The changes are noticeable, but once you adapt to them the mwd/scram/web changes do make combat a more tactical affair - surprisingly I didn't find classic 'nano ships' to be that worse off, with the exception of missile damage.
IMO there's going to be a lot of 'over-hype' about how the changes could be 'game breaking' but that wasn't my experience.
C.
Originally by: Tarminic Your continued whining is somewhat diminished by your continued willingness to give your money to CCP.
|
JVol
Amarr The IMorral MAjority Imorral Dragons
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:02:00 -
[253]
Originally by: S1r Minealot i hope a lot of people think like me when this goes through just stop playing this game.
can i have your stuff?
|
Face dePhasme
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:02:00 -
[254]
Originally by: S1r Minealot i hope a lot of people think like me when this goes through just stop playing this game.
Your stuff? Can I have?
|
Reptzo
Channel 4 News Team
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:02:00 -
[255]
Does anyone have a quick summation of what was said in the blog??? Simply what was said, no opinions.
|
JVol
Amarr The IMorral MAjority Imorral Dragons
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:04:00 -
[256]
Originally by: Reptzo Does anyone have a quick summation of what was said in the blog??? Simply what was said, no opinions.
Intys will still be fast, and the vaga.. but get ready to ACTUALLY commit to a fight.. running away isnt going to be the norm anymore.basically
|
sus antler
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:05:00 -
[257]
wel i donno how to reply to a topic this size im playing eve for a bout 1 and a halfyear and was liking the minmatar race over the others as its like the eve hard modus ( unlike those lasy caldari missile spammers) yes it has dual weapon systems yes we can tank armor shields or on speed and yea im not rich enough to go buy a super duper expensive faction setup with snakes and all but i fear ive been training hac for ......g nothing if this is goin through wich is realy a shame vagabond isnt realy a high dps machine and it only has its speed to rely on to survive, sensor strenght even a turd ina can has more sensor strenght, capacitor pftt a low voltage battery has more power in it. i feel like a sad pandaif this is ccp's way of making thing beter. i might end up selfdestructing it or sell it for scrapmetal. p.s i dont do gtc's or watever im paying for the game cause i loved it but i feel like im beeing ripped off atm spending time training for stuff that gets nerfed anyways fly safe cya around
|
Koikarmin
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:05:00 -
[258]
if CCP nerf the ships then they would have to extend the completion time of missions too, otherwhise we will all loose alot of good LP, and bonus, or maybe that is the whole point. JUDGE |
JVol
Amarr The IMorral MAjority Imorral Dragons
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:12:00 -
[259]
Originally by: S1r Minealot
Originally by: JVol
Originally by: S1r Minealot i hope a lot of people think like me when this goes through just stop playing this game.
can i have your stuff?
i'm not giving you my stuff as you fit a cloak, plate and OD on an ishtar... ROFL !!!!
When hunting a russian plex farmer in deadspace you have to get creative with setups.. dont hate the man cause of a situational setup...
|
big juggs
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:14:00 -
[260]
if you cant catch a vagga , GET A BETTER WEBB
|
|
Deej Montana
Caldari Outbound Flight
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:15:00 -
[261]
That was a serious waste of my time. There was no new info presented and, as was pointed out by many other posters, several VERY important issues weren't addressed, e.g. short range turrets and Minmatar ships.
You have a lot of anxious players here CCP. Actually giving us some answers would go a long way towards calming those anxieties and planning for how to cope with the coming changes. As a side benefit it would help with some of the forum angst. |
Jimmycs83
Gallente The Angry Mob
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:16:00 -
[262]
Originally by: JVol
Originally by: Reptzo Does anyone have a quick summation of what was said in the blog??? Simply what was said, no opinions.
Intys will still be fast, and the vaga.. but get ready to ACTUALLY commit to a fight.. running away isnt going to be the norm anymore.basically
No, people who were crap at pvp before and whined for this change will still be crap at pvp after and those that are decent will continue to use tactics that give them the ability to disengage when they need. All that will change is that combat becomes more static (less roaming gangs) and generally more boring.
Also i may have missed it but no comments on the effects this will have on blasters? And what about large bubbles maybe being reduced in size to compensate for a decrease in speeds?.
|
Waxau
Mortis Angelus The Church.
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:17:00 -
[263]
Originally by: Deej Montana That was a serious waste of my time. There was no new info presented and, as was pointed out by many other posters, several VERY important issues weren't addressed, e.g. short range turrets and Minmatar ships.
You have a lot of anxious players here CCP. Actually giving us some answers would go a long way towards calming those anxieties and planning for how to cope with the coming changes. As a side benefit it would help with some of the forum angst.
Agree with this. However, im up for the nanonerf. It'll be a boost to piracy in some aspects, as currently, we're currently plagued by nanos. You cant field huggins or nanos on empire gates, and as such, we have no real counter.
Bring on the nerf, but CCP - You did fall down tonight. Get back up, and get to work on ze nerf :D
|
S1r Minealot
Shade.
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:17:00 -
[264]
Originally by: JVol
Originally by: S1r Minealot
Originally by: JVol
Originally by: S1r Minealot i hope a lot of people think like me when this goes through just stop playing this game.
can i have your stuff?
i'm not giving you my stuff as you fit a cloak, plate and OD on an ishtar... ROFL !!!!
i wouldnt if i didnt see your sleipnir fits in orvolle.
anyway back to where we come from you wanted my stuff, come get it.
When hunting a russian plex farmer in deadspace you have to get creative with setups.. dont hate the man cause of a situational setup...
|
x psy
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:18:00 -
[265]
Good lord, we really need that ambulation expansion. There's so much testosterone in here!
|
S1r Minealot
Shade.
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:19:00 -
[266]
Originally by: Waxau
Originally by: Deej Montana That was a serious waste of my time. There was no new info presented and, as was pointed out by many other posters, several VERY important issues weren't addressed, e.g. short range turrets and Minmatar ships.
You have a lot of anxious players here CCP. Actually giving us some answers would go a long way towards calming those anxieties and planning for how to cope with the coming changes. As a side benefit it would help with some of the forum angst.
Agree with this. However, im up for the nanonerf. It'll be a boost to piracy in some aspects, as currently, we're currently plagued by nanos. You cant field huggins or nanos on empire gates, and as such, we have no real counter.
Bring on the nerf, but CCP - You did fall down tonight. Get back up, and get to work on ze nerf :D
indeed pirates will get a very nice buff, not to mention the empire war deccers. I'll guess they nerf that one after that.
I thought this whole nano nerf was adressed to help out the empire carebears, where's the idea to get more people to 0.0 or am i missing a point?
|
Shin'Tor Varikior
Minmatar Tactical Information Tribunal
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:23:00 -
[267]
Will there be a transcript made available?
|
Solomon XI
Hoist The Colors. Pirate Coalition
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:25:00 -
[268]
Is there a recording available yet? ~Solo Hoist The Colors. (CEO) Pirate Coalition (Yar?) |
Jason Edwards
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:30:00 -
[269]
Well I always have my audio turned off and never need eve voice. The only other time I've tried to use eve-voice is back when eve-voice on sisi was just enabled on all accounts... and they got some fight together on sisi. Which didnt work. The bughunters also said they didnt have it neither.
I apparently still dont have eve-voice. I guess I'll wait for someone to post a capture of it. ------------------------ "There was this bright flash of light - and now this egg shaped thing is on my screen - did I level up?" |
Berious
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 21:35:00 -
[270]
At least now they can't pretend the CSM experiment was anything but smoke up our ass when 2:1 vote against a nanonerf with a big turnout and it's back anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 23 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |