This will force the Aggressor to stay docked up (in jail) or flee justice (to low-sec of null) for that time period; and/or

All those discussions about "risk" are useless, when you're caught everytime.

Why not change to a real risky system, depending on the sec-status of the systems?

The chance to get caught by CONCORD in a 1.0 System would be near 90%, in a 0.9 system near 75%, 0.8 would be 50, then 40, 30 and 20 % for 0.7, 0.6 and 0.5.

This means, the chance CONCORD arrives at the crimescene in time gets lower, the lower the sec-status of the system is. So, the ganker has a chance to survive.

But, in case he gets caught, he has to pay the loss of the victim.

In addition to

"Don't fly, what you can't afford to loose" it then would be

"Don't gank, what you can't afford to pay"

That would be a real risk.

CCP nerfs gankers three times in a single month.
Carebears just keep on crying.
Everything normal, I can see.

Do you realize you can create a character only for suicide ganking with wallet 0 and use ships ejected/leaved in space by your friends at safespots? So your solution it's not viable at all even with 100% chance to repay the victim. This ideea get into my head right after i read your post without any effort so i bet they are more clever ways to get around your solution.
Also i don't get it why some ppl need to have a special status in this game; if i lose a ship it's lost no matter the circumstances so why another set of rules when these rules seems fine for everyone?

Of cause i know, that the possibility exists to create such chars. Do you know what happens with a char that has MINUS in his wallet today?
No trade, no contracts - the only additional thing would be, that donations to this character, whether in ISK and also ships/assets would first be used to get his wallet in balance.

And the thing with your so called "special status" - there is none. If the criminal gets caught, he has to pay. Simple as that.

like i said before the character can be created with sole purpose to suicide gank and the negative wallet it's ok for this. also "special status" it's crystal clear: if i pop a ship why should i pay for this? if i be a suicidal taliban why should i pay for the destruction of New York towers
wardec me, suicide gank me and so on you have alotsa posibilities to get revenge but you only want an automatic response from CCP server wich it's against the sandbox.
anyway pls cry some more because in this way you'l get a true hisec space and yeah imo this will kill eve as we know.

The only ones whining here and still crying for risk free ganking are all those gankbears. There is no risk, wenn you defintely loose your ship. It's a calculated loss.

My proposal gives you a chance to get off with your ship and your loot - but there is a chance, that when you get caught it will become expensive. This is a real risk.

Therefor the punishement and the consequences MUST and hopefully WILL be increased very soon. In this world there is no place for gankers, simply forbid shooting at other players in hisec.

Cheers

High level summary: I think the current CONCORD system is dumb. Please find an alternative system below. Discuss.

Exactly. Concord already considers suicide ganking to be a crime. We are treated as criminals for an indefinite time period once our sec. status falls below a certain point. A suicide ganker grinding sec. status back up is the equivalent of paying one's debts to society. Have you never heard of a "chain gang?"

That said, your biggest mistake is comparing the reality portrayed in EVE to that we have seen in real life at any given time. Do you see Apple literally declaring government sanctioned war on Microsoft and raiding their HQ with tanks? There are a lot of aspects of EVE law that do not match up with our real life counterparts. Systems of law can be arranged in an almost infinite variety, so you need to defend your arguments on their merits alone rather than making comparisons to what you feel are real life equivalents.

Personally, I'd rather the mechanics stay the way they are. I sui-gank you, you take my ship. Done and done. Jail is stupid and just further discourages an important part of the game; destruction.

What people don't seem to get a grasp on is every time a Hulk gets ganked, a miner is making money by the need for minerals going up to build new Hulks and the Hulk producer is making money to sell a replacement Hulk to the victim. It's all supply and demand. Destruction and creation. It just so happens that some of us enjoy the destruction part more, and that is truly what makes Eve great.

[...] In this world there is no place for gankers, simply forbid shooting at other players in hisec.

Cheers

tell this to a taliban when shoot a very expensive (training cost and so on) american soldier with a cheap ak-47; maybe they should need to buy expensive gear before shoot americans? imo it's logical to try to inflict maximum damage with minimum cost.

I wish the police arrived in 20 seconds IRL.

No, it's not logical because EVE is a game. You know, pixels.

No, it's not logical because EVE is a game. You know, pixels.

Yeah, but these pixels are controlled by real life persons, ones that are mobbed in their job and compensate this by blowing up weaker gamers ships, and other ones that mob in their job and just do that also in game. So it's allmost human behaviour.

Therefor the punishement and the consequences MUST and hopefully WILL be increased very soon. In this world there is no place for gankers, simply forbid shooting at other players in hisec.

Cheers

ofc it's human behavior because it's a multiplayer game. if it's not human behavior involved i play a single player game, wich unfortunately in the last years are very boring except 1 max 2 per year. so yeah when you signed for this game you also signed for a dark, unforgiven universe but dark component it's from other players not from some stupid npc's. if you don't like this part pls leave us we don't need you.