Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Smoking Blunts
ZC Industries Dark Stripes
217
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 11:09:00 -
[31] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Smoking Blunts wrote:Ting Mei wrote:Why not re-introduce T2 BPO in the game, and change the Invention principe ?
Invention could be for example be use to ME and PE instead of just waiting time ...
Invention makes research on a BPO, with a % of luck as today
Don't know ... but this T2 BPO situation is really unfair in my opinion. is it unfair that someone has 150mil sp and you only have 2mil? is it unfair that someone has a state raven and you only have a navy one? is it unfair that someone has worked in game for isk to buy a t2 bpo and ccp removes all the time and effort? T2bpo's arnt unfair in todays industry landscape, there is much profit to be made from invention as long as you are not inventing t2 armour plates or other equally ****** mods. if you really want a t2bpo you can buy one, like most of tehe current holders have. some are dirt cheap, some are expensive. imo buff the ****** mods, make them worth building... oh and the eagle, that needs looking at. Shut up, please. Nothing of what you said made any relevence to gifted items. Most T2 were given out by CCP to select players in ''lottery'' that was rigged. Yes some of the lottery were fair and others not. Alongside this CCP also handed out T2 BPO as drops or just plain straight into players assets. THIS is F'ing unfair. The BPO's should be removed from game and the player owning it reinbursd the lottery research points that BPO cost. EVE is rigged it's not an even game. I do hope Sony Reps catch wind of stuff like this and know exactly the type of company CCP is.
so ccp are going to reimburse the isk people paid other people for them, as most bpo's are now in the hands of other people, many change hands weekly. much like the state ravens mentioned in my post are not owned by teh people they were origanly handed out to. ccp never handed them out as drops. if you are refering to the ccp roams from a few months back, they were t2 bpc's and were much discussed at the time.
t2 bpo's are not the problem, ship invention should be looked at along with buffing crap t2 mods. in that way more of those items woudl be produced from invention. CCP-áare full of words and no action. We will watch what they are doing, for now
|

Smoking Blunts
ZC Industries Dark Stripes
217
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 11:14:00 -
[32] - Quote
Eva Volkova wrote:Thalysia wrote:I do not think BPO's are unfair. There are some things to be considered looking at the everlasting whining about the unfairnes or removal in the T2 BPO's vs BPC's/invention discussion.
Only 7.07% of Absolutions and 23.62% of Sleipnirs produced in March 2012 were produced through invention. thats not unfair? The problem is me. The bpo can be researched to the point invention is more expensive than the cost of the BPO so u cant compete in a market that the final product is more expensive that your cost. Thalysia wrote: BPO's can be used only to occupy one slot (being it set to one month contstant build), if the owner wants to utilize more production slots for T2 he either needs to invent himself, or have more T2 BPO's. ...
... And to be honest, if for some reason an industrialist in in possession of 10 BPO's (or 11 when fully trained advanced mass production). I trhink he deserves to have this advantage. He is probably not going to mess with prices too much and cut his own margin as he needs to somehow earn back his investment.
Never heard of alts ? You can have 3 characters per acount. With the money you earn with that single BPO you can buy more characters / mantain more acounts = more free production slots / more free invention. BPO T2 is free money. So u can NEVER compete with a BPO owner. He with less effort makes more money. Ways to solve it? - Removal - Make BPO - BPCs with x runs - Make BPO T2 default me -25 / -50 so they are more expensive than invention. - Reintroduce BPO T2 (lottery / invention chance etc) EvA
the reason why absolutions and sleps arnt not produced via invention isnt to do with a t2 bpo. its to do with why the hell would you use one, when a t3 is better and a tier 3 bc does the same damage at half the cost. if more people used teh ship, demand woudl be higher and more would be produced via invention, its very simple issue of supply and demand, they suck in there current incarnation and demand is low. if you look at other examples from the twitter feed, you can see this in action
i own an abso, but id much rather have fun in my oracle. CCP-áare full of words and no action. We will watch what they are doing, for now
|

Brewlar Kuvakei
Adeptio Gloriae
30
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 12:21:00 -
[33] - Quote
Yes the figures released for T2BPO just make me rage even further think there are people out there making 80% of the market at zero effort all from knowing a CCP dev when the game was even more corrupt than it is now. 80% of the market for all those years to fund an allince that fights in a bullcrap war that CCP decides who wins by the massive isk dumps they give through T2BPO. |

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 12:29:00 -
[34] - Quote
Smoking Blunts wrote:
the reason why absolutions and sleps arnt not produced via invention isnt to do with a t2 bpo. its to do with why the hell would you use one, when a t3 is better and a tier 3 bc does the same damage at half the cost. if more people used teh ship, demand woudl be higher and more would be produced via invention, its very simple issue of supply and demand, they suck in there current incarnation and demand is low. if you look at other examples from the twitter feed, you can see this in action
i own an abso, but id much rather have fun in my oracle.
The real reason its they are selling those ship below invention cost.
1- they are crazy and whant to loose money.
2- they use t2 BPO
As stats from @CCP_Diagoras show. Number 2 is the cause. |

Thalysia
The Ahool Guard
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 12:39:00 -
[35] - Quote
All pointless it seems.
Yes BPO's are unfair, yes they should be removed, yes I was stupid of me to even think about writing in one of those ever rerturning threads about why BPO's need to be removed.
I am going to sign all petitions I can find about this and hope they are removed. Then I can safely keep doing my invention, keep doing my T2 manufacturing, keep having the same profit I have now for the same effort, but sleeping better knowing all unfairness vanished out of New Eden. |

Smoking Blunts
ZC Industries Dark Stripes
217
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 13:36:00 -
[36] - Quote
Eva Volkova wrote:Smoking Blunts wrote:
the reason why absolutions and sleps arnt not produced via invention isnt to do with a t2 bpo. its to do with why the hell would you use one, when a t3 is better and a tier 3 bc does the same damage at half the cost. if more people used teh ship, demand woudl be higher and more would be produced via invention, its very simple issue of supply and demand, they suck in there current incarnation and demand is low. if you look at other examples from the twitter feed, you can see this in action
i own an abso, but id much rather have fun in my oracle.
The real reason its they are selling those ship below invention cost. 1- they are crazy and whant to loose money. 2- they use t2 BPO As stats from @CCP_Diagoras show. Number 2 is the cause.
no they do not show that, thats your mind playing tricks on you.
there are a number of reasons, the producers are idiots, they mine minerials, they are free. be it t1 or t2 mins, they are free or have lowered cost due to the fact they mine them.. thats the biggest reason why stuff is cheaper. if you actually bothered to check, yourll find t2 items with no bpo that sell below the cost of the parts.
dont assume anything. CCP-áare full of words and no action. We will watch what they are doing, for now
|

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 14:00:00 -
[37] - Quote
Smoking Blunts wrote:
there are a number of reasons, the producers are idiots, they mine minerials, they are free. be it t1 or t2 mins, they are free or have lowered cost due to the fact they mine them.. thats the biggest reason why stuff is cheaper. if you actually bothered to check, yourll find t2 items with no bpo that sell below the cost of the parts.
dont assume anything.
I dont assume i have facts if most of a market is done with BPO is because its cheaper. If not the price will rise until Invention is profitable again.
A market can be under the cost of the parts for a time but it will rise in time.
If the market rise above the BPO T2 cost and Below Invention cost its because of the BPO T2.
Like nocxium these days the price was there because of the pax amarria when u removed it from the game price changed.
Will happen to those products if u remove BPO T2. The price will raise above invention cost.
EvA
|

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 14:05:00 -
[38] - Quote
Crappy ships and mods will not be manufactures as they have no value. BPO are not causing this.
Once EVE tips 125 000 active players logged in, this will also lower the BPO effect.
Invrease production time on all!! Bpo/bpc, T1 and t2 by 500%. (not caps)
All problems solved. |

Gizan
Hounds Of War WHY so Seri0Us
20
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 14:07:00 -
[39] - Quote
im currently one of the guys producing absolutions off invention. my build cost is 127mil right now, and they sell for 210, should invetion be nerfed cuz im making 70~ mil/ship?
btw i have the 6 moons to produce the materials to build them.
OH OH OH, i know, maby i should shell out 90 BILLION isk for the bpo, then ill be RICH!!!!! my build cost would drop to 107mil! thats like an extra 500mil/month! would only take me 180months to pay the thing off, then ill really be racking up the cash! |

Gatan Hahran
Brukterer DUCT TAPE UNION
88
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 14:14:00 -
[40] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Yes the figures released for T2BPO just make me rage even further think there are people out there making 80% of the market at zero effort all from knowing a CCP dev when the game was even more corrupt than it is now. 80% of the market for all those years to fund an allince that fights in a bullcrap war that CCP decides who wins by the massive isk dumps they give through T2BPO.
Just coming back from the afternoon tea with the 17 CCP devs i welcomed in my plaza. I wanted to keep the story for myself, but i decided to tell you. Before the tea i was delivering my T2 BPO jobs, making another few billions with an effortless click, but then the CCP devs and me started to observe a poor T2 ship inventor guy with admin tools. he had sold his last stuff for a big invention gamble to turn the things around. The devs set his invention chance to 0% without him knowing and all his 60 invention jobs over 6 chars failed. Man, we were laughing hysterically and high-fiving each other when he had to start mining in his bestower again with a T1 miner. Always fun times with this cool dudes in my plaza.
true story.
|
|

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 14:17:00 -
[41] - Quote
qDoctor Strangelove wrote:Crappy ships and mods will not be manufactures as they have no value. BPO are not causing this.
Crappy ships and mods will be manufactured if someone buys them above cost.
The are selling above BPO cost below Invention cost.
EvA |

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 14:24:00 -
[42] - Quote
Gizan wrote:im currently one of the guys producing absolutions off invention. my build cost is 127mil right now, and they sell for 210, should invetion be nerfed cuz im making 70~ mil/ship?
Proof?
If data isnt wrong u better sell the components.
http://www.eve-market-guide.com/t2item.php?id=22448
EvA |

Shadowsword
The Scope Gallente Federation
119
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 14:25:00 -
[43] - Quote
Kenshin Tzestu wrote:More like BPO owners can undercut people trying invention to the point that they exit the market.
Only on low-demand items, and since margins on low-demand are going to be poor anyway, why do you even bother?
On low-demand stuff, margins are low so trying invention on that field was already a bad idea.
On high-demand stuff, the volume coming from T2 Bpos is only a small fraction of the total volume, and has little effect on prices.
Anyone who think his invention margins would skyrocket, should T2 Bpos be removed, need to be locked in a padded cell. |

Smoking Blunts
ZC Industries Dark Stripes
217
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 14:35:00 -
[44] - Quote
Eva Volkova wrote:Gizan wrote:im currently one of the guys producing absolutions off invention. my build cost is 127mil right now, and they sell for 210, should invetion be nerfed cuz im making 70~ mil/ship?
Proof? If data isnt wrong u better sell the components. http://www.eve-market-guide.com/t2item.php?id=22448EvA
think you missed the part where he had moons produce the mins to make it. was that your intention? CCP-áare full of words and no action. We will watch what they are doing, for now
|

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 15:08:00 -
[45] - Quote
Smoking Blunts wrote:[quote=Eva Volkova][quote=Gizan]im currently one of the guys producing absolutions off invention. my build cost is 127mil right now, and they sell for 210, should invetion be nerfed cuz im making 70~ mil/ship?
think you missed the part where he had moons produce the mins to make it. was that your intention?
I said he better of selling the mins if he wants to loose money its his call.
EvA |

Katja Faith
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
18
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 15:27:00 -
[46] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:I've known at least 2 people in RL that stopped playing EVE as a direct result of T2 BPO's. Why would they want to play a game where some chosen player gets to mis an entire step of gameplay? T2 BPO is the reason I would never touch manufacture with a barge pole.
I call utter bull****. If you can't even converse honestly don't bother posting. |

Kalipoli
State War Academy Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 16:00:00 -
[47] - Quote
You know whats really crazy, you dont have to buy T2 items, and you damn well dont HAVE to manufacture them. There is good isk to be made on even T1 so personally this whole argument is screwed up by some non-carebears who want cheaper stuff and have absolutely no experience with industry.
If you cant make isk doing industry, 1: you are doing it all wrong 2: your spreadsheets suck and or dont exist.
T2 BPOs are worth keeping in game so that people who dont need to be playing EVE have an actual reason to rage quit. Im sorry but we just dont like people who *****.
|

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 16:04:00 -
[48] - Quote
Eva Volkova wrote:qDoctor Strangelove wrote:Crappy ships and mods will not be manufactures as they have no value. BPO are not causing this.
Crappy ships and mods will be manufactured if someone buys them above cost. The are selling above BPO cost below Invention cost. EvA
If inventors didn't undercut BPO owners and sell at 0 margin, that would NOT be a problem Also, given that T2 BPO are such a gold mine, why did most orignal owners sell theirs? |

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 16:52:00 -
[49] - Quote
qDoctor Strangelove wrote:
If inventors didn't undercut BPO owners and sell at 0 margin, that would NOT be a problem Also, given that T2 BPO are such a gold mine, why did most orignal owners sell theirs?
Inventors arent undecuting bpo. bpo are undercuting inventor because they have better magin.
If u are able to sell something for the profit of 2x3 years and someone buys it why not.
But thats no the point.
The point is. - If BPO T2 are great then introduce them again. - If BPO are a problem remove them from game.
The first owner of the BPO was the one that got the free money. If he whants to give it free o charge 10 billion dosent make the sistem better or worse.
We have two systems BPO T2 and Invention.
Thats not fair or right in any way.
If you whant to keep the BPO make their final product more expensive than the one you can get from invention and problem will be solved.
BPO T2 more expensive but no need of invention.
Invention cheaper than the BPO.
EvA |

Smoking Blunts
ZC Industries Dark Stripes
218
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 17:44:00 -
[50] - Quote
Eva Volkova wrote: The point is. - If BPO T2 are great then introduce them again. - If BPO are a problem remove them from game.
EvA
the answers are. - The lottery was a mistake, invention is better and is working as intended - There not a problem CCP-áare full of words and no action. We will watch what they are doing, for now
|
|

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 18:37:00 -
[51] - Quote
Smoking Blunts wrote:
the answers are. - The lottery was a mistake, invention is better and is working as intended - There not a problem
how can the lottery be a mistake and not the bpo ? Invention isnt working as intended because a small % of players using BPO t2 sell a big% of the market. And with invention you cant compete with them. Telling me that with invention you can make money is the same that telling me that killing rats gives you money and what?
We need a system where invention can compete in every market.
If you seem BPO T2 are good lets find a way to reintroduce them.
- Make a system so everyone has a chance to get BPO T2 - Or change BPO T2 so they are more expensive than invention (still give an advantage of no spending time doing invention)
In a game we need to look what best for the system not what is best for us.
And in no way having free card its good for anyone.
They are removing R&D agents in the same way so will be a great time to think about removing/changing/reintroducing BPO T2
EvE
|

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 19:22:00 -
[52] - Quote
Eva Volkova wrote:Smoking Blunts wrote:
the answers are. - The lottery was a mistake, invention is better and is working as intended - There not a problem
how can the lottery be a mistake and not the bpo ? Invention isnt working as intended because a small % of players using BPO t2 sell a big% of the market. And with invention you cant compete with them. Telling me that with invention you can make money is the same that telling me that killing rats gives you money and what? We need a system where invention can compete in every market. If you seem BPO T2 are good lets find a way to reintroduce them. - Make a system so everyone has a chance to get BPO T2 - Or change BPO T2 so they are more expensive than invention (still give an advantage of no spending time doing invention) In a game we need to look what best for the system not what is best for us. And in no way having free card its good for anyone. They are removing R&D agents in the same way so will be a great time to think about removing/changing/reintroducing BPO T2 EvE
Guess I should not feed the Troll, but hey.....
The T2 BPO's have seeded the market with affordable T2 items across the board. High demand items was priced way up there, so, invention came to fix it, and the fix worked.
Now, should a single BPO be able to feed 2000 items a month into the market? For Warp Disruptors, this is not to bad, because they blow up all the time. Laddar ECCM Projector II however, well, there have maybe been sold 2000 of them since 2006 all in all, most to collectors.
Cut the rates that a product can be produced and the problem of T2 BPO's that you describe goes away. Make the production time of both T1 and T2 go up by 500%. The only thing it can not fix is your envy of people that invested their isk and bought the sensor booster T2 BPO at 1.2 billion isk, or the T2 ENAM at 1 bisk.. I know I envy the people that bought them for this amount back in the days.. |

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 19:34:00 -
[53] - Quote
It isnt about envy. Its about the rules we must play with. We all play and love this game i and i would love to play in a system where everyone plays with the same rules.
CPP decided BPO T2 wasnt a good system and decide to remove it from the game.
The problem of the BPO is that they give an advantage to the ones that uses them and that they dont get destroyed with it use.
you have two systems to produce T2 items (the same final product).
The old system that CPP didnt like and the new one (invention).
If you whant to have two systems you should (in a game enviroment) balance them.
One without any work producing more expensive items (BPO T2).
And another with more work and less expensive item (Invention).
And then reintroduce BPO T2 and let people decide.
EvA |

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 20:26:00 -
[54] - Quote
Eva Volkova wrote:It isnt about envy. Its about the rules we must play with. We all play and love this game i and i would love to play in a system where everyone plays with the same rules.
CPP decided BPO T2 wasnt a good system and decide to remove it from the game.
The problem of the BPO is that they give an advantage to the ones that uses them and that they dont get destroyed with it use.
you have two systems to produce T2 items (the same final product).
The old system that CPP didnt like and the new one (invention).
If you whant to have two systems you should (in a game enviroment) balance them.
One without any work producing more expensive items (BPO T2).
And another with more work and less expensive item (Invention).
And then reintroduce BPO T2 and let people decide.
EvA
1: CCP had seeded the number of BPO's that was to be seeded. That is why they stopped. 2: No BPO's is ever used up, live with it. 3: Invention is for the masses, and it only requires some small work to do and ISK. 4: T2 BPO requires you to get hold of items, then make items and sell, pretty much like any other activity. 5: Reintroduce T2 BPO's?? that will ruin invention for ever, making it totally BUST for the masses.
in short, you must be in Test.
|

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 21:24:00 -
[55] - Quote
qDoctor Strangelove wrote:
1: CCP had seeded the number of BPO's that was to be seeded. That is why they stopped. 2: No BPO's is ever used up, live with it. 3: Invention is for the masses, and it only requires some small work to do and ISK. 4: T2 BPO requires you to get hold of items, then make items and sell, pretty much like any other activity. 5: Reintroduce T2 BPO's?? that will ruin invention for ever, making it totally BUST for the masses.
in short, you must be in Test.
1. they stop because it wasnt a good system. 3. So in short BPO T2 are good for the elite and not for the masses ? 4. invention too + you have to do the invention so they allways are more expensive and cant compete. 5. Not if we change how BPO T2 work. If BPO are more expensive to produce but able to mass produce and Invention less expensive no mass produce. You have a choice.
this is more of the same. I have mi toy and dont whant anyone to broke it i want mi "i win button for industry".
Lets move all to invention o lets build a system that can work in unison wich each other. And after that re introduce BPO T2.
If the BPO are good lets all have them if not remove them or change them. I dont like good for me not good for anyone else.
EvA |

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 23:43:00 -
[56] - Quote
Eva Volkova wrote:qDoctor Strangelove wrote:
1: CCP had seeded the number of BPO's that was to be seeded. That is why they stopped. 2: No BPO's is ever used up, live with it. 3: Invention is for the masses, and it only requires some small work to do and ISK. 4: T2 BPO requires you to get hold of items, then make items and sell, pretty much like any other activity. 5: Reintroduce T2 BPO's?? that will ruin invention for ever, making it totally BUST for the masses.
in short, you must be in Test.
1. they stop because it wasnt a good system. 3. So in short BPO T2 are good for the elite and not for the masses ? 4. invention too + you have to do the invention so they allways are more expensive and cant compete. 5. Not if we change how BPO T2 work. If BPO are more expensive to produce but able to mass produce and Invention less expensive no mass produce. You have a choice. this is more of the same. I have mi toy and dont whant anyone to broke it i want mi "i win button for industry". Lets move all to invention o lets build a system that can work in unison wich each other. And after that re introduce BPO T2. If the BPO are good lets all have them if not remove them or change them. I dont like good for me not good for anyone else. EvA
T2 BPO's was seeded in a fixed number. it was not stopped because it was BAD, it stopped because they were done seeding.
Also, T2 BPO's are for heavy industrial investors... (not you) and veterans that never 'cashed in'
|

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 23:52:00 -
[57] - Quote
qDoctor Strangelove wrote:
T2 BPO's was seeded in a fixed number. it was not stopped because it was BAD, it stopped because they were done seeding.
Also, T2 BPO's are for heavy industrial investors... (not you) and veterans that never 'cashed in'
When they introduced invention cpp said they wasnt happy how the lottery was handled.
why? why no a new system? why scared of change? What is better with this sistem? What advantages have this sistem instead of the one i have talked about?
EvA
|

Stella SGP
65
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 03:46:00 -
[58] - Quote
Eva Volkova wrote:When they introduced invention cpp said they wasnt happy how the lottery was handled.
why? why no a new system? why scared of change? What is better with this sistem? What advantages have this sistem instead of the one i have talked about?
EvA Many moons ago when T2 Bpo was the only way of producing T2 items, cartels formed. They offer ridiculous amounts of isk to buy up all the BPO of the same item and controlled the prices. Peasants then had to pay 20 mil ISK for a cargo expander and 300 mil ISK for a HAC. Back then peasants whined for a good reason because cartels could control both volume and price
CCP wanted to keep T2 manufacturing distinct from T1, but didn't like to continue with the lottery because these cartels would just keep buying up the BPO and continue plundering the peasants. They wanted a system where anyone could participate and more importantly scalable as EVE population grew. Thus, Invention was born
The populace of New Eden rejoiced as Invention was introduced and quickly smashed the Cartel's grip on the T2 market. Now T2 items was in abundance and everyone could afford them. A noob no longer had to save for days just to buy a 20mil ISK for a cap recharger, mind you this was back in the days when LP stores didn't offer as much Faction mods
As you can see Invention is working as intended and it was not a typo error for invented BPC to carry -4 ME/-4 PE by default.
Fast forward several years later, EVE gets new players who joins and conveniently forgets that EVE is a game set in a persistent universe. Then more ignorant players much like yourself who can't figure out the difference between their butt hole and their mouths come out on the forums and start whining about how unfair things are while totally oblivious to how much harder the game was or how much improvements the game has seen.
So, please get off your privileged a$$ next time and read up on EVE's rich history before whining on the forums for unnecessary changes which would accomplish nothing except to satisfy your bitter jealousy. |

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
4
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 07:32:00 -
[59] - Quote
Stella SGP wrote:Eva Volkova wrote:When they introduced invention cpp said they wasnt happy how the lottery was handled.
why? why no a new system? why scared of change? What is better with this sistem? What advantages have this sistem instead of the one i have talked about?
EvA Many moons ago when T2 Bpo was the only way of producing T2 items, cartels formed. They offer ridiculous amounts of isk to buy up all the BPO of the same item and controlled the prices. Peasants then had to pay 20 mil ISK for a cargo expander and 300 mil ISK for a HAC. Back then peasants whined for a good reason because cartels could control both volume and price CCP wanted to keep T2 manufacturing distinct from T1, but didn't like to continue with the lottery because these cartels would just keep buying up the BPO and continue plundering the peasants. They wanted a system where anyone could participate and more importantly scalable as EVE population grew. Thus, Invention was born The populace of New Eden rejoiced as Invention was introduced and quickly smashed the Cartel's grip on the T2 market. Now T2 items was in abundance and everyone could afford them. A noob no longer had to save for days just to buy a 20mil ISK for a cap recharger, mind you this was back in the days when LP stores didn't offer as much Faction mods As you can see Invention is working as intended and it was not a typo error for invented BPC to carry -4 ME/-4 PE by default. Fast forward several years later, EVE gets new players who joins and conveniently forgets that EVE is a game set in a persistent universe. Then more ignorant players much like yourself who can't figure out the difference between their butt hole and their mouths come out on the forums and start whining about how unfair things are while totally oblivious to how much harder the game was or how much improvements the game has seen. So, please get off your privileged a$$ next time and read up on EVE's rich history before whining on the forums for unnecessary changes which would accomplish nothing except to satisfy your bitter jealousy.
This post almost made me cry. I remember mining in a probe with Miner I's and carg expanders for weeks. And I could not use a jet can because noone I knew had a hauler. That was 80 m3 ore per minute. Then, after some weeks of mining when I had a Rupture, I got hold of some named miner lasers, so I got 88 m3 ore per minute...
fast forward ... I do missions ... get R&D points.
fast forward even more, I get some real ****** T2 prints
And then, now, 10 years later, after spending 1500 USD on each active account from 2003, there are people crying about my isk printing press.
Newsflash : according to an EVE tool I have, my total value of ALL items in EVE, after 10 years with 3-6 clients is... just about 100 billion isk all together. I guess 25-30 billion would be my T2 prints, the rest various items spread around.
for years I would get between 200 million and 400 million isk a month in profit with 6 prints. That is something like making 50 mill isk a month per print, and I do not think that is so terrible. |

Eva Volkova
nXo Intrepid Crossing
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.07 08:25:00 -
[60] - Quote
you reply to mi post but you dont answerd mi questions. i just think invention should given better items than BPO T2 because its more time consuming. More time= better results.
So please troll all you whant but eve has changed it allways is changing and thats good.
Ravens where number one but missiles change and get a nerf. Vagabons pilgrims a nanocanes where a must but a nerf came. titans are seem very powerfull and they have receive nerf after nerf.
Whats so important of BPO T2 that cant be changed in any way.
Ok lets keep it as they are but buff invention. whats the problem you have buffing invention?
- they should be a diference between using a 0me /0pe BPO and a full researched one. - why not have a chance of having better BPC T2?. Better than a BPO T2 full researched. Its only a BPC and will run out but will give you something new and will be fun (like getting an officer loot in pve).
Lets make industri a better place. Lets static and with more change.
EvA |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |