EVE Search - taranis fitting - which to prefer?

All Channels

Ships and Modules

taranis fitting - which to prefer?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
jukriamrr	Posted - 2004.07.20 16:00:00 - [1] Edited by: jukriamrr on 20/07/2004 16:02:06 Hi all, Here are three solutions, which one should I choose? ---------------------------------------- Config I hi: 3neutron blasters med: 10 mn AB, stasis, shield booster II low: 3micro aux power cores ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Config II hi: 3ion blasters, micro plasma SB med: 10 mn AB, stasis, shield booster II low: 2micro aux power cores, capa power relay ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Config III hi: 3electron blasters med: 10 mn AB, stasis, shield booster II low: 1micro aux power cores, 2*capa power relays ---------------------------------------- Input appreciated :)
jukriamrr	Posted - 2004.07.20 16:00:00 - [2] Edited by: jukriamrr on 20/07/2004 16:02:06 Hi all, Here are three solutions, which one should I choose? ---------------------------------------- Config I hi: 3neutron blasters med: 10 mn AB, stasis, shield booster II low: 3micro aux power cores ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Config II hi: 3ion blasters, micro plasma SB med: 10 mn AB, stasis, shield booster II low: 2micro aux power cores, capa power relay ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Config III hi: 3electron blasters med: 10 mn AB, stasis, shield booster II low: 1micro aux power cores, 2*capa power relays ---------------------------------------- Input appreciated :)
meowcat	Posted - 2004.07.20 16:09:00 - [3] Edited by: meowcat on 20/07/2004 16:10:40 i havent got my tarannis yet (nearly there though) i had assumed that shield tanking would be crap, and planned to armour tank mine!!! not sure if it will fit but i was thinking: hi: 3*regulated (low cpu) blasters (whatever will fit) mid: 10mn ab, web/scrambler or both, maybe an iccle named cap battery if not using both web and scrambler low: small armour rep, micro power core, and hardener if it fits or another micro aux but then i dont know much... just assumed something like this would be best ~~~~)\~~~~~\o/~~~~ yeah but no but yeah but no but
meowcat	Posted - 2004.07.20 16:09:00 - [4] Edited by: meowcat on 20/07/2004 16:10:40 i havent got my tarannis yet (nearly there though) i had assumed that shield tanking would be crap, and planned to armour tank mine!!! not sure if it will fit but i was thinking: hi: 3*regulated (low cpu) blasters (whatever will fit) mid: 10mn ab, web/scrambler or both, maybe an iccle named cap battery if not using both web and scrambler low: small armour rep, micro power core, and hardener if it fits or another micro aux but then i dont know much... just assumed something like this would be best ~~~~)\~~~~~\o/~~~~ yeah but no but yeah but no but
jukriamrr	Posted - 2004.07.20 16:15:00 - [5] Thanks ;) Obviously, config I is for the VERY skilled, II a litle less, and III even less. I was wondering if someone had already tried of of these :)
jukriamrr	Posted - 2004.07.20 16:15:00 - [6] Thanks ;) Obviously, config I is for the VERY skilled, II a litle less, and III even less. I was wondering if someone had already tried of of these :)
Pandora Panda	Posted - 2004.07.20 16:18:00 - [7] Edited by: Pandora Panda on 20/07/2004 16:20:00 Originally by: jukriamrr Edited by: jukriamrr on 20/07/2004 16:02:06 Hi all, Here are three solutions, which one should I choose? ---------------------------------------- Config I hi: 3neutron blasters med: 10 mn AB, stasis, shield booster II low: 3micro aux power cores ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Config II hi: 3ion blasters, micro plasma SB med: 10 mn AB, stasis, shield booster II low: 2micro aux power cores, capa power relay ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Config III hi: 3electron blasters med: 10 mn AB, stasis, shield booster II low: 1micro aux power cores, 2capa power relays ---------------------------------------- Input appreciated :) I assume that these are PvE since you didnt use warp scramblers. I would go with: 3x Light Ion 1x 10mn AB 2x Tracking Comp 2 2x Micro Aux 1x Mag Stab 2 Itll take decent cap skils and fuel conservation 4 to keep this setup running indefinately, I think*. I'd try it outside combat first. Swap the Mag Stab for a cap relay if you cant maintain cap. -------------------------------------------- CONCORD: Kneecapping Pilots for Misdemeanors Since 2003
Pandora Panda	Posted - 2004.07.20 16:18:00 - [8] Edited by: Pandora Panda on 20/07/2004 16:20:00 Originally by: jukriamrr Edited by: jukriamrr on 20/07/2004 16:02:06 Hi all, Here are three solutions, which one should I choose? ---------------------------------------- Config I hi: 3neutron blasters med: 10 mn AB, stasis, shield booster II low: 3micro aux power cores ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Config II hi: 3ion blasters, micro plasma SB med: 10 mn AB, stasis, shield booster II low: 2micro aux power cores, capa power relay ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Config III hi: 3electron blasters med: 10 mn AB, stasis, shield booster II low: 1micro aux power cores, 2capa power relays ---------------------------------------- Input appreciated :) I assume that these are PvE since you didnt use warp scramblers. I would go with: 3x Light Ion 1x 10mn AB 2x Tracking Comp 2 2x Micro Aux 1x Mag Stab 2 Itll take decent cap skils and fuel conservation 4 to keep this setup running indefinately, I think*. I'd try it outside combat first. Swap the Mag Stab for a cap relay if you cant maintain cap. -------------------------------------------- CONCORD: Kneecapping Pilots for Misdemeanors Since 2003
Ronyo Dae'Loki	Posted - 2004.07.20 17:00:00 - [9] Try not using a 10MN AB and instead using what is supposed to be mounted, a 1MN MWD. Because those setups suck. Well, I suppose if they are for PvE they would work ok, but Taranis isn't really cut out for that. ------------- My salsa makes all the pretty girls want to dance and take off their underpants. I <3 ( . Y . )
Ronyo Dae'Loki	Posted - 2004.07.20 17:00:00 - [10] Try not using a 10MN AB and instead using what is supposed to be mounted, a 1MN MWD. Because those setups suck. Well, I suppose if they are for PvE they would work ok, but Taranis isn't really cut out for that. ------------- My salsa makes all the pretty girls want to dance and take off their underpants. I <3 ( . Y . )
meowcat	Posted - 2004.07.20 17:10:00 - [11] Originally by: Ronyo Dae'Loki Try not using a 10MN AB and instead using what is supposed to be mounted, a 1MN MWD. Because those setups suck. Well, I suppose if they are for PvE they would work ok, but Taranis isn't really cut out for that. a 1mn mwd will shag your sig radius and have you dead in seconds ~~~~)\~~~~~\o/~~~~ yeah but no but yeah but no but
meowcat	Posted - 2004.07.20 17:10:00 - [12] Originally by: Ronyo Dae'Loki Try not using a 10MN AB and instead using what is supposed to be mounted, a 1MN MWD. Because those setups suck. Well, I suppose if they are for PvE they would work ok, but Taranis isn't really cut out for that. a 1mn mwd will shag your sig radius and have you dead in seconds ~~~~)\~~~~~\o/~~~~ yeah but no but yeah but no but
jukriamrr	Posted - 2004.07.20 17:15:00 - [13] Originally by: Ronyo Dae'Loki Try not using a 10MN AB and instead using what is supposed to be mounted, a 1MN MWD. Because those setups suck. Well, I suppose if they are for PvE they would work ok, but Taranis isn't really cut out for that. mmmm ... no :-) Having the sig radius of a battleship, now that sucks :) ditto meowcat. As for PvP, switching the shield booster for scrambler should do, yes.
jukriamrr	Posted - 2004.07.20 17:15:00 - [14] Originally by: Ronyo Dae'Loki Try not using a 10MN AB and instead using what is supposed to be mounted, a 1MN MWD. Because those setups suck. Well, I suppose if they are for PvE they would work ok, but Taranis isn't really cut out for that. mmmm ... no :-) Having the sig radius of a battleship, now that sucks :) ditto meowcat. As for PvP, switching the shield booster for scrambler should do, yes.
Masochist	Posted - 2004.07.20 17:25:00 - [15] Originally by: jukriamrr Originally by: Ronyo Dae'Loki Try not using a 10MN AB and instead using what is supposed to be mounted, a 1MN MWD. Because those setups suck. Well, I suppose if they are for PvE they would work ok, but Taranis isn't really cut out for that. mmmm ... no :-) Having the sig radius of a battleship, now that sucks :) ditto meowcat. As for PvP, switching the shield booster for scrambler should do, yes. Have you guys actually tested that or are you just guessing? I use a 1MN MWD on my Taranis and haven't noticed a bit of difference. The sig penalty really isn't that bad.
Masochist	Posted - 2004.07.20 17:25:00 - [16] Originally by: jukriamrr Originally by: Ronyo Dae'Loki Try not using a 10MN AB and instead using what is supposed to be mounted, a 1MN MWD. Because those setups suck. Well, I suppose if they are for PvE they would work ok, but Taranis isn't really cut out for that. mmmm ... no :-) Having the sig radius of a battleship, now that sucks :) ditto meowcat. As for PvP, switching the shield booster for scrambler should do, yes. Have you guys actually tested that or are you just guessing? I use a 1MN MWD on my Taranis and haven't noticed a bit of difference. The sig penalty really isn't that bad.
Pandora Panda	Posted - 2004.07.20 17:29:00 - [17] Edited by: Pandora Panda on 20/07/2004 17:42:50 Originally by: Masochist Have you guys actually tested that or are you just guessing? I use a 1MN MWD on my Taranis and haven't noticed a bit of difference. The sig penalty really isn't that bad. Situatons where the MWD penalty doesnt matter: When you are orbiting 1 person at close range. Situations where the MWD penalty will get you killed: When you are trying to get close enough to someone to orbit. When you are orbiting one person while his buddy shoots at you. When you are playing with NPCs. When you get webbed. -------------------------------------------- CONCORD: Kneecapping Pilots for Misdemeanors Since 2003
Pandora Panda	Posted - 2004.07.20 17:29:00 - [18] Edited by: Pandora Panda on 20/07/2004 17:42:50 Originally by: Masochist Have you guys actually tested that or are you just guessing? I use a 1MN MWD on my Taranis and haven't noticed a bit of difference. The sig penalty really isn't that bad. Situatons where the MWD penalty doesnt matter: When you are orbiting 1 person at close range. Situations where the MWD penalty will get you killed: When you are trying to get close enough to someone to orbit. When you are orbiting one person while his buddy shoots at you. When you are playing with NPCs. When you get webbed. -------------------------------------------- CONCORD: Kneecapping Pilots for Misdemeanors Since 2003
Cruz	Posted - 2004.07.20 17:32:00 - [19] Yeah, the sig radius KILLS you when fighting NPCs. .................
Cruz	Posted - 2004.07.20 17:32:00 - [20] Yeah, the sig radius KILLS you when fighting NPCs. .................
Neil Crow	Posted - 2004.07.20 18:15:00 - [21] You do know that it is +500% and NOT 500 METERS, right? So if the penalty would give you "the sig radius of the battleship", I suppose your original signature radius is above 75?
Neil Crow	Posted - 2004.07.20 18:15:00 - [22] You do know that it is +500% and NOT 500 METERS, right? So if the penalty would give you "the sig radius of the battleship", I suppose your original signature radius is above 75?
Muntz	Posted - 2004.07.20 18:22:00 - [23] There's also the 25% cap and shield penalty to consider, which the 10MN AB doesn't suffer from. Not to mention that with fuel conservation and AB skill, you can run the AB for longer that an MWD for very reasonable cap usage, which, coupled with the fact that you have 25% more cap that with an MWD, makes it easier to sustain. It works, trust me. You don't go quite as fast as with an MWD, but if you have a high enough base speed, it doesn't really matter.
Muntz	Posted - 2004.07.20 18:22:00 - [24] There's also the 25% cap and shield penalty to consider, which the 10MN AB doesn't suffer from. Not to mention that with fuel conservation and AB skill, you can run the AB for longer that an MWD for very reasonable cap usage, which, coupled with the fact that you have 25% more cap that with an MWD, makes it easier to sustain. It works, trust me. You don't go quite as fast as with an MWD, but if you have a high enough base speed, it doesn't really matter.
Xanz	Posted - 2004.07.20 18:25:00 - [25] Trust me when I say Ronyo knows how to fly and fit a Taranis.
Xanz	Posted - 2004.07.20 18:25:00 - [26] Trust me when I say Ronyo knows how to fly and fit a Taranis.
jukriamrr	Posted - 2004.07.20 18:44:00 - [27] Originally by: Masochist Have you guys actually tested that or are you just guessing? Yes, in the following ships: - claw - stiletto - crow - raptor Hence my genuine questions about the taranis :)
jukriamrr	Posted - 2004.07.20 18:44:00 - [28] Originally by: Masochist Have you guys actually tested that or are you just guessing? Yes, in the following ships: - claw - stiletto - crow - raptor Hence my genuine questions about the taranis :)
Cruz	Posted - 2004.07.20 18:53:00 - [29] Cap Relay + Shield booster = nono .................
Cruz	Posted - 2004.07.20 18:53:00 - [30] Cap Relay + Shield booster = nono .................

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.