| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |

Padme Amidala Naberrie
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 16:52:00 -
[121] - Quote
Kytoth wrote:baltec1 wrote:Padme Amidala Naberrie wrote: As long as *all* the major alliances are investigated and those that RMT are similarly actioned.
You'd have to be very naive to think that only PL were at it.........................
PAN
Which is why I am looking forwards to the next few days. Do you really think they manually looked at alliances/corps/chars? I'm pretty sure they ran some DB script looking for suspicious transfers, which are pretty hard to define, and then just removed all the isk said script flagged / banned flagged accounts.
You might well be right but I would have thought that *someone* within CCP took a look at this *before* a final decision to take the ISK from PL was made.
We would hope at any rate.
PAN |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
118
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 16:52:00 -
[122] - Quote
Padme Amidala Naberrie wrote:Richard Desturned wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:CCP Sreegs you need to show a similar Goonswarm RMT sweep before people start thinking you are pulling a T20.
The evil EvE playerbase will obviously suspect that as former GS leader you would rush in help of GS now that they are in difficulty due to the Fanfest incident and PL could take advantage.
Creaming the GS enemies right after Mittani's ban without a similar mirror operation on GS WILL be seen as Developer involvement in game. The fact that our alliance wallet wasn't touched. Yet....................... PAN
Don't hold your breath. "Nullsec alliances will now begin counting reporters on staff along with supercapitals and tech moons. Unironically." - The Mittani |

Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
69
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 16:53:00 -
[123] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:CCP Sreegs you need to show a similar Goonswarm RMT sweep before people start thinking you are pulling a T20.
The evil EvE playerbase will obviously suspect that as former GS leader you would rush in help of GS now that they are in difficulty due to the Fanfest incident and PL could take advantage.
Creaming the GS enemies right after Mittani's ban without a similar mirror operation on GS WILL be seen as Developer involvement in game. rumor says elusif got hit
if that is true expect a lot of CFC members to have negative wallets. |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
2024
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 16:53:00 -
[124] - Quote
Kytoth wrote:I think it should be obvious that a Char doing ship reimbursement from his own wallet for a 1000+ pilot alliance might look alot like an RMT'er, e.g. both give large amounts of isk to lots of people for no apparent reason.
Especially to some script crawling the DB.
Ofc PL could also have accepted large amounts of RMT'ed isk for their contracts with certain alliances.
I'd however be slow with pointing fingers, I'm pretty sure CCP's program has some major flaws in it.
Sounds like a perfect place to try to hide your RMT trades in. I'm also quite confident, that they don't remove trillions from a major alliance without some input by a human. It might be a mistake of some sort, but I'm doubtful that it's just a flaw in a program. |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
118
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 16:54:00 -
[125] - Quote
Vera Algaert wrote:rumor says elusif got hit
if that is true expect a lot of CFC members to have negative wallets.
he did wololol "Nullsec alliances will now begin counting reporters on staff along with supercapitals and tech moons. Unironically." - The Mittani |

baltec1
975
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 17:04:00 -
[126] - Quote
Vera Algaert wrote: rumor says elusif got hit
if that is true expect a lot of CFC members to have negative wallets.
A few inderviduals wallets in CFC have gone negetive. The general responce in the CFC is "AHAHAHAHAHA" |

Kytoth
Elysian Navy
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 17:07:00 -
[127] - Quote
Padme Amidala Naberrie wrote:Kytoth wrote:baltec1 wrote:Padme Amidala Naberrie wrote: As long as *all* the major alliances are investigated and those that RMT are similarly actioned.
You'd have to be very naive to think that only PL were at it.........................
PAN
Which is why I am looking forwards to the next few days. Do you really think they manually looked at alliances/corps/chars? I'm pretty sure they ran some DB script looking for suspicious transfers, which are pretty hard to define, and then just removed all the isk said script flagged / banned flagged accounts. You might well be right but I would have thought that *someone* within CCP took a look at this *before* a final decision to take the ISK from PL was made. We would hope at any rate. PAN
I'd sure hope that as well, but judging by the sheer amount of transactions and chars involved I'm not certain.
Also they might just blindly remove/ban in the first cycle, then look at all the petitions etc and use that experience to tweak their scripts, then start again.
EDIT: There seems to be a misconception here that they took 15t or so from an alliance wallet. In fact that number seems to have been reached by looking at ALL the chars in PL and how much isk they lost. So this is over hundreds of chars, and not some single wallet. |

Jas Dor
Republic University Minmatar Republic
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 17:08:00 -
[128] - Quote
Simi Kusoni wrote:Hmm, just out of interest how come everyone is assuming it was related to buying ISK? I would have thought PL would be more likely to be involved in selling it?
It looks like CCP traced isk for its source onward and removed it. Could be that PL received rent payments from botters who were RMTing. |

baltec1
975
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 17:16:00 -
[129] - Quote
Kytoth wrote:
I'd sure hope that as well, but judging by the sheer amount of transactions and chars involved I'm not certain.
Also they might just blindly remove/ban in the first cycle, then look at all the petitions etc and use that experience to tweak their scripts, then start again.
EDIT: There seems to be a misconception here that they took 15t or so from an alliance wallet. In fact that number seems to have been reached by looking at ALL the chars in PL and how much isk they lost. So this is over hundreds of chars, and not some single wallet.
Kinda blows the who "this is a mistake" out of the water. Also, if the CCP auto destroyer was going to go after a alliance based simply on isk exchanges I would have thought the goons would have been top of that list if it were true. |

El Geo
Pathfinders. Mining For Profit Alliance
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 17:17:00 -
[130] - Quote
isnt it against the eula for multiple players to use one character?
I doubt its a mistake they got banned either |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
118
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 17:18:00 -
[131] - Quote
Jas Dor wrote:Could be that PL received rent payments from botters who were RMTing.
pandemic legion is known for holding space to rent out "Nullsec alliances will now begin counting reporters on staff along with supercapitals and tech moons. Unironically." - The Mittani |

Kytoth
Elysian Navy
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 17:27:00 -
[132] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Kytoth wrote:
I'd sure hope that as well, but judging by the sheer amount of transactions and chars involved I'm not certain.
Also they might just blindly remove/ban in the first cycle, then look at all the petitions etc and use that experience to tweak their scripts, then start again.
EDIT: There seems to be a misconception here that they took 15t or so from an alliance wallet. In fact that number seems to have been reached by looking at ALL the chars in PL and how much isk they lost. So this is over hundreds of chars, and not some single wallet.
Kinda blows the who "this is a mistake" out of the water. Also, if the CCP auto destroyer was going to go after a alliance based simply on isk exchanges I would have thought the goons would have been top of that list if it were true.
A. They did not go "after an alliance". They took isk from a large amount of chars, and banned the source. Don't see how this "blows the mistake out of the water".
B. "simply on isk exchanges" How do you suppose they identify RMT'ers if not by their isk transfer patterns?
C. Who said other alliances did not have this occuring / use the same centralized structure. |

baltec1
975
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 17:30:00 -
[133] - Quote
Kytoth wrote:
A. They did not go "after an alliance". They took isk from a large amount of chars, and banned the source. Don't see how this "blows the mistake out of the water".
B. "simply on isk exchanges" How do you suppose they identify RMT'ers if not by their isk transfer patterns?
C. Who said other alliances did not have this occuring / use the same centralized structure.
If CCP simply went after the master wallet because it was spamming out a lot of isk why then did the master wallet of the largest ship replacement fund not get hit first? |

OfBalance
Caldari State
358
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 17:37:00 -
[134] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Vera Algaert wrote: rumor says elusif got hit
if that is true expect a lot of CFC members to have negative wallets.
A few inderviduals wallets in CFC have gone negetive. The general responce in the CFC is "AHAHAHAHAHA"
Confirmed. |

Kytoth
Elysian Navy
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 17:38:00 -
[135] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Kytoth wrote:
A. They did not go "after an alliance". They took isk from a large amount of chars, and banned the source. Don't see how this "blows the mistake out of the water".
B. "simply on isk exchanges" How do you suppose they identify RMT'ers if not by their isk transfer patterns?
C. Who said other alliances did not have this occuring / use the same centralized structure.
If CCP simply went after the master wallet because it was spamming out a lot of isk why then did the master wallet of the largest ship replacement fund not get hit first?
Because one was done over a char's wallet and the other is a corp wallet? Honestly I have no idea, but how likely is it that CCP wrote something that worked perfectly from the beginning (or ever will) |

Lord Publow
The Publow Confederation
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 17:40:00 -
[136] - Quote
Brothers and Sisters, maybe we are all to harsh on the botters and RTMers in New Eden. We all call consider it is their fault they are doing what they are doing; we never take the moment to consider that they may actually be nice people, whom are forced to act in such an EULA-Breaking manner because of genuine misfortune in their internet spaceships career?
Yours Truly,
Lord Publow I fight for Hoovers everywhere.-áhttp://hoover.com/ |

baltec1
975
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 17:41:00 -
[137] - Quote
Kytoth wrote:
Because one was done over a char's wallet and the other is a corp wallet? Honestly I have no idea, but how likely is it that CCP wrote something that worked perfectly from the beginning (or ever will)
Im going to go with highly likely. |

Prince Kobol
469
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 17:48:00 -
[138] - Quote
I have to admit its **** funny watching how many people are shitting them lols..
Just spent the last 10 minutes scouting various forums and panic is well.. delicious .
|

baltec1
975
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 17:50:00 -
[139] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:I have to admit its **** funny watching how many people are shitting them lols.. Just spent the last 10 minutes scouting various forums and panic is well.. delicious  .
Please share the fun with us |

Prince Kobol
469
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 17:54:00 -
[140] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:I have to admit its **** funny watching how many people are shitting them lols.. Just spent the last 10 minutes scouting various forums and panic is well.. delicious  . Please share the fun with us 
Too many posts on too many sites however the funniest has to be on reddit  |

GondriA
BLUE EAGLES Pinked
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 17:57:00 -
[141] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:baltec1 wrote:Prince Kobol wrote:I have to admit its **** funny watching how many people are shitting them lols.. Just spent the last 10 minutes scouting various forums and panic is well.. delicious  . Please share the fun with us  Too many posts on too many sites however the funniest has to be on reddit 
give links to the ppl  |

OfBalance
Caldari State
358
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 17:57:00 -
[142] - Quote
Reddit, sperging the hardest you say? |

Nex apparatu5
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
240
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 18:34:00 -
[143] - Quote
Test is rounding up a list of people who got negged as the API updates and is planning to release it so we can laugh at the RMTers |

GondriA
BLUE EAGLES Pinked
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 18:36:00 -
[144] - Quote
Nex apparatu5 wrote:Test is rounding up a list of people who got negged as the API updates and is planning to release it so we can laugh at the RMTers
that will be ok if contains all the ppl and no only some |

Marlona Sky
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
751
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 19:01:00 -
[145] - Quote
People saying Screegs needs go after the goons to make things fair is just dumb. Yes he used to be in goons and the alliance leader, but he takes his job seriously and is doing a great one at that. I personally do not care what alliance/corp/whatever you belong to, if you RMT enjoy your ban.
|

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
476
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 19:14:00 -
[146] - Quote
Nex apparatu5 wrote:Test is rounding up a list of people who got negged as the API updates and is planning to release it so we can laugh at the RMTers
You mean they're outting their useless RMT accounts that have negative wallet balances so large as to make keeping them pointless. Yes, I can see how this might be construed as legit attempts to distance themselves from supposedly unknown RMT'ers.
On the other hand, characters with such large balances don't get those balances by being quiet or by not making a business out the game. So, Test's sincerity in this matter is dubious at best.
You know....when a character has a negative balance smaller than say 10b or less, one might assume he bought RMT isk or traded or earned the isk or purchased through plex or what not completely on his own. When those balances start hitting the negative 10's of billions of isk, something more is going on and there's not much you can do to convince me it isn't conspiratory throughout the alliance rather than individually. We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |

baltec1
978
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 19:22:00 -
[147] - Quote
Mr Kidd wrote:
You mean they're outting their useless RMT accounts that have negative wallet balances so large as to make keeping them pointless. Yes, I can see how this might be construed as legit attempts to distance themselves from supposedly unknown RMT'ers.
On the other hand, characters with such large balances don't get those balances by being quiet or by not making a business out the game. So, Test's sincerity in this matter is dubious at best.
You know....when a character has a negative balance smaller than say 10b or less, one might assume he bought RMT isk or traded or what not completely on his own. When those balances start hitting the negative 10's of billions of isk, something more is going on and there's not much you can do to convince me it isn't systemic rather than individually.
The alliance wallets have not been hit so trying to make this into a "all of test RMTs" argument is just silly. |

Revolution Rising
Gentlemen of Better Ilk
254
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 19:25:00 -
[148] - Quote
CCP Sreegs wrote:DrizzCat wrote:Well we know that Screegs is watching the thread.
Can you atleast Confirm or Deny that the Isk was removed do to an RMT source.
Not asking for a Yes or No if PL are Guilty, just a Yes it was isk from an RMT source. The actions of yesterday were RMT related. I won't discuss specifics or confirm or deny who may have been impacted or how.
You rock sreegs. You have fans, keep it up  CSM7 Skype Leak
|

Taihbea
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
104
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 19:28:00 -
[149] - Quote
I'm impressed. CCP is keeping their word.
Good for eve. Nothing else. |

Kaldaine
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.31 19:28:00 -
[150] - Quote
I can confirm that Goonswarm was not affected by this. Noone in the alliance RMT's. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |