| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Irek Dabry
   |
Posted - 2004.07.22 19:41:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Irek Dabry on 22/07/2004 19:49:45
Ok, so I just bought an ATI Radeon X800 Pro (256Mb). Replaced an ATI 9700 Pro (128mb) card.
The installed ATI's latest drivers, made a couple of tweaks (FastWrite off, Vsync always off, anso-whatever filtering set to application preference). Cool, I thought.. time to check out EVE!
After fiddling around I was still only getting, at best, 20 FPS! Wtf! I was getting worse frame rates with my new X800 than my 9700!
I went ahead and tried the latest Omega drivers (www.omegadrivers.net) and after a couple more tweaks I was able to get a steady 20-25 FPS, unless there was station in the view, then I would get 15-20 FPS.
Don't get me wrong, the load times between jumps and exiting the station is a lot better, but the FPS suck!
What am I doing wrong?!?
Edit: this should probably go in the EVE Technology Lab forum if someone wants to move it. Sorry!
--
Irek Dabry |
Irek Dabry
|
Posted - 2004.07.22 19:41:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Irek Dabry on 22/07/2004 19:49:45
Ok, so I just bought an ATI Radeon X800 Pro (256Mb). Replaced an ATI 9700 Pro (128mb) card.
The installed ATI's latest drivers, made a couple of tweaks (FastWrite off, Vsync always off, anso-whatever filtering set to application preference). Cool, I thought.. time to check out EVE!
After fiddling around I was still only getting, at best, 20 FPS! Wtf! I was getting worse frame rates with my new X800 than my 9700!
I went ahead and tried the latest Omega drivers (www.omegadrivers.net) and after a couple more tweaks I was able to get a steady 20-25 FPS, unless there was station in the view, then I would get 15-20 FPS.
Don't get me wrong, the load times between jumps and exiting the station is a lot better, but the FPS suck!
What am I doing wrong?!?
Edit: this should probably go in the EVE Technology Lab forum if someone wants to move it. Sorry!
--
Irek Dabry |
Dray
|
Posted - 2004.07.23 08:04:00 -
[3]
try looking at your framerates with the interface removed as its a big drain on framerate, plus have you seen an improvement in performance of other games/apps/benchmarks? ive got a 9800 pro and i get better framerates than that if its an empty system but any heavy work load in eve on the gfx side will test the best hardware.
I picked up this ace book today everyone rates it as a must buy for the budding military genius, tho ive decided to rename it as "Sun Tzu's art of the bloody obvious" |
Dray
|
Posted - 2004.07.23 08:04:00 -
[4]
try looking at your framerates with the interface removed as its a big drain on framerate, plus have you seen an improvement in performance of other games/apps/benchmarks? ive got a 9800 pro and i get better framerates than that if its an empty system but any heavy work load in eve on the gfx side will test the best hardware.
I picked up this ace book today everyone rates it as a must buy for the budding military genius, tho ive decided to rename it as "Sun Tzu's art of the bloody obvious" |
Gun Kata
|
Posted - 2004.07.23 12:11:00 -
[5]
Is that windowed or full screen?
"I have seen everything now."
"Yeah? Have you seen a man eat his own head?" |
Gun Kata
|
Posted - 2004.07.23 12:11:00 -
[6]
Is that windowed or full screen?
"I have seen everything now."
"Yeah? Have you seen a man eat his own head?" |
TheJay
|
Posted - 2004.07.23 14:40:00 -
[7]
Whats the specs for the rest of the system?
|
TheJay
|
Posted - 2004.07.23 14:40:00 -
[8]
Whats the specs for the rest of the system?
|
Irek Dabry
|
Posted - 2004.07.23 15:39:00 -
[9]
I haven't tried it with the UI turned off, I might try that just to see what I can get. (Not that I normally play that way).
I play it full-screened at 1024x768 with 24-bit color. I've changed the colors around but that doesn't really seem to do anything.
My system specs:
AMD XP 2200
Gigabyte mobo (can't remember which)
1Gig RAM
I'm not seeing much improvement on my other games either.. yes there is some, but not what I'd expect. I ran 3DMark03 a couple of times and the highest score I got was 8300 with ATI's Overdrive turned on.
While messing with this last night I realized my mobo only supports AGP 4x, so I have a new mobo and CPU (AMD 64 3500+) on the way. I'm sure that'll help, so we'll see where we end up once that's installed. :)
--
Irek Dabry |
Irek Dabry
|
Posted - 2004.07.23 15:39:00 -
[10]
I haven't tried it with the UI turned off, I might try that just to see what I can get. (Not that I normally play that way).
I play it full-screened at 1024x768 with 24-bit color. I've changed the colors around but that doesn't really seem to do anything.
My system specs:
AMD XP 2200
Gigabyte mobo (can't remember which)
1Gig RAM
I'm not seeing much improvement on my other games either.. yes there is some, but not what I'd expect. I ran 3DMark03 a couple of times and the highest score I got was 8300 with ATI's Overdrive turned on.
While messing with this last night I realized my mobo only supports AGP 4x, so I have a new mobo and CPU (AMD 64 3500+) on the way. I'm sure that'll help, so we'll see where we end up once that's installed. :)
--
Irek Dabry |
CidHighwind
|
Posted - 2004.07.24 02:52:00 -
[11]
Yeah, the AGP 4x HALVES the x800's transfer rate. 1.1GB/sec on 4x, 2.2GB/sec on 8x. and yes, it does use all of this.
Just wait until new BTX Form Factor boards come out with PCI express and 8.8GB/sec video transfer rate!!
|
CidHighwind
|
Posted - 2004.07.24 02:52:00 -
[12]
Yeah, the AGP 4x HALVES the x800's transfer rate. 1.1GB/sec on 4x, 2.2GB/sec on 8x. and yes, it does use all of this.
Just wait until new BTX Form Factor boards come out with PCI express and 8.8GB/sec video transfer rate!!
|
obscuroditus
|
Posted - 2004.07.24 13:03:00 -
[13]
The AGP bus is not your problem, I can assure you. (Despite what the gentleman above claims). You can run a recent card on AGP 2x and still get excellent performance except for the highest resolutions.
Anyways, your problem is not your videocard - it's your CPU.
Your CPU is pretty old, and will be a major bottleneck for EVE performance.
I'm suspecting that the higher-end videocard only increased the strain for the CPU somehow.
Anyways, upgrade the cpu to a newer one and you're fine.
Also the speed of your memory is important - having 1 gig of it is cool, but if it's PC133 EVE will run a lot slower then if it's DDR @ 166 or 200 MHz.
I noticed this myself - by accident had my memory set to 133 Mhz (DDR) - and was cursing abotu the horrible performance. Later on I changed it to my default overclocked settings of 180 MHz and EVE is running smooth as butter!
|
obscuroditus
|
Posted - 2004.07.24 13:03:00 -
[14]
The AGP bus is not your problem, I can assure you. (Despite what the gentleman above claims). You can run a recent card on AGP 2x and still get excellent performance except for the highest resolutions.
Anyways, your problem is not your videocard - it's your CPU.
Your CPU is pretty old, and will be a major bottleneck for EVE performance.
I'm suspecting that the higher-end videocard only increased the strain for the CPU somehow.
Anyways, upgrade the cpu to a newer one and you're fine.
Also the speed of your memory is important - having 1 gig of it is cool, but if it's PC133 EVE will run a lot slower then if it's DDR @ 166 or 200 MHz.
I noticed this myself - by accident had my memory set to 133 Mhz (DDR) - and was cursing abotu the horrible performance. Later on I changed it to my default overclocked settings of 180 MHz and EVE is running smooth as butter!
|
Idono
|
Posted - 2004.07.24 16:12:00 -
[15]
Simple.
You need a new motherborad.
As someone said wait for a MB with PCI-X.
Not worth buying a MB with a max suport of 8 piplines.
Had the same problem a when i bought my 9800 XT card. (forgot to buy a MB with 8 piple suport)
|
Idono
|
Posted - 2004.07.24 16:12:00 -
[16]
Simple.
You need a new motherborad.
As someone said wait for a MB with PCI-X.
Not worth buying a MB with a max suport of 8 piplines.
Had the same problem a when i bought my 9800 XT card. (forgot to buy a MB with 8 piple suport)
|
Irek Dabry
|
Posted - 2004.07.24 20:06:00 -
[17]
Well thanks for the advice. I already have the new hardware on the way, so too late to wait for the PCI-Express stuff. Besides, my vid card isn't PCI-Express so it wouldn't help!
Oh well, I'm sure it'll be better than what I got now!
--
Irek Dabry |
Irek Dabry
|
Posted - 2004.07.24 20:06:00 -
[18]
Well thanks for the advice. I already have the new hardware on the way, so too late to wait for the PCI-Express stuff. Besides, my vid card isn't PCI-Express so it wouldn't help!
Oh well, I'm sure it'll be better than what I got now!
--
Irek Dabry |
fuze
|
Posted - 2004.07.26 23:56:00 -
[19]
You might try older Ati drivers since the 4.8 version was retracted being too dodgy.
___________________________
Favorite bumpersticker of the month:
My head hurts! |
fuze
|
Posted - 2004.07.26 23:56:00 -
[20]
You might try older Ati drivers since the 4.8 version was retracted being too dodgy.
___________________________
Favorite bumpersticker of the month:
My head hurts! |
Irek Dabry
|
Posted - 2004.07.27 00:48:00 -
[21]
I'm using 4.7 now, but anything earlier doesn't support the X800.
--
Irek Dabry |
Irek Dabry
|
Posted - 2004.07.27 00:48:00 -
[22]
I'm using 4.7 now, but anything earlier doesn't support the X800.
--
Irek Dabry |
fuze
|
Posted - 2004.07.29 00:42:00 -
[23]
Got an Asus X800 pro today. Used Asus 3.06 drivers and it works flawlessly.
Getting up to 32fps on 1280x1024. With the advanceDevice=1 turned on and using 32bit Zbuffer.
Might get a little more out of it when I hardmod it to and XT but I don't have a clue what core GPU I have.
But in short works A ok for me.
___________________________
Favorite bumpersticker of the month:
My head hurts! |
fuze
|
Posted - 2004.07.29 00:42:00 -
[24]
Got an Asus X800 pro today. Used Asus 3.06 drivers and it works flawlessly.
Getting up to 32fps on 1280x1024. With the advanceDevice=1 turned on and using 32bit Zbuffer.
Might get a little more out of it when I hardmod it to and XT but I don't have a clue what core GPU I have.
But in short works A ok for me.
___________________________
Favorite bumpersticker of the month:
My head hurts! |
Robskiwarrior
|
Posted - 2004.07.29 07:56:00 -
[25]
yes, unfortunatly upgrading just your grafics card sometimes does not work... glad you hsve this sorted!! PCI-X would have been good to wait for, and the boards will have an AGP slot as well for a for year atleast anyway. But your fine with the MB you have bought, PCI-X will be awsome when it really gets going, the only issue is, by the time it does get going you will prob have to upgrade again anyway lol...
|
Robskiwarrior
|
Posted - 2004.07.29 07:56:00 -
[26]
yes, unfortunatly upgrading just your grafics card sometimes does not work... glad you hsve this sorted!! PCI-X would have been good to wait for, and the boards will have an AGP slot as well for a for year atleast anyway. But your fine with the MB you have bought, PCI-X will be awsome when it really gets going, the only issue is, by the time it does get going you will prob have to upgrade again anyway lol...
|
Joshua Calvert
|
Posted - 2004.07.29 08:08:00 -
[27]
X800's are too good for current CPU's - all the reviews I have seen have stated these cards are too advanced and are bottlenecked by CPU's of the day.
LEEEEERRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY! |
Joshua Calvert
|
Posted - 2004.07.29 08:08:00 -
[28]
X800's are too good for current CPU's - all the reviews I have seen have stated these cards are too advanced and are bottlenecked by CPU's of the day.
LEEEEERRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY! |
fuze
|
Posted - 2004.07.29 13:58:00 -
[29]
 Originally by: Robskiwarrior
yes, unfortunatly upgrading just your grafics card sometimes does not work... glad you hsve this sorted!! PCI-X would have been good to wait for, and the boards will have an AGP slot as well for a for year atleast anyway. But your fine with the MB you have bought, PCI-X will be awsome when it really gets going, the only issue is, by the time it does get going you will prob have to upgrade again anyway lol...
Sorry but PCI-X won't improve a bit. AGP8 has more than enough bandwith for a game like this. It's not heavy on the textures like Doom3 is gonna be. So if you get the PCI-X version of the X800 it will hardly improve the fps rate of Eve.
Like Joshy says is that the CPU will make a difference. And this generation GPU's is developed for the AMD64/PIV EE so lesser CPU's won't benefit as much from these new GPU's.
And before yesterday I used to have 512Mb PC2100 on my 250Gb chipset board and the performance wasn't that good. But using 1Gb of PC3200 definately helped out there. Since the game is leaking or using up memory on the long run. It starts up with about 150Mb of heap and after 4 hours it's up to 300-380. So with that rate you could easily play a whole day with the 1Gb.
___________________________
Favorite bumpersticker of the month:
My head hurts! |
fuze
|
Posted - 2004.07.29 13:58:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Robskiwarrior
yes, unfortunatly upgrading just your grafics card sometimes does not work... glad you hsve this sorted!! PCI-X would have been good to wait for, and the boards will have an AGP slot as well for a for year atleast anyway. But your fine with the MB you have bought, PCI-X will be awsome when it really gets going, the only issue is, by the time it does get going you will prob have to upgrade again anyway lol...
Sorry but PCI-X won't improve a bit. AGP8 has more than enough bandwith for a game like this. It's not heavy on the textures like Doom3 is gonna be. So if you get the PCI-X version of the X800 it will hardly improve the fps rate of Eve.
Like Joshy says is that the CPU will make a difference. And this generation GPU's is developed for the AMD64/PIV EE so lesser CPU's won't benefit as much from these new GPU's.
And before yesterday I used to have 512Mb PC2100 on my 250Gb chipset board and the performance wasn't that good. But using 1Gb of PC3200 definately helped out there. Since the game is leaking or using up memory on the long run. It starts up with about 150Mb of heap and after 4 hours it's up to 300-380. So with that rate you could easily play a whole day with the 1Gb.
___________________________
Favorite bumpersticker of the month:
My head hurts! |
Kthol RegusII
|
Posted - 2004.07.30 00:37:00 -
[31]
i got an x800 pro today have an xp barton 2500+ and get 60fps at 1600 by 1200 using cat 4.7 im HAPPY!!!! thats with 4 aa and 8 af too :)
|
Kthol RegusII
|
Posted - 2004.07.30 00:37:00 -
[32]
i got an x800 pro today have an xp barton 2500+ and get 60fps at 1600 by 1200 using cat 4.7 im HAPPY!!!! thats with 4 aa and 8 af too :)
|
Irek Dabry
|
Posted - 2004.07.30 19:04:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Kthol RegusII
i got an x800 pro today have an xp barton 2500+ and get 60fps at 1600 by 1200 using cat 4.7 im HAPPY!!!! thats with 4 aa and 8 af too :)
How do you get it so high? I've got an 64 3500+, ATI X800Pro and still only get 30fps! :( :( :( I have 1 gig of DDR333 ram, so that shouldn't be a bottleneck.
Are you running it with ATI's Overdrive on? (I am, but still the 30 fps at 1280x960!)
-sigh-
--
Irek Dabry |
Irek Dabry
|
Posted - 2004.07.30 19:04:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Kthol RegusII
i got an x800 pro today have an xp barton 2500+ and get 60fps at 1600 by 1200 using cat 4.7 im HAPPY!!!! thats with 4 aa and 8 af too :)
How do you get it so high? I've got an 64 3500+, ATI X800Pro and still only get 30fps! :( :( :( I have 1 gig of DDR333 ram, so that shouldn't be a bottleneck.
Are you running it with ATI's Overdrive on? (I am, but still the 30 fps at 1280x960!)
-sigh-
--
Irek Dabry |
Kthol RegusII
|
Posted - 2004.07.30 20:12:00 -
[35]
I havent done anything special to get it to run that fast just took it out the box and plugged it in reinstalled the drivers and direct x 9c
i score 25000 3d marks 2001se and just over 10000 3dmarks 2003 no overclocking nothing.
guess im just lucky but surely this is how the card is supposed to perform
|
Kthol RegusII
|
Posted - 2004.07.30 20:12:00 -
[36]
I havent done anything special to get it to run that fast just took it out the box and plugged it in reinstalled the drivers and direct x 9c
i score 25000 3d marks 2001se and just over 10000 3dmarks 2003 no overclocking nothing.
guess im just lucky but surely this is how the card is supposed to perform
|
Kthol RegusII
|
Posted - 2004.08.01 05:19:00 -
[37]
Hey guys more news on x800 front .i have soft modded my x800pro into a x800xt platinum edition and enabled the 4 extra pipelines it is a beast now http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?t=312063 got to this link for details of how to do so it takes like 10 minutes i have a sapphire x800pro vivo this mod only works on vivo cards apparently and you must have samsung 1.6 ram modules. antway its a soft mod so give it a whirl 
|
Kthol RegusII
|
Posted - 2004.08.01 05:19:00 -
[38]
Hey guys more news on x800 front .i have soft modded my x800pro into a x800xt platinum edition and enabled the 4 extra pipelines it is a beast now http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?t=312063 got to this link for details of how to do so it takes like 10 minutes i have a sapphire x800pro vivo this mod only works on vivo cards apparently and you must have samsung 1.6 ram modules. antway its a soft mod so give it a whirl
|
CidHighwind
|
Posted - 2004.08.03 04:12:00 -
[39]
Well, I wasnt saying the Pipeline wasnt the only problem, but it was one of them. The CPU would be the other.
Anyway, I'm not sure if PCI-X even supports AGP cards, and if it does, then the card still dont have 8.8 transfer to match anyway.
|
CidHighwind
|
Posted - 2004.08.03 04:12:00 -
[40]
Well, I wasnt saying the Pipeline wasnt the only problem, but it was one of them. The CPU would be the other.
Anyway, I'm not sure if PCI-X even supports AGP cards, and if it does, then the card still dont have 8.8 transfer to match anyway.
|
Kthol RegusII
|
Posted - 2004.08.04 22:05:00 -
[41]
Hmmm youll be lucky to get a pci-x motherboard as far as i know only intel xeon boards support pci-x.
pci-express on the other hand should be widely available very soon but latest benchmarks show no improvement using pci-express cards and there probably wont be any improvements until the next iteration of pci-express similar to the sata thing at the mo oh and with my soft-modded x800pro i get over 13000 3dmark 03 points now :)
|
Kthol RegusII
|
Posted - 2004.08.04 22:05:00 -
[42]
Hmmm youll be lucky to get a pci-x motherboard as far as i know only intel xeon boards support pci-x.
pci-express on the other hand should be widely available very soon but latest benchmarks show no improvement using pci-express cards and there probably wont be any improvements until the next iteration of pci-express similar to the sata thing at the mo oh and with my soft-modded x800pro i get over 13000 3dmark 03 points now :)
|
Scorpyn
|
Posted - 2004.08.05 13:08:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Irek Dabry
The installed ATI's latest drivers, made a couple of tweaks (FastWrite off, Vsync always off, anso-whatever filtering set to application preference).
I know that you get a higher fps by turning off vsync, but it should really be on. Otherwise, the picture will update in the graphics card as it's being sent to the monitor, causing some graphic glitches (and it'll also put more stress to the gpu than necessary, as it sometimes gets a (very short) "time-out" with vsync on).
|
Scorpyn
|
Posted - 2004.08.05 13:08:00 -
[44]
Originally by: Irek Dabry
The installed ATI's latest drivers, made a couple of tweaks (FastWrite off, Vsync always off, anso-whatever filtering set to application preference).
I know that you get a higher fps by turning off vsync, but it should really be on. Otherwise, the picture will update in the graphics card as it's being sent to the monitor, causing some graphic glitches (and it'll also put more stress to the gpu than necessary, as it sometimes gets a (very short) "time-out" with vsync on).
|
StaticW
|
Posted - 2004.08.06 08:16:00 -
[45]
Hm did you increase the AGP aperture size in the BIOS as well?
It did it for me when I increased the 32MB standard setting to the 128MB to match my GFX cards RAM...
worth a try...
|
StaticW
|
Posted - 2004.08.06 08:16:00 -
[46]
Hm did you increase the AGP aperture size in the BIOS as well?
It did it for me when I increased the 32MB standard setting to the 128MB to match my GFX cards RAM...
worth a try...
|
Scorpyn
|
Posted - 2004.08.06 13:00:00 -
[47]
Originally by: StaticW
Hm did you increase the AGP aperture size in the BIOS as well?
It did it for me when I increased the 32MB standard setting to the 128MB to match my GFX cards RAM...
worth a try...
AGP aperture size seems to be a setting that everybody disagrees on what to set it to. Some recommend setting it to the lowest, others to the highest, and most ppl probably never change it and leave it at the default. I've never really understood that one. Setting it to match the memory of the gfx card makes sense, and in any case it can't hurt to tweak it (if it fails, just revert to the pervious setting.
|
Scorpyn
|
Posted - 2004.08.06 13:00:00 -
[48]
Originally by: StaticW
Hm did you increase the AGP aperture size in the BIOS as well?
It did it for me when I increased the 32MB standard setting to the 128MB to match my GFX cards RAM...
worth a try...
AGP aperture size seems to be a setting that everybody disagrees on what to set it to. Some recommend setting it to the lowest, others to the highest, and most ppl probably never change it and leave it at the default. I've never really understood that one. Setting it to match the memory of the gfx card makes sense, and in any case it can't hurt to tweak it (if it fails, just revert to the pervious setting.
|
Nomeshta
|
Posted - 2004.08.06 13:23:00 -
[49]
AGP should be set at either 25% or 50% of your current RAM size.
- Caution: Ninja Fingers
WTB: Implants
|
Nomeshta
|
Posted - 2004.08.06 13:23:00 -
[50]
AGP should be set at either 25% or 50% of your current RAM size.
- Caution: Ninja Fingers
WTB: Implants
|
OmegaTron
|
Posted - 2004.08.08 16:31:00 -
[51]
that sux i have the same X800 and EVE runs better than ever. also scored a 10,189 w/ 3DMARK2003 19,248 w/ 3DMARK2001
------------------------------------------------
A Plague is comming.... |
OmegaTron
|
Posted - 2004.08.08 16:31:00 -
[52]
that sux i have the same X800 and EVE runs better than ever. also scored a 10,189 w/ 3DMARK2003 19,248 w/ 3DMARK2001
------------------------------------------------
A Plague is comming.... |
Catherine Yudaz
|
Posted - 2004.08.09 08:33:00 -
[53]
How can you guys see the fps ?
Is there a command in the prefs.ini or something to enable it ? Or even a 3rd party program ?
|
Catherine Yudaz
|
Posted - 2004.08.09 08:33:00 -
[54]
How can you guys see the fps ?
Is there a command in the prefs.ini or something to enable it ? Or even a 3rd party program ?
|
Albus
|
Posted - 2004.08.09 11:52:00 -
[55]
Edited by: Albus on 09/08/2004 11:54:38
Ctrl - Alt - Shift - M
Lets you see your fps as well as loads of other networking/memory info.
Alternatively you can use FRAPS, a third party progrm which will show your frame rate and let you record videos of the game running if you want to.
|
Albus
|
Posted - 2004.08.09 11:52:00 -
[56]
Edited by: Albus on 09/08/2004 11:54:38
Ctrl - Alt - Shift - M
Lets you see your fps as well as loads of other networking/memory info.
Alternatively you can use FRAPS, a third party progrm which will show your frame rate and let you record videos of the game running if you want to.
|
OmegaTron
|
Posted - 2004.08.13 13:59:00 -
[57]
I have the x800 card and i've been noticeing CTD (crash to desktop) while playing DOOM III and sometimes with EVE-ONLINE?
------------------------------------------------
A Plague is comming.... |
OmegaTron
|
Posted - 2004.08.13 13:59:00 -
[58]
I have the x800 card and i've been noticeing CTD (crash to desktop) while playing DOOM III and sometimes with EVE-ONLINE?
------------------------------------------------
A Plague is comming.... |
zcian
|
Posted - 2004.08.13 19:58:00 -
[59]
Hiya
Just wanted to add my 243 norwegian kroner on X800 and EVE.
Inserted an X800XT PE Asus card today, disabled fastwrites and installed the rad_w2kxp_omega_2558_7z.exe drivers at default settings.
Used to have a ti4600 card earlier.. fps has only risen by 4 or 5 and
is between 20 and 30 now.
The big thing is load times, faster smoother.. everything is a bit more snappy and crisp.
The rest of my system is a bit old but this new gfx card really livens things up. ..
Basic specs atm. Dual AMD 2800MP on an MSI K7Master-L with 1.5 gigs of reg 2100 memory.
Oh.. the bilboard works to ;) the fps thing makes me wonder tough... with any other game it goes to the roof but with eve its like nothing..
for the moment im happy with the faster loadtimes
/cheers
|
zcian
|
Posted - 2004.08.13 19:58:00 -
[60]
Hiya
Just wanted to add my 243 norwegian kroner on X800 and EVE.
Inserted an X800XT PE Asus card today, disabled fastwrites and installed the rad_w2kxp_omega_2558_7z.exe drivers at default settings.
Used to have a ti4600 card earlier.. fps has only risen by 4 or 5 and
is between 20 and 30 now.
The big thing is load times, faster smoother.. everything is a bit more snappy and crisp.
The rest of my system is a bit old but this new gfx card really livens things up. ..
Basic specs atm. Dual AMD 2800MP on an MSI K7Master-L with 1.5 gigs of reg 2100 memory.
Oh.. the bilboard works to ;) the fps thing makes me wonder tough... with any other game it goes to the roof but with eve its like nothing..
for the moment im happy with the faster loadtimes
/cheers
|
Zeltar
|
Posted - 2004.08.15 21:53:00 -
[61]
Eve seems to be very CPU dependant. I have an X800 and an Athlon 64 3500+. I get 50-60 fps most of the time.
I can get 35-40 with the same processor and a Geforce 4 Ti4200 however, so the processor obviously has a lot to do with it.
|
Zeltar
|
Posted - 2004.08.15 21:53:00 -
[62]
Eve seems to be very CPU dependant. I have an X800 and an Athlon 64 3500+. I get 50-60 fps most of the time.
I can get 35-40 with the same processor and a Geforce 4 Ti4200 however, so the processor obviously has a lot to do with it.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |