| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Varus Riaz
Gallente
Sarissa Defense Group
   |
Posted - 2008.10.17 05:40:00 -
[31]
I'm betting on a darkhorse nerf to cloaking.
|
Elegbara
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 10:18:00 -
[32]
T2 BPOs
Open your eyes.
And Awaken. |
RaTTuS
BIG
Libertas Fidelitas
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 10:28:00 -
[33]
posting
or posting with alts
--
BIG Lottery, BIG Deal, InEve
|
Miyamoto Uroki
Caldari
Katsu Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 10:37:00 -
[34]
boy.. there is just so much stuff that needs nerfing, dunno where to begin...
My bet goes on cloaking though
 Originally by: Puupuu
dude... your face
|
Irida Mershkov
Gallente
War is Bliss
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 10:42:00 -
[35]
Drones.
Yeah.
|
LaVista Vista
Conservative Shenanigans Party
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 10:43:00 -
[36]
My bet: Force multipliers(This includes falcons).
|
Sheriff Jones
Amarr
Clinical Experiment
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 10:46:00 -
[37]
Lag *nods*
My opinions represent the opinions of my corporation completely. I'm the CEO damnit. |
Tippia
Caldari
School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 11:03:00 -
[38]
Originally by: NupetietVer
From a business point of view, buying GTC's with ISK will be up next. No way a company would let players pay for the game with in-game money.
Quite true &emdash; no company would allow that. However, that's not what GTC trading is. GTC trading allows you to give another player ISK in return for them paying the account for you.
|
|
CCP Navigator
C C P
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 11:06:00 -
[39]
Thread cleaned.
Please stay on topic.
Navigator
Senior Community Representative
CCP Hf, EVE Online
Email / Netfang
|
|
Kerdrak
3B Legio IX
Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 11:10:00 -
[40]
ECM
________________________________________
|
Julius Rigel
House Rigel
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 11:13:00 -
[41]
Edited by: Julius Rigel on 17/10/2008 11:14:37
Like I mentioned in another thread, blasters. I'm putting my money on blasters.
[Eit:] Typo.
Frigate racing is fast and fun! |
TwoShoes
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 11:14:00 -
[42]
Dare I say it, but "accounts/characters inactive for 3 consecutive months will be deleted".
|
Lilith Order
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 11:20:00 -
[43]
Ask for 0.0 sec buff, they nerf high sec, ask for skill que, they nerf ghosting, ask for tracking speed buffs, they nerf nano.
What do people want to see buffed? See the counter to it and you see the next nerf.
Seeing an Eve end game anyone? |
RedSplat
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 11:23:00 -
[44]
I hope it will be local: Local just plain shouldn't exist in 0.0, should show individuals in the nearest 5 systems in empire.
I fear it will be cloakers. The Carebear Brigade probably consider them 'griefing' ships.
|
Sexiest Beast
Caldari
State War Academy
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 11:25:00 -
[45]
Moon Mining
On a lighter note. Wasn't the forums supposed to be going through and "upgrade" I would reckon that the "upgrades" to the forum will displease some. ergo a nerf.
|
Another Forum'Alt
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 12:05:00 -
[46]
Falcons.
HACtors (can hope)
Amarr.
This is not part of my sig.
...Or is it? |
Andrea Skye
Caldari
The Python Cartel
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 12:19:00 -
[47]
NOT falcons, thier made of tissue and dies if something so much as looks at it.
Next nerf? hmm, prolly claoking or log off timers.
Not sure, only real whines i seen recently is against falcons. And falcons are finnnneee.. they dont jam 30 ships, hell they can jam 2-3 (asumming mixed jammers, which most falcons equip because you never know what you are going to encounter, and bigger than a cruiser), if one ship fits an ECCM then it makes jamming multiple targets very very difficult. Then did i mention falcons are made of tissue? One jam cycle fail at the wrong moment and your toast.
If they do nerf falcons, then i expect them to make it so they have some kind of tank that isnt breakable by an ibis.
|
Demitria Fernir
Caldari
Science and Trade Institute
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 12:22:00 -
[48]
Nanos. Again.
_______________________________________________
10100110010100101010011010100101001100101110101
I will Conquer My Signature
Somewhere in the future
10100110010100101010011010100101001100101110101 |
Deathhawk
Ore Mongers
Black Hand.
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 12:27:00 -
[49]
Originally by: Tobias Sjodin
This is what will come in 2 months (then whined about and re-scheduled to 6 months from now):
"ECM-rebalance
Dear EVE-players, We have concluded that the state of ECM currently, in particular to Caldari-recons is unbalanced. After having an almost three hour long discussion in the office we have concluded that ECM in it's current form is not following our original intentions. Jamming something for a period time is not 'feature as intended'. First of all we will change ECM by making each ECM function as a targeted ECM-burst. Meaning, that there will no longer be any timer during which the target is jammed, it will lose it's lock and after that be able to re-lock any target at will again, until jammed again. We have after ten minutes of checking these changes out decided that the activation time needs to be cut somewhat, while at the same time reducing cap-requirements. Now meaning that a T2 Multispectral ECM will have a cycle time of 8 seconds with maximum skills (modifiable of course via support mods) and a 42 units activation cap cost.
This will finally make EVE a game about tactics again, and no longer will we see one Falcon creating imbalance where 2 ships can easily defeat 30.
CCP Nose"
lol tob thats actually the best idea ive heard about ecm so far... give your self a pat on the back haha
DH 
|
Deviana Sevidon
Gallente
Panta-Rhei
United Front Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 13:01:00 -
[50]
I think Forum Whining will be heavily nerfed by the moderators and the forgotten rule, that ranting is not allowed will see the forums again.
|
Sarin Adler
Caldari
Dark Shadow Cartel
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 13:08:00 -
[51]
ECM, script for range/strength maybe. A good thing IMO (and I'm a falcon pilot).
---
|
Malcanis
RuffRyders
Eradication Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 13:14:00 -
[52]
Originally by: Iva Soreass
Edited by: Iva Soreass on 17/10/2008 10:57:57
Well the 'WoWhiner's Brigade' has started on cloaking, so my next bet is that will be hit hard next. (considering everytime they whine, ccp take action  )
Heh there have been "Cloakwhines" since I started playing EvE.
|
Malcanis
RuffRyders
Eradication Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 13:23:00 -
[53]
Originally by: Demitria Fernir
Nanos. Again.
Nah, there's still some juice left in a few minmatar ships. Them.
|
NupetietVer
Neuro Cartographic Services
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 13:59:00 -
[54]
All Passive Income generators like Moon Mining, Research Points, Market orders.
They did change the loot tables a bit to drop less junk, so another nerf is named loot dropping except missions in Low Sec to get players down there.
Or maybe only Rat frigs and cruisers in Missions in High Sec, while Rat BC's and BS only spawn in Low Sec.
Knowing CCP's logic, this would probably happen. Those good old days of the Wild West are gone now.
|
Le Skunk
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 14:02:00 -
[55]
Originally by: Tobias Sjodin
...
CCP Nose"
CCP Nose is a ****
SKUNK
|
Veldya
Guristari Freedom Fighters
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 14:22:00 -
[56]
Lets hope they nerf shit posting.
|
DrAtomic
Atomic Heroes
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 14:27:00 -
[57]
ECM will become FOTM again so....
- - -
Originally by: CCP Wrangler
If you can understand our goal, disagree with our solution and offer a solution that is equal or better your opinion has a better chance of being heard...
|
Roemy Schneider
BINFORD
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 14:39:00 -
[58]
Originally by: DrAtomic
ECM will become FOTM again so....
will...?
-
putting the gist back into logistics |
Chaos Incarnate
Faceless Logistics
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 14:40:00 -
[59]
Missiles!
__________
Originally by: Tortun Nahme
nah, that is the true badge of a forum warrior, to draw the humorous ire of the devs
|
Thea Arsoniztik
Red Tides
Viewer Discretion Advised
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 14:52:00 -
[60]
I'm going to keep my idea to myself because I don't want it to be considered.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |