| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Eris Discordia
   |
Posted - 2004.07.19 09:13:00 -
[61]
sticky for a while
I ♥ my pink dreadnought of pwnage
Mail [email protected] if you have any questions. |
Eris Discordia
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 09:13:00 -
[62]
sticky for a while
I ♥ my pink dreadnought of pwnage
Mail [email protected] if you have any questions. |
Yarrick
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 09:36:00 -
[63]
No, only benefits the carbears imo.
_____________________________________________
|
Yarrick
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 09:36:00 -
[64]
No, only benefits the carbears imo.
_____________________________________________
|
DarkStar251
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 09:41:00 -
[65]
/o\ nooooo!
|
DarkStar251
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 09:41:00 -
[66]
/o\ nooooo!
|
Negotiator
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 09:44:00 -
[67]
Sinist, for a person that sits in Empire (Asrios) all day, you sure have a big mouth...
|
Negotiator
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 09:44:00 -
[68]
Sinist, for a person that sits in Empire (Asrios) all day, you sure have a big mouth...
|
Spanker
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 09:50:00 -
[69]
I vote YAY. Thinking about it, seeing exactly who is in local is just ludicrous. The local chat is just that - a means of communication. Shouldn't be used as a tactical resource at all imo. If you have to choose between local names and map blobs, I say keep the map blob - it's feels more realistic to be able to get info on the approx. number of ships in a region than instantly seeing the names and shoe sizes of everyone within a hundred AU radius just because one happens to jump through a stargate. Imagine the suspence of entering say A2 without knowing what's in store for you - the tension alone would be enough to kill a guy/gal 
This is of course what would suit me the best, but I suppose that's why we're voting.
|
Spanker
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 09:50:00 -
[70]
I vote YAY. Thinking about it, seeing exactly who is in local is just ludicrous. The local chat is just that - a means of communication. Shouldn't be used as a tactical resource at all imo. If you have to choose between local names and map blobs, I say keep the map blob - it's feels more realistic to be able to get info on the approx. number of ships in a region than instantly seeing the names and shoe sizes of everyone within a hundred AU radius just because one happens to jump through a stargate. Imagine the suspence of entering say A2 without knowing what's in store for you - the tension alone would be enough to kill a guy/gal
This is of course what would suit me the best, but I suppose that's why we're voting.
|
Arud
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 10:14:00 -
[71]
A big fat no because of the same reason as Ronyo Dae'Loki wrote.
Also for this to work corps, and alliances with shiva, the information on local should be shared. If one player is in a system, detects another player on local, scanning, him blabbering on local or something. So when another player of the same corp,alliance as the other player enters the system he should be allowed to see the same thing on local. Also with this there must be relay stations like I have pointed out in the shiva forum. Please please put in relay stations, I think that would make most people happy.
A change like this will have huge impact on everything in 0.0 and it shouldnt be considered as a "qickfix" to quiet some loudmouths on the forum.
Being able to scan for logged off ships is a great idea though. But the scanner needs a filter to filter out asteroids, planets and other stuff you dont want when you are scanning for ships. Just simple checkboxes for the relevant info would work great.
and.. please... relay stations :)
|
Arud
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 10:14:00 -
[72]
A big fat no because of the same reason as Ronyo Dae'Loki wrote.
Also for this to work corps, and alliances with shiva, the information on local should be shared. If one player is in a system, detects another player on local, scanning, him blabbering on local or something. So when another player of the same corp,alliance as the other player enters the system he should be allowed to see the same thing on local. Also with this there must be relay stations like I have pointed out in the shiva forum. Please please put in relay stations, I think that would make most people happy.
A change like this will have huge impact on everything in 0.0 and it shouldnt be considered as a "qickfix" to quiet some loudmouths on the forum.
Being able to scan for logged off ships is a great idea though. But the scanner needs a filter to filter out asteroids, planets and other stuff you dont want when you are scanning for ships. Just simple checkboxes for the relevant info would work great.
and.. please... relay stations :)
|
Estios
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 10:16:00 -
[73]
I say yay to changing Pilots in space feature to what I think was a superb suggestion of 'Average Number of Pilots in space over last hour' or something similary vague but still mildly useful. And make this average figure actually realistic and not like the crappy bugged pilots in space we have now when it say 18 in space when there are infact 84 etc
I wouldnt like local removed unless you make the scanner ie by range better.
All the folks saying about you'd have no idea who was in local there is always the scanner and remember that the carebears wouldnt see you coming and safespot as soon as local jumped.
Its a pretty radical change thats for sure. You cannot simply remove both features without implementing better working alternatives.
So HMV consider Andy Williams and Dean Martin to be "easy listening" do they? Tell that to my mate Dave, he's been deaf for 20 years.
|
Estios
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 10:16:00 -
[74]
I say yay to changing Pilots in space feature to what I think was a superb suggestion of 'Average Number of Pilots in space over last hour' or something similary vague but still mildly useful. And make this average figure actually realistic and not like the crappy bugged pilots in space we have now when it say 18 in space when there are infact 84 etc
I wouldnt like local removed unless you make the scanner ie by range better.
All the folks saying about you'd have no idea who was in local there is always the scanner and remember that the carebears wouldnt see you coming and safespot as soon as local jumped.
Its a pretty radical change thats for sure. You cannot simply remove both features without implementing better working alternatives.
So HMV consider Andy Williams and Dean Martin to be "easy listening" do they? Tell that to my mate Dave, he's been deaf for 20 years.
|
StarWolfer
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 11:08:00 -
[75]
All I can hope for is that when it are like 1000 Yay's and 999 Nay's, CCP doesn't push it through, just for the sake of the poll result...
You will have 999 disappointed customers that way 
Me hopes for a clear direction (a far majority has to be achieved, otherwise leave it as is) |
StarWolfer
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 11:08:00 -
[76]
All I can hope for is that when it are like 1000 Yay's and 999 Nay's, CCP doesn't push it through, just for the sake of the poll result...
You will have 999 disappointed customers that way
Me hopes for a clear direction (a far majority has to be achieved, otherwise leave it as is) |
Raia Mortius
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 11:15:00 -
[77]
big time NAY !
|
Raia Mortius
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 11:15:00 -
[78]
big time NAY !
|
Rod Blaine
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 11:31:00 -
[79]
Edited by: Rod Blaine on 19/07/2004 11:33:41
 Originally by: StarWolfer
All I can hope for is that when it are like 1000 Yay's and 999 Nay's, CCP doesn't push it through, just for the sake of the poll result...
You will have 999 disappointed customers that way
Me hopes for a clear direction (a far majority has to be achieved, otherwise leave it as is)
lol, you really think ccp sees this poll as some kind of binding thing ?
This was just a balloon going up, a wild idea being thrown on the table for discussion and opinion. They wont just blinldy do what the majority asks. If they'd work that way we would have no highways, no research agents, cruiser missiles on cruisers and 5 bonuses on every ship 
Nah, and since the way in which the question was posed is fuxt to a whole new dimension in itself, they could hardly take the result seriously anyway.
_______________________________________________
Yes yes, blogging is passÚ I know.
Rod's Ramblingz on Eve-Online
Solutions to your issues. |
Rod Blaine
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 11:31:00 -
[80]
Edited by: Rod Blaine on 19/07/2004 11:33:41
Originally by: StarWolfer
All I can hope for is that when it are like 1000 Yay's and 999 Nay's, CCP doesn't push it through, just for the sake of the poll result...
You will have 999 disappointed customers that way
Me hopes for a clear direction (a far majority has to be achieved, otherwise leave it as is)
lol, you really think ccp sees this poll as some kind of binding thing ?
This was just a balloon going up, a wild idea being thrown on the table for discussion and opinion. They wont just blinldy do what the majority asks. If they'd work that way we would have no highways, no research agents, cruiser missiles on cruisers and 5 bonuses on every ship
Nah, and since the way in which the question was posed is fuxt to a whole new dimension in itself, they could hardly take the result seriously anyway.
_______________________________________________
Yes yes, blogging is passÚ I know.
Rod's Ramblingz on Eve-Online
Solutions to your issues. |
Tophereon
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 11:45:00 -
[81]
\o/ to removing pilots in space
Not sure about local, this would need a lot of thought, to get it right I guess.
Toph.
|
Tophereon
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 11:45:00 -
[82]
\o/ to removing pilots in space
Not sure about local, this would need a lot of thought, to get it right I guess.
Toph.
|
Grimpak
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 11:48:00 -
[83]
as said once, removing "pilots in space" is bad, but not that bad, but removing local chat, that's the part i REALY don't like it, so I say a prolly "yay" (\o/) for the 1st part, but a big "NAY" ( /o\ ) to the remove local.
-------------------
Quote:
Fragm's Oversized Ego Cannon barely scratches the forums, inflicting omgnoonecares damage
|
Grimpak
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 11:48:00 -
[84]
as said once, removing "pilots in space" is bad, but not that bad, but removing local chat, that's the part i REALY don't like it, so I say a prolly "yay" (\o/) for the 1st part, but a big "NAY" ( /o\ ) to the remove local.
-------------------
Quote:
Fragm's Oversized Ego Cannon barely scratches the forums, inflicting omgnoonecares damage
|
XpoHoc
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 12:23:00 -
[85]
You can remove one thing, not both.
 |
XpoHoc
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 12:23:00 -
[86]
You can remove one thing, not both.
|
Naqq
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 12:38:00 -
[87]
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!! NO DAMNIT NO!
Think the idea through god damnit, how will you be able to find enemies in 0.0? You can warp through more then then 50 systems without finding any victims, pirating would be dead!
--
"Yarrr..."
[FRIG] promotional video|Training film #1|Training film #2|
|Newsreels: #1,#2,#3(NEW).| |
Naqq
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 12:38:00 -
[88]
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!! NO DAMNIT NO!
Think the idea through god damnit, how will you be able to find enemies in 0.0? You can warp through more then then 50 systems without finding any victims, pirating would be dead!
--
"Yarrr..."
[FRIG] promotional video|Training film #1|Training film #2|
|Newsreels: #1,#2,#3(NEW).| |
Arlen Seek
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 12:47:00 -
[89]
\O/ YES
E Pluribus Unum
|
Arlen Seek
|
Posted - 2004.07.19 12:47:00 -
[90]
\O/ YES
E Pluribus Unum
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |