CCP Sreegs said at fanfest, that appeals had so far only identified One false positive.

Not to defend Goons, but aren't their finances transparent?

Wouldn't that make it harder for them to RMT?

I had a long time, well established, corp mate who was wrongly tagged for RMT over a year ago. It took over a week for his petition to be resolved and was ultimately denied. He rejected several offers from corp mates to donate isk to cover his loss and PLEX'd his way back. He quit the game a few months later.

So forgive me if I am less gung-ho about your "No false positives, everyone gets taken care of" line as I was in the past.

Yes, that;s the point of it.

But you see, if you ask the many pubbies here *looks for hands shooting up* they'll tell you it's all fake.

Yes, our reimbursement gives out the same stuff that the titans we sell to reds are made of.

I have said bad things about the guy before to stir up the tinfoil crowd, but my true opinion of his is that he is 110% legit. GO GO Team Security

Not to defend Goons, but aren't their finances transparent?

Wouldn't that make it harder for them to RMT?

Goons have an 'accountant' that looks over the books and post a spreadsheet so the line members can see if any directors are goonfucking.

Most big alliances does not do this, because unlike the goon management, they are corrupt bastards stealing the tax $$$

If Sreeg is coming out of Goons. Maybe now he does not favor anyone, but i can hardly believe he did not warn anyone before he placed his system up and thus favoring some people who will never lose what RMT they had time to do..... .

CCP Sreegs said at fanfest, that appeals had so far only identified One false positive.

Goons have an 'accountant' that looks over the books and post a spreadsheet so the line members can see if any directors are goonfucking

Most big alliances does not do this, because unlike the goon management, they are corrupt bastards stealing the tax $$$

Not to defend Goons, but aren't their finances transparent?

Wouldn't that make it harder for them to RMT?

Really? And what is that big bad meanie CCP gonna do? They already ban people for no reason, so I might as well give them one.

O and if it gets me to a quicker solution with my bank, charging back these fraudulent bastards after their bullshit will not only be justified, but feel good.

There once was a company named Enron
Whose stockholders they shite on
While Author Anderson did their accounting
To show everyone their was no failing
Both are never again to be heard from

I had a long time, well established, corp mate who was wrongly tagged for RMT over a year ago.

2 words

viper shitzle

alright let's weigh the evidence

evidence supporting goonswarm being clean: transparent finances, we didn't get owned by CCP

evidence supporting pubbies' claims of us RMTing: *crickets chirp*

Shizzle

2 words and 50% of em are wrong spelled, typical Goon.

Incorrectly spelt.

If you are going to pick on someone's spelling and grammar to try and hoist them you really should make some effort to get it right yourself.

Just saying.

PAN

to spell (sth.) | spelled/spelt, spelled/spelt |
just sayin'

Incorrectly spelt.

If you are going to pick on someone's spelling and grammar to try and hoist them you really should make some effort to get it right yourself.

Just saying.

PAN

I see this statement thrown around alot but i fail to see how it proves goons immunity to corruption ?

just as a quick example they must do 1,000's of ship replacements weekly ? monthly ? wouldn't be to hard for the reimburstment guy to send 50mil to he's alt in alliance everytime and i highly doubt someone checks every loss to isk payout

If you're going to pick on someone's spelling, who is picking on someone's spelling, you should know what is English and what is not.

Just saying,

BRO

I can confirm that Goonswarm was not affected by this. Noone in the alliance RMT's.

Goonswarm has strict policies against RMTing with zero tolerance policies. Please, no trolling or unsupported false accusations.

I may not have fully understood the Security Presentation by CCP but I thought that it was the perpetrators of the ISK generating activities that had their ISK removed and not the end parties.

For example, if EVE player Iamguilty botted and generated a billion ISK, then Iamguilty bought a really nice implant from Innocent then the ISK would be removed from Iamguilty and not Innocent.

If Iamguilty bought ISK via RMT then Iamguilty has that amount removed regardless if Iamguilty bought something from Innocent.

The posts here are suggesting that Innocent gets nailed by the removal of ISK. Is this the case?

If Iamguilty buys a billion ISK then uses it to buy all sorts of cool stuff from Innocent, Innocent loses a billion ISK and Iamguilty is left alone? That seems... strange and contrary to the stated policy of CCP but I could have misunderstood.

Further, if someone is selling ISK for money, who has that ISK removed?

In the situation: ImaketoomuchISK has an excess of ISK and therefore sells it to Iamguilty.

Who has what punishment?

Does ImaketoomuchISK have ISK removed? Are they banned? Heck, does ImaketoomuchISK have ISK reimbursed? (to reset where the ISK was from, especially if the ISK generating activity was legal?)