| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 10 post(s) |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
   |
Posted - 2008.10.16 08:57:00 -
[121]
well just like with trinity lots of information other features will hit at fanfest.
interesting name to say the least... makes me think of quantum leap though 
|
Metal Monster
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 09:05:00 -
[122]
Looking foward to this update and woud like to see new models of ships or its upgrades.
As for forum.... to many players think this is WoW forum and talking shit is thier highest priority.
|
Daan Sai
Polytrope
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 09:11:00 -
[123]
 Originally by: CCP Explorer
Sorry, I have to wait for Marketing to announce the features before I can discuss them.
This is very very sad  , what has CCP done - muzzling devs, and putting an ignorant clumsy marketing/PR division in charge!?!
|
skuko
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 09:26:00 -
[124]
Edited by: skuko on 16/10/2008 09:27:28
so with weapon linking, you will not be able to fire the guns/launchers separately anymore?
if so, then basically, you can do steady dps on a target no more, and eve will become alpha-online, right?
lets see: you have a drake with 7 HMLs, and you activate modules like 1--2--3--4--5--6--7, where "--" is a 1-2s pause. this way, you will hava stream of missiles coming out, doing steady dps on a target. on the other hand, activating all at once will fire a "blob" of 7 missiles which hit the target at the same time, doing bigger damage, but leaving time to take action until the second volley hits.
this would allow for the target to repair/shield boost more effectively.
i might be completely wrong tho.
please correct me, if my perpective is wrong. thanks in advance.
edit: typos end speelings
|
Miyamoto Uroki
Caldari
Katsu Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 09:36:00 -
[125]
Originally by: skuko
Edited by: skuko on 16/10/2008 09:27:28
so with weapon linking, you will not be able to fire the guns/launchers separately anymore?
if so, then basically, you can do steady dps on a target no more, and eve will become alpha-online, right?
lets see: you have a drake with 7 HMLs, and you activate modules like 1--2--3--4--5--6--7, where "--" is a 1-2s pause. this way, you will hava stream of missiles coming out, doing steady dps on a target. on the other hand, activating all at once will fire a "blob" of 7 missiles which hit the target at the same time, doing bigger damage, but leaving time to take action until the second volley hits.
this would allow for the target to repair/shield boost more effectively.
i might be completely wrong tho.
please correct me, if my perpective is wrong. thanks in advance.
edit: typos end speelings
meh, think before you write something. ofc you don't have to link the weapons. It's your own choice and they can still be held all separated. Also consider to link multiple groups, like 2 launchers with EM missiles and 5 launchers with kin missiles, that would be 2 groups.
Originally by: Puupuu
dude... your face
|
Rutger Centemus
Gallente
Joint Empire Squad
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 09:40:00 -
[126]
Originally by: skuko
Edited by: skuko on 16/10/2008 09:27:28
so with weapon linking, you will not be able to fire the guns/launchers separately anymore?
if so, then basically, you can do steady dps on a target no more, and eve will become alpha-online, right?
lets see: you have a drake with 7 HMLs, and you activate modules like 1--2--3--4--5--6--7, where "--" is a 1-2s pause. this way, you will hava stream of missiles coming out, doing steady dps on a target. on the other hand, activating all at once will fire a "blob" of 7 missiles which hit the target at the same time, doing bigger damage, but leaving time to take action until the second volley hits.
this would allow for the target to repair/shield boost more effectively.
i might be completely wrong tho.
please correct me, if my perpective is wrong. thanks in advance.
edit: typos end speelings
I think you're wrong - same DPS (rof doesn't change), with higher volleydamage (all weapons striking at once). I always get the feeling that if I get full volleys (all turrets / missiles striking at once) it's more effective than 'chaingunning' my weapons (1 after another). Especially in situations where it's a close call whether or not you can break your opponents tank, full volleys might be the thing needed to do enough damage to 'get under his tank' - aka do damage to (armor and) structure of your opponent, even when he's repairing a big part of the damage you do. This, especially on passiv shield tankers  .
But hey, I might be wrong on that one.
***
My opinions are my own, and don't necessarily represent those of my corpmembers. |
Demtalin le'Mercennaire
The Arrow Project
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 10:18:00 -
[127]
Edited by: Demtalin le''Mercennaire on 16/10/2008 10:25:14
Edited by: Demtalin le''Mercennaire on 16/10/2008 10:23:49
Originally by: Joss Sparq
Originally by: Chribba
Corporations will be able to set their products apart from the rest by building trust in their goods through customizable storefronts.
"Building trust in their goods" might take on greater meaning if the goods weren't all the same as each other, once you get past who sold them and what price they were purchased at ...
When I read the announcement that was my first thought too. Does this mean they are removing the current market format so that we have to manually search shops instead of being shown the lowest price? Or is it just a way to show brand loyalty to a product which is identical to everyone elses? Sorry if there has been an announcement on this, I haven't really been paying attention.
[EDIT]
Nevermind, it seems the store front is for contract sales rather than market sales
--------
Billy Jean is not my lover |
Deviana Sevidon
Gallente
Panta-Rhei
United Front Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 10:41:00 -
[128]
Originally by: CCP Explorer
Originally by: Chaos Incarnate
While you're chilling in here with us regular forumites Explorer, can you answer my question about what graphics updates are going to be included with the patch? Be as vague as gives you sufficient wiggle room against further emorage 
Sorry, I have to wait for Marketing to announce the features before I can discuss them. See my reply in the offical thread.
Slight graphic changes are already on Singularity. Space Background and Nebula is less bright and Station Interiors are much darker then right now on TQ.
|
Confuzer
Volition Cult
The Volition Cult
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 10:52:00 -
[129]
imho this is just marketing acting up.
With the recent .1 updates/fixes they made, they wanted to link a name to them.
Why implement features and call it an expansion afterwards?
System avoidence? That feature must have cost like 1 day for 1 person to implement, because the algoritm was allready there. The most time was probably the administrator window for it.
We have the same with our marketing dudes. They want to go wild on some tiny features, just to sell...
-----------------
Destiny is not a matter of chance. It is a matter of choice. It's not a thing to be waited for - it is a thing to be achieved. |
Sheriff Jones
Amarr
Clinical Experiment
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 10:59:00 -
[130]
Does it matter if it's "added features" or "add-on package" or "expansion"?
It's free for Freya's panties sake!
My opinions represent the opinions of my corporation completely. I'm the CEO damnit. |
trueblue1872
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 11:11:00 -
[131]
Looks all a bit shite to me.
Nothing really stands out. Is this just going to be like the last patch were, if you didn't like FW, it did nothing for you?
Quote:
Changes to autopilot routes and avoidance techniques
One of the main super changes in this patch.
I hope to god they pull something out of the hat 
|
Adaera
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 11:49:00 -
[132]
Originally by: Last Wolf
Originally by: Elitia
Might be a dumb question, but where the hell is ambulation?
Just walk away.......
I can't. There's no ambulation 
Your signature is too large. Please resize it to a maximum of 400 x 120 with the file size not exceeding 24000 bytes. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] - Mitnal |
Veldya
Guristari Freedom Fighters
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 11:56:00 -
[133]
Originally by: Daan Sai
This is very very sad , what has CCP done - muzzling devs, and putting an ignorant clumsy marketing/PR division in charge!?!
No, it was probably released prematurely to help with the backlash from the peons for ghost training "bug fix".
We need to wait for the real info though.
It will be good to get some advanced warning, for those obnoxious skills nobody trains to 5 because they are next to useless. :P
|
Goparu Prdc3r
Caldari
Fenix 68
Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 12:04:00 -
[134]
Where's is WIS?
Where's is ambulation
Where are my legs?
Mamma I want my leeeeeeegzzzz!!1!!!1
|
Sheriff Jones
Amarr
Clinical Experiment
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 12:05:00 -
[135]
Originally by: Veldya
It will be good to get some advanced warning, for those obnoxious skills nobody trains to 5 because they are next to useless. :P
Some of us only got those "useless" skills left to train...
My opinions represent the opinions of my corporation completely. I'm the CEO damnit. |
Gautan Virdamot
Nebula Rasa Technologies
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 12:05:00 -
[136]
I hope the weapons linking has a module to it, an any slot module with no fitting requirements would do just fine but a module nonetheless.
|
Daelin Blackleaf
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 13:48:00 -
[137]
An added benefit to weapon linking is when mocking talentless combat no longer need we say "and all they do is bush F1, F2, F3, etc" now it's the much more effective "PUSH BUTTAN".
|
Konrad Wachsmann
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 14:04:00 -
[138]
Originally by: clone 1
Eve Online: Quantum Rise
"Theorizing that one could time travel within his own lifetime, Wrangler stepped into the Quantum Rise accelerator and vanished .... He woke to find himself trapped in the past, facing forum posts that were not his own and driven by an unknown force to change history for the better. His only guide on this journey is Fallout, an observer from his own time, who appears in the form of a hologram that only Wrangler can see and hear. And so Wrangler finds himself leaping from thread to thread, striving to put right what once went wrong and hoping each time that his next thread will be the leap home."
Love it! The question is will his changes fix the fubar fiasco which has already happened?
|
CopyCatz
Caldari
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 14:23:00 -
[139]
So what's with the name anyway? I understand that "Quantum Rise" can be translated as "a little bit more":
- Is it a little bit more subscription cost?
- A little bit more bugs?
- A little bit more features?
Or is it a typo and should it read "Quantum Rice"?
|
fivetide humidyear
Gallente
EXCESS10N
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 15:01:00 -
[140]
just please let us be able to put rigged ships in one class of freighter.
ccp, i'd love you long time for that alone
|
Ansala
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 15:10:00 -
[141]
I'm beginning to think there is a need for "technical expansions" separate from "content expasions."
When players are told of an up-coming expansion they expect new content...new things to do, new ways to do them.
So an expansion whose description consists almost completely of technical improvements is bound to disappoint the players, and by implication
depreciate the value of the technical improvements being announced.
StacklessIO, Eve64, continued improvements to the graphics engine, are very significant improvements to the game. But when they make up the major part of an annoucement which the players expect to provide new content, there is bound to be disappointment. |
Everir Entar
Minmatar
Legion Du Lys
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 15:24:00 -
[142]
"The reality of thousands of ships simultaneously engaged in adrenaline-charged combat is at hand and several fleet battles have already been fought using this new technology. Emboldened by the significant effects these improvements bring to high-level gameplay, CCP will push forward with a myriad of hardware and server improvements to bring the most massive player vs player experience available, expanding a boundless universe into a limitless one."
Really?
|
Awngrid Butimmune
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 15:53:00 -
[143]
Originally by: Chaos Incarnate
Originally by: Elitia
Might be a dumb question, but where the hell is ambulation?
Next summer
NOOOOOOO,
|
Knawt Ongrid
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 15:54:00 -
[144]
Originally by: Chaos Incarnate
Originally by: Elitia
Might be a dumb question, but where the hell is ambulation?
Next summer
NOOOOOOO,
You have a face now, they nerfed your face
|
Chaos Incarnate
Faceless Logistics
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 15:55:00 -
[145]
Threadnaught in progress!
To arms, my fellow EVEicans! To arms!
__________
Originally by: Tortun Nahme
nah, that is the true badge of a forum warrior, to draw the humorous ire of the devs
|
Knawt Ongrid
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 16:16:00 -
[146]
"Slight graphic changes are already on Singularity. Space Background and Nebula is less bright and Station Interiors are much darker then right now on TQ."
This is the best news I've seen on the changes. Space is supposed to be sort of . . dark. Hate the blindingly bright background where i can't even see whether my modules are blinking green for on or red for off.
Ditto for the station strobe lights. I purposely open up windows to try to block their blinding effect.
|
skuko
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 16:52:00 -
[147]
Originally by: Miyamoto Uroki
Originally by: skuko
Edited by: skuko on 16/10/2008 09:27:28
so with weapon linking, you will not be able to fire the guns/launchers separately anymore?
if so, then basically, you can do steady dps on a target no more, and eve will become alpha-online, right?
lets see: you have a drake with 7 HMLs, and you activate modules like 1--2--3--4--5--6--7, where "--" is a 1-2s pause. this way, you will hava stream of missiles coming out, doing steady dps on a target. on the other hand, activating all at once will fire a "blob" of 7 missiles which hit the target at the same time, doing bigger damage, but leaving time to take action until the second volley hits.
this would allow for the target to repair/shield boost more effectively.
i might be completely wrong tho.
please correct me, if my perpective is wrong. thanks in advance.
edit: typos end speelings
meh, think before you write something. ofc you don't have to link the weapons. It's your own choice and they can still be held all separated. Also consider to link multiple groups, like 2 launchers with EM missiles and 5 launchers with kin missiles, that would be 2 groups.
i'm really sorry, but didn't notice this in writing anywhere, so forgive me, if my post offended you. i was merely asking for an explanation. i sincerely thank you for that. peace out.
|
DrAtomic
Atomic Heroes
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 16:53:00 -
[148]
Originally by: Chaos Incarnate
Edited by: Chaos Incarnate on 15/10/2008 20:13:52
Quantum Rise?
Edit: First. Also, what a weird name
Actually you are second... start a thread if you want to be first...
- - -
Originally by: CCP Wrangler
If you can understand our goal, disagree with our solution and offer a solution that is equal or better your opinion has a better chance of being heard...
|
DrAtomic
Atomic Heroes
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 16:54:00 -
[149]
Originally by: CCP Explorer
Sorry, I have to wait for Marketing to announce the features before I can discuss them.
OMG CCP became a real company alert!!!!
- - -
Originally by: CCP Wrangler
If you can understand our goal, disagree with our solution and offer a solution that is equal or better your opinion has a better chance of being heard...
|
Slash Harnet
Minmatar
Fire Mandrill
|
Posted - 2008.10.16 17:26:00 -
[150]
Orca =
Everything else =
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |